Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPolicy UpdatesHematology/OncologySelectHealth Chelation Therapy Coverage Update | O…
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.

    ModifiedSelectHealthPolicy N/A

    Chelation Therapy

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for all SelectHealth policy alerts

    Know when SelectHealth releases new policies or updates existing guidance.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    This policy describes Select Health coverage determinations for chelation therapy (intravenous or oral chelating agents) for treatment of metal toxicity and specified indicated conditions across Commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid lines of business.

    Policy Summary
    PayerSelectHealth
    PolicyChelation Therapy
    Policy CodePolicy N/A
    Change TypeCoverage criteria modified / additions
    Effective Date
    Last ReviewMar 30, 2025
    Next Review Date
    Key ActionVerify member benefits and obtain prior authorization when required before providing chelation therapy or related infusion services.
    SourceLink
    POLICY UPDATE CHANGES

    Modified requirements in criterion #3 for Commercial Plan Policy to reference patients who have an increased risk of complications associated with other therapies or who have other medical comorbidities.

    For Commercial Plan Policy, added criterion #2: 'For patients with stage III ovarian cancer' as a qualifying factor for coverage of this procedure.

    For Commercial Plan Policy, added criterion #3: 'For patients diagnosed with metastatic colon cancer to the peritoneum, if the following are not present: biliary obstruction, extensive disease at the gastrohepatic ligament/porta hepatis, extensive retroperitoneal disease, intraparenchymal liver lesions (requiring major resection), diffuse small bowel serosa/mesenteric involvement, and/or multiple sites of small bowel obstruction' as a qualifying factor for coverage.

    For Commercial Plan Policy, added new coverage criterion #4: 'For patients diagnosed with gastric cancer, only with peritoneal carcinoma with a low ... and who are candidates to undergo complete cytoreduction; and who have completed at least 3 months of chemotherapy.'

    11+listed indications covered
    96365-96367Listed CPT infusion codes
    96547,96548HIPEC CPT codes listed
    Commercial/Medicare/MedicaidPlan applicability
    3new coverage items (Revision History)

    Coverage Criteria and Indications

    Literature citations and context

    Literature citations and context — Select Health references and supporting literature cited in this section (representative list from policy source).

    36. 1996 TEC Assessment; Tab 3.
    37. 1998 TEC Assessment; Tab 24.
    38. Stadtmauer EA, O'Neill LJ, Goldstein P et al. Phase III randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell support shows no difference in overall survival or severe toxicity compared to maintenance chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil for women with metastatic breast cancer who are not responding to conventional induction chemotherapy: The Philadelphia Intergroup Study (PBT-1) Proc ASCO 1999; 18:1a (abstract no 1).
    39. Lotz JP, Cure H, Janvier F et al. High dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cells transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. Results of the French protocol PEGASE-04. Proc ASCO 1999; 18:42a (abstract no. 161).
    Policy Summary
    PayerSelectHealth
    PolicyChelation Therapy
    Policy CodePolicy N/A
    Change TypeCoverage criteria modified / additions
    Effective Date
    Last ReviewMar 30, 2025
    Next Review Date
    Key ActionVerify member benefits and obtain prior authorization when required before providing chelation therapy or related infusion services.
    SourceLink
    On This Page
    Coverage Criteria and IndicationsBilling Codes and Key Coding ParametersPrior Authorization, Documentation, and Operational RequirementsBackground and RationaleLine of Therapy ContextBiomarker and Diagnostic RequirementsHigh-Dose Chemotherapy Regimens and ExamplesPolicy Revisions and Material Changes
    40. Peters W, Rosner G, Vredenburgh J, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of two doses of combination alkylating agents as consolidation after CAF in high-risk primary breast cancer involving ten or more axillary lymph nodes: preliminary results of CALGB 9082/SWOG 9114/NCIC MA-13. Proc ASCO 1999; 18: 1a (abstract no. 2).
    41. The Scandinavian Breast Cancer Study Group 9401. Results from a randomized adjuvant breast cancer study with high dose chemotherapy with CTC, supported by autologous bone marrow stem cells versus dose escalated and tailored FEC therapy. Proc ASCO 1999; 18:2a (abstract no 3).
    42. Bezwoda WR. Randomized controlled trial of high dose chemotherapy versus standard dose chemotherapy for high risk, surgically treated primary breast cancer. Proc ASCO 1999; 18:2a (abstract no. 4).
    43. Weiss RB, Rifkin RM, Stewart FM et al. High-dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer: an on-site review of the Bezwoda study. Lancet 2000; 355:999-1003.
    113. Matthay KK. Impact of myeloablative therapy with bone marrow transplantation in advanced neuroblastoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 18 (suppl3): S21-S24.
    114. McTiernan A, Driver D, Michelagnoli MP, Kilby AM, Whelan JS. High dose chemotherapy with bone marrow or peripheral stem cell rescue is an effective treatment option for patients with relapsed or progressive Ewing's sarcoma family of tumours. Ann Oncol 2006;17:1301-1305.
    115. Medical Technology Directory. High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Support, Treatment for Non-CNS Pediatric Solid Tumors other than Neuroblastoma - ARCHIVED: 2007. Winifred S. Hayes, Inc.
    116. Meyers PA, Kraillo MD, Ladanyi M et al. High-dose melphalan, etoposide, total-body irradiation, and autologous stem-cell reconstitution as consolidation therapy for high-risk Ewing's sarcoma does not improve prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2001;19(11):2812-20.
    117. Nath SV, Prince HM, Choong PF, Toner GC. Durable remissions are rare following high dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation for adults with pediatric bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2005;2:12.
    118. National Cancer Institute. Ewing Family of Tumors Treatment (PDQ®). 2008. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/ewings/healthprofessional/allpages. Date Accessed: June 28, 2008.
    119. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Bone cancer. 2008. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/bone.pdf. Date Accessed: June 28, 2008.
    120. Oberlin O, Rey A, Desfachelles AS, et al. Impact of high-dose busulfan plus melphalan as consolidation in metastatic Ewing tumors. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(24):3997-4002.
    121. Pein et al. High dose melphalan, etoposide and carboplatin with bone marrow transplantation as consolidation therapy in high risk Wilms' tumors. Proc ASCO 1995; 4: 451a.
    122. Perentesis J, Katsanis E, DeFor T, Neglia J, Ramsay N. Autologous stem cell transplantation for high-risk pediatric solid tumors. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999;24(6):609-15.
    123. Rosenthal J, Bolotin E, Shakhnovits M, et al. High-dose therapy with hematopoietic stem cell rescue in patients with poor prognosis Ewing family tumors. Bone Marrow Transplant (2008).
    124. Shankar AG, Ashley S, Craft AW, Pinkerton CR. Outcome after relapse in an unselected cohort of children and adolescents with Ewing sarcoma. Med Pediatr Oncol 2003;40(3):141-7.
    125-276. Additional citations and registry reports referenced throughout the HSCT/BMT policy, including BCBSA TEC assessments, EBMT registry analyses, NCCN guidance, and individual clinical trials and series as cited in the policy text.

    Not covered — Prostate MRI for radiation planning

    Not covered — Prostate MRI for radiation planning (Commercial plan and CHIP).

    ALL of the following

    • Select Health does NOT cover prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer.
    • Rationale: Current evidence has failed to demonstrate superior outcomes with the use of prostate MRI for radiation treatment planning compared to alternative procedures.
    • Application: This determination applies to Commercial plan members and CHIP; coverage is dependent on the individual's benefits and any applicable Medicare/CMS determinations.
    • Operational note: When CMS has an adopted coverage determination that applies, CMS policy supersedes the Select Health commercial policy for affected members.

    Billing Codes and Key Coding Parameters

    Covered CPT CodesCPTCovered
    96365Intravenous infusion, for therapy, prophylaxis, or diagnosis (specify substance or drug); initial, up to 1 hour
    96366Each additional hour
    96367Additional sequential infusion of a new drug/substance, up to 1 hour
    HCPCS / J-codesHCPCSCovered
    G0068Professional services for the administration of anti-infective, pain management, chelation, pulmonary hypertension, inotropic, or other intravenous infusion drug or biological (excluding chemotherapy or other highly complex drug or biological) for each infusion drug administration calendar day in the individual's home, each 15 min
    G0088Professional services, initial visit, for the administration of anti-infective, pain management, chelation, pulmonary hypertension, inotropic, or other intravenous infusion drug or biological (excluding chemotherapy or other highly complex drug or biological) for each infusion drug administration calendar day in the individual's home, each 15 min
    J0470Injection, dimercaprol, per 100 mg
    J0600Injection, edetate calcium disodium up to 1,000 mg
    J0895Injection, deferoxamine mesylate, 500 mg
    J3520Edetate disodium, per 150 mg
    S9355Home infusion therapy, chelation therapy; administrative services, professional pharmacy services, care coordination, and all necessary supplies and equipment (drugs and nursing visits coded separately), per diem
    Not covered / MiscellaneousmixedNot Covered
    M0300IV chelation therapy (chemical endarterectomy)
    CoveredneutralCovered
    No codes listed
    Covered CPT Codes (cryoablation)CPTCovered
    50250Ablation, open, one or more renal mass lesion(s), cryosurgical, including intraoperative ultrasound, if performed
    50542Laparoscopy, surgical; ablation of renal mass lesion(s), including intraoperative ultrasound guidance and monitoring, when performed
    50593Ablation, renal tumor(s), unilateral, percutaneous, cryotherapy
    HCPCS CodesHCPCS
    No codes listed
    Covered CPT Codes / Not coveredCPT
    96547Intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedure, including separate incision(s) and closure, when performed; first 60 minutes
    96548Intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedure, including separate incision(s) and closure, when performed; each additional 30 minutes
    96549Unlisted chemotherapy procedure
    HCPCS CodesHCPCS
    No codes listed
    Commercial CPT Codes (GammaTile)CPTCovered
    77799Unlisted procedure, clinical brachytherapy
    Covered CPT CodesCPTCovered
    38204Management of recipient hematopoietic progenitor cell donor search and cell acquisition
    38205Blood-derived hematopoietic progenitor cell harvesting for transplantation, per collection; allogenic
    38206Blood-derived hematopoietic progenitor cell harvesting for transplantation, per collection; autologous
    38207-38215Code range for transplant preparation of hematopoietic progenitor cells
    38230Bone marrow harvesting for transplantation; allogeneic
    38232Bone marrow harvesting for transplantation; autologous
    38240Bone marrow or blood-derived peripheral stem cell transplantation, allogenic
    38241Bone marrow or blood-derived peripheral stem cell transplantation, autologous
    38242Allogenic donor lymphocyte infusion
    86812HLA typing; A, B, or C (eg, A10, B7, B27), single antigen
    1–10 of 14
    1/2
    Additional CPT CodesCPTCovered
    86825HLA crossmatch, non-cytotoxic; first serum sample
    86826HLA crossmatch, non-cytotoxic; additional serum sample
    96401-96450Chemotherapy administration code range
    HCPCS CodesHCPCSCovered
    J9000-J9999Chemotherapy drugs code range
    S2150Bone marrow or blood-derived stem cells (peripheral or umbilical), allogeneic or autologous, harvesting, transplantation, and related complications; including: pheresis and cell preparation/storage; marrow ablative therapy; drugs, supplies, hospitalization with outpatient follow-up; medical/surgical, diagnostic, emergency, and rehabilitative services; and the number of days of pre and post-transplant care in the global definition
    Informational coding statementmixed
    No codes listed
    Tumor size — ≤ 3 cm
    Tumor size≤ 3 cm
    ContextApplies to cryoablation coverage for renal cell carcinoma when other criteria are met
    Source policyPolicy #337 - CRYOABLATION FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA (RCC)
    GFR — ≤ 60 ml/min
    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR)≤ 60 ml/min
    ContextPart of renal function criteria for cryoablation eligibility
    Associated thresholdsUsed with serum creatinine ≥ 2.0 and BUN/Cr <20/1
    Serum creatinine — ≥ 2.0
    Serum creatinine≥ 2.0 mg/dL
    ContextUsed as a criterion for reduced renal function in cryoablation candidacy (Commercial/CHIP)
    Related prognostic noteIn amyloidosis selection, serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dL associated with better outcomes (refer to transplant candidacy guidance)
    BUN-to-creatinine ratio — < 20/1
    BUN-to-creatinine ratio< 20/1
    ContextRequired alongside GFR ≤60 ml/min and creatinine ≥2.0 to define reduced renal function for cryoablation eligibility
    ApplicationUsed by Select Health Commercial/CHIP policy to determine cryoablation candidacy
    HIPEC perfusion duration and core temperature monitoring — Perfusion up to 90 minutes; core temperature maintained approximately 97°-102°F
    Perfusion durationUp to 90 minutes
    Core temperature monitoringCore temperature maintained approximately 97°-102°F (esophageal and bladder probes) during perfusion
    Perioperative measuresPatient cooled preoperatively (cooling blanket); ambient OR temperature reduced to ~60°F during perfusion
    Not applicable — Not applicable
    Not applicableNot applicable
    ContextNo threshold or numeric requirement specified
    Usage noteDisplayed where a threshold does not apply

    Prior Authorization, Documentation, and Operational Requirements

    Prior Authorization

    Prior authorization and benefits verification

    Select Health requires providers to verify member benefits and obtain prior authorization when required by the member's contract. Application of coverage criteria depends on the individual's benefit coverage at the time of request; inclusion or exclusion of codes in this policy does not itself guarantee coverage or reimbursement. Providers should contact Customer Service or Provider Relations for benefit-specific questions.

    • Verify member benefits and eligibility prior to service; benefits determine coverage and applicability of policy criteria.
    • Obtain prior authorization when required by the member's contract or plan rules.
    • Member/customer service and provider relations contact: phone on member ID card; Select Health Provider Relations 801-442-3692.
    Prior Authorization

    Preauthorization for transplant indications

    For transplant-related indications (HSCT/BMT, autologous or allogeneic), preauthorization is generally required. Prior authorization requests should document transplant indication, prior lines of therapy, risk stratification (for example high- or high-intermediate IPI for NHL consolidation), evidence of refractory disease when applicable, and other selection criteria used to justify transplant candidacy.

    • Document indication for transplant and rationale (e.g., consolidation of first CR for high/high-intermediate IPI, relapsed Hodgkin's disease after salvage therapy).
    • Include prior therapies and response, duration of remission, and lines of therapy.
    • Provide candidacy parameters: age, organ function measures (e.g., serum creatinine, cardiac ejection fraction, interventricular septal thickness), performance status, number of organs involved (for amyloidosis), and other transplant-specific thresholds.
    • Attach supporting literature/guideline citations when available (NCCN, PDQ, InterQual references applicable).
    Note

    Payer alignment and applicable authorization pathway

    Select Health Community Care (Medicaid) typically aligns with State of Utah Medicaid policy and may use InterQual. Medicare coverage is determined by CMS and may supersede Select Health Commercial criteria when a CMS determination exists. Providers must follow the appropriate payer-specific pathway (Commercial, Medicare/CMS, or Medicaid/Select Health Community Care) when requesting authorization.

    • Check whether a CMS NCD/LCD applies for Medicare members; if present, CMS rules govern coverage.
    • For Community Care/Medicaid members, reference Utah Medicaid manuals and InterQual criteria as applicable.
    • When no payer-specific guidance exists, Select Health Commercial policy may apply.
    Documentation Required

    Clinical and procedural documentation required

    Clinical and procedural documentation must be submitted to support medical necessity for procedural therapies (e.g., cryoablation, HIPEC, GammaTile) and transplant requests. Lack of sufficient clinical evidence or inadequate documentation can lead to denial.

    • Include operative reports, imaging guidance (ultrasound/MRI), tumor size/location, and approach (open, laparoscopic, percutaneous) for ablative procedures.
    • For HIPEC, document disease extent, PCI where applicable, prior chemotherapy (e.g., at least 3 months for gastric cancer), and absence of exclusionary anatomic findings.
    • For GammaTile, document prior maximal resection and standard-of-care adjuvant therapy, and recurrence within the high-dose radiotherapy volume.
    • For transplants, provide detailed prior therapy history, disease stage, laboratory and organ function data, and performance status.
    Denial Risk

    HIPEC coverage limitations and coding

    HIPEC is covered only for specified indications; requests for HIPEC outside listed indications are considered investigational/experimental and will generally be denied. Providers must document that the patient meets all listed clinical criteria for coverage.

    • Covered indications include mucinous appendiceal carcinoma with pseudomyxoma peritonei, diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, stage III ovarian cancer, select metastatic colon cancer to the peritoneum (with specified anatomic exclusions), and gastric cancer with low PCI ≤ 10 after ≥3 months chemotherapy when candidate for complete cytoreduction.
    • CPT codes 96547 and 96548 apply when HIPEC criteria are met; CPT 96549 (unlisted) is not covered for investigational/unproven indications.
    • Requests for other indications should be expected to be denied as investigational/experimental.
    Denial Risk

    Denial risk: evidence insufficiency and high-risk indications

    Evidence insufficiency or high treatment-related mortality for certain indications (for example many autoimmune diseases, ependymoma, select solid tumors) increases the risk of denial. When evidence is limited or outcomes are heterogeneous, documentation must clearly justify the clinical rationale and patient selection.

    • High transplant-related mortality or insufficient peer-reviewed data for some indications may lead to denial.
    • For autoimmune indications and certain solid tumors, randomized trials are lacking; provide strong rationale and selection criteria if requesting coverage.
    • Clinical trial enrollment is encouraged where conventional therapy uncertainty exists.
    Billing Rule

    Coding and billing documentation required

    Required coding and billing documentation must be supplied on claims for transplantation and associated services. Inclusion or exclusion of codes in this policy is informational and does not guarantee coverage; verify benefit-specific code coverage prior to claim submission.

    • Use appropriate CPT/HCPCS codes for harvesting, transplantation, HLA testing, chemotherapy administration, HIPEC (96547/96548), and other related services as listed in the policy.
    • Document procedure duration and additional units when billing time-based HIPEC codes (first 60 minutes and each additional 30 minutes).
    • Claims lacking required supporting documentation or with codes billed for investigational indications may be denied.
    Note

    References and guideline resources

    Operational notes and references: this section provides literature citations and references to guidance (e.g., NCCN, UpToDate, InterQual, CMS/Medicare manuals, Utah Medicaid manuals) that support policy rationale. Providers may cite these resources in prior authorization requests when relevant.

    • Policy cites peer-reviewed literature, consensus guidelines, and public payer manuals to justify coverage positions.
    • Providers may reference NCCN, PDQ, InterQual, CMS, and State Medicaid guidance when submitting documentation.
    Note

    When prior authorization is not specified

    Prior authorization requirements are not always specified explicitly for every procedure or indication in this section. Where no explicit prior authorization rule is provided, providers must still verify benefits and follow the member's contract and payer pathway to determine if preauthorization is required.

    • Some chunks contain clinical evidence or coding tables but do not state an explicit prior authorization procedure.
    • When authorization is not specified, default to verifying member benefits and follow payer-specific rules (Commercial, Medicare/CMS, Medicaid/Community Care).
    Step Therapy

    Step therapy and sequencing expectations

    Step therapy: no step-therapy rules are provided in this section for the listed surgical, transplant, or procedure-based therapies. Where step-up from conventional salvage therapy is clinically expected (for example relapsed Hodgkin's disease prior to HDC/AuSCS), document prior conventional therapies and rationale for escalation.

    • No formal step-therapy requirements described here; however, several indications expect that conventional therapies or enrollment in clinical trials be considered before high-dose or transplant approaches.
    • Document prior salvage chemotherapy and outcomes when requesting transplant for relapsed disease.

    Background and Rationale

    Background: GammaTile intracavitary brachytherapy involves placement of bioresorbable tiles with cesium‑131 seeds into the surgical resection cavity. Select Health limits its coverage to the specific recurrent Grade IV astrocytoma scenario described in policy and requires documentation of prior maximal resection and standard adjuvant therapy prior to use.

    Chelating agents — definition and examples
    DefinitionChelating agents are drugs that form complexes with toxic heavy metals to render them inactive and facilitate urinary excretion
    ExamplesDeferoxamine mesylate, dimercaprol (BAL), edetate (EDTA), succimer (DMSA), penicillamine
    Clinical useUsed to treat symptomatic metal toxicity (eg, iron, lead, arsenic, mercury, copper)
    cryoablation — definition
    DefinitionCryoablation is an ablation technique using cryoprobes cooled by liquid nitrogen or argon to produce subfreezing temperatures causing tumor cell destruction and thromboembolic ischemia
    ApproachesCan be performed open, laparoscopic, or percutaneous with imaging guidance (ultrasound or MRI)
    Clinical intentUsed to provide oncologic control for small renal masses while preserving renal function
    Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) — definition and description
    DefinitionHyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a technique where, after cytoreductive surgery, a heated chemotherapy solution is continuously circulated in the peritoneal cavity to target residual tumor cells
    Technical featuresPerfusion is performed intraoperatively immediately after cytoreduction, typically up to 90 minutes, using heat-synergistic agents and specialized perioperative measures
    Clinical intentUsed as an adjunct to cytoreductive surgery for select peritoneal surface malignancies (eg, pseudomyxoma peritonei, DMPM, selected colorectal/ovarian/gastric cases)
    Cryoablation for renal tumors — definition and context
    DefinitionCryoablation for renal tumors is ablation of renal mass lesions using cryosurgical techniques performed open, laparoscopically, or percutaneously to achieve tumor destruction while preserving renal function
    IndicationsConsidered for small (T1) renal cell carcinomas when patients cannot tolerate nephrectomy or to preserve renal function
    Procedural detailsMultiple cryoprobes placed under imaging guidance with intraoperative ultrasound monitoring of the ice ball; FDA-approved systems available
    Pseudomyxoma peritonei — definition and clinical context
    DefinitionPseudomyxoma peritonei is a peritoneal surface malignancy frequently originating from the appendix characterized by disseminated mucinous tumor deposits
    Clinical contextCRS with HIPEC has produced prolonged survival in cohorts of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (eg, Elias series reporting 5-year OS ~80%)
    Operative outcomesIn reported series, a high proportion achieved no visible residual disease after CRS but operative morbidity and mortality can be substantial
    Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) — definition and outcomes summary
    DefinitionDiffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a primary peritoneal malignancy for which CRS and HIPEC have been used
    Outcomes summaryReported median overall survival varies widely across series; operative mortality and morbidity are significant with median OS reported from ~29.5 to >100 months in different studies
    Evidence baseEvidence consists primarily of prospective uncontrolled case series and systematic reviews summarizing heterogeneous protocols and outcomes
    GammaTile intracavitary brachytherapy — definition
    DefinitionGammaTile intracavitary brachytherapy consists of bioresorbable collagen tiles containing four cesium-131 seeds placed into the surgical resection cavity after debulking
    Intended useLocalized intracavitary radiation delivered at time of resection to the tumor cavity to treat recurrent brain tumors (eg, recurrent Grade IV astrocytoma)
    Coverage contextSelect Health covers GammaTile only for recurrent Grade IV astrocytoma when all listed clinical criteria are met
    Ideal allogeneic donor — definition
    DefinitionIdeal allogeneic donor: HLA-identical sibling matched at HLA-A, B, and DR loci
    AlternativesRelated donors mismatched at one locus, matched unrelated donors (via registry), and haploidentical donors may be considered when identical sibling donors are unavailable
    Clinical implicationDonor selection impacts graft-versus-host risk and transplant-related morbidity
    Severe and very severe aplastic anemia — definition
    DefinitionSevere aplastic anemia: platelets <20 x10^9/L, granulocytes <0.5 x10^9/L, and reticulocytes <1% after correction for hematocrit; very severe when granulocytes <0.2 x10^9/L
    Clinical relevanceSevere/very severe AA are indications considered for allogeneic HSCT or ATG depending on donor availability and patient factors
    Treatment alternativesAllogeneic HSCT and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) have comparable outcomes in selected patients
    AuSCS — Autologous stem cell support definition
    DefinitionAuSCS (Autologous stem cell support) — reinfusion of a patient's own hematopoietic stem cells following marrow-ablative high-dose chemotherapy
    Clinical useUsed to rescue marrow function after high-dose chemotherapy in consolidation or salvage settings for various malignancies
    RisksReinfusion may carry risk of tumor cell contamination; selection criteria impact outcomes
    Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) — definition
    DefinitionMyelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic disorders with impaired maturation and risk of transformation to AML
    ClassificationTypically categorized by FAB subtypes (RA, RARS, RAEB, RAEBT, CMML) reflecting increasing blast counts
    Clinical implicationHigh-dose chemotherapy or HSCT considered for patients with rising blasts, high-risk cytogenetics, or progressive disease
    Myeloproliferative disorders — definition
    DefinitionMyeloproliferative disorders are clonal disorders with expansion of hematopoietic cells (eg, PV, ET, primary myelofibrosis, CML) that may evolve to blast crisis
    Clinical implicationHigh-dose chemotherapy or HSCT may be considered with progression to myelofibrosis or evolution toward acute leukemia
    ExamplesPolycythemia vera (PV), Essential thrombocythemia (ET), primary myelofibrosis, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
    Responsive multiple myeloma — definition
    DefinitionResponsive multiple myeloma: tumors achieving a complete or partial (≥50% tumor reduction) response to chemotherapy
    Clinical implicationAutologous HSCT is supported for newly diagnosed or responsive multiple myeloma in appropriate patients
    ThresholdsOften recommended for stage II/III disease and patients with good performance status
    Resistant or refractory multiple myeloma — definition
    DefinitionResistant or refractory multiple myeloma: tumors achieving <50% reduction in tumor burden after therapy
    Clinical implicationEvidence is insufficient to support routine HDC/AuSCS or allogeneic transplant for resistant/refractory disease in unselected patients
    OutcomesNonrandomized reports show median survival ~31 months and 5-year OS ~27% in some series
    Tandem (serial) transplant — definition
    DefinitionTandem (serial) transplant: two planned hematopoietic stem cell transplants regardless of the outcome of the initial transplant
    Evidence summaryRandomized trials show improved response rates but inconsistent survival benefit and higher treatment-related mortality
    Use contextStudied both as first-line consolidation and in salvage settings with heterogeneous outcomes
    HDC AuSCS — definition
    Clinical applicationUsed as consolidation or salvage in various malignancies; candidate selection affects outcomes and transplant-related mortality can be substantial
    ExamplesRegimens include busulfan + melphalan, high-dose melphalan, BCNU-based regimens among others described in the literature
    Allogeneic HSCT — definition
    DefinitionAllogeneic HSCT — transplantation using donor (usually HLA-matched related) hematopoietic stem cells
    Clinical effectCan establish normal erythropoiesis and be potentially curative for certain hematologic and genetic disorders (eg, severe aplastic anemia, sickle cell anemia) but carries graft-versus-host disease risk
    Donor hierarchyIdeal donor is HLA-identical sibling; matched unrelated donors and haploidentical donors are alternatives
    Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) — definition
    Clinical roleUsed in various malignancies as consolidation or salvage to allow marrow recovery after myeloablative regimens
    Coding noteAssociated CPT codes include 38206, 38232, 38241 among others for harvesting and transplant procedures
    High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support — definition
    Clinical considerationsCandidate selection, prior therapies, organ function, and disease sensitivity influence outcomes and transplant-related mortality
    Evidence baseSupported in selected indications (eg, relapsed Hodgkin’s, germ cell tumors, some pediatric solid tumors) with variable evidence across tumor types
    Autologous HSCT — definition (additional)
    Practical noteUsed as consolidation or salvage; timing of collection and avoidance of extensive alkylator exposure are important considerations
    EvidenceRandomized and registry data inform use in multiple myeloma, Hodgkin’s, and certain pediatric tumors; evidence is heterogeneous for many adult solid tumors

    Line of Therapy Context

    Biomarker and Diagnostic Requirements

    c-kit (KIT) mutation — biomarker requirement (label present)
    Biomarkerc-kit (KIT) mutation
    Clinical relevancePresence of c-kit mutation in some AML/Inv(16) patients identifies a subset with poorer prognosis who may be considered for transplant in CR1
    SourceNCI clinical trial database / HSCT policy discussion
    Philadelphia chromosome — biomarker requirement (label present)
    BiomarkerPhiladelphia chromosome (Ph)
    Clinical relevancePh-positive ALL is a very poor-risk feature that may make allogeneic transplant routinely recommended in some settings
    ContextListed among risk factors predictive of relapse in ALL influencing transplant decisions

    High-Dose Chemotherapy Regimens and Examples

    Regimen / DrugsIndication / SettingEvidence summaryCoverage stance
    Thiotepa ± etoposide ± temozolomide / carmustineHigh‑grade gliomas / CNS tumors (consolidation or salvage)Phase I/II series report occasional long‑term survivors but substantial treatment‑related morbidity and mortality; authors note results are disappointing and emphasize selection bias; no phase III trials identified through 1999 searches.Experimental
    High‑dose thiotepa with autologous stem cell rescueOligodendroglioma / recurrent aggressive oligodendrogliomaSmall series (e.g., Cairncross) reported some complete and partial responses but notable treatment‑related deaths; Phase II data only; need for randomized trials noted.Experimental
    Regimen / DrugsIndication / SettingEvidence summaryCoverage stance
    Thiotepa + etoposide (high‑dose) regimensRecurrent ependymoma (salvage therapy)Small case series (Mason et al.; Grill et al.) reported poor outcomes with multiple treatment‑related deaths; authors concluded thiotepa‑based HDC was not effective for ependymoma.Not medically necessary / Experimental
    Regimen / DrugsIndication / SettingEvidence summaryCoverage stance
    Melphalan‑based high‑dose regimens ± radiotherapyRecurrent or refractory Ewing's sarcoma; salvage and consolidation settingsRegistry and phase II reports (EBMT registry: 210 patients; complete response ~27%, 5‑year OS ~19%). Melphalan regimens commonly used; some long‑term survivors but overall outcomes modest and subject to selection bias.Experimental
    Regimen / DrugsIndication / SettingEvidence summaryCoverage stance
    High‑dose melphalan + etoposide + total‑body irradiation (Meyers et al. regimen)Consolidation for newly diagnosed metastatic Ewing's sarcomaMeyers et al. treated 23 patients with this intensive consolidation; two‑year event‑free survival 24%; authors concluded this high‑dose approach did not improve prognosis in that cohort.Experimental
    Regimen / DrugsIndication / SettingEvidence summaryCoverage stance
    BEAM (BCNU/carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) with autologous stem‑cell supportRelapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma (salvage)Randomized trial comparing BEAM‑AuSCS to conventional Dexa‑BEAM in relapsed patients (n=166 randomized): freedom‑from‑treatment‑failure was significantly better after HDC/AuSCS; no OS difference reported at median 39‑month follow‑up but subgroup benefits noted.Covered (when criteria and prior therapy sequencing met)
    Regimen / DrugsIndication / SettingEvidence summaryCoverage stance
    Carboplatin/thiotepa/etoposide; cyclophosphamide/cisplatin/vincristine; thiotepa/carboplatin; cisplatin/vincristine/cyclophosphamide/etoposideRecurrent or high‑risk medulloblastoma/PNET and selected pediatric solid tumorsLargest series and phase II reports describe event‑free survivors in selected patients (e.g., recurrent medulloblastoma: 7 event‑free survivors at median 54 months in a 23‑patient series); no phase III trials; results influenced by patient selection and minimal residual disease at HDC.Experimental / investigational
    Regimen / DrugsIndication / SettingEvidence summaryCoverage stance
    High‑dose BCNU (carmustine) ± radiotherapy with ASCTSupratentorial glioblastoma / high‑grade gliomasPilot and prospective reports described use of high‑dose BCNU with ASCT and subsequent radiation; small series show benefit in selected patients but overall evidence limited and lacking randomized confirmation.Informational / Experimental
    Thiotepa + etoposide with autologous rescueRecurrent CNS tumors (children and young adults)Phase II pilot studies report responses but with treatment‑related toxicity; authors call for randomized trials to control for selection bias.Experimental
    Busulfan + melphalan combinationsHigh‑grade gliomas and other solid tumors in selected protocolsReported across series and reviews as one of multiple conditioning/regimen approaches; evidence consists of case series and institutional reports.Informational / Experimental
    Regimen / DrugsIndication / SettingEvidence summaryCoverage stance
    Busulfan + melphalan (high‑dose)Various malignancies as conditioning or consolidation (e.g., Ewing's, pediatric solid tumors)Cited across registry reports and clinical series (e.g., Oberlin et al. on busulfan+melphalan in metastatic Ewing tumors); data derive from nonrandomized studies and phase II series.Informational / Experimental
    High‑dose melphalan + etoposide + total‑body irradiationConsolidation in high‑risk settings (e.g., Ewing's sarcoma studied by Meyers et al.)Used in phase II protocols; Meyers reported lack of improved event‑free survival in one cohort; evidence insufficient for routine adoption.Experimental
    Ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE‑type) and fludarabine‑based reduced intensity conditioningUsed across conditioning strategies for hematologic malignancies and reduced‑intensity allogeneic approachesDescribed in reviews and policy citations as examples of regimens employed; outcomes vary by disease and transplant type; evidence base heterogeneous.Informational / regimen examples
    Regimen / DrugsIndication / SettingEvidence summaryCoverage stance
    Carboplatin ± paclitaxel; melphalan‑based regimens; topotecan/carboplatin/paclitaxel; TMC (topotecan, melphalan, cyclophosphamide)Advanced ovarian epithelial carcinoma and other solid tumors in phase I/II trialsMultiple phase I/II studies and institutional series evaluated these combinations with autologous stem‑cell support; outcomes variable and nonrandomized; randomized evidence lacking to demonstrate consistent survival benefit.Experimental / investigational
    Busulfan + thiotepa; carboplatin‑thiotepa‑etoposide; other multi‑agent high‑dose combinationsPNET/medulloblastoma, pediatric solid tumors, and other trial contextsCited in phase II trials and collaborative studies (e.g., Dunkel, Strother); phase III data not identified for most regimens; evidence limited to uncontrolled series.Experimental

    Policy Revisions and Material Changes

    2025-06-11addedLatest

    For Commercial Plan Policy, added new coverage criterion #4: coverage for gastric cancer limited to patients with peritoneal carcinoma with low PCI (≤10), who are candidates for complete cytoreduction, and after completion of at least 3 months of chemotherapy.

    2025-05-27modified

    For Commercial Plan Policy, modified criterion #3 to specify patients who have an increased risk of complications associated with other therapies or who have other medical comorbidities.

    2025-05-09added

    For Commercial Plan Policy, added coverage criterion #3 for metastatic colon cancer to the peritoneum, conditioned on absence of listed anatomic findings (biliary obstruction; extensive gastrohepatic ligament/porta hepatis disease; extensive retroperitoneal disease; intraparenchymal liver lesions requiring major resection; diffuse small bowel serosa/mesenteric involvement; and/or multiple sites of small bowel obstruction).

    2024-11-06added

    For Commercial Plan Policy, added criterion #2 to qualify coverage for patients with stage III ovarian cancer.