Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Alabama for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Alabama only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Alabama (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Richard Pearlman (NPI 1639526874)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Richard Pearlman
Address	180 Cox Creek Pkwy S Ste A
City	Florence
State	AL
ZIP	35630
Taxonomy	Radiation Oncology Physician
NPI Enumerated	May 18, 2016

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$1.4M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider is effectively a Medicare-only billing practice: Total Medicare revenue is $1.4M and Total Medicaid revenue is none (no Medicaid billing on file). That concentration makes the practice highly dependent on Medicare reimbursement and exposes overall revenues to Medicare policy or utilization changes.

Revenue is highly concentrated in a few high-return procedural codes: the precomputed top‑3 Medicare codes account for 53.3% of total Medicare revenue, with G6015 alone representing 32.3% ($440.3K), 77014 representing 11.3% ($153.4K), and G0340 representing 9.7% ($132.8K). This concentration indicates the bulk of income derives from radiotherapy delivery and image‑guided stereotactic services rather than routine E/M visits.

The code mix and volumes identify a radiation oncology operations profile centered on high-volume treatment delivery and advanced radiotherapy techniques: G6015 shows 1.8K claims while 77014 also shows 1.8K claims, and IMRT planning/delivery codes such as 77301 (92 claims) and 77334 (351 claims) are in the top revenue list. Combined with image‑guided stereotactic codes G0340 (77 claims) and G0339 (26 claims), the data indicate the practice delivers frequent fractionated treatments and supports specialized stereotactic courses.

Competitive standing is mixed across procedures: the provider ranks in the 91th percentile nationally for G6015 (rank #123 of 1429) which the dataset labels as typical/unremarkable volume for that code, while ranking notably above typical national volume for several planning and therapy support codes (for example, 77014 at the 96th percentile, 77427 at the 97th percentile, and 77334 at the 95th percentile). In sum, the provider is not a dominant national leader across all radiation oncology services but is a clearly above‑peer performer on a set of planning/support and some delivery codes.

Several codes stand out as statistical outliers or unusually concentrated relative to peers, consistent with the provided labels: 77014 (96th percentile; notably above typical national volume), 77427 (97th percentile; notably above typical national volume), 77334 (95th percentile; notably above typical national volume), 77336 (93th percentile; notably above typical national volume), 77263 (95th percentile; notably above typical national volume), 77293 (94th percentile; notably above typical national volume), and 77417 (97th percentile; notably above typical national volume). These flags suggest a stronger-than-typical throughput in planning, dosimetry, physics consultation, and port‑film activity relative to national peers.

High‑unit‑value stereotactic codes contribute meaningfully despite lower claim counts: G0340 averages $1725 paid/claim for 77 claims and accounts for $132.8K (9.7% of Medicare revenue), while G0339 averages $2266 paid/claim for 26 claims and accounts for $58.9K (4.3% of Medicare revenue). This pattern shows the practice combines high-frequency delivery codes with lower-frequency, higher‑paid specialized SRS fractions, which can materially shape revenue without large claim volumes.

The provider has an established billing tenure: NPI enumerated 2016-05-18 (~10 years ago), indicating roughly a decade of Medicare participation and likely stable operational presence in Florence, AL. That tenure, together with concentrated Medicare revenue and above‑typical volumes on planning/support codes, points to an established local provider specializing in radiation delivery and treatment planning.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

27 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
G6015	Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session	1,750	$250	$440.3K
77014	N/A	1,780	$90	$153.4K
G0340	Image-guided robotic linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery, delivery including collimator changes and custom plugging, fractionated treatment, all lesions, per session, second through…	80	$1,730	$132.8K
77301	Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) uses advanced computer technology to deliver very precise radiation beams that target and destroy the cancerous cells while avoiding the surrounding healthy…	90	$1,300	$120K
G6012	Radiation treatment delivery, 3 or more separate treatment areas, custom blocking, tangential ports, wedges, rotational beam, compensators, electron beam; 6-10 mev	510	$160	$84K
77427	Radiation therapy utilizes ionizing radiation beams that are directed at cancerous cells in order to destroy them. The radiation, damages the DNA (the genetic material) in the cell, thus preventing…	550	$140	$77.8K
G6013	Radiation treatment delivery,3 or more separate treatment areas, custom blocking, tangential ports, wedges, rotational beam, compensators, electron beam; 11-19 mev	370	$160	$60.4K
G0339	Image-guided robotic linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery, complete course of therapy in one session or first session of fractionated treatment	30	$2,270	$58.9K
77336	This code is for reporting ongoing medical physics consultation. When a patient is undergoing radiation treatment for a particular span of time with a number of therapy sessions every week, the…	570	$60	$34.3K
77334	The provider designs, develops, and constructs special and customized devices for proper radiation dose delivery and protection of nearby healthy tissues.	350	$90	$31.6K

Showing 1–10 of 27

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 27 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Alabama Distribution

Richard Pearlman — 2 of 25 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Alabama

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

27 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
G6015	4	40	600	$250	$178.4K
G0340	1	10	80	$1,720	$132.8K
77280	15	50	40	$180	$61.8K
G0339	1	10	30	$2,270	$58.9K
G6012	4	20	280	$160	$57.4K
77014	6	60	440	$70	$43.2K
77301	4	60	30	$790	$32.3K
77427	7	70	150	$140	$30.5K
G6013	2	10	150	$160	$26.2K
99214	7,244	7,330	120	$80	$16.8K

Showing 1–10 of 27

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Richard Pearlman, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
John Waples	AL	Medical Oncology Physician	$9.6M	$0
Marshall Schreeder	AL	Medical Oncology Physician	$3.5M	$0
Heather Brody	AL	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$3.1M	$0
Jorge Diaz	AL	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.6M	$0
Naveen Lobo	AL	Medical Oncology Physician	$2.4M	$0
Ali Hachem	AL	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.3M	$0
Daniel Schreeder	AL	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.3M	$0
Robert Conry	AL	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.1M	$0
Lakshmikanth Katragadda	AL	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.1M	$0
Oncology Specialties, P.C.	AL	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$0	$2M

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Richard Pearlman, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Infants And Childrens Clinic PC	AL	Pediatrics Physician	$0	$8.7M
Shoals Pediatric Group PC	AL	Pediatrics Physician	$0	$4.4M
Pinnacle Medical Solutions LLC	AL	Durable Medical Equipment & Medical Supplies	$0	$4.4M
Stepping Stone Pediatric Therapy, Inc.	AL	Occupational Therapist	$0	$4.1M
Lifeguard Ambulance Service LLC	AL	Land Ambulance	$1.9M	$1.6M
Rchp - Florence LLC	AL	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$3.4M
Alahealth, Inc.	AL	Case Management Agency	$0	$3.2M
Shoals Pediatric Dentistry, P.C.	AL	Pediatric Dentistry	$0	$3.1M
Shoals Hospice LLC	AL	Community Based Hospice Care Agency	$0	$3M
The Pediatric Dental Clinic	AL	Pediatric Dentistry	$0	$3M

Richard Pearlman — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Richard Pearlman — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Richard Pearlman — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Richard Pearlman — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References