Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Michigan for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Michigan only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Michigan (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Asheesh Tewari (NPI 1043248032)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Asheesh Tewari
Address	25230 Michigan Ave
City	Dearborn
State	MI
ZIP	48124
Taxonomy	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician
NPI Enumerated	June 29, 2006

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$2.8M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider is a retina specialist with $2.8M in reported lifetime Medicare revenue and no Medicaid billing on file, so the practice is effectively single‑payer (Medicare) in the available claims data. The absence of Medicaid billing suggests care and revenue streams are concentrated in the Medicare population rather than dual‑payer mix.

Revenue is highly concentrated in intravitreal drug administration: the precomputed top three Medicare codes account for 83.8% of total Medicare revenue, driven by J0178 ($1.5M, 54.6%), J2777 ($659.5K, 23.7%), and 67028 ($153.1K, 5.5%). This concentration indicates that a large share of billing and reimbursement depends on a small number of high-value injection and injection‑related procedure codes.

The code mix and top revenue drivers point to an office‑based retina practice model that emphasizes intravitreal biologic therapy and injection procedures. J0178 (aflibercept) and J2777 (faricimab) are the dominant revenue sources and, together with 67028 (isolated intravitreal injection), indicate routine, ongoing management of retinal disease with intravitreal pharmacologic therapy.

Despite heavy revenue from injectable biologics, the provider’s national competitive standing on those drugs is not dominant: both J0178 and J2777 are described as typical, unremarkable volume relative to peers. In other words, the practice relies on high-revenue drugs but does so at volumes that align with many similar retina providers rather than indicating national market leadership.

The practice shows exceptionally high diagnostic and examination intensity relative to national peers: 92134 (retinal imaging) is an extreme outlier, far above typical national volume, and 92201 (extended ophthalmoscopy with retinal drawing) is also an extreme outlier, far above typical national volume. This suggests a workflow that pairs frequent intravitreal treatment with high utilization of imaging and detailed retinal examinations for monitoring and documentation.

Established patient management and visit volume are elevated: 92014 (comprehensive established ophthalmological exam) and 99214 (office E/M for established patient) are both described as notably above typical national volume. These patterns are consistent with sustained follow‑up care and complex medical decision‑making typical of retina disease management.

Procedural surgery exposure is limited in scale: 67039 (pars plana vitrectomy) appears only 14 times for $10.9K (0.4% of Medicare revenue) and is characterized as typical, unremarkable volume for that code. The low surgical billing share indicates the provider primarily manages retinal disease non‑operatively in the office setting rather than as a high‑volume surgical retina center.

This NPI has been enumerated since 2006‑06‑29 (~20 years ago), indicating long tenure in Medicare; combined with the high concentration of revenue in a few injection codes and no Medicaid activity, the practice appears experienced but also exposed to payer and drug‑utilization policy changes that affect intravitreal biologic reimbursement.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

15 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
J0178	Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg	2,210	$690	$1.5M
J2777	Injection, faricimab‑svoa, 0.1 mg	22,740	$30	$659.5K
67028	The provider injects a medication into the vitreous chamber of the eye as an isolated procedure or a separate procedure unrelated to any other procedure being performed on the eye.	1,680	$90	$153.1K
J2778	Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg	550	$180	$100.1K
92014	An ophthalmologist sees an established patient for a comprehensive level eye examination. Generally, a patient is considered to be "established" if the same physician, or any physician in the group…	1,010	$90	$89.2K
92134	The provider performs computerized diagnostic imaging of the retina in the posterior segment (back part) of the eye, interprets the data, and provides a report. The service may be on one or both eyes.	2,830	$30	$85K
99214	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the…	770	$100	$73.5K
92201	The provider performs an extended ophthalmoscopy, typically with an indirect ophthalmoscope which utilizes a bright light and a hand–held indirect lens rather than the common hand–held one–piece…	1,430	$20	$27.1K
J2781	Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg	210	$120	$25.2K
92004	The provider performs a comprehensive level ophthalmological evaluation of a new patient and initiates a diagnostic and treatment program for one or more visits.	140	$110	$14.7K

Showing 1–10 of 15

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 15 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Michigan Distribution

Asheesh Tewari — 6 of 15 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Michigan

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

15 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
J0178	9	110	680	$690	$630.2K
J2777	8	60	7,200	$30	$321K
J2778	29	50	730	$180	$240.5K
67028	12	160	440	$90	$57.6K
J2781	3	10	260	$120	$31.9K
67039	3	10	20	$1,050	$24.1K
J3590	46	80	140	$80	$19.6K
92014	18	1,080	100	$80	$14.8K
99214	280	15,470	80	$80	$11.4K
92134	5	820	60	$30	$7.1K

Showing 1–10 of 15

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Asheesh Tewari, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
University Physician Group	MI	Internal Medicine Physician	$0	$87.4M
University Physician Group	MI	Counselor	$57.7K	$1.4M
Anthony Parendo	WI	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$1.2M	$0
Patrick Murphy	MI	Ophthalmology Physician	$581.3K	$0
Brett Malbin	MI	Ophthalmology Physician	$477.6K	$0
Xihui Lin	MI	Ophthalmology Physician	$376.6K	$0
Darius Mehregan	MI	Dermatopathology Physician	$351.7K	$0
Rajiv Shah	NC	Ophthalmology Physician	$328.3K	$0
Yahya Murad	MI	Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician	$297.7K	$0
Gabriel Sosne	MI	Ophthalmology Physician	$250.3K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Asheesh Tewari, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.	MI	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$165.3M
Services To Enhance Potential	MI	Developmentally Disabled Services Day Training Agency	$0	$72.8M
Oakwood Ambulatory LLC	MI	Internal Medicine Physician	$0	$66.9M
Chitter Chatter P.C.	MI	Behavior Analyst	$0	$59.5M
Emergency Professionals Of Michigan, P.C.	MI	Emergency Medicine Physician	$0	$35.2M
Drs Harris Birkhill Wang Songe & Assoc PC	MI	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$0	$27.8M
Futures Healthcore, LLC	MI	Community Health Clinic/Center	$0	$15.6M
First Choice Urgent Care PC	MI	Urgent Care Clinic/Center	$0	$13.5M
David K. Vazquez D.d.s. Plc	MI	Pediatric Dentistry	$0	$8M
Dearborn Surgery Center, LLC	MI	Ambulatory Surgical Clinic/Center	$2.3M	$0

Asheesh Tewari — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Asheesh Tewari — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Asheesh Tewari — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Asheesh Tewari — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References