Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Nebraska for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Nebraska only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Nebraska (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Curtis Burhoop (NPI 1508829292)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Curtis Burhoop
Address	7601 Pioneers Blvd
City	Lincoln
State	NE
ZIP	68506
Taxonomy	Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI Enumerated	April 11, 2006

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$687.7K
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

Practice appears concentrated in breast imaging and image‑guided breast interventions: the largest individual Medicare revenue lines are mammography/tomosynthesis and biopsy codes (77067, 77063, 77049, 19081, 19085, 19083, 77065 and G0279), with additional cross‑sectional imaging support (72197, 74177, 78815) indicating a radiology service mix that couples screening/diagnostic breast care with MRI/CT/PET capabilities. The presence of high‑revenue, modality‑specific codes like 77067 ($169.7K) and 19081 ($38.2K) supports a focused service line rather than a generalist imaging footprint.

Revenue is highly concentrated in a few Medicare codes: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes (77067, 77063, 72197) account for 50.2% of this provider's total Medicare revenue, with 77067 representing $169.7K (26.9%), 77063 $77.7K (12.3%), and 72197 $69.6K (11.0%). This concentration implies that changes to mammography or pelvic MRI utilization or reimbursement would meaningfully affect overall Medicare revenue.

This provider is effectively single‑payer in the dataset: total Medicare revenue is $687.7K and there is no Medicaid billing on file, so Medicaid represents zero reported billing. That payer mix means commercial/Medicaid contracting strategies and Medicaid network presence cannot be assessed from claims here and Medicare reimbursement dynamics will dominate revenue risk.

For mammography/tomosynthesis the provider ranks well above typical national volume: 77067 ranks #308 of 15198 providers nationally (98th percentile; notably above typical national volume) and 77063 ranks #302 of 14277 providers nationally (98th percentile; notably above typical national volume), while diagnostic mammography 77065 ranks #6 of 9312 providers nationally (100th percentile; extreme outlier). These high national percentiles indicate the provider is a major national outlier in screening and diagnostic mammography volumes relative to peers.

The provider is an outlier on image‑guided breast biopsy services, consistent with a specialized procedural focus: 19081 ranks #1 of 1707 providers nationally (100th percentile; extreme outlier) and 19085 ranks #4 of 65 providers nationally (94th percentile; notably above typical national volume). High paid‑per‑claim amounts for biopsy codes (e.g., 19081 average paid/claim $364) combined with top ranks suggest a significant throughput of interventional breast procedures.

Pelvic MRI shows unusually high relative volume: 72197 (MRI pelvis with and without contrast) accounts for $69.6K (11.0% of Medicare revenue) and ranks #36 of 4732 providers nationally (99th percentile; extreme outlier, far above typical national volume). This single high‑rank MRI code alongside many breast‑focused codes suggests the provider supports advanced cross‑sectional imaging services that extend beyond routine mammography.

Several additional codes further confirm a high‑volume, specialized imaging profile: 77049 (breast MRI with and without contrast) generated $42.8K (6.8%) and ranks #26 of 3140 (99th percentile; extreme outlier), while targeted breast ultrasound 76642 produced $14.9K (2.4%) and ranks #72 of 9096 (99th percentile; extreme outlier). The combination of multiple 99th–100th percentile placements across mammography, MRI and biopsy codes indicates concentrated expertise and volume in breast imaging modalities.

Provider tenure is long enough to be considered established: NPI enumerated 2006-04-11 (~20 years ago). That length of enrollment, paired with persistent high percentile rankings on multiple modality codes, suggests the provider has maintained a sustained service role in breast imaging and related cross‑sectional procedures over an extended period.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

71 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
77067	The provider takes two X–ray views of each breast for routine screening and may use specially designed computer software to help identify any potential abnormalities within the images; the software…	1,890	$90	$169.7K
77063	The provider captures three dimensional images of the breast using X–rays at various angles for routine checkup. He checks for the presence of any abnormality within the breasts. Tomosynthesis…	1,850	$40	$77.7K
72197	In this diagnostic procedure, the provider performs magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis first without using contrast and again after injecting contrast material.	430	$160	$69.6K
77049	The provider obtains images of both breasts by applying an external magnetic field and radiofrequency waves to create three–dimensional images, with and without contrast; he may also perform…	180	$230	$42.8K
77065	The provider performs X–ray imaging on one breast in a patient with a known lump or suspected cancer and may use specially designed computer software to help identify or diagnose potential…	590	$70	$40.3K
19081	Under stereotactic guidance, the provider takes breast tissue percutaneously from a single lesion for biopsy. He may place a localization device at the same time.	110	$360	$38.2K
74177	The provider performs computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast material to diagnose the cause of abdominal or pelvic pain or other abnormalities of the internal organs.	250	$100	$25.8K
78815	PET and CT scans are both standard imaging tools that allow doctors to evaluate the location and metabolic actions of tumors or cancer inside the body before beginning an active treatment regimen.…	50	$370	$17.2K
19085	Under magnetic resonance guidance, the provider takes breast tissue percutaneously from a single lesion for biopsy. He may place a localization device at the same time.	30	$580	$16.8K
76642	In this procedure, the provider performs a focused ultrasound of one breast on a limited area. The procedure includes documentation of the images.	330	$50	$14.8K

Showing 1–10 of 71

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 71 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Nebraska Distribution

Curtis Burhoop — 11 of 25 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Nebraska

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

71 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
78815	39	60	70	$380	$32.7K
77067	5	190	110	$50	$17.2K
74177	40	160	170	$80	$15.3K
19085	1	10	20	$560	$12.4K
19081	1	10	20	$310	$10.7K
77063	5	180	140	$30	$10.1K
70553	44	90	70	$90	$9.2K
70450	60	140	200	$30	$8.2K
72148	28	110	60	$70	$6.6K
72197	1	40	30	$110	$5.9K

Showing 1–10 of 71

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Curtis Burhoop, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Mary Washington Hospital Inc.	VA	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$80.1M
Northwest Iowa Hospital Corporation	IA	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$22.8M
Northwest Iowa Hospital Corporation	IA	Emergency Medical Services (Emergency Medicine) Physician	$0	$7.9M
Donald Wender	IA	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.6M	$0
Nibash Budhathoki	MO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.2M	$0
Lisa Chaiken	CA	Radiation Oncology Physician	$1.6M	$0
Chandana Javvaji	IA	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$1.6M	$0
Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital	NE	Rehabilitation Hospital	$0	$1.6M
Jeffry Ailes	NE	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$1.1M	$0
Radiology Associates PC	NE	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$0	$931.6K

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Curtis Burhoop, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Bryan Medical Center	NE	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$56.9M
Integrated Behavioral Health Services	NE	Community/Behavioral Health Agency	$0	$16.3M
Nebraska Emergency Medicine PC	NE	Emergency Medicine Physician	$0	$14.9M
Firstcare Home Health Of Eastern Nebraska, Inc	NE	Home Health Agency	$0	$6.6M
Matthew Wood	NE	Ophthalmology Physician	$3.9M	$0
Eric Avery	NE	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$3.1M	$0
Daniel Chruscicki	NE	Ophthalmology Physician	$3M	$0
Kailash Mosalpuria	NE	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.9M	$0
Integrated Cardiology Group LLC	NE	Cardiovascular Disease Physician	$0	$2.7M
Madhu Midathada	NE	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.3M	$0

Curtis Burhoop — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Curtis Burhoop — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Curtis Burhoop — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Curtis Burhoop — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References