Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Washington for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Washington only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Washington (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Jane Myung (NPI 1063616472)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Jane Myung
Address	345 College St Ste C
City	Lacey
State	WA
ZIP	98503
Taxonomy	Ophthalmology Physician
NPI Enumerated	June 12, 2007

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$2.7M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider is effectively single‑payer: lifetime Medicare revenue is $2.7M and there is no Medicaid billing on file. The absence of Medicaid activity means this clinician’s commercial and Medicare contracting posture will drive most revenue exposure rather than Medicaid participation. The provider’s NPI was enumerated 2007-06-12 (~19 years ago), indicating an established practice presence.

Revenue is highly concentrated in three procedure/drug codes: J0178 ($1.4M, 53.1% of Medicare revenue), J2777 ($821.3K, 30.1%), and 67028 ($173.1K, 6.3%); the top three codes together account for 89.6% of total Medicare revenue. This concentration signals material dependence on a small set of injection and injection‑related services for the bulk of billed income. Payers and network managers should note the potential financial sensitivity if utilization or drug reimbursement for these codes changes.

The code mix and descriptions indicate a retina‑focused, clinic‑based injection practice: J0178 and J2777 are high-volume injectable drug codes and 67028 is an intravitreal injection procedure. High utilization of these codes, together with retinal imaging code 92134, is consistent with ongoing anti‑VEGF/retina treatment workflows delivered in an outpatient setting rather than primarily surgical care.

There is a pronounced volume/price split across the main injectables: J2777 shows 28.3K claims at an average paid/claim of $29, while J0178 shows 2.1K claims at an average paid/claim of $690. This pattern yields a substantial portion of revenue from a high‑claim/low‑unit‑price product alongside fewer high‑unit‑price administrations, illustrating how billing mix—not just claim count—drives revenue composition.

On competitive standing for the top revenue drivers, the provider ranks as a typical but active national participant: J0178 ranks #497 of 3204 (85th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume), J2777 ranks #323 of 2039 (84th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume), and 67028 ranks #482 of 4255 (89th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume). These ranks indicate the practice is neither an extreme national outlier nor marginal for these primary injection services, but operates at an above‑median volume level within the specialty.

Diagnostic and monitoring services are comparatively prominent: 92134 has 2.7K claims, $83.8K revenue (3.1% of Medicare revenue) and ranks #548 of 26868 (98th percentile; extreme outlier), and 92014 has 965 claims, $84.9K revenue (3.1%) and ranks #1796 of 35415 (95th percentile; notably above typical). The elevated percentile positions for retinal imaging and established comprehensive exams suggest intensive disease monitoring and follow‑up activity that complements the high injection volumes.

Surgical procedural codes associated with vitrectomy and operating room interventions are present but low in volume and revenue: 67042 (15 claims, $13.8K, 25th percentile rank) and 67036 (13 claims, $7.2K, 15th percentile rank) generate only small shares of revenue. This distribution reinforces that clinical operations are centered on outpatient injections and diagnostics rather than frequent posterior‑segment surgery.

The provider’s long tenure (NPI enumerated 2007-06-12, ~19 years) combined with a concentrated Medicare revenue base and no Medicaid billing suggests an established, Medicare‑centric retina practice. For payer contracting and competitive analysis, key considerations are the dependency on a few high‑revenue injectable codes and the pronounced imaging/monitoring footprint represented by extreme and notably above‑typical volumes for 92134 and 92014.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

17 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
J0178	Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg	2,100	$690	$1.4M
J2777	Injection, faricimab‑svoa, 0.1 mg	28,320	$30	$821.3K
67028	The provider injects a medication into the vitreous chamber of the eye as an isolated procedure or a separate procedure unrelated to any other procedure being performed on the eye.	1,860	$90	$173.1K
92014	An ophthalmologist sees an established patient for a comprehensive level eye examination. Generally, a patient is considered to be "established" if the same physician, or any physician in the group…	970	$90	$84.9K
92134	The provider performs computerized diagnostic imaging of the retina in the posterior segment (back part) of the eye, interprets the data, and provides a report. The service may be on one or both eyes.	2,700	$30	$83.8K
99214	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the…	380	$100	$36.1K
J9035	Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg	580	$60	$32K
67042	In this procedure, the provider removes vitreous humor, the gelatinous material that gives shape to the eye, using a mechanical cutting tool. He removes the internal limiting membrane of the retina…	20	$920	$13.8K
92235	The provider uses a special dye, fluorescein that causes the blood vessels in the one or both eyes to stand out in photographic images taken with the use of multiframe timing, or serial images, taken…	90	$110	$9.9K
67036	The provider removes vitreous fluid from the eye to access the posterior segment of the eye and introduce surgical instruments through incisions in the pars plana.	10	$550	$7.2K

Showing 1–10 of 17

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 17 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Washington Distribution

Jane Myung — 2 of 17 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Washington

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

17 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
J2777	17	50	12,780	$30	$599.7K
J0178	13	90	470	$680	$597.2K
67028	11	110	550	$90	$72.9K
67042	29	40	30	$1,190	$39.2K
67036	20	20	20	$1,140	$28.6K
92014	17	790	110	$80	$16.8K
99214	1,099	10,860	100	$80	$13.6K
92012	111	220	70	$70	$12.9K
J9035	4	40	70	$50	$10.9K
92235	15	50	50	$110	$8.3K

Showing 1–10 of 17

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Jane Myung, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Penporn Reck	WA	Ophthalmology Physician	$802.6K	$0
Grant Aaker	WA	Ophthalmology Physician	$481.9K	$0
Stephen Reck	WA	Ophthalmology Physician	$433.1K	$0
Anthony Grillo	WA	Cornea and External Diseases Specialist Physician	$348.5K	$0
David Pratt	WA	Plastic Surgery Within the Head and Neck (Plastic Surgery) Physician	$282.4K	$0
Clifton Blake Perry	WA	Ophthalmology Physician	$262K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Jane Myung, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Sea-mar Community Health Center	WA	Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC)	$0	$8M
National Seating & Mobility, Inc.	WA	Durable Medical Equipment & Medical Supplies	$0	$5.9M
Vest Thurston LLC	WA	Psychiatric Hospital	$0	$2.6M
Laser & Surgery Center, LLC	WA	Ambulatory Surgical Clinic/Center	$1.5M	$4K
Crystal Adams	WA	Gynecologic Oncology Physician	$183.2K	$0
David Overton	WA	Physician Assistant	$158.1K	$0
Fred Meyer Stores Inc	WA	Community/Retail Pharmacy	$142.3K	$100
Justin Suszko	WA	Radiation Oncology Physician	$128K	$0
Stephanie Sparks	WA	Physical Therapist	$112.8K	$0
Abraham Jeon	WA	Family Medicine Physician	$91.6K	$0

Jane Myung — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Jane Myung — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Jane Myung — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Jane Myung — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References