Prescription Digital Therapeutics
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for all Premera Bluecross policy alerts
Know when Premera Bluecross releases new policies or updates existing guidance.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines medical necessity and investigational coverage criteria for prescription digital therapeutics prescribed by licensed practitioners and used to evaluate, diagnose, manage, or treat illnesses or symptoms; applies to Premera benefit determinations.
Added SleepioRX to list of investigational digital therapeutic devices that are considered investigational.
Removed d-Nav Insulin management, Mahana for IBS, and Regulora for IBS as they are no longer marketed in the US.
Added new HCPCS code A9294, effective April 1, 2026.
Coverage Criteria for Prescription Digital Therapeutics
Medical Necessity — Prescription digital therapeutics are considered medically necessary when ALL of the following criteria in A and B have been met:
inv-01: Medical Necessity — Prescription digital therapeutics are considered medically necessary when ALL of the following criteria in A and B have been met:
ALL of the following
ALL of the following
- The prescription digital therapeutic has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA);
- There is credible scientific evidence which permits reasonable conclusions regarding the impact of the prescription digital therapeutic on health outcomes;
- The prescription digital therapeutic has been proven to improve the net health outcome or is considered as beneficial as another established alternative. (See Related Policies)
ALL of the following
- The prescription digital therapeutic requires a prescription by a licensed healthcare practitioner;
- There is documentation supporting that the prescription digital therapeutic was ordered for a covered purpose such as preventing, evaluating, diagnosing, or treating an illness, injury or disease or its symptoms and in accordance with generally accepted standards of medical practice;
- The requested prescription digital therapeutic is not primarily for the convenience of the individual, physician, or health care provider
Investigational — Prescription digital therapeutics are considered investigational when ALL of the above criteria are not met.
inv-02: Investigational — Prescription digital therapeutics are considered investigational when ALL of the above criteria are not met.
ALL of the following
- Prescription digital therapeutics are considered investigational when one or more medical necessity criteria are not met (e.g., no FDA approval/clearance for the intended use, insufficient credible scientific evidence demonstrating net health benefit, or not appropriate for the individual);
- FDA-approved or cleared devices may still be considered investigational if evidence for the specific indicated use, population, or clinical outcome is insufficient or if limitations in study design/generalizability exist;
- Examples of products considered investigational (not exhaustive): BlueStarRx System; Canvas Dx autism diagnosis aid; CT-132; CureSight CS 100 System; DaylightRx; EndeavorRx; EpiMonitor; HaloAF Detection System; Insulia Diabetes Management Companion; leva Pelvic Digital Health System; Luminopia One; MamaLift Plus; MindMotion GO; My Dose Coach; NightWare; Rejoyn; RelieVRx; ReSet; ReSet-O; RevitalVision; SleepioRX.
General sufficiency conclusions — Conclusions from the evidence summaries in this section
inv-04: General sufficiency conclusions — Conclusions from the evidence summaries in this section
ALL of the following
- Evidence for many prescription digital therapeutics is limited by small sample sizes, short follow-up, high attrition, lack of blinding, or single-center designs;
- Randomized controlled trials exist for some products with positive signals for specific outcomes (e.g., Luminopia One, Luminopia RCT; RelieVRx RCT), but generalizability and durability often remain uncertain;
- Where randomized evidence is absent, conflicting, or of low quality, the evidence is insufficient to determine improvement in net health outcome;
- FDA clearance/approval status should be considered alongside the strength and applicability of peer-reviewed evidence when evaluating coverage decisions.
Positive signals with limitations — Devices with RCTs showing benefit in at least one outcome but with limitations
inv-05: Positive signals with limitations — Devices with RCTs showing benefit in at least one outcome but with limitations
ANY of the following
- RelieVRx (EaseVRx): RCTs show reductions in pain intensity and interference versus sham VR with moderate effect sizes and durability to 6 months, but studies had limited generalizability and potential bias;
- Luminopia One: RCT demonstrated improvement in amblyopic eye visual acuity versus refractive correction alone in children 4–7 years, but study stopped early and had some missing data;
- CureSight CS 100: RCT evidence exists for amblyopia treatment versus patching with specified dosing regimens, though direct comparisons and long-term outcomes vary;
- EndeavorRx: RCT showed improvement on a validated attention test but no consistent improvements on parent/clinician symptom ratings; authors noted insufficiency to replace established ADHD treatments.
Coverage considerations by product — Evidence-based coverage considerations depend on device, indication, and quality/duration of evidence. Examples from the document:
inv-06: Coverage considerations by product — Evidence-based coverage considerations depend on device, indication, and quality/duration of evidence. Examples from the document:
ALL of the following
- Products with robust randomized, placebo- or active-controlled trials demonstrating clinically meaningful and durable benefit for specified outcomes are more likely to meet medical necessity when prescribed within the studied indication and population;
- Products supported only by single-arm studies, small RCTs with methodological limitations, or nonpeer-reviewed data are less likely to meet medical necessity until higher-quality evidence is available;
- Common exclusions in study populations (e.g., bipolar disorder, psychosis, seizure disorder, concurrent psychotherapy or medication changes) should be considered when applying trial results to individual patients;
- Use outside FDA-cleared indications (e.g., age ranges, standalone use when studied as adjunctive therapy) requires careful justification and typically is investigational.
Coverage when meeting FDA-cleared indication — Devices listed have FDA-cleared indications; coverage should be considered when the device is prescribed for the FDA-cleared intended use...
inv-07: Coverage when meeting FDA-cleared indication — Devices listed have FDA-cleared indications; coverage should be considered when the device is prescribed for the FDA-cleared intended use and the medical necessity criteria are satisfied.
ALL of the following
- When a prescription digital therapeutic is prescribed consistent with its FDA-cleared/approved indication and the individual meets the medical necessity criteria, coverage may be considered;
- Examples of devices with FDA clearance/approval and specified indications include (but are not limited to): Luminopia One (amblyopia, ages 4–7), RelieVRx (chronic low back pain, adults 18+), EndeavorRx (ADHD attention function, children 8–12), NightWare (temporary reduction of sleep disturbance related nightmares, adults 22+), Halo AF Detection System (pulse rhythm monitoring for atrial fibrillation), leva Pelvic Health System (pelvic floor strengthening for urinary incontinence), BlueStarRx and Insulia/My Dose Coach (diabetes management aids), CureSight CS100 (amblyopia, ages 4–<9).
Investigational / Medical Necessity status (document history) — Policy-level determinations and historical actions
inv-08: Investigational / Medical Necessity status (document history) — Policy-level determinations and historical actions
ALL of the following
- Policy history documents additions and removals of products considered investigational vs medically necessary over time; updates include device additions, coding updates (HCPCS/CPT), and periodic literature reviews through specified dates;
- As of the 04/01/26 annual review, SleepioRX was added to the list of investigational devices and HCPCS code A9294 was added effective April 1, 2026;
- This policy is not applicable to Medicare Advantage and member contract language may alter benefit determinations; always verify individual plan benefits.
Coding and Billing
| 0687T | Treatment of amblyopia using an online digital program; device supply, educational set-up, and initial session (use to report: RevitalVision) |
| 0688T | Treatment of amblyopia using an online digital program; assessment of patient performance and program data by physician or other qualified health care professional, with report, per calendar month (use to report: RevitalVision) |
| 0704T | Remote treatment of amblyopia using an eye tracking device; device supply with initial set-up and patient education on use of equipment (use to report: CureSight CS 100) |
| 0705T | Remote treatment of amblyopia using an eye tracking device; surveillance center technical support including data transmission with analysis, with a minimum of 18 training hours, each 30 days (use to report: CureSight CS 100) |
| 0706T | Remote treatment of amblyopia using an eye tracking device; interpretation and report by physician or other qualified health care professional, per calendar month (use to report: CureSight CS 100) |
| 0740T | Remote autonomous algorithm-based recommendation system for insulin dose calculation and titration; initial set-up and patient |
| 0741T | Remote autonomous algorithm-based recommendation system for insulin dose calculation and titration; provision of software, data collection, transmission, and storage, each 30 days |
| 99199 | Unlisted special service, procedure or report |
| A9291 | Prescription digital cognitive and/or behavioral therapy, FDA-cleared, per course of treatment (use to report: ReSet and ReSet-O) |
| A9292 | Prescription digital visual therapy, software-only, FDA cleared, per course of treatment (use to report: Luminopia) |
| A9999 | Miscellaneous DME supply or accessory, not otherwise specified |
| E1399 | Durable medical equipment, miscellaneous |
| E1905 | Virtual reality cognitive behavioral therapy device (CBT), including pre-programmed therapy software (use to report: RelieVRx) |
| G0552 | Supply of digital mental health treatment device and initial education and onboarding, per course of treatment that augments a behavioral therapy plan |
| G0553 | First 20 minutes of monthly treatment management services directly related to the patient's therapeutic use of the digital mental health treatment (dmht) device that augments a behavioral therapy plan |
| G0554 | Each additional 20 minutes of monthly treatment management services directly related to the patient's therapeutic use of the digital mental health treatment (dmht) device that augments a behavioral therapy plan |
| S9002 | Intravaginal motion sensor system, provides biofeedback for pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation device (used to report Leva Pelvic Health System) |
| DEN240064 | De Novo submission identifier for CT-132 (Click Therapeutics) |
| K233872 | 510(k) clearance for DaylightRx (Big Health Inc.) |
| K233577 | 510(k) clearance for SleepioRx (Big Health Inc.) |
| K223515 | 510(k) clearance for MamaLift Plus (Curio Digital Therapeutics) |
| DEN240064 | De Novo authorization identifier for CT-132 (Click Therapeutics) |
| K233872 | FDA 510(k) clearance for DaylightRx (Big Health Inc.) |
| K233577 | FDA 510(k) clearance for SleepioRx (Big Health Inc.) |
| K223515 | FDA 510(k) clearance for MamaLift Plus (Curio Digital Therapeutics) |
| K231209 | FDA 510(k) clearance for Rejoyn (CT-152) (Otsuka) |
| K232915 | FDA 510(k) clearance for EpiMonitor (Empatica) |
| K221375 | FDA 510(k) clearance for CureSight-CS100 (NovaSight) |
| DEN210005 | De Novo authorization for Luminopia One |
| DEN210014 | De Novo authorization for RelieVRx (AppliedVR) |
| DEN200026 | De Novo authorization for EndeavorRx (Akili Interactive Labs) |
| A9294 | HCPCS code added effective 04/01/2026 |
| A9291 | HCPCS code present in history entries |
| A9292 | HCPCS code present in history entries |
| A9281 | HCPCS code removed earlier (history notes correction) |
| E1905 | HCPCS code added 04/01/23 |
| S9002 | HCPCS code added 06/01/24 |
| G0552 | HCPCS code added 01/01/25 |
| G0553 | HCPCS code added 01/01/25 |
| G0554 | HCPCS code added 01/01/25 |
Provider Requirements, Authorization, and Documentation
Coding‑linked authorization — Prior authorization required and must use listed codes
Prior authorization/coverage determination is required for prescription digital therapeutics when billing for covered services. Billing must use the CPT/HCPCS codes listed in the policy and authorization will be linked to those codes; use of alternative or unlisted codes may result in denial or delay.
Prescription‑only devices may require prior authorization
Many prescription digital therapeutics are regulated as prescription‑only devices; a valid prescription/order from a licensed practitioner is required for coverage. Lack of a required prescription or ordering inconsistent with FDA labeling may trigger non‑coverage.
- Examples of prescription‑only devices in this policy: SleepioRX, MamaLift Plus, Rejoyn, RelieVRx, Luminopia One, CureSight CS100, Insulia, My Dose Coach, NightWare, Halo AF, leva Pelvic Health System
- OTC or non‑prescription digital therapeutics are generally excluded from most Plans
Prior authorization requirements — documentation expectations
Prior authorization requires supporting documentation demonstrating medical necessity: diagnosis, baseline severity measures, validated outcome scores where applicable, and objective clinical data (e.g., HbA1c for diabetes tools). Ensure documentation demonstrates the device is ordered for a covered purpose and consistent with generally accepted standards of practice.
- Diabetes tools: baseline and follow‑up HbA1c, hypoglycemia frequency, insulin regimen and medication history, usage/adherence data
- Mental health tools: validated scales such as EPDS, HAMD-17, MADRS or other disorder‑specific validated instruments
- Sleep/insomnia tools: Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) or clinician diagnosis of insomnia; consider evidence of prior face‑to‑face CBT‑I when applicable
Prescription and FDA‑clearance implication
FDA regulatory status can affect coverage and whether a device is prescription‑only; De Novo or 510(k) clearance may clarify intended use and prescription requirements. Coverage is contingent on meeting medical necessity criteria and supporting evidence, regardless of clearance.
- Devices cleared via De Novo or 510(k) (examples: Luminopia One, RelieVRx, EndeavorRx, SleepioRX, DaylightRx, CT‑132) may still be subject to prescription requirements and prior authorization
- FDA clearance for adjunctive use (e.g., adjunct to clinician‑managed care) often implies prescription and monitoring expectations
Prior authorization and prescription — devices are often adjunctive and clinician‑managed
Many covered devices are prescription‑use software intended as adjuncts to clinician‑managed care; prior authorization should reflect that ongoing clinician oversight and monitoring channels (e.g., clinician dashboards) may be required.
- Products often include clinician portals or dashboards (e.g., Insulia, My Dose Coach, MamaLift Plus) and prior authorization may require documentation of the prescribing clinician's role and follow‑up plan
- Adjunctive‑use devices are not intended as first‑line standalone replacements for established therapies
Coding / prior authorization note — coding updates and new HCPCS A9294 (04/01/2026)
Coding and prior authorization rules are updated periodically; note the addition of new HCPCS code A9294 effective 04/01/2026. Use current code lists when submitting authorization and claims to avoid denial.
- New HCPCS: A9294 effective 04/01/2026 (Prescription digital cognitive/behavioral therapy, biofeedback)
- Verify CPT/HCPCS changes at time of submission and reference policy history for recent updates
Triggers for denial — services not meeting medical necessity or documentation requirements
Services that do not meet ALL applicable medical necessity criteria, lack required prescription or supporting documentation, fail to use authorized billing codes, or rely on devices with insufficient evidence (failed primary endpoints, high attrition, limited generalizability) are at risk for denial.
- Failed pivotal trial primary endpoint (e.g., NightWare) is a denial trigger
- High nonuse/attrition rates or insufficient real‑world adherence data may lead to investigational determination and denial
- Absence of FDA clearance/prescription‑only labeling when required may prompt non‑coverage
Nonuse / attrition risk — high attrition may limit evidence of effectiveness
High attrition, limited long‑term data, or failure to demonstrate net health outcome improvements in pivotal trials may render a device investigational and not covered. Document actual device use/adherence when available to support effectiveness claims.
- dCBT‑I (e.g., Sleepio) trials show high dropout/nonuse rates (average noncompletion ~35–41%); this may limit coverage unless adherence and outcomes are documented
- Diabetes titration tools: benefits in analyses often driven by users who regularly engaged with the tool; low usage in intent‑to‑treat populations weakens evidence
Failed primary endpoint — pivotal trial failures increase denial risk
A pivotal trial that fails its primary efficacy endpoint (e.g., NightWare) is a significant evidence limitation and may lead to an investigational determination and denial of coverage.
- NightWare pivotal trial did not meet the primary efficacy endpoint; coverage is uncertain and investigational per policy
Required documentation — order, objective diagnosis, baseline measures, and benefit verification
Required documentation for prior authorization includes an order from a licensed practitioner, diagnosis tied to a covered purpose, objective baseline measures, prior therapy history, and plan for clinician monitoring. Member benefit verification is required to confirm applicable benefits and any exclusions.
- Order/prescription from licensed practitioner documenting covered purpose and indication
- Objective diagnosis and baseline severity (e.g., HbA1c, ISI, EPDS, pain scores) and prior therapy history including medications and trials of standard care when applicable
- Plan for clinician follow‑up and monitoring (dashboard access, scheduled visits, treatment management services codes when billed)
- Verify member contract/benefit booklet or contact customer service for plan‑specific coverage
Diabetes outcomes and adherence — HbA1c, hypoglycemia, and usage data required
For diabetes digital therapeutics and insulin titration tools, prior authorization should include baseline and follow‑up HbA1c, record of hypoglycemic events, medication and regimen details, and documented adherence to allow assessment of clinical benefit.
- Baseline HbA1c and periodic HbA1c follow‑up values
- Documentation of insulin regimen, dosing plan entered by clinician, and any clinician configuration of dosing algorithms
- Adherence or utilization data (frequency of app use, entries, engagement) and reports of hypoglycemia
Mental health outcome measures — use validated scales and document clinician oversight
Behavioral and mental health digital therapeutics require validated outcome measures (e.g., EPDS for postpartum depression, HAMD‑17, MADRS) and confirmation that the device is intended as adjunctive to clinician‑managed care rather than a standalone treatment for serious mental illness.
- Provide baseline and follow‑up scores on validated scales used in pivotal studies (e.g., EPDS ≥4 point change considered clinically meaningful in MamaLift Plus)
- Document concomitant clinician management, ongoing medication use, and safety monitoring plans
Need for objective diagnosis and medication documentation
Objective confirmation of diagnosis and documentation of relevant medication history are needed for several devices (e.g., antidepressant use with Rejoyn, insulin medications with titration apps). Absence of objective diagnosis or medication documentation may lead to denial.
- Confirm the diagnosed condition in the medical record and include pertinent medication lists and prior treatment attempts
- For combination adjunctive indications, document that the patient remains on prescribed medications when required by device indication
Benefit verification — member contracts differ; confirm benefits
Verify member benefits before initiating authorization — member contracts vary and some plans exclude digital therapeutics or OTC products; coverage under an employer or carve‑out may follow different rules.
- Consult the member benefit booklet or contact customer service to confirm whether the specific device and associated services are a covered benefit
- Coverage granted by an employer group outside of standard plan benefits may not be governed by this policy
Step therapy — No explicit step therapy rules specified
Step therapy is not specified in this portion of the policy. There are no explicit step therapy rules documented here; follow plan‑specific utilization management rules if applicable.
- If step therapy requirements exist for a plan, those are implemented operationally outside the scope of this policy
Adjunctive use / not first‑line — document rationale for adjunctive therapy
Many digital therapeutics are intended as adjunctive treatments and not replacements for established first‑line therapies. Prior authorization should document that the device is being used as adjunctive therapy when indicated and not as a substitute for standard care.
- Examples: Sleepio, MamaLift Plus, Rejoyn, RelieVRx, Luminopia One — labeled or studied as adjunctive to clinician‑managed care
- Document prior standard therapy tried when device is not intended as first‑line
Consideration of face‑to‑face CBT‑I before digital CBT‑I
For digital CBT‑I (dCBT‑I) devices, consider whether face‑to‑face CBT‑I has been offered or is appropriate; evidence suggests face‑to‑face CBT‑I may be superior for some patients. Prior authorization may request documentation that face‑to‑face CBT‑I was not available or contraindicated when relevant.
- If face‑to‑face CBT‑I is clinically indicated and available, document rationale for choosing a digital CBT‑I adjunct (access barriers, patient preference, or clinician recommendation)
- NICE guidance notes Sleepio may be cost‑saving but more research is needed comparing to face‑to‑face CBT‑I
Adjunctive use documentation — show clinician oversight and evidence for adjunctive indication
When a device is used adjunctively, include documentation that clarifies the adjunctive indication, clinician monitoring responsibilities, and evidence that adjunctive use is supported by credible studies or FDA labeling.
- Provide evidence that adjunctive use aligns with FDA‑cleared indication and that clinician management (monitoring, medication adjustments) is planned
- Adjunctive use without documentation of clinician oversight or needed safety monitoring may be denied
Background and Evidence Summary
Prescription digital therapeutics (PDTs) are software‑based, prescribed interventions intended to evaluate, diagnose, manage, or treat diseases or symptoms. PDTs differ from general wellness or over‑the‑counter apps by being evidence‑based and subject to FDA regulatory pathways such as De Novo or 510(k); examples in the policy include device‑level FDA clearances and De Novo authorizations for multiple prescription‑use digital therapeutics.
Definitions
Policy Revision History
Annual review approved March 10, 2026; literature review through September 22, 2025; SleepioRX added to the list of investigational prescription digital therapeutics; d-Nav Insulin management, Mahana for IBS, and Regulora for IBS removed as no longer marketed in the US; HCPCS A9294 added effective April 1, 2026.
Annual review approved August 12, 2025; CT-132 added to the list of investigational prescription digital therapeutics.
Annual review approved September 10, 2024; RevitalVision added to the list of investigational prescription digital therapeutics and HCPCS code T1505 removed.
Interim review approved May 14, 2024; EpiMonitor, Rejoyn, and MamaLift Plus added to the list of investigational prescription digital therapeutics; CPT codes 0687T and 0688T and HCPCS S9002 added.
Interim review approved October 10, 2023; Pear Therapeutics products ReSet, ReSet-O, and Somryst removed as no longer in business and HCPCS code A9281 removed (history later corrected).
As a historical policy note, prescription digital therapeutics that do not meet the policy's medical necessity criteria have been classified as investigational (not medically necessary) in prior history entries; the policy history documents the dates and rationale for additions and removals to that list.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.