Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) testing and management
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for blue cross blue shield - louisiana Policy AHS - M2116 alerts
Get alerted when Policy AHS - M2116 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines coverage criteria for HIV screening, diagnostic nucleic acid testing, viral load monitoring, genotyping/phenotyping, and limitations for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana members.
Added antigen/antibody testing to CC1 and CC2 and added a new CC3 for nucleic acid testing (qualitative or quantitative) for HIV-1 and HIV-2 with a frequency limit of no more than one test every month.
Removed former CC5 which had provided coverage for baseline HIV quantification when therapy initiation was anticipated.
Added '(no more than one test every month)' to CC6 for plasma quantification of HIV-1 RNA or HIV-2 RNA.
Coverage Criteria for HIV Testing and Monitoring
HIV Screening
Covered when ALL of the following are met
See repeat frequency rule for subsequent testing.
Nucleic Acid Testing
Covered when ANY of the following indications are present
NATs may be used for early detection and to confirm reactive or indeterminate antibody/antigen results.
Genotype/Phenotype Testing
Covered when ANY of the following are present
Genotyping preferred; phenotyping used when complex resistance suspected or to supplement genotype.
Phenotype — Multidrug Resistance
Covered when ALL of the following are met
Phenotypic testing is indicated when multidrug resistance is suspected (treatment-experienced on failing regimens).
Viral Load Monitoring
Covered when ANY of the following indications are present
Assay consistency is recommended when monitoring an individual patient.
Guideline-based coverage criteria
Covered when meeting DHHS guideline-based indications
Includes monitoring after regimen change or for virologic failure.
Genotypic testing preferred; include integrase genotyping if INSTI exposure or use is suspected.
Testing may be unsuccessful at lower viral loads but should still be considered.
Delay may miss selected mutations.
Guideline-based HIV testing and monitoring recommendations
Covered when aligned with guideline-driven indications:
Supported by IDSA, DHHS, IAS, CDC.
DHHS and pediatric guidance; EACS and IAS support baseline genotype.
IDSA and IAS monitoring schedules.
IAS guidance.
IAS and IDSA recommendations.
CDC, ACOG, SMFM guidance.
BHIVA HIV-2 guidance.
Covered diagnostic and confirmatory testing
Covered diagnostic testing and confirmatory algorithms consistent with CDC/USPSTF guidance:
Refer to USPSTF and CDC for population-based screening and pregnancy screening.
Follows CDC algorithm; NATs used for early detection and confirmation.
Document test type and timing relative to exposure.
Specific assays and intended uses are listed in the policy.
Initial and follow-up HIV testing coverage
Covered when specified conditions and frequency limits are met
Added antigen/antibody testing to CC1 in recent revision.
Repeat frequency limit operationalized in revision.
New CC3 added and former CC5 removed.
Plasma quantification (CC6)
Monthly frequency limit was added in the revision history.
Routine combined use of both genotyping and phenotyping is explicitly stated in the policy as not meeting coverage criteria. The source states: 'Routine use of combined genotyping and phenotyping DOES NOT MEET COVERAGE CRITERIA,' reflecting a lack of published evidence that combined routine use is required or beneficial for diagnosis or management.
The policy excludes coverage for automated drug susceptibility phenotype prediction based solely on genotypic comparison to curated genotypic/phenotypic databases. The document language is clear: 'Drug susceptibility phenotype prediction using genotypic comparison to known genotypic/phenotypic database DOES NOT MEET COVERAGE CRITERIA.'
A cited cost-effectiveness analysis found that using point-of-care viral load quantification to guide mode of delivery for HIV-positive pregnant people without prenatal care increased costs and reduced effectiveness compared with routine cesarean delivery. The study concluded that quantifying viral load in this setting resulted in more infected neonates and higher total cost, and therefore was not cost-effective for that narrow application.
The policy notes that proviral DNA genotyping is not recommended routinely before switching to two‑drug therapy or for all virologically suppressed persons. International guidance is cited indicating proviral testing may be useful in select cases (for example, multiple prior failures or when historical results are unavailable), but results require cautious interpretation and routine use is not recommended.
The document explains that many laboratories use laboratory‑developed tests (LDTs), which are regulated under CLIA as high‑complexity tests and are not approved or cleared by the FDA. The policy notes LDTs exist and are subject to CMS/CLIA oversight; FDA clearance is not required for clinical use.
The revision history documents removal of the former CC5 language that had allowed baseline HIV quantification when therapy initiation was anticipated. The note states that the addition of CC3 resulted in removal of the prior CC5 coverage entry, so the prior baseline-quantification provision is no longer in effect.
The policy again reiterates that both routine combined genotyping and phenotyping and genotype-based phenotype prediction do not meet coverage criteria. This exclusion is stated directly in the coverage limitations and repeated as not medically necessary due to insufficient evidence of benefit.
The policy cites evidence that using point‑of‑care viral load measurement to determine delivery mode in HIV‑positive pregnant people without prenatal care led to higher costs and fewer quality‑adjusted life years versus routine cesarean delivery. Based on the modeled analysis, this specific application resulted in increased costs without clear clinical benefit.
Applicable Procedure and Billing Codes
| No codes listed |
| 86689 | Antibody; HTLV or HIV antibody, confirmatory test (eg, Western Blot) |
| 86701 | Antibody; HIV-1 |
| 86702 | Antibody; HIV-2 |
| 86703 | Antibody; HIV-1 and HIV-2, single result |
| 87389 | Infectious agent antigen detection by immunoassay technique; HIV-1 antigen(s), with HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies, single result |
| 87390 | Infectious agent antigen detection by immunoassay technique; HIV-1 |
| 87391 | Infectious agent antigen detection by immunoassay technique; HIV-2 |
| 87534 | Immunoassay [FIA], immunochemiluminometric assay [IMCA]; HIV-2 |
| 87535 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); HIV-1, amplified probe technique, includes reverse transcription when performed |
| 87536 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); HIV-1, quantification, includes reverse transcription when performed |
| 87537 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); HIV-2, direct probe technique |
| 87538 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); HIV-2, amplified probe technique, includes reverse transcription when performed |
| 87539 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); HIV-2, quantification, includes reverse transcription when performed |
| 87806 | Infectious agent antigen detection by immunoassay with direct optical observation; HIV-1 antigen(s), with HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies |
| 87900 | Infectious agent drug susceptibility phenotype prediction using regularly updated genotypic bioinformatics |
| 87901 | Infectious agent genotype analysis by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); HIV-1, reverse transcriptase and protease regions |
| 87903 | Infectious agent phenotype analysis by nucleic acid with drug resistance tissue culture analysis, HIV-1; first through 10 drugs tested |
| 87904 | Infectious agent phenotype analysis by nucleic acid with drug resistance tissue culture analysis, HIV-1; each additional drug tested |
| 87906 | Infectious agent genotype analysis by nucleic acid; HIV-1, other region (eg, integrase, fusion) |
| 0219U | Infectious agent (HIV), targeted viral next-generation sequence analysis (protease, reverse transcriptase, integrase), algorithm reported as prediction of antiviral drug susceptibility (Sentosa® SQ HIV-1 Genotyping Assay) |
| G0432 | Infectious agent antibody detection by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technique, HIV-1 and/or HIV-2, screening |
| G0433 | Infectious agent antibody detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique, HIV-1 and/or HIV-2, screening |
| G0435 | Infectious agent antibody detection by rapid antibody test, HIV-1 and/or HIV-2, screening |
| G0475 | HIV antigen/antibody, combination assay, screening |
| S3645 | HIV-1 antibody testing of oral mucosal transudate |
| 86689 | HIV antigen/antibody assay (code listed in revision history) |
| 86701 | HIV-1 antibody |
| 86702 | HIV-2 antibody |
| 86703 | HIV-1 & HIV-2 antibodies |
| 87389 | HIV-1 antigen |
| 87390 | HIV-2 antigen |
| 87391 | HIV combo antigen/antibody |
| 87534 | HIV-1 RNA detection |
| 87535 | HIV-2 RNA detection |
| 87537 | HIV quantification |
Provider Actions, Documentation, and Authorization Guidance
Resistance testing authorization and testing sequence guidance
Genotypic resistance testing is recommended at entry into care and for persons with virologic failure; phenotypic testing is recommended when complex or multidrug resistance is suspected. Prefer genotypic testing before selecting initial ART in most patients; add phenotypic testing for complex mutation patterns or when genotyping alone is insufficient. If virologic failure is confirmed, perform genotypic resistance testing preferably while the patient is on the failing regimen; proviral DNA testing may be considered when plasma RNA is undetectable.
- Genotyping is preferred for ARV‑naïve patients; include integrase region when INSTI resistance is a concern or prior CAB‑LA/INSTI exposure (DHHS).
- Phenotyping is indicated for treatment‑experienced patients with suspected multidrug resistance.
- If ART is being initiated urgently (including in pregnancy), do not delay therapy while awaiting resistance results; modify regimen when results available.
Resistance testing trigger for HIV‑2
HIV‑2: perform resistance testing at diagnosis, prior to initiating treatment, and at virologic failure when HIV‑2 viral load is ≥500 copies/mL. Note that HIV‑2 plasma RNA is often low and RNA testing may be unreliable; use DNA testing to confirm infection when indicated.
- Trigger threshold for HIV‑2 resistance testing: ≥500 copies/mL.
- Use DNA testing for HIV‑2 confirmation as RNA assays may not detect HIV‑2 reliably.
Viral load and resistance testing documentation; pregnancy delivery planning
Providers must document viral load measurements at baseline (entry into care or prior to ART when possible) and during follow‑up (e.g., 4–8 weeks after ART initiation or modification) and record clinical reasons for ordering resistance or viral quantification tests. For pregnant patients, document viral load near delivery and the rationale for delivery planning decisions.
- Measure plasma viral load before ART initiation and within 4–8 weeks after starting or changing ART; repeat at intervals per guidelines until suppression.
- Document clinical justification for resistance testing, attempts/results, and any test failures (especially when RNA 500–1,000 copies/mL where assays may fail).
- For pregnancy: document near‑delivery viral load; if >1000 copies/mL schedule prelabor cesarean at 38 0/7 weeks and document rationale per ACOG/SMFM guidance.
Documentation for positive antibody tests
If an HIV antibody/antigen screening test is reactive or positive, follow-up nucleic acid testing (NAT) is required to confirm infection. Document the type of initial test, specimen collection timing, and the follow‑up NAT performed.
- Positive antibody/antigen tests require confirmatory NAT (qualitative or quantitative) and documentation of test type and timing relative to exposure and specimen collection.
- If initial antibody tests are positive but NAT is negative, document rationale for additional testing or interpretation given window periods.
Applicable CPT/HCPCS codes — check PA rules
Applicable CPT/HCPCS codes related to HIV antibody/antigen screening, NAT (qualitative and quantitative), genotyping, and phenotyping are listed below. Procedure codes in policy are reference only; check plan‑specific prior authorization and PA rules before billing.
- Common codes: 86689, 86701, 86702, 86703, 87389–87391, 87534–87539, 87806, 87900–87906, 0219U, G0432, G0433, G0435, G0475, S3645.
- Genotype/phenotype codes: 87901 (genotype RT/protease), 87903–87904 (phenotype), 87906 (other region), 0219U (targeted NGS genotyping).
- Check payer prior authorization rules for which codes require PA and for any coding/billing guidance.
Prior authorization status
Prior authorization requirements are not explicitly stated in this section. Providers must consult plan‑specific coverage rules and prior authorization (PA) procedures for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana to confirm whether testing or specific procedure codes require PA.
- Refer to member benefit documents and the plan's PA lookup tools for authorization requirements.
- When in doubt, submit preauthorization with clinical documentation (viral loads, prior treatments, pregnancy status, rationale for resistance testing).
Frequency limits
Frequency limits apply: antigen/antibody screening is covered no more than once every 90 days for repeat screening; nucleic acid testing (qualitative or quantitative) and plasma HIV RNA quantification are covered no more than once monthly unless clinically justified. Requests exceeding these limits may be denied.
- Repeat antigen/antibody screening: ≤1 test every 90 days for individuals 11–65 years.
- Nucleic acid testing/plasma quantification: ≤1 test per month unless clinical circumstances justify more frequent monitoring (document rationale).
- Excessive frequency requests should include clinical justification in documentation to avoid denial.
Conflict with government policy may trigger denial
Conflict with applicable government policies (e.g., Local Coverage Determinations or National Coverage Determinations for Medicare, or state Medicaid policies) takes precedence. If a government policy conflicts with this policy, the government policy will be used for coverage determinations and may result in denial.
- Check CMS LCD/NCD resources and applicable state Medicaid coverage when evaluating requests.
- When a denial is issued due to conflict with government policy, document the applicable government policy used to make the determination.
Background and Rationale
Proviral DNA genotyping may have a limited role in specific circumstances (for example, multiple prior virologic failures or when prior resistance history is unavailable), but it is not recommended routinely prior to switching to two‑drug regimens or for all virologically suppressed patients. The policy emphasizes cautious interpretation of proviral results and aligns with international guidance that routine use is not supported.
Definitions and Test Descriptions
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.