Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or District of Columbia for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to District of Columbia only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. District of Columbia (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Ingrid Ott (NPI 1174573190)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Ingrid Ott
Address	2141 K St Nw
City	Washington
State	DC
ZIP	20037
Taxonomy	Specialist
NPI Enumerated	May 11, 2006

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$303.5K
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider’s Medicare activity is narrowly concentrated in breast imaging: the three highest-revenue CPTs (77067, 77063, 77066) together account for 60.3% of total Medicare revenue, and the top individual code 77067 alone represents $115.8K (38.3% of Medicare revenue). The code descriptions indicate routine screening mammography and tomosynthesis are core services, so the practice appears to operate primarily as an imaging-focused specialty with a strong emphasis on breast cancer screening and diagnostic mammography.

Medicare revenue totals $303.5K while there is no Medicaid billing on file, so this provider functions effectively as a single-payer (Medicare) billing entity in the data available. The absence of Medicaid claims suggests either no Medicaid panel, non-participation in state programs, or that Medicaid services are routed through a different taxonomy/NPI not represented here; analysts should treat the profile as Medicare-dominant for utilization and revenue benchmarking.

For its principal mammography codes the provider’s national placement is broadly within typical volume ranges rather than as a market leader: 77067 ranks #2145 of 15198 providers (86th percentile) and 77063 ranks #1969 of 14277 providers (86th percentile), reflecting steady, unremarkable national volume for routine screening and tomosynthesis relative to peers. 77066 ranks #709 of 8499 (92nd percentile), which is higher than the others but still described as typical volume, suggesting the provider is a modest but consistent regional contributor rather than a dominant national center for diagnostic mammography.

Beyond mammography, the provider bills for a mix of other imaging services (DXA 77080, multiple MRI codes 72148/70553/70551, and various ultrasound codes). These secondary codes collectively contribute meaningful tail revenue (examples: 77080 $15.1K, 72148 $13.3K, 77049 $12.8K), indicating the practice either offers a broader imaging suite beyond breast exams or shares imaging resources across musculoskeletal and neurologic studies.

Several codes show typical-to-above-typical national ranking across imaging modalities, but no extreme outliers are present. For example, 77066 sits at the 92nd percentile nationally and 77080 is at the 88th percentile—both characterized in the source as typical, unremarkable volumes—so utilization patterns align with an established imaging practice rather than exceptional concentration in unusual services.

Tenure data indicate the NPI was enumerated on 2006-05-11 (approximately 20 years ago), signaling long-standing participation in Medicare billing. This longevity supports interpreting current volumes as reflective of an established clinical operation rather than a recent entrant or transient billing pattern.

The provider’s high claim count for an injected contrast supply code (A9575 listed with 11.5K claims but $0 revenue reported) suggests frequent use of contrast agents in MRI workflows yet invoices do not show associated Medicare payment for that line item. This could reflect reporting conventions, pass-through billing of supply items, or zero-dollar reimbursement lines and warrants attention when reconciling procedure-level revenue to operational supply usage.

Given the heavy tilt toward breast imaging codes and absence of Medicaid activity, competitive comparisons and capacity planning should benchmark this NPI primarily against other Medicare-focused diagnostic imaging providers in the region. Payors and provider analysts assessing network adequacy or imaging capacity should treat this entity as a Medicare-oriented imaging site with notable mammography volume but otherwise typical breadth across general radiology modalities.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

25 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
77067	The provider takes two X–ray views of each breast for routine screening and may use specially designed computer software to help identify any potential abnormalities within the images; the software…	830	$140	$115.8K
77063	The provider captures three dimensional images of the breast using X–rays at various angles for routine checkup. He checks for the presence of any abnormality within the breasts. Tomosynthesis…	830	$60	$46.4K
77066	The provider performs X–ray imaging on both breasts in a patient with a lump or suspected cancer and may use specially designed computer software to help identify or diagnose potential abnormalities…	150	$140	$20.3K
77080	The provider performs an imaging procedure, called dual–energy X–ray absorptiometry (DXA), of one or more bony areas on the trunk to determine the bone mineral density (BMD) and whether the patient…	340	$40	$15.1K
72148	In this diagnostic procedure, the provider performs magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spinal canal and contents without using contrast.	80	$170	$13.3K
77049	The provider obtains images of both breasts by applying an external magnetic field and radiofrequency waves to create three–dimensional images, with and without contrast; he may also perform…	40	$330	$12.8K
70553	In this procedure, the provider performs a magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, study of the brain including the brain stem. He performs this procedure without using contrast material. He then follows…	40	$280	$10.4K
77065	The provider performs X–ray imaging on one breast in a patient with a known lump or suspected cancer and may use specially designed computer software to help identify or diagnose potential…	80	$110	$9.4K
G0279	Diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis, unilateral or bilateral (list separately in addition to 77065 or 77066)	200	$50	$9.4K
19083	Under ultrasound guidance, the provider takes breast tissue percutaneously from a single lesion for biopsy. He may place a localization device at the same time.	10	$480	$6.2K

Showing 1–10 of 25

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 25 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. District of Columbia Distribution

Ingrid Ott — 0 of 24 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — District of Columbia

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

25 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
77067	15	50	480	$90	$51.6K
77063	14	50	480	$40	$24.2K
70553	24	30	120	$150	$21.4K
72148	20	40	80	$110	$16.2K
70551	30	40	110	$100	$15.9K
77049	12	20	40	$210	$10.8K
72141	21	30	60	$100	$10.3K
77066	17	50	110	$70	$9.3K
70450	67	70	130	$30	$8.7K
77080	15	40	230	$30	$7.9K

Showing 1–10 of 25

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Ingrid Ott, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Jill Wilkens	MD	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$509.3K	$0
Stuart Fruman	VA	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$393.8K	$0
Lisa Johnson	VA	Specialist	$336.5K	$0
Jason Katzen	DC	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$327.5K	$0
Amanda Kappler	DC	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$319.4K	$0
Huijung Kim	DC	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$302.7K	$0
Anam Salman	MD	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$290K	$0
Mark Monteferrante	DC	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$286.1K	$0
Gary Rose	DC	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$277.4K	$0
Anjali Malik	VA	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$247.8K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Ingrid Ott, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
District Hospital Partners L P	DC	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$136.3M
Medical Faculty Associates, Inc	DC	Anesthesiology Physician	$0	$75.7M
Baymark Health Services Of West Virginia, Inc.	DC	Substance Use Disorder Rehabilitation Clinic/Center	$571.6K	$6.4M
Medical Home Development Group	DC	Family Medicine Physician	$0	$6.7M
The Foundation For Contemporary Mental Health	DC	Public Health or Welfare Agency	$0	$5.4M
Dva Renal Healthcare Inc	DC	End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center	$0	$3.9M
Miriam's Kitchen	DC	Case Management Agency	$0	$3.1M
Faysal Haroun	DC	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.4M	$0
Rishi Sood	DC	Vascular & Interventional Radiology Physician	$2.2M	$0
Matthew Forsthoefel	DC	Radiation Oncology Physician	$1.1M	$0

Ingrid Ott — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Ingrid Ott — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Ingrid Ott — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Ingrid Ott — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References