Erectile Dysfunction and Peyronie's Disease
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for Aetna Policy 0007 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 0007 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines Aetna's medical necessity, diagnostic workup, and coverage stance for evaluation and treatments of erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease for Aetna members.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage Criteria and Evidence Summary
Diagnostic Workup - Medically Necessary
Diagnostic workup for erectile dysfunction is considered medically necessary when appropriate:
Biothesiometry is considered an integral part of the comprehensive history and physical examination.
Implantable Penile Prosthesis - Medically Necessary Criteria
Implantable penile prosthesis is considered medically necessary when ALL of the following are met:
Individuals with surgical, radiation, or traumatic causes do not need to document normal prolactin, thyroid, or testosterone.
Penile Re-vascularization - Medically Necessary Criteria
Penile re-vascularization is considered medically necessary only when ALL of the following are met:
Re-vascularization is considered experimental for other indications and arterial reconstructive or venous procedures for arteriosclerotic disease are not recommended.
Covered with criteria
Covered when selection criteria are met for listed diagnostic tests, penile prosthesis procedures, and related services
Providers must document medical necessity and required diagnostic/laboratory results when billing covered codes.
Experimental/Investigational/Not Covered
Not covered / considered experimental, investigational, or unproven for indications listed in the CPB
Many specific CPT/HCPCS/J-codes are enumerated as not covered for the CPB indications.
Therapy hierarchy and investigational stance
Summarized coverage-relevant clinical positions from cited guidelines and reviews:
ACP and AUA guidance support PDE-5 inhibitors as initial therapy.
AUA guidance and policy statements referenced.
Guideline conclusions and trial data inform investigational stance.
Evidence summaries informing coverage stance
Summaries of efficacy findings that determine clinical support:
Multiple RCTs report non-significant differences (see verapamil trials).
Limited clinical data exist for curvature benefit.
Placebo-controlled RCT found no curvature benefit and possible worsening.
No quality evidence of efficacy for ED.
Preliminary safety and efficacy signals need confirmatory trials.
Limited non-randomized data only.
Authors recommend restricting to research settings.
Evidence limited by heterogeneity and follow-up.
Systematic reviews and RCTs show mixed results and limited durability beyond 6–12 months.
LI-ESWT (evidence synthesis)
Summary of evidence-based coverage considerations for LI-ESWT:
Consider limited/experimental coverage or require prior authorization with documented failed standard therapies and outcome measures.
Radial wave therapy
Radial wave therapy:
Systematic review found no differences versus placebo and contradictory animal data.
Fractional CO2 laser (Peyronie's disease)
Fractional CO2 laser for Peyronie's disease:
Larger controlled trials are needed before routine clinical adoption.
Gene therapy and stem-cell approaches
Gene and advanced cellular therapies:
Clinical translation has not been established; further human safety and efficacy trials required.
Biomarkers (MPV, melatonin, vitamin D)
Biomarkers and predictors:
Not established for routine clinical use.
Emerging/Investigational Therapies and Diagnostic Modalities
Evidence and policy-relevant conclusions summarized from background literature in this excerpt.
Device data are preliminary; further studies may clarify indications.
Recommend further standardized clinical trials and research participation.
Further validation studies needed.
Further human trials required for safety, efficacy, and standardization.
Additional large studies required.
Considered promising but not definitively proven.
Aetna identifies numerous diagnostic tests and adjunctive therapies for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease as experimental, investigational, or unproven. Examples include genetic polymorphism testing (e.g., eNOS, ACE), cavernosal nerve mapping/electrical stimulation, corpora cavernosal electromyography, dorsal nerve conduction studies, penile plethysmography, shear wave elastography, measurement of serum melatonin or vitamin D for ED, and various serum biomarker panels — all of which lack established clinical utility and are not supported as standard diagnostic procedures.
Routine nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) and simple gauge tests are rarely necessary; NPT is considered medically necessary only when history and physical cannot distinguish psychogenic from organic impotence and when simpler tests are inconclusive. The policy lists these diagnostic and investigational modalities to clarify that they are not routine components of the medically necessary ED workup.
The policy enumerates specific CPT, HCPCS, and J-codes that are either covered when selection criteria are met or listed as not covered for the CPB indications. Examples of codes not covered include 0038U (vitamin D LC‑MS/MS microsample), 0101T (high-energy extracorporeal shock wave), 0232T (platelet-rich plasma injections), 11900–11901 (intralesional injections by lesion count), 37790 (penile venous occlusive procedure), and HCPCS E0201 (manual penile contracture device >3 lbs traction).
Covered procedure groups include diagnostic duplex scanning codes (e.g., 93975–93981) and penile prosthesis CPT ranges (54400–54417) and HCPCS prosthesis codes (e.g., C1813, C2622) when the policy's selection criteria and documentation requirements are met.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for ED and Peyronie’s disease are considered experimental. Available human and preclinical studies are small, heterogeneous, often uncontrolled, and lack standardized protocols and adequate follow-up; therefore PRP is not supported as a routine covered therapy outside of clinical trials.
As a result, CPT 0232T (injection(s), PRP) and similar billing for PRP-based treatments may be excluded for the indications described in this CPB.
The policy lists multiple treatments lacking Level 1 or Level 2 supportive evidence or cleared indications and classifies them as not medically necessary or investigational. Examples include transdermal/iontophoresis verapamil for Peyronie’s disease (randomized trials showing non-significant curvature improvement), extracorporeal shock wave therapy for PD (RCT showing pain reduction but no curvature or plaque benefit and potential worsening of deviation), and acoustical wave therapies cleared only as soft-tissue massage devices without ED efficacy data.
The document emphasizes that interventions with mixed or negative RCT results, inconsistent outcomes across trials, or insufficient randomized evidence should not be considered proven therapies for routine coverage.
Radial pressure wave therapy is not supported by quality human evidence. Systematic review findings indicate no meaningful differences between radial wave therapy and placebo on mean IIEF score, EHS, or penile Doppler parameters, and preclinical results are contradictory. Therefore radial pressure wave therapy is considered unsupported and may be classified as experimental or not covered for ED.
RestoreX is an FDA‑cleared, reusable penile traction device indicated for Peyronie’s disease deformity and length loss. Clinical trial protocols and manufacturer guidance describe typical use of two 30‑minute sessions per day (totaling 30–90 minutes/day) with minimum treatment durations commonly reported at 12 weeks and some studies extending to 24 weeks. The manufacturer notes no evidence to recommend RestoreX for congenital penile curvature.
Stem cell therapy (SCT) for erectile dysfunction remains investigational. Most evidence comprises preclinical rodent studies and a very small number of human phase I/II trials (totaling limited patient counts), which report preliminary safety signals and some functional improvements but are constrained by small cohorts, short follow-up, and few controlled trials. Routine coverage is not supported pending larger, standardized trials addressing safety, efficacy, and reproducibility.
A randomized, double‑blind trial of oral tacrolimus after nerve‑sparing radical prostatectomy failed to demonstrate a statistically significant benefit in erectile function recovery versus placebo. Tacrolimus did not improve IIEF‑EFD outcomes or rates of return to spontaneous erectile function in the reported trial and therefore is not supported as an effective therapy for this indication based on current evidence.
Clinical Policy Bulletins (CPBs) are administrative guidance to assist in applying plan benefits and do not constitute a contract or guarantee of coverage. Specific coverage decisions, prior authorization requirements, and exclusions depend on the member’s benefit plan and program provisions; providers should follow plan-specific rules and document required clinical information when requesting authorization.
Routine nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) testing and simple gauge methods are rarely medically necessary. NPT testing (postage stamp or snap gauge) is only considered when history and physical exam cannot reliably distinguish psychogenic from organic erectile dysfunction and when simpler assessments are inconclusive; RigiScan is reserved for cases where NPT testing is indicated and less‑complex tests produce equivocal results.
The policy references ICD‑10 codes used for Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction and identifies certain diagnoses not covered for the listed indications. Examples include N48.6 (Peyronie’s disease) and the N52.* series for organic male erectile dysfunction as codes that may be covered when selection criteria are met, whereas diabetes mellitus codes (E08.69–E13.69) and several psychosexual disorder codes (F52.*) are listed among codes not covered for the CPB indications.
Transdermal verapamil delivered via electromotive drug administration or iontophoresis has not demonstrated consistent, significant reductions in penile curvature versus placebo in clinical trials. Randomized and small uncontrolled studies report limited or non‑significant curvature improvement, with some benefit noted for pain in uncontrolled series; overall evidence does not support verapamil transdermal therapy as an effective curvature‑reducing treatment.
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT/LI‑ESWT) for Peyronie’s disease is not recommended for reducing curvature or plaque size. A randomized trial (n=102) showed pain improvement in a subgroup but no benefit for deviation or plaque size and some instances of worsened deviation; guideline summaries and systematic reviews report mixed or insufficient evidence to support ESWT for deformity correction.
Interventions that lack standardized clinical translation or reproducible RCT evidence are considered investigational or not medically necessary. This includes heterogeneous LI‑ESWT protocols without consistent durable benefit, radial wave therapy with no quality human evidence, fractional CO2 laser for Peyronie’s disease (pilot data only), and gene therapies that remain at preclinical or early‑phase stages.
PRP, stem cell injections, and exosome therapies share common evidence limitations: small, heterogeneous studies, short follow‑up, lack of standardized preparations or dosing, and few controlled trials. While preclinical data and early human reports suggest possible biologic effects and safety signals, these modalities remain investigational and are not supported for routine coverage outside of well‑designed clinical trials.
Several emerging therapies are supported only by preclinical or small early‑phase human data. Examples include stem cell‑derived exosomes (animal meta‑analyses showing improvements in ICP/MAP and microstructure), intracavernous stem cell injections (limited human phase I/II trials), and gene therapy approaches — all of which require further clinical investigation before consideration as standard care.
Coding and Billing Guidance
| 37788 | Penile revascularization, artery, with or without vein graft. |
| 54230 | Injection procedure for corpora cavernosography. |
| 54231 | Dynamic cavernosometry, including intracavernosal injection of vasoactive drugs (e.g., papaverine, phentolamine). |
| 54235 | Injection of corpora cavernosa with pharmacologic agent(s) (e.g., papaverine, phentolamine). |
| 54360 | Plastic operation on penis to correct angulation. |
| 54400-54417 | Penile prosthesis procedures. |
| 74445 | Corpora cavernosography, radiological supervision and interpretation. |
| 78012 | Thyroid uptake, single or multiple quantitative measurement(s). |
| 0038U | Vitamin D, 25 hydroxy D2 and D3, by LC-MS/MS, serum microsample, quantitative. |
| 0101T | Extracorporeal shock wave involving musculoskeletal system, not otherwise specified, high energy. |
| 0232T | Injection(s), platelet rich plasma, any site, including image guidance, harvesting and preparation when performed. |
| 11900-11901 | Injection, intralesional; up to and including 7 lesions / more than 7 lesions. |
| 37790 | Penile venous occlusive procedure. |
| 38240-38242 | Hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation codes (allogeneic/autologous). |
| 51792 | Stimulus evoked response (e.g., measurement of bulbocavernosus reflex latency time). |
| 54110-54112 | Excision of penile plaque (Peyronie disease). |
| C1813 | Prosthesis, penile, inflatable. |
| C2622 | Prosthesis, penile, non-inflatable. |
| J0270 | Injection, alprostadil, 1.25 mcg. |
| J0275 | Alprostadil urethral suppository. |
| J0775 | Injection, collagenase, clostridium histolyticum, 0.01 mg. |
| L7900 | Male vacuum erection system. |
| L7902 | Tension ring, for vacuum erection device, replacement only. |
| N48.6 | Induration of penis plastica [Peyronie's disease]. |
| N52.01-N52.1 | Male erectile dysfunction [impotence of organic origin]. |
| F52.0-F52.4 | Sexual dysfunction and related psychosexual disorders. |
| E08.69-E13.69 | Diabetes mellitus codes listed as not covered for indications in CPB. |
Provider Requirements, Prior Authorization, and Documentation
Prior authorization for surgical interventions
Prior authorization is implied for implantable penile prostheses and penile re-vascularization because specific medical necessity criteria and documentation must be met before these surgical interventions are covered.
Prior authorization for prosthesis and surgical procedures
Certain penile prosthesis procedures and related prosthesis HCPCS codes are covered only when the policy's selection criteria are met; prior authorization may be required when billing CPT 54400–54417 or HCPCS C1813/C2622.
- Document that all medical criteria for implantation are satisfied (see policy selection criteria).
Prior authorization for surgical/device therapies
Surgical interventions and device implants (for example inflatable penile prosthesis or penile revascularization) typically require documentation of prior treatment attempts and indications consistent with guideline recommendations when requesting authorization.
- Include evidence of nonsurgical therapy failure or contraindication.
- Provide relevant guideline-based indications and counseling documentation.
Endovascular therapy — prior authorization considerations
Endovascular therapies for vasculogenic ED have limited, heterogeneous evidence; prior authorization should require documentation of a focal vascular lesion, prior conservative therapy failure, and discussion of limited long-term data.
- Document diagnostic imaging confirming focal arterial lesion or venous pathology.
- Provide record of prior medical management and counseling regarding limited durability.
Prior authorization for LI-ESWT
Prior authorization may be required for low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LI-ESWT); when requested include the indication (e.g., vasculogenic ED, post-prostatectomy, diabetic ED), prior treatments tried, and objective outcome measures (IIEF, EHS) documented before and after therapy.
- Specify LI-ESWT protocol used and prior response to PDE5 inhibitors or other therapies.
PTT (RestoreX) authorization note
RestoreX is FDA-cleared and trial evidence describes typical home use (30–90 minutes/day), but the policy text does not define payer prior authorization requirements for this device; include device usage instruction and documented patient use if submitting for review.
- Document patient instruction and recorded daily use (minutes/day) and treatment duration in the medical record.
Prior authorization for stem cell or experimental biologic treatments
Prior authorization requests for stem cell therapy or other novel biologic injections should include clinical trial phase, safety data, validated outcome measures (IIEF/EHS), and supporting human evidence because current data are limited.
- Provide trial phase, sample size, follow-up duration, and safety outcomes.
- Document prior conventional therapy failure and inclusion criteria if part of a trial.
Follow plan-specific prior authorization
Follow the member's plan-specific prior authorization rules and program provisions; Clinical Policy Bulletins do not replace plan requirements and prior authorization may be required per plan rules.
- Verify member benefits and obtain any plan-required authorizations before scheduling procedures.
Step requirement before implantable devices
Penile prosthesis implantation is covered only after nonsurgical methods have proven ineffective or are contraindicated; failure to document prior therapy attempts may lead to noncoverage.
- Document trials of PDE5 inhibitors, vacuum devices, injections, or contraindications to these therapies.
First-line PDE-5 inhibitor therapy
Guideline-supported first-line therapy for ED is initiation of an oral PDE-5 inhibitor when not contraindicated; document use and response to PDE-5 inhibitors when relevant to authorization of advanced therapies.
- Record which PDE-5 inhibitor was used, dose, duration, and clinical response.
Step: start with PDE-5 inhibitors
When escalating therapy, start with a PDE-5 inhibitor in men without contraindications; authorization for invasive or device therapies should reflect documented trial and response to PDE-5 inhibitors.
- Include documentation of contraindications if PDE-5 inhibitors were not used.
Step considerations around bariatric surgery
When bariatric surgery is reported as a management option for ED, ensure prior optimization of medical management of ED and document obesity-related comorbidities and prior ED therapy attempts.
- Provide records of medical optimization and objective ED assessments pre- and post-intervention when available.
Adjunct use after PDE5i
For post-prostatectomy ED, LI-ESWT is often studied as an adjunct to PDE-5 inhibitors; consider documenting a trial of PDE5i and response status prior to authorization of LI-ESWT.
- Document timing of LI-ESWT relative to surgery and prior PDE5i therapy details.
No explicit step therapy sequences given
The policy excerpt provides no explicit step therapy sequences for devices or biologics; when seeking authorization, include documented prior treatments and clinical rationale even though no formal sequence is defined here.
Surgical approach guided by SUI severity
For synchronous surgical management of ED with stress urinary incontinence, surgical severity (e.g., severe SUI >4 pads/day) should guide choice of combined procedures; document SUI severity and rationale for combined approach.
- Record pad counts/day, urodynamic findings if available, and surgical plan justification.
Required diagnostic documentation
Providers must document a comprehensive history and physical, specified laboratory testing (including serum testosterone, prolactin, and thyroid studies when indicated), and appropriate diagnostic studies (e.g., duplexscan with intracorporeal papaverine) to support medical necessity.
- Include biothesiometry as part of the exam when performed.
- Provide results of duplex Doppler, cavernosometry/cavernosography when relevant.
Document selection criteria for covered codes
When billing CPT and HCPCS codes listed as 'covered if selection criteria are met' (for example CPT 54400–54417 or HCPCS C1813/C2622), document the medical necessity and the specific selection criteria used to justify coverage.
- Attach the policy selection criteria text or cite the clinical findings that meet each required element.
Testing and counseling documentation
Document morning serum total testosterone levels for men diagnosed with ED when indicated, and counsel patients about FDA‑approved PDE5 inhibitors and other options per AUA guidance; include counseling notes in the record.
- Record testosterone level values, date/time (morning sample), and any subsequent endocrine evaluation.
Documentation for investigational biologic therapy
For investigational biologic treatments (e.g., adipose-derived regenerative cells), document trial phase, inclusion/exclusion criteria, prior conventional therapy failure, and safety monitoring results when submitting for review.
- Include study identifiers (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov number) if treatment is part of a clinical trial.
Documentation for investigational therapies
For investigational therapies such as fractional CO2 laser for Peyronie's disease, document the device used, treatment protocol (number and timing of sessions), concomitant topical/adjunct treatments, baseline and follow-up curvature measurements, validated questionnaires (IIEF, PDQ), and adverse events.
- Provide objective curvature measurements and dates of each treatment session.
PTT (RestoreX) usage documentation
Manufacturer and trial guidance report typical RestoreX use of about 30–90 minutes/day (commonly two 30‑minute sessions) with minimum 12 weeks and up to 24 weeks in some studies; document patient instruction and device usage time in records.
- Record daily minutes of device use and total weeks of therapy in the chart.
Required evidence details for experimental therapies
When submitting experimental therapies for review, include trial phase, sample size, follow-up duration, safety outcomes, and objective erectile function measures (e.g., IIEF, EHS) because the cited literature emphasizes limited cohorts and heterogeneous endpoints.
- Provide published study references and any available comparative data.
Documentation and plan provisions
Clinical Policy Bulletins are partial descriptions of plan benefits and not contracts; participating providers remain responsible for following plan-specific program provisions and disclosures when seeking authorization or billing.
- Confirm member eligibility and any plan-specific prior authorization or coverage limitations before treatment.
Penile prosthesis prerequisites (denial risk)
Failure to document that nonsurgical methods were ineffective or contraindicated, or failure to provide required lab documentation (normal prolactin, thyroid, and testosterone when indicated) may lead to denial of coverage for penile prosthesis implantation.
- Ensure labs and prior therapy attempts are in the medical record prior to submission for authorization.
Billing non-covered codes may be denied
Use of CPT/HCPCS codes listed as 'not covered for indications listed in the CPB' (for example 0038U, 0101T, 0232T, 11900–11901, 37790, or HCPCS E0201) may trigger claim denial when billed for the policy's stated indications.
- Avoid billing these codes for indications listed in the CPB unless plan exceptions or prior approvals are documented.
Investigational therapy denial risk
Therapies described as investigational or experimental such as platelet-rich plasma, intracavernosal stem cell injections, or some ESWT applications may be denied if billed as medically necessary without robust supporting evidence.
- If provided in research context, include trial documentation; otherwise expect coverage denial risk.
Risk for denial when using treatments lacking Level 1/2 support
Use of treatments with mixed or negative Level 1/2 evidence (e.g., iontophoresis/transdermal verapamil, certain oral therapies, ESWT for Peyronie's, intralesional verapamil/nicardipine) may be unsupported and could risk denial if billed as proven treatments.
- Document trial results and rationale when considering these therapies; preferentially enroll patients in trials.
Radial wave therapy unsupported — denial risk
Radial pressure wave therapy has no quality human evidence demonstrating benefit for ED; claims for this treatment may be denied or considered experimental based on lack of supporting data.
- Do not bill radial wave therapy for ED as standard care for indications listed in the CPB.
AUA states penile traction is promising
The AUA states penile traction is promising but evidence is insufficient for a formal recommendation; until larger rigorous trials are available, use may be considered unproven and could be subject to investigational coverage decisions.
- Document clinical rationale and device usage if seeking coverage consideration.
Investigational therapies may be denied
Treatments described as investigational or lacking robust human evidence (for example stem cell therapy for ED) may trigger coverage denial or require further evidence before authorization.
- Submit comprehensive human trial data, safety outcomes, and objective measures when requesting review.
Policy administrative note
Clinical Policy Bulletins do not constitute coverage guarantees; providers must follow plan-specific provisions and authorizations to avoid denials related to nonconformance with plan rules.
- Confirm benefit limitations and obtain required prior authorizations per the member's plan.
Background and Rationale
Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie’s disease (PD) require a structured diagnostic evaluation including history, physical examination, and targeted testing. Oral phosphodiesterase‑5 inhibitors are first‑line therapy when not contraindicated. Mechanical and surgical options — such as penile traction devices (RestoreX) and implantable penile prostheses — are described as promising or indicated in select situations, but many novel regenerative and device therapies (LI‑ESWT, PRP, stem cell therapies) remain investigational pending higher‑quality and longer‑term evidence.
The policy notes that penile arterial reconstruction may be considered in select young men with focal traumatic arterial lesions, whereas venous surgery is not recommended. It further highlights that mechanical traction (RestoreX) is FDA‑cleared for PD with trial evidence of benefit but that AUA guidance regards mechanical therapies as promising yet unsupported for a formal recommendation until larger rigorous trials are available.
Definitions and Terms
Policy Revision History
Policy originally became effective.
Policy underwent most recent clinical and administrative review.
Next scheduled policy review date.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.