Diagnostic Testing of Common Sexually Transmitted Infections
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for blue cross blue shield - louisiana Policy AHS - G2157 alerts
Get alerted when Policy AHS - G2157 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Coverage policy for laboratory testing of common STIs (Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Treponema pallidum, Trichomonas vaginalis, HSV, HPV, and select others) describing when tests meet or do not meet coverage criteria for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana members.
Moved prenatal STI screening from the Prenatal Screening policy into this policy, adding new coverage criteria items (CC2.a., 5.e., 6.a., and 10.a.).
Clarified and reorganized multiple coverage criteria (renumbering CC3→CC4, CC6→CC7, CC7→CC8, CC12→CC13, CC13→CC14, CC16→CC18, etc.) and added/removed specific test modalities (e.g., antigen testing, culture testing).
Qualitative NAAT for Trichomonas vaginalis explicitly MEETS coverage criteria in defined situations and multi-organism vaginitis panels reallocated between policies.
Added and removed multiple CPT codes across review cycles (e.g., added 87494, 0483U/0484U, 87626, 0455U/0463U; removed several older codes).
Coverage Criteria for STI Testing
Syphilis antibody testing (treponemal and nontreponemal)
Covered only when ANY of the following are met:
Multiple test modalities are explicitly listed in the policy as excluded from coverage. Examples include PCR, NAAT, and antigen testing for syphilis, and for chlamydial infections the policy specifically states that culture testing, antibody testing, and antigen testing for Chlamydia trachomatis or LGV DO NOT MEET COVERAGE CRITERIA. The policy also lists direct probe detection and/or quantitative NAAT for several organisms among methods that do not meet coverage criteria, reflecting a deliberate narrowing of covered assay types.
These exclusions are operational: tests described as 'DO NOT MEET COVERAGE CRITERIA' are treated as non-covered modalities and may trigger claim denials if submitted as standalone covered services. Providers should therefore select and document covered, guideline-aligned methods (for example, serology for syphilis and NAAT for CT/NG where indicated) or follow the explicit coverage criteria when ordering tests.
The policy notes that NAAT/PCR for genital syphilis is not FDA‑approved for routine testing in this excerpt and is not typically performed for genital syphilis. There is no internationally approved PCR for Treponema pallidum, and molecular methods must be strictly validated and used with appropriate quality controls when applied.
Consequently, the policy classifies PCR, NAAT, and antigen testing for syphilis as not meeting coverage criteria, and recommends the standard two‑tiered serologic approach (nontreponemal plus treponemal testing) as the primary diagnostic method for most clinical scenarios.
Routine serologic screening for genital herpes in asymptomatic adolescents and adults is not recommended. The USPSTF systematic review and CDC guidance cited in the policy indicate a high false‑positive rate with population screening (example: in a population prevalence of 16% the positive predictive value was ~50%), and potential psychosocial harms from false positives.
Accordingly, type‑specific HSV serology is reserved for selected clinical situations (for example, recurrent or atypical genital symptoms with negative lesion testing, or evaluation when a partner has genital herpes) rather than for routine population screening.
The policy does not support routine population‑wide serologic screening for HSV‑2, routine asymptomatic screening for Mycoplasma genitalium using NAAT, nor routine HPV testing in men or for diagnosis of anogenital/penile warts. CDC guidance cited in the policy explicitly advises against HPV testing in men and states HPV testing does not guide anogenital wart management.
For M. genitalium, CDC guidance and the policy limit NAAT testing to symptomatic indications (e.g., recurrent nongonococcal urethritis, recurrent cervicitis, or consideration in PID) and state that screening asymptomatic individuals with NAAT does not meet coverage criteria.
The policy describes older direct detection techniques for syphilis (e.g., darkfield microscopy, Warthin‑Starry staining, direct fluorescent antibody) as having limited routine utility. IUSTI and CDC guidance note that darkfield examination was historically a gold standard but is labor intensive, subjective, and produces variable sensitivity and specificity; it is therefore not recommended for routine diagnosis where more sensitive, validated molecular or serologic methods are available.
Immunohistochemistry and tissue hybridization also have limited routine roles, and direct fluorescent antibody testing is characterized as obsolete in the guideline summaries included in the policy.
HPV testing within this policy is limited to indications consistent with cancer screening or assessment (for example, testing for high‑risk HPV in cervical cancer screening or pathology‑directed assays such as p16 immunohistochemistry). The CDC guidance cited in the policy states there is no approved HPV test for men, and HPV testing is not recommended for diagnosing anogenital warts because results do not guide management.
Therefore, the policy does not support routine HPV NAAT as a general STI screen in men or for anogenital wart diagnosis; HPV testing for cervical cancer screening follows separate, age‑based guideline recommendations.
Procedure and HCPCS/CPT codes included in Medical Policy documents are provided as a general reference tool and may not be all‑inclusive. The policy explicitly advises that listed procedure codes should be used only as reference and that providers should verify coding, billing, and payer requirements prior to submission.
Because codes are updated off‑cycle and changes are recorded in the revision history, clinicians and billing staff should confirm the current code set and any payer‑specific authorization rules when ordering or submitting claims for STI testing.
The policy explicitly identifies specific test types that DO NOT MEET COVERAGE CRITERIA. These include PCR/NAAT/antigen testing for syphilis, and for chlamydia/LGV the policy lists culture, antibody, and antigen testing as non‑covered methods. The revision history documents reassignments and clarifications that added or moved these modalities between 'meets' and 'does not meet' coverage lists.
These reassignments are operational: tests listed as not meeting coverage criteria may be denied when billed as standalone covered services, so ordering clinicians should select covered methods and document the clinical indication and specimen type to support medical necessity where testing is performed.
The policy states that screening asymptomatic individuals for HSV‑1 or HSV‑2 does not meet coverage criteria. This aligns with USPSTF and CDC guidance that routine serologic screening for genital herpes in asymptomatic adolescents and adults is not recommended due to high false‑positive rates and limited clinical benefit.
HSV type‑specific serology is still appropriate in targeted clinical contexts (for example, recurrent or atypical genital symptoms with negative lesion PCR/culture, or partner evaluation) but not for population screening of asymptomatic people.
The policy clarifies that NAAT screening for Mycoplasma genitalium in asymptomatic individuals does not meet coverage criteria. CDC guidance incorporated into the policy recommends M. genitalium NAAT testing only for symptomatic patients (such as men with recurrent nongonococcal urethritis or women with recurrent cervicitis) and suggests resistance testing when available to guide therapy.
Asymptomatic population screening for M. genitalium is therefore not supported by the policy and may be considered not medically necessary.
Antigen‑detection point‑of‑care tests (POCTs) for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae demonstrate markedly lower sensitivity than laboratory NAATs and are therefore not recommended as sole screening tests. The policy cites systematic reviews showing POCT antigen tests have sensitivities as low as ~37–63% for CT depending on specimen, while near‑patient NAATs and laboratory NAATs have sensitivities >95%.
Because of their limited sensitivity, antigen‑detection POCT immunochromatographic/optical assays are not generally recommended for routine screening or diagnosis when a higher‑sensitivity NAAT is available.
The policy reiterates that routine HSV‑2 serologic screening in the general population is not supported and that routine asymptomatic testing for M. genitalium or HPV outside recommended screening contexts is not covered. CDC guidance states type‑specific HSV testing is useful only in select clinical scenarios and that HPV testing is not recommended for men or for diagnosis of anogenital warts.
Additionally, the policy lists nucleic acid testing to determine antimicrobial susceptibility in N. gonorrhoeae or macrolide resistance in M. genitalium as not meeting coverage criteria, further limiting routine molecular testing outside of specified clinical indications.
Darkfield examination is described as labor intensive, operator dependent, and subject to variable sensitivity and specificity; guideline excerpts cited in the policy conclude that darkfield microscopy is not recommended for routine diagnosis because modern molecular assays (when appropriate and validated) and serologic testing offer improved performance.
As a consequence, the policy discourages routine use of darkfield and describes direct fluorescent antibody tests and certain older staining techniques as having limited or obsolete roles in routine clinical practice.
Per USPSTF and CDC guidance summarized in the policy, testing asymptomatic patients for HSV‑2 is not recommended and may be considered not medically necessary absent symptoms, exposure, or other specific indications. The policy highlights the low positive predictive value of HSV serology in low‑prevalence populations and potential psychosocial harms from false positives.
Ordering clinicians should therefore reserve HSV serologic testing for the scenarios identified in the coverage criteria (for example, recurrent/atypical symptoms with negative lesion PCR/culture or partner evaluation) and document the clinical rationale.
Screening asymptomatic individuals for M. genitalium using NAAT DOES NOT MEET COVERAGE CRITERIA. This policy position aligns with CDC recommendations that limit M. genitalium NAAT to symptomatic patients (e.g., recurrent NGU or recurrent cervicitis) and advise against routine asymptomatic screening.
Clinicians should order M. genitalium testing only when specific clinical indications are present and should document symptoms and risk factors to support medical necessity.
Applicable Procedure and Proprietary Codes
| 86592 | Syphilis test, non-treponemal antibody; qualitative (eg, VDRL, RPR, ART) |
| 86593 | Syphilis test, non-treponemal antibody; quantitative |
| 86631 | Antibody; Chlamydia |
| 86632 | Antibody; Chlamydia, IGM |
| 86694 | Antibody; herpes simplex, non-specific type test |
| 86695 | Antibody; herpes simplex, type 1 |
| 86696 | Antibody; herpes simplex, type 2 |
| 86780 | Antibody; Treponema pallidum |
| 87081 | Culture, presumptive, pathogenic organisms, screening only |
| 87110 | Culture, Chlamydia, any source |
| 87492 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Chlamydia trachomatis, quantification |
| 87494 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, multiplex amplified probe technique |
| 87528 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Herpes simplex virus, direct probe technique |
| 87529 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Herpes simplex virus, amplified probe technique |
| 87530 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Herpes simplex virus, quantification |
| 87563 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Mycoplasma genitalium, amplified probe technique |
| 87590 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Neisseria gonorrhoeae, direct probe technique |
| 87591 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Neisseria gonorrhoeae, amplified probe technique |
| 87592 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Neisseria gonorrhoeae, quantification |
| 87623 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Human Papillomavirus (HPV), low-risk types |
| 87660 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Trichomonas vaginalis, direct probe technique |
| 87661 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Trichomonas vaginalis, amplified probe technique |
| 87797 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), not otherwise specified; direct probe technique, each organism |
| 87798 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), not otherwise specified; amplified probe technique, each organism |
| 87799 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), not otherwise specified; quantification, each organism |
| 87800 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), multiple organisms; direct probe(s) technique |
| 87808 | Infectious agent antigen detection by immunoassay with direct optical observation; Trichomonas vaginalis |
| 87810 | Infectious agent antigen detection by immunoassay with direct optical observation; Chlamydia trachomatis |
| 88341 | Immunohistochemistry or immunocytochemistry, per specimen; each additional single antibody stain procedure |
| 88342 | Immunohistochemistry or immunocytochemistry, per specimen; initial single antibody stain procedure |
| 0065U | Syphilis test, non-treponemal antibody, immunoassay, qualitative (BioPlex 2200 RPR Assay) |
| 0096U | Human papillomavirus (HPV), high-risk types, male urine (Proprietary test) |
| 0210U | Syphilis test, non-treponemal antibody, immunoassay, quantitative (BioPlex 2200 RPR Assay - Quantitative) |
| 0402U | Probe technique, vaginal, endocervical, or male urine, each pathogen reported as detected or not detected (Abbott Alinity™ m STI Assay) |
| 0483U | Infectious disease (Neisseria gonorrhoeae), sensitivity, ciprofloxacin resistance (gyrA S91F point mutation) |
| 0484U | Infectious disease (Mycoplasma genitalium), macrolide sensitivity (23S rRNA point mutation) |
| 0483U | Infectious disease (Neisseria gonorrhoeae), sensitivity, ciprofloxacin resistance (gyrA S91F point mutation), oral, rectal, or vaginal swab, algorithm reported as probability of fluoroquinolone resistance; Proprietary test: Ciprofloxacin Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Lab/Manufacturer: MedArbor Diagnostics, SpeeDx, Inc |
| 0484U | Infectious disease (Mycoplasma genitalium), macrolide sensitivity (23S rRNA point mutation), oral, rectal, or vaginal swab, algorithm reported as probability of macrolide resistance; Proprietary test: Macrolide Resistance of Mycoplasma genitalium; Lab/Manufacturer: MedArbor Diagnostics, SpeeDx, Inc |
| 87494 | CPT code added (off-cycle modification) |
| 0483U | Added CPT code |
| 0484U | Added CPT code |
| 87626 | Added CPT code |
| 0455U | Added CPT code |
| 0463U | Added CPT code |
| 0167U | Removed CPT code |
| 0353U | Removed CPT code |
| 0354U | Removed CPT code |
| 87660 | Previously added/removed in revisions |
Provider Actions, Documentation, and Billing Considerations
Prior authorization not specified
The policy excerpt does not state routine prior authorization requirements for the STI tests listed; follow payer-specific administrative rules and member benefit coverage for any authorization needs.
- If local payer or government (Medicare/Medicaid) policies require prior authorization, those rules apply.
- No standalone prior‑auth language for listed CPT/HCPCS codes is present in the policy excerpt; verify in the payer portal before billing.
Prior authorization — none specified in excerpt
No explicit prior authorization conditions are described in the document excerpts; when ordering FDA‑approved assays, document clinical indication and specimen type and follow Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana administrative rules.
- Providers should check member benefits and payer portals for any local prior‑auth requirements.
- Document clinical indication and specimen to support medical necessity if requested.
Rapid/near-patient NAAT use
Near‑patient/rapid molecular NAATs (e.g., Cepheid GeneXpert Xpert CT/NG) offer high sensitivity and rapid turnaround and can influence same‑day treatment decisions; document clinical indication and use of the rapid NAAT when performed.
- Use validated near‑patient NAAT platforms as appropriate (e.g., GeneXpert) and record the assay name and result timing.
- Document that rapid testing informed same‑day management when used to guide treatment.
Prior authorization — none specified
The policy fragment contains no explicit prior authorization statements for listed CPT/HCPCS codes; providers must verify payer and government policy requirements prior to submission.
- Confirm prior‑auth needs for individual member plans and for any codes added via off‑cycle coding.
- Codes listed in this policy are for reference and may not reflect payer billing rules.
Prior authorization not specified in guideline excerpts
Guideline excerpts and the policy do not include routine prior authorization triggers for STI testing; always follow applicable payer and government policies when ordering.
- If conflict exists between this policy and LCD/NCD/state Medicaid, government policy prevails and may impose authorization requirements.
- Check the Medicare and state Medicaid coverage databases when treating beneficiaries.
Prior authorization for listed codes
No explicit prior authorization requirements are stated for the CPT/HCPCS codes listed in the policy fragment; verify payer rules before billing the included procedure codes.
- Procedure codes in the policy are provided as a reference and may not be all‑inclusive.
- Confirm code-specific prior‑auth requirements in the payer portal or member benefit documents.
Check proprietary test coding
Certain proprietary molecular or infectious‑disease tests are mapped to HCPCS (for example, Abbott Alinity m STI Assay and proprietary resistance assays); verify billing and medical‑policy requirements for these proprietary HCPCS codes before submission.
Coding updates — verify payer authorization requirements
After off‑cycle coding or other code changes, verify whether newly added CPT/HCPCS codes require payer notification or prior authorization per local administrative rules.
Step to culture for treatment non-response
If a patient does not respond to initial gonorrhea therapy, culture testing for N. gonorrhoeae to determine antimicrobial susceptibility MEETS COVERAGE CRITERIA and should be performed to guide treatment.
- Order culture and susceptibility testing when there is clinical or microbiologic evidence of treatment failure.
- Document prior treatment, timing, and clinical response to justify culture for antimicrobial susceptibility.
Step therapy — not applicable in excerpt
No step‑therapy restrictions are described in the excerpt; the policy does not impose prior therapeutic trial requirements for listed STI diagnostic tests.
- Step therapy is not specified for diagnostic testing in this policy excerpt.
- Follow clinical guidelines for test sequencing (e.g., NAAT preferred for CT/NG) rather than a payer step‑therapy mandate.
Supporting clinical documentation recommended
Document the patient's risk group status, presenting symptoms, pregnancy status, HIV status, timing relative to prior diagnosis or treatment, and PrEP or transplant status when ordering STI tests to support medical necessity.
- Include pregnancy status and gestational timing for prenatal testing documentation.
- Record prior infection dates and dates of treatment when ordering tests as tests of cure or follow‑up.
Assay, specimen, and indication documentation
Record the specific assay used, specimen type (e.g., first‑void urine, clinician‑ or patient‑collected vaginal swab, endocervical swab, pharyngeal swab, rectal swab) and the indication (screening vs symptomatic) because product performance varies by specimen and indication.
- Document assay name/manufacturer (e.g., Cepheid Xpert CT/NG, Abbott Alinity m STI) and specimen type in the medical record and lab requisition.
- For extragenital exposure, document the anatomic site to justify extragenital NAAT collection.
Specimen and test documentation for ulcerative disease
For evaluation of genital, anal, or perianal ulcers, include syphilis serology and direct detection (darkfield or lesion NAAT/PCR) when available; for suspected HSV, perform NAAT from lesion specimens and document lesion testing.
- Order both treponemal and nontreponemal serology and lesion NAAT/darkfield if available for ulcerative disease.
- Document lesion site, timing of lesion onset, and specimen type collected for HSV or T. pallidum testing.
For syphilis, document results of both a nontreponemal and a treponemal test
When diagnosing syphilis, document results of both a nontreponemal test (e.g., RPR or VDRL) and a treponemal test (e.g., TP‑PA, EIA/CLIA); for neurologic/ocular/otologic signs, document CSF analysis and CSF‑VDRL.
- If a treponemal test is positive but the nontreponemal test is negative, repeat both tests in one month when early infection is suspected.
- Record quantitative NTT titers (and dilutions) when used for diagnosis or test‑of‑cure monitoring.
Prenatal syphilis testing documentation
For prenatal care in areas with outbreaks or ongoing maternal risk, repeat maternal syphilis serology at 28–32 weeks and at delivery; ensure documentation and do not discharge newborns until maternal syphilis results are known when relevant.
- Document maternal syphilis test dates and results in the prenatal record.
- Ensure timing of repeat testing (28–32 weeks and at delivery) is recorded when indicated by local outbreak or risk status.
LDT validation/documentation
Laboratory‑developed tests (LDTs) used by clinical laboratories must be validated per CLIA requirements; document LDT validation and that the test was performed in a CLIA‑certified high‑complexity lab when applicable.
- If using an LDT for T. pallidum or other organisms, include validation documentation and performance characteristics in the lab record.
- FDA approval status and CLIA validation should be documented for proprietary vs in‑house assays.
Document relevant signs/symptoms for syphilis-related testing
Document clinical signs and symptoms that support syphilis‑related testing, including neurologic, ocular, otologic, or late/tertiary signs, to support medical necessity for advanced testing and CSF analysis when present.
- When ordering CSF‑VDRL or neurosyphilis workup, record specific neurologic or ocular findings prompting the test.
- Include physical exam findings (e.g., cranial nerve dysfunction, vision or hearing changes) in the chart to justify expanded testing.
Denial risk for non-covered test methods
Tests explicitly listed as DO NOT MEET COVERAGE CRITERIA (for example: PCR/NAAT/antigen testing for syphilis; culture/antigen/antibody for chlamydia; rapid EIA for Trichomonas; nucleic acid susceptibility testing for N. gonorrhoeae or macrolide resistance in M. genitalium) may trigger claim denials when billed as covered services.
- Before ordering or billing a modality listed as DNMCC, verify that an alternative covered test is not indicated.
- If ordering a DNMCC test for research or public health reasons, obtain prior authorization or document exceptional circumstances per payer rules.
Specimen-dependent performance
Specimen type and collection method affect test performance; document that an appropriate specimen was collected (e.g., first‑void urine, appropriate rectal swab technique) because improper collection can reduce sensitivity and affect claim validity.
- Record collection method (self‑collected vs clinician‑collected) and time of collection (first‑void urine) in the requisition.
- For rectal specimens, note collection technique and rationale because sensitivity is lower and may require documentation.
Testing method recommendation — use NAATs for CT/NG
Testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea should be performed using NAATs as the preferred method; failure to use recommended NAAT methods may represent inappropriate testing choices.
- Order NAATs for urogenital and indicated extragenital sites (pharyngeal, rectal) per exposure history.
- If a non‑NAAT method is used, document clinical justification and that NAAT was unavailable or inappropriate.
Using only one type of serologic test is insufficient for syphilis diagnosis
Using only a single serologic test (either nontreponemal or treponemal alone) is insufficient to diagnose syphilis and can produce false‑negative or false‑positive interpretations; document both test results per the two‑test algorithm.
- When a treponemal test is positive and NTT is negative, repeat testing in one month if early infection suspected.
- Perform and document quantitative NTT titers when using NTTs for diagnosis or test‑of‑cure.
Government policy precedence
If this policy conflicts with any government coverage policy (LCD/NCD/state Medicaid), the government policy takes precedence and noncompliance with applicable government policy may lead to denials.
- Check Medicare LCD/NCD and state Medicaid rules for beneficiaries before ordering or billing.
- Document adherence to applicable government policy when it differs from this policy to support coverage.
Procedure codes appearing in Medical Policy
Procedure codes listed in Medical Policy documents are provided as a general reference and may not be all‑inclusive; verify coding completeness before submission.
- Use the policy code lists as a guide but confirm with current CPT/HCPCS manuals and payer code lists.
- If a required billing code is missing from the policy, contact the payer’s provider relations for clarification prior to claim submission.
Tests listed as not meeting coverage criteria may be denied
Testing modalities explicitly listed as 'DO NOT MEET COVERAGE CRITERIA' (for example PCR/NAAT/antigen for syphilis; culture, antibody, and antigen testing for chlamydia/LGV; nucleic acid susceptibility testing for N. gonorrhoeae or macrolide resistance in M. genitalium) are triggers for denial when submitted as standalone covered services.
- Avoid ordering or billing DNMCC modalities as covered services unless there is a documented exception or prior authorization.
- If a DNMCC test is required for public health, surveillance, or research, obtain payer confirmation and document the reason.
Background and Scope
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are caused by a variety of pathogens including bacteria (e.g., Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Treponema pallidum, Mycoplasma genitalium), viruses (e.g., herpes simplex virus, human papillomavirus), and protozoa (e.g., Trichomonas vaginalis). These infections can lead to significant morbidity including pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, adverse pregnancy outcomes, neurologic and cardiovascular complications (notably with syphilis), and increased susceptibility to HIV.
Public health guidance emphasizes targeted screening and use of the most appropriate diagnostic methods for each pathogen: molecular NAATs are preferred for chlamydia, gonorrhea, M. genitalium, and trichomoniasis in indicated scenarios; serologic two‑tiered testing is the mainstay for syphilis diagnosis; and HPV testing is focused on cervical cancer screening in eligible age groups. The policy organizes coverage around these organism‑specific recommendations and documents clinical scenarios where testing meets or does not meet coverage criteria.
Definitions and Terminology
Policy Changes and Revision History
Clinical Advisory Board review approved relocation of prenatal STI screening into this policy and added new coverage subcriteria (CC2.a., 5.e., 6.a., 10.a.), plus renumbering and reorganization of multiple coverage criteria.
Off-cycle coding modification: added CPT code 87494.
Reviewed and updated policy with additions of CPT codes 0483U and 0484U and creation of new CC23 (nucleic acid testing for antimicrobial susceptibility does not meet coverage).
Off-cycle coding modification: added CPT code 87626 and removed CPT code 0500T; revised code description for CPT 87624.
Off-cycle coding modification: added CPT codes 0455U and 0463U and removed CPT code 0353U.
Removed a set of legacy CPT and HCPCS codes during the 01/01/2026 update (including 82565, 82575, 84702, 84703, 86701, 86702, 86703, 86705, 86803, 86804, 87660 and several G- and S-codes).
Removed CPT code 0354U as part of an off-cycle coding modification noted 04/01/2024.
Removed CPT code 0353U during the 05/01/2024 off-cycle coding modification.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.