Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Kansas for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Kansas only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Kansas (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Rita Tablante (NPI 1245340827)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Rita Tablante
Address	619 Sw Corporate View
City	Topeka
State	KS
ZIP	66615
Taxonomy	Ophthalmology Physician
NPI Enumerated	August 30, 2006

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$1.2M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider’s billed activity is concentrated in Medicare with total Medicare revenue of $1.2M and Medicaid revenue of none; the practice is effectively single-payer Medicare in the available data. The NPI was enumerated 2006-08-30 (~20 years ago), indicating long tenure that aligns with a stable, clinic-based practice rather than a recent entrant.

Revenue concentration is extremely high in anti-VEGF and similar intravitreal drug codes: the precomputed top-3 Medicare codes account for 76.1% of the provider’s Medicare revenue, led by J0178 ($403.2K, 32.7%), J2778 ($352.9K, 28.6%), and J2777 ($182.7K, 14.8%). This concentration means the practice’s financial performance is tightly linked to drug administration and drug-specific reimbursement levels rather than a broad mix of office visits or surgeries.

The code mix (high revenue from J0178, J2778, J2777 combined with substantial volumes of 92014, 92012, and retinal imaging codes) describes an ophthalmology practice organized around intravitreal injection services and longitudinal retina care. High-volume visit and imaging codes such as 92014 ($97.2K) and 92134 ($44.9K) support an ongoing, visit-driven model where injections are paired with diagnostic imaging and established-patient management.

Competitive standing on drug administration is mixed: J2778 ranks #219 of 1208 providers nationally (82th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code), indicating relatively strong national placement for ranibizumab usage, while J0178 ranks #1788 of 3204 (44th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code) and J2777 ranks #1358 of 2039 (33th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code), reflecting more modest or average participation on those agents. In short, the provider shows above-average national placement for one branded biologic but otherwise typical volumes for other injectables.

Several non-drug clinical services are statistical outliers on the high side, signaling a high-throughput clinic platform: 92014 ranks #979 of 35415 providers nationally (97th percentile; notably above typical national volume for this code), 92134 ranks #1364 of 26868 (95th percentile; notably above typical national volume for this code), 92012 ranks #880 of 17177 (95th percentile; notably above typical national volume for this code), and 92083 ranks #864 of 25484 (97th percentile; notably above typical national volume for this code). These elevated ranks for established-patient exams and advanced retinal imaging are consistent with routine follow-up and monitoring associated with chronic retinal disease management.

Procedural billing beyond drug administration is present but not dominant: 67028 (intravitreal injection procedure) shows 825 claims, $76 avg paid/claim, $62.7K revenue and ranks #1623 of 4255 providers nationally (62th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code), indicating the practice performs many injections but that the procedural component is not unusually concentrated compared with peers. Ancillary diagnostics like 92133 and 92250 appear at lower revenue levels, reinforcing that high-cost drug codes drive the financial profile.

The absence of any Medicaid billing on file (none below) means the provider’s commercial/payer negotiation leverage, patient mix, and referral patterns should be interpreted through a Medicare-centric lens; any risk, access, or revenue diversification tied to Medicaid participation is not evident in the claims data. For payers or networks evaluating capacity for Medicaid populations, this record suggests limited or no historical Medicaid engagement to use as a basis for contracting assumptions.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

16 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
J0178	Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg	590	$680	$403.2K
J2778	Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg	1,990	$180	$352.9K
J2777	Injection, faricimab‑svoa, 0.1 mg	6,300	$30	$182.7K
92014	An ophthalmologist sees an established patient for a comprehensive level eye examination. Generally, a patient is considered to be "established" if the same physician, or any physician in the group…	1,250	$80	$97.2K
67028	The provider injects a medication into the vitreous chamber of the eye as an isolated procedure or a separate procedure unrelated to any other procedure being performed on the eye.	830	$80	$62.7K
92134	The provider performs computerized diagnostic imaging of the retina in the posterior segment (back part) of the eye, interprets the data, and provides a report. The service may be on one or both eyes.	1,660	$30	$44.9K
92012	For this CPT code, an Ophthalmologist sees an established patient for an intermediate level eye examination. Generally, a patient is considered to be "established" if the same physician, or any…	750	$60	$41.7K
92083	The provider may use one or more methods to determine the extent of a patient's visual field of one or both eyes; he interprets the results and prepares a report. Report this code for an extended…	450	$40	$18.2K
92004	The provider performs a comprehensive level ophthalmological evaluation of a new patient and initiates a diagnostic and treatment program for one or more visits.	90	$90	$8.2K
92250	Code 92250 describes the taking of fundus photographs, that is, photographs of the posterior segment of the inner aspect of the eye, to document alterations in the optic nerve head, retinal vessels,…	240	$20	$5.6K

Showing 1–10 of 16

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 16 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Kansas Distribution

Rita Tablante — 3 of 16 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Kansas

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

16 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
J0178	25	30	1,770	$690	$1.3M
J2777	22	30	12,060	$30	$575.7K
J2778	5	20	860	$180	$297.6K
67028	21	40	1,170	$90	$111.4K
66821	91	110	60	$210	$24.8K
92014	1	530	180	$70	$18.5K
92235	15	30	60	$90	$12.3K
92012	7	240	70	$60	$8.6K
83861	6	20	60	$20	$6.5K
92134	22	410	50	$30	$6K

Showing 1–10 of 16

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Rita Tablante, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
David Dyer	KS	Ophthalmology Physician	$7.5M	$0
Bassam Mattar	KS	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$7.2M	$0
Pavan Reddy	KS	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$6.7M	$0
Jeremy Deutsch	KS	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$5.7M	$0
Thomas Finley	OK	Ophthalmology Physician	$4.8M	$0
Daniel Feiler	KS	Ophthalmology Physician	$4.8M	$0
Travis Koeneke	KS	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$4.4M	$0
Christopher Dakhil	KS	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$4.4M	$0
Stephen Wiles	MO	Ophthalmology Physician	$4.4M	$0
Shaker Dakhil	KS	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$4.4M	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Rita Tablante, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Washburn Surgery Center, LLC	KS	Ambulatory Surgical Clinic/Center	$1.1M	$0
Apria Healthcare LLC	KS	Durable Medical Equipment & Medical Supplies	$0	$711.1K
Trent Vande Garde	KS	Ophthalmology Physician	$606.4K	$0
Craig Vosburgh	KS	Orthopaedic Surgery Physician	$260.1K	$0
Tallgrass Surgical Center, LLC	KS	Ambulatory Surgical Clinic/Center	$251.9K	$0
Timothy Willingham	KS	Orthopedic Physical Therapist	$177.2K	$0
Betsy Johns	KS	Family Medicine Physician	$154.5K	$0
Gary Mcknight	KS	Audiologist	$148.3K	$0
Thomas Doyle	KS	Cardiovascular Disease Physician	$103.2K	$0
Benedict Figuerres	KS	Orthopaedic Surgery Physician	$103.2K	$0

Rita Tablante — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Rita Tablante — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Rita Tablante — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Rita Tablante — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References