Positron Emission Tomography (PET) - Non-Oncologic Applications
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for univerahealthcare Policy 6.01.07 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 6.01.07 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines medical appropriateness criteria for PET/CT and cardiac PET perfusion imaging for non-oncologic indications (abdominal, retroperitoneal, splenic, lymphoproliferative, cardiac) affecting providers requesting or performing these studies for Univera Healthcare members.
Added new criteria for AQMBF with PET and Stress Testing with Imaging including PET MPI.
Abdominal imaging: Medically appropriate criteria was added for PET/CT for sclerosing mesenteritis, incidental non-diagnostic splenic findings, and retroperitoneal fibrosis.
Chest imaging: Added indications for PET/CT for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and incidental pulmonary nodule detected by CT.
Removed all head imaging criteria and moved it to the new PET Head Imaging Policy #6.01.47.
Spine imaging: New medically appropriate statement for spinal infections.
PVD imaging: Medically necessary statement added for PET/CT for initial staging in place of MRA or CTA of multiple areas when diffuse large vessel involvement.
Removed not medically necessary statement for inflammation of cranial arteries and added new medically necessary statement for PET when MRA or ultrasound are equivocal.
Off cycle review removed cardiac PET criteria regarding body mass, breast size or implants and exercise requirements; replaced with new criteria.
Removed E/I (experimental/investigational) designation from radiotracers that are FDA approved.
Coverage Criteria — Non‑Oncologic PET/CT and Cardiac PET
Lymphoproliferative disorders
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging is medically appropriate for lymphoproliferative disorders for ANY of the following indications:
Each listed condition is sufficient (ANY).
Each listed condition is sufficient (ANY).
Each listed condition is sufficient (ANY).
Sclerosing mesenteritis or mesenteric panniculitis
PET/CT imaging is medically appropriate when ALL of the following are met:
All conditions must be met for appropriateness.
All conditions must be met for appropriateness.
All conditions must be met for appropriateness.
Incidental non-diagnostic splenic findings on CT or MRI
PET/CT imaging is medically appropriate for either of the following indication branches:
One branch allowing PET when instability on prior imaging is present.
All sub-conditions must be met when no known malignancy.
Retroperitoneal fibrosis
PET/CT imaging is medically appropriate when either of the following indications are met:
Either branch is sufficient.
Either branch is sufficient.
Cardiac PET perfusion imaging
Cardiac PET perfusion imaging is considered medically appropriate for EITHER of the following indications:
Either condition qualifies.
Either condition qualifies.
Cardiac PET perfusion — Either/Or indications
Cardiac PET perfusion imaging is considered medically appropriate for EITHER of the following:
See policy statement.
See policy statement.
Myocardial viability
Cardiac PET or PET-metabolic or perfusion is considered medically appropriate for ANY of the following:
Any listed criterion is sufficient.
Cardiac sarcoidosis indications and monitoring
Suspected cardiac sarcoidosis — any of the following scenarios:
See cardiac sarcoidosis indications.
See cardiac sarcoidosis indications.
See cardiac sarcoidosis indications.
See cardiac sarcoidosis indications.
See cardiac sarcoidosis monitoring.
Repeat interval for monitoring per policy.
Approved radiotracers for cardiac indications
Accepted radiotracers for the above cardiac PET indications:
See radiotracer list.
See radiotracer list.
See radiotracer list.
FDG PET/CT for suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis
FDG PET/CT for suspected prosthetic heart valve endocarditis is considered medically appropriate when ALL of the following are met:
Echocardiography must be nondiagnostic.
Laboratory threshold required.
Absence of prolonged antibiotics must be documented.
Post-implantation interval required.
Absence of surgical adhesives required.
Absolute Quantitation Of Myocardial Blood Flow (AQMBF)
AQMBF with PET perfusion
AQMBF must be performed in conjunction with cardiac PET perfusion.
Stress Testing with Imaging (PET MPI)
Stress testing with imaging (including PET MPI) is considered medically necessary in ANY of the following clinical settings:
Any listed clinical setting suffices.
ETT Inadequacy / ECG Uninterpretable
Reasons ETT may be inadequate or ECG uninterpretable
Bifascicular block involving right bundle branch and left anterior hemiblock does not render ECG uninterpretable.
ETT Uninterpretable ECG Exclusions
ETT is considered not to meet medically necessary components when ANY of the following ECG findings/history are present (making exercise ECG uninterpretable for ischemia):
Any listed finding renders ETT ECG uninterpretable for ischemia.
Inconclusive ETT Criteria
An ETT is considered inconclusive when ANY of the following occur:
Either condition makes ETT inconclusive.
Abnormal ETT Findings
Abnormal ETT results that may prompt alternative imaging include ANY of the following:
Any listed abnormal ETT result may prompt alternative imaging.
Physical limitations preventing ETT
Inability to perform adequate exercise testing (ETT) due to physical limitations:
Any listed limitation may render ETT inadequate.
AQMBF for non-obstructive CAD with persistent symptoms
Stress imaging with AQMBF is indicated for individuals with suspected or known non-obstructive CAD (MINOCA, INOCA, ANOCA) to evaluate persistent symptoms when ANY of the following apply:
Any listed condition supports AQMBF for persistent symptoms.
PET for heart failure / LV dysfunction / viability assessment
PET to evaluate heart failure or left ventricular systolic dysfunction is indicated when ANY of the following are documented:
Any listed condition suffices for consideration of PET.
Arrhythmia and antiarrhythmic therapy assessment
PET is indicated for evaluation related to arrhythmia or suspected ischemic arrhythmogenic etiologies when ANY of the following are present:
Any listed indication supports PET evaluation.
Functional assessment for moderate coronary stenosis
To evaluate the functional significance of moderate coronary stenosis (when documentation exists):
Documentation of stenosis required.
Cardiac indications - evaluation for coronary artery disease
Cardiac PET/CT covered when criteria are met:
See individual criteria nodes for details.
Documentation required.
See policy for surveillance intervals and specifics.
Sarcoidosis indications
Chest PET/CT covered when criteria are met:
Also when no apparent lung involvement to identify extrapulmonary biopsy site.
Either listed purpose supports PET/CT use.
Enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes
Mediastinal lymphadenopathy
Size threshold required for PET consideration.
Pulmonary nodule PET/CT
Incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT
Ground-glass opacities are not an indicated population for PET/CT.
Suspected bone infection (FDG PET/CT)
Musculoskeletal PET/CT covered when criteria are met:
FDG PET/CT is medically appropriate when prior imaging is equivocal or not feasible.
FDG is the only indicated radiotracer for musculoskeletal PET/CT.
FDG PET/CT for suspected bone infection
FDG PET/CT for suspected bone infection is covered when ALL of the following are met:
Required prerequisite imaging condition.
Any one of these indications must be present.
PET/CT for peripheral vascular/aortic infection
PET/CT for peripheral vascular/aortic infection is covered when ALL of the following are met:
Clinical concern for aortic/graft infection required.
Prior vascular imaging must be nondiagnostic or unavailable.
Alternative nuclear studies should be unavailable or not feasible.
Policy allows PET/CT as initial staging alternative in specified vascular disease contexts.
FDG-PET/CT whole body for suspected spinal infection
FDG-PET/CT whole body for suspected spinal infection is covered when ALL of the following are met:
Prerequisite imaging condition.
At least one clinical risk factor or sign is required.
PET for initial staging of vascular disease
Single top-level indication for vascular staging.
Temporal artery / GCA
Temporal artery / GCA
Where results would change clinical management.
PET considered when management decisions depend on imaging.
Spinal infection indications
FDG-PET/CT whole body is medically appropriate when ALL of the following are met:
All prerequisites must be met before accepting clinical risk factors.
Any single listed clinical context meets this branch when prerequisites are present.
Musculoskeletal indications
Covered when criteria below are met:
FDG is the only indicated radiotracer for musculoskeletal PET/CT.
Cardiac AQMBF / MBFR
AQMBF (cardiac MBF quantification) coverage considerations:
Supports diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction.
Per professional society guidance.
No explicit modality or indication exclusions are listed in this portion of the policy extract; additional exclusions or clarifying statements may appear elsewhere in the full policy document. This section should not be interpreted as a comprehensive list of exclusions for all PET/CT uses.
For FDG PET/CT performed to evaluate suspected prosthetic heart valve endocarditis, documentation must show no evidence of surgical adhesives used during the valve implantation. Cases with documented adhesive use are specifically called out and may alter appropriateness determinations.
The prosthetic valve endocarditis criteria explicitly require documentation that no surgical adhesives were used at the time of valve implantation; the absence of adhesives is therefore an explicit condition for considering PET in this indication.
The policy clarifies that nonspecific ST/T wave changes are not included in the threshold for ischemic ST depression; only ST segment depression of ≥ 1.0 mm (horizontal or downsloping) meets the criterion for an abnormal exercise ECG.
Stress testing (exercise or pharmacologic) is not appropriate in settings of significant safety risk. The policy lists unstable angina or concern for acute coronary syndrome, recent elevated troponin, severe aortic valve disease (e.g., severe aortic stenosis), and uncontrolled severe hypertension as exclusions because they preclude safe stress testing and therefore exclude stress PET in those circumstances.
Incidental pulmonary nodules described as ground-glass opacity are excluded from the PET/CT indication for incidental nodules. PET/CT is considered only for solid nodules or a solid component of a sub-solid nodule measuring ≥ 8 mm.
PET imaging for pelvic evaluation of impotence/erectile dysfunction is designated investigational in this policy and therefore is not a covered indication.
The policy states that PET/CT is not medically appropriate for the evaluation of Gaucher disease; requests for PET/CT for this condition are not supported by the documented criteria.
The policy specifies that routine PET/CT for surveillance or assessment of non-neoplastic spinal disorders—such as routine assessment after fusions or unsuccessful spine surgery—is not medically appropriate. PET/CT is only indicated for suspected spinal infection when the listed imaging and clinical prerequisites are met.
The policy cautions billing practices: CPT codes 76376 and 76377 (3D rendering) should not be billed in conjunction with PET imaging and doing so may lead to denial or billing edits.
The HCPCS entry for S8085 is flagged as (E/I) (experimental/investigational) in the policy's HCPCS list. Experimental or investigational items designated in this manner may not be covered under the policy.
Coverage determinations are product-dependent. If a product does not cover a service, the policy criteria do not apply; where a product does provide coverage, the medical policy criteria described in this document apply to the benefit and should be used for prior authorization and adjudication decisions.
Covered Indications — Summary of Allowed PET Uses
Lymphoproliferative disorders — covered indication summary
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging is medically appropriate for lymphoproliferative disorders for ANY of the following indications:
Each listed condition is sufficient (ANY).
Each listed condition is sufficient (ANY).
Each listed condition is sufficient (ANY).
Sclerosing mesenteritis / mesenteric panniculitis — covered indication summary
PET/CT imaging is medically appropriate when ALL of the following are met:
All conditions must be met for appropriateness.
All conditions must be met for appropriateness.
All conditions must be met for appropriateness.
Incidental non-diagnostic splenic findings — covered indication branches
PET/CT imaging is medically appropriate for either of the following indication branches:
One branch allowing PET when instability on prior imaging is present.
All sub-conditions must be met when no known malignancy.
Retroperitoneal fibrosis — covered indication summary
PET/CT imaging is medically appropriate when either of the following indications are met:
Either branch is sufficient.
Either branch is sufficient.
Cardiac PET perfusion — covered indication summary
Cardiac PET perfusion imaging is considered medically appropriate for EITHER of the following indications:
Either condition qualifies.
Either condition qualifies.
Cardiac PET and FDG PET/CT appropriate use
Cardiac PET and FDG PET/CT appropriate use — multiple top-level nodes:
See policy statements.
See policy statements.
See cardiac sarcoidosis nodes.
All conditions must be met.
AQMBF with cardiac PET perfusion — covered when performed with PET perfusion
AQMBF with cardiac PET perfusion — covered when performed with PET perfusion:
Must be performed with PET perfusion and by accredited labs per reporting requirements.
Stress testing with imaging including PET MPI — covered settings
Stress testing with imaging including PET MPI — covered settings:
Risk factors enumerated in policy.
When ETT is inadequate, inconclusive, or abnormal — consider PET
When ETT is inadequate, inconclusive, or abnormal as specified, consider alternative stress imaging such as PET.
When any of these are present, alternative stress imaging including PET is indicated.
Stress PET with AQMBF for suspected/known non-obstructive CAD
Stress PET with AQMBF for suspected/known non-obstructive CAD with persistent symptoms:
Used to evaluate persistent symptoms with AQMBF.
PET for evaluation of heart failure, LV dysfunction, and viability
PET for evaluation of heart failure, LV dysfunction, and viability — covered when documented:
Any listed documentation supports PET for evaluation.
PET for arrhythmia evaluation and pre-/on-therapy Class IC assessment
PET for arrhythmia evaluation and CAD assessment related to Class IC antiarrhythmics — covered when any are present:
Indications listed in policy.
Sarcoidosis — biopsy guidance and treatment monitoring
Sarcoidosis — chest PET/CT guidance for biopsy and management:
Used to select alternative biopsy locations.
Either purpose supports PET/CT use.
Suspected bone infection — covered indication summary
Suspected bone infection — covered indication summary:
FDG PET/CT appropriate when prior imaging equivocal and specific indications exist.
Any one of these indications may justify FDG PET/CT when prerequisites met.
Coding — CPT, HCPCS, ICD-10 and Billing Notes
| (E/I) | Experimental/Investigational |
| (NMN) | Not medically necessary/appropriate |
| 78429 | Myocardial imaging, PET, metabolic evaluation study; with concurrently acquired CT transmission scan |
| 78430 | Myocardial imaging, PET, metabolic evaluation study; single study, at rest or stress, with concurrently acquired CT transmission scan |
| 78811 | PET imaging; limited area (e.g., chest, head/neck) |
| 78812 | PET imaging; skull base to mid-thigh whole body |
| 78813 | PET imaging; skull base to mid-thigh |
| 78814 | PET with concurrently acquired CT for attenuation correction and anatomical localization; limited area |
| 78815 | PET with concurrently acquired CT for attenuation correction and anatomical localization; skull base to mid-thigh |
| 78816 | PET with concurrently acquired CT for attenuation correction and anatomical localization; whole body |
| A9526 | Nitrogen N-13 ammonia, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 40 millicuries |
| A9552 | Fluorodeoxyglucose F-18 (FDG), diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuries |
| A9555 | Rubidium Rb-82, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 60 millicuries |
| A9586 | Florbetapir F18, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 10 millicuries |
| A9598 | PET radiopharmaceutical, diagnostic, for non-tumor identification, not otherwise classified |
| A9601 | Flortaucipir f 18 injection, diagnostic, 1 millicurie |
| A9602 | Fluorodopa f-18, diagnostic, per millicurie |
| Q9982 | Flutemetamol F18, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 5 millicuries |
| Q9983 | Florbetaben F18, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 8.1 millicuries |
| S8085 | Fluorine-18 FDG imaging using dual-head coincidence (E/I) |
| D33.0-D33.9 | Benign neoplasm of brain and other parts of central nervous system (code range) |
| D43.0-D43.9 | Neoplasm of uncertain behavior of brain and central nervous system (code range) |
| I25.10-I25.119 | Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with or without angina pectoris (code range) |
| I25.700-I25.739 | Atherosclerosis of autologous or nonautologous vein or artery coronary artery bypass graft(s) with angina pectoris (code range) |
| I25.790-I25.799 | Atherosclerosis of other coronary artery bypass graft(s) with angina pectoris (code range) |
| I25.810 | Atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft(s) without angina pectoris |
| I51.9 | Heart disease, unspecified |
| I52 | Other heart disorders in diseases classified elsewhere |
| K65.4 | Sclerosing mesenteritis |
| M86.30-M86.69 | Chronic osteomyelitis (code range) |
Provider Actions — Prior Authorization, Documentation & Billing Guidance
Prior authorization guidance
Policy establishes medical necessity criteria that payers may use for prior authorization decisions for PET non-oncologic studies; specific code-level prior authorization requirements are not listed in this portion of the document.
Repeat interval for cardiac sarcoidosis monitoring
PET (FDG metabolic with perfusion) for monitoring cardiac sarcoidosis may be repeated at intervals of 3–6 months if there is active disease or to inform therapeutic decisions.
AQMBF must accompany cardiac PET perfusion
Absolute quantitation of myocardial blood flow (AQMBF) is considered medically appropriate only when performed in conjunction with cardiac PET perfusion.
ETT findings that trigger prior authorization
Prior authorization considerations should reference specified abnormal or inconclusive ETT results such as failure to achieve 85% of maximum predicted heart rate, exercise ECG becoming uninterpretable (e.g., rate‑related LBBB), ST segment depression ≥ 1.0 mm, non‑sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia, or CAC score ≥ 100.
Prior auth for pre-Class IC antiarrhythmic assessment
PET to assess for coronary artery disease is indicated prior to initiating a Class IC antiarrhythmic (flecainide or propafenone) and annually while on the medication; prior authorization may be required per plan rules.
Prior auth for bone infection PET/CT after equivocal MRI/CT
Prior authorization is required when FDG PET/CT is ordered for suspected bone infection only after MRI or CT are equivocal or cannot be performed and one of the specified indications (e.g., multifocal infection, hardware‑associated infection) is present.
Prior authorization for vascular PET/CT indications
Prior authorization is expected when PET/CT is requested as an alternative to nondiagnostic MRA/CTA or when PET/CT is used for initial staging in place of MRA/CTA for suspected diffuse large‑vessel involvement.
Prior authorization recommended for spinal infection PET/CT
Prior authorization is recommended for whole‑body FDG‑PET/CT in suspected spinal infection; requests should document that MRI cannot be performed or is inconclusive and include listed risk factors or abnormal x‑ray/CT findings.
Prior authorization for musculoskeletal PET/CT when MRI/CT equivocal
PET/CT for select musculoskeletal indications is indicated only when MRI or CT are equivocal or cannot be performed; prior authorization is required per payer rules for these non‑oncologic musculoskeletal PET/CT studies.
Confirm authorization for listed PET codes
Coverage for the listed PET CPT and HCPCS codes may require prior authorization depending on circumstances; providers should confirm coverage/authorization requirements before performing services.
- Codes listed in policy include 78811–78816, 78429–78430 and HCPCS A9526–Q9983, S8085.
Verify Medicare and local coverage decisions
If a Medicare product covers a service and there is no national or local Medicare coverage decision for the service, medical policy criteria apply; verify Medicare/local coverage and product terms prior to authorization.
Ensure imaging will change management
Appropriateness of PET imaging often depends on whether the result will change management; obtain and document that the requested PET study will affect therapeutic or diagnostic decisions.
Use cardiac PET after equivocal SPECT MPI
Cardiac PET perfusion may be used after an equivocal SPECT myocardial perfusion (SPECT MPI) stress test as an alternative imaging modality.
ETT component failures that justify imaging
Document ECG‑interfering conditions (e.g., complete left bundle branch block or ventricular paced rhythm) that make exercise treadmill testing inadequate or uninterpretable prior to requesting PET.
Document inability to exercise before stepping to alternatives
Providers should document inability to perform exercise (for example due to gait disturbance or need for assistive device) before proceeding to pharmacologic stress testing or imaging alternatives such as PET.
Stepwise evaluation required before AQMBF PET
Before performing AQMBF PET for suspected/known non‑obstructive CAD, demonstrate a normal/equivocal ETT or diagnostic uncertainty after other testing per the stepwise evaluation rules.
Prior imaging required before bone infection PET/CT
Require prior use or consideration of MRI or CT before FDG PET/CT for suspected bone infection unless those modalities are equivocal or contraindicated.
Required documentation of prior imaging attempts
Document that nondiagnostic or unavailable MRA/CTA (and where relevant indium‑111 or gallium‑67 studies) were attempted or not feasible before approving PET/CT for vascular infection or staging in place of MRA/CTA.
Imaging pathway: prefer MRI/CT before FDG‑PET/CT
Consider MRI or CT first; FDG‑PET/CT is indicated when x‑ray or CT are abnormal and MRI cannot be performed or is inconclusive.
AQMBF accreditation and qualified personnel required
AQMBF should be performed only in accredited laboratories with board‑certified interpreting physicians experienced in AQMBF using standardized protocols; reports must include rest and stress MBF (ml/g/min) and MBFR (ratio of stress to rest) and RPP‑corrected values where applicable.
- Laboratory accreditation: IAC, ACR, or Joint Commission cardiac PET accredited.
- Interpreting physician board certification in Nuclear Cardiology, Nuclear Medicine, or Radiology with AQMBF training.
- Standardized protocols and reporting of MBF/MBFR and RPP‑corrected values.
Supporting imaging/biopsy documentation for incidental splenic findings
When PET/CT is requested for incidental splenic findings, prior imaging and documentation that MRI was inconclusive or biopsy is not feasible must be provided to support the request.
Echocardiography equivocal documentation for prosthetic valve PET
Documentation should demonstrate that transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography was equivocal or nondiagnostic and that clinical suspicion for prosthetic valve endocarditis remains high before ordering FDG PET/CT.
Document device timing and surgical adhesive absence for prosthetic valve PET
Document timing of valve or device implantation (implantation ≥ 3 months ago) and absence of surgical adhesives used during implantation when seeking FDG PET/CT for prosthetic valve endocarditis.
- Implantation date showing ≥ 3 months since procedure.
- Statement that no surgical adhesives were used during the implantation.
Document ETT inconclusive details (e.g., <85% MPHR)
When seeking PET due to an inconclusive ETT, document specific details such as failure to reach 85% of maximum predicted heart rate or exercise ECG becoming uninterpretable (e.g., development of rate‑related LBBB).
- Record achieved % of MPHR and reason ETT was inconclusive.
Required clinical documentation for stress PET
Clinical documentation supporting stress PET should include use of home oxygen for daily activity, activity‑limiting dyspnea or heart failure, and the provider’s assessment that exercise testing is unsafe or inadequate.
Coronary imaging documentation for PET functional assessment
To support PET for functional assessment of moderate coronary stenosis, provide coronary imaging showing CCTA with 50–69% stenosis (CAD‑RADS 3) or invasive angiography with intermediate lesions when invasive physiologic testing has not been performed.
Imaging pathway documentation showing prior modalities nondiagnostic/unavailable
Documentation should demonstrate that prior imaging modalities (MRI, CT, MRA, CTA) were equivocal/indeterminate or could not be performed and indicate the specific clinical indication for PET (e.g., multifocal bone infection, hardware‑associated infection, suspected aortic infection).
Clinical justification for spinal infection PET
Clinical justification for spinal infection PET must include clinical suspicion plus at least one listed risk factor or laboratory marker of infection (e.g., fever, IV drug use, recent bacterial infection, elevated WBC/ESR/CRP, positive cultures) and abnormal x‑ray or CT when MRI cannot be done or is inconclusive.
AQMBF reporting requirements (rest/stress MBF and MBFR)
AQMBF reports must include rest MBF and stress MBF in ml/g/min and myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR, ratio of stress to rest MBF); laboratories should also report RPP‑corrected resting MBF and MBFR where applicable.
Coding documentation: use policy CPT/HCPCS descriptors
Use the CPT and HCPCS code descriptors listed in the policy when submitting claims for PET procedures and radiopharmaceuticals to support billing and authorization.
Confirm member product covers the service
Confirm that the member’s product covers the requested PET service before applying medical policy criteria, as policy criteria apply only when the product covers the service.
Denial risk for unmet policy criteria
Requests that fail to meet any of the indication‑specific criteria listed in the policy (for example, none of the ANY or ALL conditions for lymphoproliferative, sclerosing mesenteritis, incidental splenic findings, or cardiac PET indications) are at risk of being found not medically appropriate and denied.
Prosthetic valve PET criteria required to avoid denial
FDG PET/CT for suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis is contingent on meeting criteria including echocardiography equivocal/nondiagnostic, CRP ≥ 40 mg/L, no evidence of prolonged antibiotic therapy, implantation ≥ 3 months ago, and no evidence of surgical adhesives used during implantation.
LVAD driveline infection unsupported—denial risk
Studies for suspected LVAD driveline infection may be denied if other studies and physical examination are inconclusive and do not support the diagnosis.
ETT‑precluding ECG findings (document to justify PET)
Uninterpretable ECG findings that preclude an adequate ETT include complete left bundle branch block, ventricular paced rhythm, pre‑excitation (e.g., WPW), ST segment depression ≥ 1.0 mm (not nonspecific ST/T changes), LVH with repolarization abnormalities, T‑wave inversion in ≥2 contiguous inferior/lateral leads, or digitalis therapy; document these when relying on ECG non‑interpretability.
Document physical limitations preventing ETT
Physical limitations that may prevent adequate ETT—such as gait disturbance, use of assistive devices, neuromuscular abnormalities, need for home oxygen, or activity‑limiting dyspnea/heart failure—should be documented to support alternative stress imaging.
Safety‑related denial risks for stress testing
Requests for stress testing may be denied for safety reasons in patients with unstable angina or concern for acute coronary syndrome, recent elevated troponin, severe aortic valve disease, or uncontrolled severe hypertension.
Pulmonary nodule size threshold—denial risk for <8 mm/ground‑glass
PET is not supported for incidental solid pulmonary nodules smaller than 8 mm or for ground‑glass opacities; requests outside the ≥ 8 mm solid nodule criterion may be denied.
Investigational indication: impotence/erectile dysfunction
PET imaging for impotence/erectile dysfunction is considered investigational and will be denied.
Not medically appropriate: Gaucher disease
PET/CT for evaluation of Gaucher disease is considered not medically appropriate and may be denied.
Routine spinal assessment excluded—denial risk
Routine PET/CT for assessment of spinal disorders, fusions, or unsuccessful spine surgery other than neoplastic disease is not medically appropriate and may be denied.
Coverage conditionality—codes may not be covered in all circumstances
Coverage for codes listed in the policy may be conditional and not covered in all circumstances; verify code‑level coverage before proceeding.
Product‑dependent coverage—verify member product
Confirm the member’s product covers the service; medical policy criteria apply only when the product covers the service and lack of coverage may lead to denial.
Definitions and Key Terms
Prior Authorization Guidance and Frequency Limits
Authorization for repeat cardiac sarcoidosis PET at 3–6 months
Repeated PET for active cardiac sarcoidosis may be authorized at 3–6 month intervals; obtain authorization consistent with this frequency limit when applicable.
AQMBF requires concurrent cardiac PET perfusion for authorization
AQMBF is medically appropriate only when performed together with cardiac PET perfusion; prior authorization should reflect that AQMBF is an add‑on to PET perfusion.
Prior auth when ETT inconclusive/abnormal—submit ETT findings
When ETT is inconclusive or shows specified abnormal results (e.g., failure to reach 85% MPHR, ST depression ≥ 1.0 mm, CAC ≥ 100), prior authorization for PET may be required and documentation of the ETT findings should be submitted.
Prior auth for PET before/while on Class IC antiarrhythmics
Obtain prior authorization for PET performed prior to initiating or annually while on Class IC antiarrhythmics per plan rules.
Prior auth: FDG PET/CT for bone infection after equivocal MRI/CT
Prior authorization is required for FDG PET/CT for suspected bone infection only after MRI or CT are equivocal or cannot be done and a qualifying indication (e.g., multifocal infection) is present.
Prior auth for PET/CT as alternative to nondiagnostic MRA/CTA
Prior authorization is expected for PET/CT when used as an alternative to nondiagnostic MRA/CTA or for initial staging in place of MRA/CTA for suspected diffuse large‑vessel involvement; document prior nondiagnostic vascular imaging.
Prior auth: whole‑body FDG‑PET/CT for suspected spinal infection
Prior authorization is required when whole‑body FDG‑PET/CT is requested for suspected spinal infection if MRI cannot be performed or is inconclusive and x‑ray/CT are abnormal; include documented risk factors or laboratory markers of infection.
Prior auth required for musculoskeletal PET/CT when MRI/CT equivocal
Prior authorization is required for PET/CT in musculoskeletal indications when MRI or CT are equivocal or unavailable; submit documentation of prior imaging and clinical indication.
Verify authorization requirements for listed PET/PET‑CT codes
Verify plan rules and authorization requirements for the PET/PET‑CT codes listed in the policy prior to performing services, as coverage and authorization requirements may vary by product.
Contrast and Radiotracer Considerations
Radiotracer operational and contrast rules
Many PET radiotracers require on‑site cyclotron production because of short half‑lives; exceptions include fluorine‑18 and rubidium‑82. Follow radiotracer operational and contrast rules when scheduling and billing studies.
Background and Scope
PET/CT may be used in several non-oncologic abdominal and cardiac contexts to assess metabolic activity when conventional imaging or biopsy is nondiagnostic or infeasible. Common non-oncologic uses include evaluation to guide biopsy in lymphoproliferative disorders, assessment of indeterminate splenic or mesenteric disease, and cardiac PET for perfusion, viability, or inflammatory conditions such as cardiac sarcoidosis.
Not Covered / Investigational Indications
The policy lists multiple not-covered or investigational uses including PET/CT for pulmonary ground-glass opacities (ground-glass nodules are excluded from the incidental pulmonary nodule indication), PET for impotence/erectile dysfunction (investigational), PET/CT for evaluation of Gaucher disease (not medically appropriate), and routine PET/CT for non-neoplastic spinal disorders or routine post‑surgical spine assessment (not medically appropriate). These scenarios may be denied if submitted for coverage.
Revision History and Policy Changes
Off-cycle review added new criteria for Absolute Quantitation Of Myocardial Blood Flow (AQMBF) with PET and for stress testing with imaging including PET MPI.
Abdominal PET/CT: added medically appropriate criteria for sclerosing mesenteritis, incidental non-diagnostic splenic findings, and retroperitoneal fibrosis.
Chest PET/CT: added indications for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and for incidental pulmonary nodule detected by CT.
Removed all head imaging criteria from this policy and moved them to PET Head Imaging Policy #6.01.47.
Spine PET/CT: added a new medically appropriate statement for FDG-PET/CT whole-body imaging for suspected spinal infections when prior imaging is equivocal or cannot be performed and listed clinical criteria are met.
Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) PET/CT: added medically necessary statement allowing PET/CT for initial staging in place of MRA or CTA of multiple areas when diffuse large-vessel involvement is suspected.
The policy's HCPCS listing includes code S8085 with an (E/I) designation indicating experimental/investigational status. Experimental codes flagged in the policy should be considered when assessing coverage and prior authorization, as such items may not be covered.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.