3–5 Pathogen Panel — Medically Necessary
Covered when ALL of the following criteria are met:
ALL of the following
Testing is for a diagnosis listed in the policy; see the Billing Guidelines for the complete list of diagnosis codes.
Testing is for an individual at high risk for complications of respiratory viral infection.
Testing will be used to guide or alter management.
3–5 Pathogen Panel — Not Medically Necessary
Respiratory viral panels of 3–5 pathogens are considered not medically necessary when the medical-necessity requirements below are not all met:
Any of the following
Testing is not for a diagnosis listed in the policy.
The individual is not at high risk for complications of respiratory viral infection.
Testing will not be used to guide or alter management.
Panels of 6 or More Pathogens
Panels testing for 6 or more pathogens are not medically necessary.
ALL of the following
The test is a multiplex PCR respiratory viral panel testing for 6 or more pathogens.
The panel is determined not medically necessary regardless of individual risk status or intended management use.
High-Risk Individuals
Evidence supports respiratory viral panel testing of 5 or fewer targets when ALL of the following criteria are met:
ALL of the following
The individual is at high risk for complications of respiratory viral infection, including an immunocompromised individual.
The clinical presentation and diagnosis support respiratory viral testing under the policy.
The test result will be used to guide or alter clinical management.
Average-Risk Individuals
Routine respiratory viral panel testing is not supported for average-risk individuals.
All of the following describe the evidence limitation
The individual is at average risk for complications of respiratory viral infection.
The testing is being considered as routine respiratory viral panel testing.
Improved clinical outcomes have not been demonstrated in this population.
Large Panels With 6 or More Targets
Use of large respiratory viral panels is not supported by sufficient evidence.
ALL of the following
The panel contains 6 or more pathogen targets.
Evidence is insufficient to establish the clinical utility of the large panel.
Additional large diagnostic cohort studies are needed to establish clinical utility.
Influenza Testing Indications
Influenza testing is supported or may be considered when the result is expected to influence clinical management, including the following situations:
ONE or more of the following
ALL of the following
The patient is at high risk for influenza complications, including an immunocompromised person.
The patient presents with influenza-like illness, pneumonia, or nonspecific respiratory illness, such as cough without fever.
The test result will influence clinical management.
ALL of the following
The patient presents with acute-onset respiratory symptoms, with or without fever.
Multiplex PCR respiratory viral panels testing for 6 or more pathogens are excluded from coverage because they are considered not medically necessary under this policy. The policy identifies the applicable large-panel CPT codes as 87632, 87633, 0115U, 0202U, 0223U, and 0225U.
Routine respiratory viral panel testing is not supported in average-risk individuals because studies to date have not demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in this population.
Evidence is insufficient to support large viral panels containing 6 or more pathogen targets. Additional large diagnostic cohort studies are needed to establish their clinical utility.
A respiratory viral panel testing 3–5 pathogens is not medically necessary when criterion I is not met—that is, when the testing is not for a policy-listed diagnosis, the individual is not at high risk for complications of respiratory viral infection, or the result will not guide or alter management.
Multiplex PCR respiratory viral panels testing for 6 or more pathogens are considered not medically necessary, including panels billed with CPT codes 87632, 87633, 0115U, 0202U, 0223U, and 0225U.
Testing in average-risk individuals is unsupported when clinical utility has not been demonstrated, because available studies have not shown improved clinical outcomes in this population.