Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Louisiana for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Louisiana only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Louisiana (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Mary Janine Hopkins (NPI 1851316590)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Mary Janine Hopkins
Address	2509 Broadmoor Blvd
City	Monroe
State	LA
ZIP	71201
Taxonomy	Dermatology Physician
NPI Enumerated	July 13, 2006

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$993.2K
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider’s Medicare footprint is modest but concentrated, with Total Medicare revenue of $993.2K and no Medicaid billing on file; the dataset therefore portrays an effectively Medicare‑dependent practice rather than a dual‑payer operation. The absence of any Medicaid claims suggests payer mix and revenue risk are concentrated in the Medicare population.

Revenue concentration is high: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes account for 70.8% of the provider’s total Medicare revenue, driven primarily by 77280 (38.2% of Medicare revenue, $369.2K), G6001 (27.0% of Medicare revenue, $261.1K), and 77401 (5.5% of Medicare revenue, $53.6K). This means a small number of service lines dominate the revenue stream and will disproportionately affect overall revenue if utilization or payment for these codes changes.

The code mix indicates substantial radiation therapy planning and guidance activity: high volumes for 77280 (1.8K claims) and G6001 (1.9K claims) and continued use of 77401 point to operations centered on simulation, field placement, and guidance for radiation treatments. Notably, this clinical profile is heavily weighted toward radiation therapy services despite the listed taxonomy of Dermatology Physician, implying the practice operates clinical services that span procedural dermatology and radiation therapy planning.

Alongside radiation planning codes, the provider also bills a cluster of dermatology and photodynamic therapy services, including J7345 (26.6K claims, $26.6K revenue, 2.8% of Medicare revenue), 96573 (143 claims, $20.7K revenue, 2.1%), and biopsy codes such as 11102 (295 claims, $18.9K revenue, 2.0%). This mix suggests the practice delivers both lesion‑directed dermatologic care and photosensitizer‑based therapies, with a combination of high‑volume/low‑unit price drug dispensing (J7345 at $1 avg paid/claim) and higher‑unit clinical procedures.

Competitive standing is uneven by code: 77280 ranks #38 of 3348 nationally (99th percentile; extreme outlier, far above typical national volume), and 11300 ranks #27 of 1624 (98th percentile; extreme outlier, far above typical national volume), indicating national‑level dominance for a small set of services. Other high‑revenue codes such as G6001 rank #28 of 280 (90th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume) and J7345 ranks #41 of 767 (95th percentile; notably above typical national volume), so the provider is a major outlier on certain codes while otherwise operating at typical volumes for many services.

Operational throughput is pronounced in specific lines: 77280 and G6001 each have roughly 1.8K–1.9K claims, and J7345 shows 26.6K claims, illustrating substantial procedural and drug dispensing volume with divergent reimbursement profiles (e.g., 77280 at $206 avg paid/claim, G6001 at $138 avg paid/claim, J7345 at $1 avg paid/claim). This combination of high claim counts and variable average paid per claim drives the concentration of revenue into a few technical/radiation planning codes.

The provider’s NPI tenure (enumerated 2006-07-13, ~20 years ago) indicates a long‑standing presence in the market, which can matter for network contracting, referral patterns, and competitive positioning. Combined with the concentrated revenue mix and code‑level outliers, the long tenure suggests an established operational model focused on the specific high‑volume services noted above.

From a payer and business risk perspective, the lack of any Medicaid billing on file plus heavy revenue dependence on the top 3 codes (70.8% of Medicare revenue) means the practice has limited payer diversification and high exposure to shifts in Medicare utilization or reimbursement for those codes; analysts should flag this concentration when modeling revenue sensitivity or when evaluating contract negotiations.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

38 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
77280	The provider uses a simulator or other imaging modality to determine the size and location of ports to be used for radiation therapy. This code describes a simple level service.	1,790	$210	$369.2K
G6001	Ultrasonic guidance for placement of radiation therapy fields	1,890	$140	$261.1K
77401	Deleted effective Jan. 1, 2026.	1,730	$30	$53.6K
77427	Radiation therapy utilizes ionizing radiation beams that are directed at cancerous cells in order to destroy them. The radiation, damages the DNA (the genetic material) in the cell, thus preventing…	350	$150	$52.1K
99214	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the…	410	$90	$34.4K
J7345	Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg	26,600	$1	$26.6K
96573	The provider applies a photosensitizing drug to a lesion and exposes it to a specific wavelength of light, depending on how far into the body the light needs to penetrate. The procedure is performed…	140	$150	$20.7K
11102	The provider biopsies a single skin lesion using a tangential (side–ways) approach; he shaves off the lesion or scoops it out with a knife or curette.	300	$60	$18.9K
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	300	$60	$18K
77336	This code is for reporting ongoing medical physics consultation. When a patient is undergoing radiation treatment for a particular span of time with a number of therapy sessions every week, the…	240	$70	$15.6K

Showing 1–10 of 38

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 38 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Louisiana Distribution

Mary Janine Hopkins — 8 of 25 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Louisiana

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

38 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
G6001	1	10	490	$130	$99.4K
77427	7	60	180	$150	$30.4K
77280	1	40	40	$170	$22.4K
99214	979	6,670	110	$80	$16.5K
77401	1	10	240	$30	$16.1K
77336	7	20	180	$60	$14.6K
J7308	10	30	20	$300	$13K
J7345	1	10	7,400	$1	$11.6K
96574	7	10	20	$190	$10.1K
17110	117	240	80	$70	$10K

Showing 1–10 of 38

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Mary Janine Hopkins, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Anna Livingston	LA	Nurse Practitioner	$59.9K	$0
Rachel Head	TN	Acute Care Nurse Practitioner	$56.2K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Mary Janine Hopkins, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Care Solutions, Inc.	LA	Child Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities Respite Care	$0	$49.8M
Affinity Health Group, LLC	LA	Family Medicine Physician	$0	$34.6M
Ascent Health, Inc	LA	Community/Behavioral Health Agency	$0	$31.4M
Cognitive Development Center Personal Care Services	LA	Nursing Care Agency	$0	$27.8M
St Francis Medical Center, Inc	LA	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$27.2M
Enrich Personal Care Services, LLC.	LA	Preferred Provider Organization	$0	$26.7M
Southern Center For Children And Families, Inc.	LA	Community/Behavioral Health Agency	$0	$24.5M
Afnb Home Care LLC	LA	In Home Supportive Care Agency	$0	$19.3M
D & D Community Connections	LA	Preferred Provider Organization	$0	$19.2M
Hearts Desire LLC	LA	In Home Supportive Care Agency	$0	$17.3M

Mary Janine Hopkins — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Mary Janine Hopkins — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Mary Janine Hopkins — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Mary Janine Hopkins — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References