Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or District of Columbia for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to District of Columbia only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. District of Columbia (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Matthew Forsthoefel (NPI 1942664560)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Matthew Forsthoefel
Address	2150 Pennsylvania Ave Nw
City	Washington
State	DC
ZIP	20037
Taxonomy	Radiation Oncology Physician
NPI Enumerated	April 9, 2016

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$1.1M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider reports Total Medicare revenue: $1.1M and has no Medicaid billing on file, making their public payer footprint effectively single‑payer with Medicare as the dominant source of recorded revenue. The absence of Medicaid claims suggests either limited participation in Medicaid or a caseload concentrated in Medicare‑eligible patients.

Revenue concentration is high: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes account for 71.5% of this provider's total Medicare revenue. Those top codes are G6015 ($593.3K, 54.4%), 77301 ($93.8K, 8.6%), and G6002 ($92K, 8.4%), indicating most dollars flow from a small set of radiation‑delivery and guidance services.

The CPT/HCPCS mix indicates a procedure‑focused radiation oncology practice that emphasizes advanced delivery and image‑guided techniques. High revenue and counts for G6015 (Intensity modulated treatment delivery) and meaningful shares from 77301 (IMRT planning/delivery) and G6002 (stereoscopic x‑ray guidance) point to an operation centered on IMRT and image‑guided radiation therapy workflows rather than predominantly E/M office care.

G6002 is an acknowledged statistical outlier: it ranks #28 of 2280 providers nationally (99th percentile; extreme outlier, far above typical national volume), which signals unusually heavy utilization of stereoscopic x‑ray guidance compared with peers. That exceptionally high volume for G6002 likely reflects a deliberate clinical emphasis or practice pattern focused on image‑guided localization during treatment delivery.

G6015 also demonstrates strong national standing, ranking #69 of 1429 providers (95th percentile; notably above typical national volume), and 77427 ranks #210 of 4720 providers (96th percentile; notably above typical national volume). Together these rankings show the provider is a major national outlier on several core radiation delivery codes rather than a modest or average user for those services.

Complementary planning and physics services appear at more typical volumes: 77373 (80 claims, $57.8K; 5.3% of Medicare revenue) and 77336 (498 claims, $29.9K; 2.7%) are present but described as typical or unremarkable volumes. This mix is consistent with a high‑throughput treatment delivery model supported by routine medical physics and treatment planning activity.

Claim‑level patterns show high procedural throughput: G6015 has 2.3K claims at $254 avg paid/claim (yielding $593.3K), and G6002 has 1.7K claims at $53 avg paid/claim (yielding $92K). These figures imply the provider generates most revenue via high claim volumes for specialized treatment and guidance codes rather than through high per‑claim reimbursement for office E/M services.

The provider’s NPI was enumerated on 2016-04-09 (~10 years ago), indicating several years of recorded Medicare activity. Coupled with concentrated Medicare revenue and no Medicaid billing on file, the data suggest an established, Medicare‑focused radiation oncology practice with specialized, high‑volume use of IMRT and image‑guided delivery services.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

17 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
G6015	Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session	2,340	$250	$593.3K
77301	Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) uses advanced computer technology to deliver very precise radiation beams that target and destroy the cancerous cells while avoiding the surrounding healthy…	70	$1,320	$93.8K
G6002	Stereoscopic x-ray guidance for localization of target volume for the delivery of radiation therapy	1,740	$50	$92K
77427	Radiation therapy utilizes ionizing radiation beams that are directed at cancerous cells in order to destroy them. The radiation, damages the DNA (the genetic material) in the cell, thus preventing…	480	$140	$69.2K
77373	This code represents the technical component of a procedure in which the provider performs stereotactic body radiation therapy. The therapy uses a three–dimensional coordinate system to locate small…	80	$720	$57.8K
77014	N/A	670	$90	$57.7K
77336	This code is for reporting ongoing medical physics consultation. When a patient is undergoing radiation treatment for a particular span of time with a number of therapy sessions every week, the…	500	$60	$29.9K
77338	In this procedure, the provider participates in the design and construction of one or more multi–leaf collimator, MLC, devices for intensity modulated radiation therapy, IMRT. IMRT is a radiotherapy…	90	$340	$29.5K
99205	The provider sees a new patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a high level of medical decision making, and/or the provider…	100	$160	$15.6K
G6012	Radiation treatment delivery, 3 or more separate treatment areas, custom blocking, tangential ports, wedges, rotational beam, compensators, electron beam; 6-10 mev	80	$170	$14.3K

Showing 1–10 of 17

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 17 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. District of Columbia Distribution

Matthew Forsthoefel — 6 of 17 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — District of Columbia

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

17 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
G6015	1	10	320	$270	$250.3K
77373	1	10	80	$720	$57.9K
77435	6	10	30	$560	$38.3K
77427	1	20	140	$160	$25.5K
77301	3	10	40	$540	$23.1K
77014	5	10	350	$50	$23.1K
G6002	1	10	450	$30	$22.6K
G6012	1	10	80	$170	$14.3K
77336	1	10	70	$60	$12.8K
77263	7	20	70	$140	$10.3K

Showing 1–10 of 17

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Matthew Forsthoefel, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
First Urology, Psc	IN	Urology Physician	$0	$5.6M
David Musich	IN	Radiation Oncology Physician	$1.1M	$0
Lawrence Hochman	IN	Radiation Oncology Physician	$1.1M	$0
Ryan Malone	IN	Urology Physician	$784.5K	$0
Charles Goodwin	IN	Urology Physician	$596.2K	$0
John Eifler	IN	Urology Physician	$427.6K	$0
Christopher Smith	IN	Urology Physician	$426.4K	$0
Dennis Smith	IN	Urology Physician	$408.6K	$0
John Jurige	IN	Urology Physician	$408.3K	$0
David Rosenbaum	IN	Urology Physician	$401.3K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Matthew Forsthoefel, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
District Hospital Partners L P	DC	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$136.3M
Medical Faculty Associates, Inc	DC	Anesthesiology Physician	$0	$75.7M
Baymark Health Services Of West Virginia, Inc.	DC	Substance Use Disorder Rehabilitation Clinic/Center	$571.6K	$6.4M
Medical Home Development Group	DC	Family Medicine Physician	$0	$6.7M
The Foundation For Contemporary Mental Health	DC	Public Health or Welfare Agency	$0	$5.4M
Dva Renal Healthcare Inc	DC	End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center	$0	$3.9M
Miriam's Kitchen	DC	Case Management Agency	$0	$3.1M
Faysal Haroun	DC	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.4M	$0
Rishi Sood	DC	Vascular & Interventional Radiology Physician	$2.2M	$0
Mustafa Ali	DC	Internal Medicine Physician	$135.4K	$909.4K

Matthew Forsthoefel — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Matthew Forsthoefel — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Matthew Forsthoefel — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Matthew Forsthoefel — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References