Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Washington for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Washington only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Washington (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Amador Subong (NPI 1982782710)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Amador Subong
Address	200 Westerly Rd
City	Bellingham
State	WA
ZIP	98226
Taxonomy	Ophthalmology Physician
NPI Enumerated	November 1, 2006

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$2.5M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider is effectively a Medicare-only biller: total Medicare revenue is $2.5M and there is no Medicaid billing on file, so payer exposure is concentrated entirely in the Medicare program. The NPI was enumerated on 2006-11-01 (~20 years ago), indicating long tenure on the Medicare rolls which supports an established referral and billing pattern.

Revenue is highly concentrated in intravitreal biologic injections: J2777 accounts for 43.2% of Medicare revenue, J0178 accounts for 25.8%, and J2778 accounts for 9.7% — together the top three codes account for 78.7% of this provider's total Medicare revenue. This concentration means most Medicare payments are driven by a small set of high-cost retinal therapeutics rather than broad outpatient E&M or surgical case mix.

Clinical mix and service line evidence point to a retina-focused ophthalmology practice: the dominant codes are J2777, J0178 and J2778 (anti‑VEGF/faricimab/ranibizumab injections) complemented by retinal imaging codes such as 92134 and angiography codes 92242/92235, plus isolated intravitreal injection code 67028. The presence of these diagnostic and injection codes together indicates routine in-office management of retinal disease (e.g., wet AMD, diabetic macular edema) with on‑site imaging and frequent injection visits.

Competitive standing on the top injectable therapies is mixed: J2777 ranks #183 of 2039 providers (91th percentile) indicating a relatively high national standing for faricimab use, while J0178 ranks #1337 of 3204 (58th percentile) and J2778 ranks #322 of 1208 (73th percentile), both characterized as typical or unremarkable national volumes. In short, the provider is a prominent user of J2777 by national percentile but a more modest participant for the other leading biologics.

This provider shows substantially elevated outpatient evaluation and management and imaging volumes relative to peers: 92012 is at the 98th percentile and labeled an "extreme outlier, far above typical national volume," 99204 is at the 98th percentile and "notably above typical national volume," and 92134 is at the 95th percentile and "notably above typical national volume." Those high percentiles suggest a heavy throughput of established‑patient visits and retina imaging that supports the frequent injection regimen reflected in the revenue mix.

Surgical and invasive procedure volume is low: 67042 (vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane procedures) appears only 14 claims for $12.5K revenue (0.5% of Medicare revenue) and ranks #818 of 1087 providers (20th percentile) which is characterized as typical, unremarkable volume. This pattern indicates the practice is focused primarily on medical retina and office-based treatments rather than on surgical retina.

A small portion of revenue comes from less common billing lines: J3590 (unclassified biologics) generated $48.8K (1.9% of Medicare revenue) across 23 claims and ranks #556 of 631 providers (11th percentile). The presence of J3590 alongside the named biologics suggests occasional use of nonstandard or miscellaneous biologic products, but at low overall contribution to revenue.

From a business risk perspective, the combination of $2.5M in Medicare revenue and heavy dependence on a few high-cost injectable codes (top three codes = 78.7% of Medicare revenue) means the practice’s revenue is sensitive to changes in coverage, reimbursement rates, or utilization patterns for those agents. Analysts should treat formulary shifts, prior authorization policy updates, or price adjustments for J2777/J0178/J2778 as material potential drivers of future revenue variability.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

20 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
J2777	Injection, faricimab‑svoa, 0.1 mg	37,680	$30	$1.1M
J0178	Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg	950	$690	$651.8K
J2778	Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg	1,360	$180	$245K
67028	The provider injects a medication into the vitreous chamber of the eye as an isolated procedure or a separate procedure unrelated to any other procedure being performed on the eye.	1,250	$100	$126.7K
92012	For this CPT code, an Ophthalmologist sees an established patient for an intermediate level eye examination. Generally, a patient is considered to be "established" if the same physician, or any…	1,170	$70	$79.8K
92014	An ophthalmologist sees an established patient for a comprehensive level eye examination. Generally, a patient is considered to be "established" if the same physician, or any physician in the group…	780	$90	$71.9K
92134	The provider performs computerized diagnostic imaging of the retina in the posterior segment (back part) of the eye, interprets the data, and provides a report. The service may be on one or both eyes.	1,700	$30	$52.6K
J3590	Unclassified biologics	20	$2,120	$48.8K
92242	The provider injects two different special dyes into one or both eyes that cause the blood vessels to stand out in photographic images timed so that multiple frames are taken in rapid succession. He…	220	$210	$46.4K
92235	The provider uses a special dye, fluorescein that causes the blood vessels in the one or both eyes to stand out in photographic images taken with the use of multiframe timing, or serial images, taken…	240	$110	$26.2K

Showing 1–10 of 20

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 20 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Washington Distribution

Amador Subong — 7 of 20 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Washington

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

20 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
J2777	9	50	12,780	$30	$599.7K
J0178	33	90	470	$680	$597.2K
J2778	2	30	510	$180	$117.1K
67028	27	110	550	$90	$72.9K
67042	33	40	30	$1,190	$39.2K
J3590	4	10	20	$980	$24.4K
92242	3	20	50	$210	$19.7K
92014	34	790	110	$80	$16.8K
J7999	43	70	150	$70	$15.9K
92012	5	220	70	$70	$12.9K

Showing 1–10 of 20

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Amador Subong, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Eric Subong	WA	Ophthalmology Physician	$4.2M	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Amador Subong, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Lummi Indian Business Council	WA	Recovery Care Clinic/Center	$0	$26.1M
Lummi Indian Business Council	WA	Clinic/Center	$0	$23.3M
Sea Mar Community Health Centers	WA	Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC)	$0	$8.6M
Lummi Indian Business Council	WA	Dental Clinic/Center	$0	$8.5M
Infusion Solutions Inc	WA	Home Infusion Agency	$73.8K	$8.3M
Lummi Indian Business Council	WA	Counselor	$0	$7.8M
Sea Mar Community Health Centers	WA	Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC)	$0	$6.4M
Sea Mar Community Health Centers	WA	Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC)	$0	$4.8M
Bellingham Oral Surgery And Dental Implants	WA	Specialist	$0	$4M
North Whatcom Fire & Rescue Services	WA	Land Ambulance	$204.5K	$2.8M

Amador Subong — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Amador Subong — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Amador Subong — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Amador Subong — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References