Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Colorado for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Colorado only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Colorado (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Patrick Richard (NPI 1134418890)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Patrick Richard
Address	4715 Arapahoe Ave
City	Boulder
State	CO
ZIP	80303
Taxonomy	Radiation Oncology Physician
NPI Enumerated	April 4, 2011

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$1.9M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider is a radiation oncology physician in Boulder, CO, with an NPI enumerated on 2011-04-04 (~15 years ago), indicating long-term Medicare participation and continuity in practice over roughly a decade and a half. Tenure at this level suggests established referral pathways and sustained clinical activity in radiation oncology services within the market.

Lifetime Medicare revenue for this provider is $1.9M and there is no Medicaid billing on file, so the practice is effectively single-payer in the public programs dataset — Medicare constitutes the entirety of reported public payer revenue and there is no Medicaid footprint to assess payer diversification or low-income population exposure.

Revenue concentration is notable: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes account for 58.6% of this provider’s total Medicare revenue, indicating that a small set of services drives the majority of Medicare reimbursements and likely represents the core service line and referral focus for the practice.

The code mix is consistent with an advanced radiation oncology practice focused on image-guided diagnostics and high-complexity radiotherapy. High-revenue codes include G6015 (IMRT treatment delivery), 78815 (PET/CT imaging), and A9595 (Piflufolastat f-18 diagnostic agent), which together form the top three revenue drivers; this mix implies the practice both performs or bills for advanced treatment delivery (IMRT) and high-value molecular imaging used to stage and plan therapy.

Competitive standing across individual codes is generally modest to strong but not dominant nationwide: G6015 revenue ranks #189 of 1429 (87th percentile) indicating above-typical national volume for that delivery code, while 78815 ranks #455 of 6566 (93rd percentile) showing a relatively high national presence for PET/CT imaging. A9595 ranks #97 of 528 (82nd percentile), also above typical national volume; overall these percentiles indicate the provider is a meaningful, above-typical participant for several high-value oncology services but not a national outlier dominating the specialty.

Most other listed CPT/HCPCS codes show typical, unremarkable national volumes by their percentile labels, with a few exceptions: 71260 (CT thorax with contrast) is marked as notably above typical national volume (97th percentile), which may reflect elevated diagnostic CT use in this practice relative to peers. Conversely, A9587 (Ga-68 DOTATATE) ranks in the 9th percentile among a small group of providers, meaning the provider bills little of that specific agent relative to peers who use it more frequently, suggesting limited activity in certain neuroendocrine imaging.

Operationally, the mix of high counts for imaging codes (e.g., 78815 with 347 claims) alongside substantial IMRT delivery (G6015 with 1.4K claims) and related treatment planning codes (77301, 77373, 77338) suggests an integrated workflow: patients are staged with advanced PET/CT, undergo sophisticated planning/dosimetry, and receive IMRT or stereotactic treatments. This pattern is consistent with a practice that combines diagnostic imaging and high-complexity radiation therapy rather than a low-acuity or consult-only role.

From a payer/contracting perspective, the absence of Medicaid billing limits assessment of commercial or safety-net exposure and may influence negotiations or risk attribution if a payer set expects dual-payer coverage; the provider’s public revenue base is concentrated in Medicare at $1.9M, which should be treated as the primary benchmark for utilization and rate comparisons.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

33 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
G6015	Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session	1,430	$300	$426.4K
78815	PET and CT scans are both standard imaging tools that allow doctors to evaluate the location and metabolic actions of tumors or cancer inside the body before beginning an active treatment regimen.…	350	$1,220	$422.6K
A9595	Piflufolastat f-18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie	500	$490	$246.5K
77014	N/A	1,390	$100	$135.8K
77301	Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) uses advanced computer technology to deliver very precise radiation beams that target and destroy the cancerous cells while avoiding the surrounding healthy…	80	$1,520	$126K
77373	This code represents the technical component of a procedure in which the provider performs stereotactic body radiation therapy. The therapy uses a three–dimensional coordinate system to locate small…	90	$840	$75.3K
78816	The patient is injected with a radiopharmaceutical tracer called FDG (fluoro–deoxyglucose, a radioactive substance containing glucose) about one hour before the imaging is scheduled to begin. The…	50	$1,220	$58.6K
74177	The provider performs computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast material to diagnose the cause of abdominal or pelvic pain or other abnormalities of the internal organs.	300	$180	$54.8K
77427	Radiation therapy utilizes ionizing radiation beams that are directed at cancerous cells in order to destroy them. The radiation, damages the DNA (the genetic material) in the cell, thus preventing…	330	$150	$49.9K
77338	In this procedure, the provider participates in the design and construction of one or more multi–leaf collimator, MLC, devices for intensity modulated radiation therapy, IMRT. IMRT is a radiotherapy…	90	$380	$35.3K

Showing 1–10 of 33

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 33 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Colorado Distribution

Patrick Richard — 4 of 25 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Colorado

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

33 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
G6015	4	10	370	$300	$234K
A9595	2	20	220	$540	$141.1K
78815	7	120	60	$540	$58.9K
A9587	5	10	290	$120	$48.9K
77373	1	10	50	$830	$43.9K
77014	10	80	490	$50	$32.9K
G6013	8	10	160	$200	$31.4K
77301	8	60	40	$540	$28K
77427	11	80	130	$150	$27.3K
G6012	3	10	120	$200	$21.9K

Showing 1–10 of 33

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Patrick Richard, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Nauman Moazzam	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$3.6M	$0
Robert Rifkin	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$3.3M	$0
Ioana Hinshaw	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.7M	$0
John Burke	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.6M	$0
Patrick Eulitt	CO	Medical Oncology Physician	$2.4M	$0
Christopher Benton	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$1.8M	$0
Paul Decarolis	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$1.6M	$0
Maurice Markus	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$1.6M	$0
Sujatha Nallapareddy	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$1.4M	$0
Manojkumar Bupathi	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$1.4M	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Patrick Richard, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Boulder Community Health	CO	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$7.8M
Geeta Lalchandani-lalwani	CO	Ophthalmology Physician	$1.5M	$0
Austin Poole	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$1.1M	$0
Gregory Britt	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$1.1M	$0
Dario Pasalic	CO	Radiation Oncology Physician	$956.3K	$0
David Andorsky	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$890K	$0
Leslie Busby	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$863.7K	$0
Vlad Matei	CO	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$791.9K	$0
Jenny Fox	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$476.5K	$0
Mark Sitarik	CO	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$468.8K	$0

Patrick Richard — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Patrick Richard — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Patrick Richard — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Patrick Richard — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References