Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Oklahoma for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Oklahoma only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Oklahoma (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Mark Mclaughlin (NPI 1386164507)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Mark Mclaughlin
Address	5901 W Memorial Rd
City	Oklahoma City
State	OK
ZIP	73142
Taxonomy	Radiation Oncology Physician
NPI Enumerated	June 20, 2017

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$2M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider’s Medicare footprint is the dominant payer presence: lifetime Medicare revenue is $2M while there is no Medicaid billing on file, so the practice is effectively single‑payer Medicare from a billing perspective. That concentration implies revenue exposure is tied to Medicare reimbursements and utilization patterns rather than a diversified payer mix.

Revenue is highly concentrated in a very small set of services: the precomputed top three Medicare codes account for 76.7% of total Medicare revenue, and a single code, 77523, represents 67.1% of Medicare revenue ($1.3M). This degree of concentration indicates the business is driven overwhelmingly by one high‑revenue procedure.

The code mix and descriptions point to a specialized, high‑technology radiation oncology operation: heavy billing for 77523 (proton beam technical component), frequent use of image guidance codes such as G6002 (stereoscopic x‑ray guidance), and prostate spacer procedures under 55874 together suggest a clinical focus on advanced external beam modalities and prostate cancer care. These procedure types are consistent with a center that offers proton therapy, robust image guidance, and prostate‑specific workflow.

For several top codes this provider is a market leader nationally: 77523 ranks #7 of 111 providers (95th percentile) and is described as notably above typical national volume, signaling the provider is a major national participant for proton technical services. Similarly, other planning and delivery codes show elevated national standing rather than modest local practice volumes.

G6002 is an extreme statistical outlier in national comparison: it produces $101.6K (5.1% of Medicare revenue) from 1.9K claims and ranks #20 of 2280 providers (99th percentile) with the label "extreme outlier, far above typical national volume." This suggests unusually high use of stereoscopic x‑ray guidance relative to peers and indicates intensive image‑guided workflows.

The practice demonstrates strong in‑house planning, dosimetry, and medical physics activity as shown by high national percentiles on several support codes: 77334 ($45.5K) ranks #66 of 4463 (99th percentile); 77290 ($36.8K) ranks #116 of 3650 (97th percentile); and 77295 ($24.7K) ranks #120 of 3008 (96th percentile). Together with 77331 ranking #14 of 267 (95th percentile) for dosimetry, these results show the provider bills substantially for technical planning and QA services that underpin complex radiation treatments.

Beyond procedure volumes, the practice also bills a non‑trivial amount for high‑acuity consults and visits: 99205 appears with 106 claims and $16.2K revenue (0.8% of Medicare revenue) and ranks #2701 of 66257 providers (96th percentile), indicating above‑typical volume of complex new patient evaluations. This supports a model in which advanced technical treatments are paired with higher‑complexity clinical evaluation.

The provider’s NPI was enumerated on 2017-06-20 (~9 years ago), indicating a moderate tenure in the Medicare program. Combined with the concentrated revenue mix and multiple high national percentiles, tenure plus utilization patterns are consistent with an established, specialized radiation oncology operation rather than a new or diffuse general practice.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

27 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
77523	This code represents the technical component of a procedure in which the provider administers radiation therapy using a beam of protons to irradiate the cancer. The treatment performed is…	1,960	$690	$1.3M
G6002	Stereoscopic x-ray guidance for localization of target volume for the delivery of radiation therapy	1,880	$50	$101.6K
55874	Under imaging guidance, the provider inserts a needle through the perineum, the area between the anus and the scrotum, and injects one or more biodegradable materials, i.e., material that decomposes…	40	$2,050	$90.2K
G6015	Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session	290	$250	$73.3K
77427	Radiation therapy utilizes ionizing radiation beams that are directed at cancerous cells in order to destroy them. The radiation, damages the DNA (the genetic material) in the cell, thus preventing…	440	$140	$63.2K
77334	The provider designs, develops, and constructs special and customized devices for proper radiation dose delivery and protection of nearby healthy tissues.	500	$90	$45.5K
77290	Before starting radiation therapy, a physician needs to know the location and size of the cancerous tumor, the radiation doses required to treat the tumor, and the positioning of the radiation beams…	110	$320	$36.8K
77373	This code represents the technical component of a procedure in which the provider performs stereotactic body radiation therapy. The therapy uses a three–dimensional coordinate system to locate small…	50	$670	$32.1K
77336	This code is for reporting ongoing medical physics consultation. When a patient is undergoing radiation treatment for a particular span of time with a number of therapy sessions every week, the…	500	$60	$30.2K
77014	N/A	330	$90	$28.4K

Showing 1–10 of 27

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 27 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Oklahoma Distribution

Mark Mclaughlin — 9 of 25 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Oklahoma

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

27 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
77523	1	10	280	$690	$383.2K
G6015	6	10	270	$250	$141K
77373	3	10	150	$700	$84.6K
55874	1	10	20	$1,700	$40.8K
77427	7	40	210	$140	$33.5K
A4648	2	10	80	$390	$33K
77014	26	40	500	$50	$29.2K
77280	7	40	50	$160	$28.4K
77301	25	30	40	$580	$28K
G6002	1	20	240	$30	$13.4K

Showing 1–10 of 27

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Mark Mclaughlin, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Warren Clinic Inc	OK	General Practice Physician	$0	$40.2M
Saint Francis Hospital Muskogee Inc	OK	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$16.8M
Matthew Comstock	OK	Interventional Cardiology Physician	$2.8M	$0
Han-chih Chang	TN	Radiation Oncology Physician	$2.6M	$0
Hassan Abouhouli	OK	Pulmonary Disease Physician	$1.4M	$0
Mindy Ewert	OK	Physician Assistant	$1.1M	$0
Mark Storey	OK	Radiation Oncology Physician	$1.1M	$0
Johnathan Ledet	OK	Dermatology Physician	$862.7K	$0
Samuel Dakil	OK	Urology Physician	$823.8K	$0
Bradley Wilson	OK	Urology Physician	$688.5K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Mark Mclaughlin, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Alexander Frank	OK	Family Medicine Physician	$4M	$0
Long Term Care Specialists, Inc	OK	Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician	$0	$3.3M
Speech Pathway LLC	OK	Speech-Language Pathologist	$0	$1.8M
Leslie Yonemoto	OK	Radiation Oncology Physician	$1.4M	$0
Terry Hermance	OK	Family Medicine Physician	$768.1K	$0
Angela Mcguire	OK	General Practice Physician	$738.3K	$0
Graciela Gallardo	OK	Family Medicine Physician	$710K	$0
Tamara Altstatt	OK	Adult Health Nurse Practitioner	$436.8K	$0
Ronald Cable	OK	Family Medicine Physician	$403.2K	$0
David Neumann	OK	Gastroenterology Physician	$392.2K	$0

Mark Mclaughlin — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Mark Mclaughlin — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Mark Mclaughlin — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Mark Mclaughlin — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References