Plantar Fasciitis Treatments
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for Cigna Policy 0097 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 0097 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
This Cigna Coverage Policy governs coverage determinations for various minimally invasive and adjunctive treatments for plantar fasciitis for members covered under Cigna-administered health benefit plans.
Revised policy statement for not medically necessary treatments for plantar fasciitis.
Revised policy statement for experimental, investigational or unproven treatments for plantar fasciitis.
Coverage Criteria for Minimally Invasive Treatments
Coverage determinations
Policy coverage stance for specific interventions:
These interventions are considered Not Medically Necessary for the treatment of plantar fasciitis.
These interventions are considered experimental, investigational or unproven for plantar fasciitis.
Treatment pathway / Medical necessity criteria
Standard of care and treatment progression for plantar fasciitis:
Prefabricated orthoses adequate for the majority; iontophoresis may be tried as part of first-line management.
Steroid injections may provide short-term relief but carry risks (plantar fascia rupture, fat pad atrophy); night splints have supporting studies.
Surgery considered only after failure of conservative care; endoscopic techniques are less invasive with supportive retrospective data.
Coverage stance for amniotic-derived allografts
Covered only when supported by high-quality evidence meeting policy criteria
Although a pilot RCT (Cazzell et al.) reported short‑term findings, the policy concludes overall evidence is insufficient and further investigation is required.
Coverage stance for PRP / Autologous platelet-derived growth factors
Mixed evidence with some medium- and long-term benefits but high heterogeneity limits broad coverage support
High heterogeneity (I2 > 90% in some meta-analyses), variable PRP preparations, and small trial sizes limit generalizability; additional high‑quality trials recommended.
Coverage stance for allogeneic growth factors
Promising single trials but insufficient replication and safety data
Authors call for further evaluation of adverse effects, immunogenicity, and microbiologic safety before routine use.
ESWT (focal and radial)
Summary coverage logic based on evidence and FDA indications:
Heterogeneous trial results and variable quality mean ESWT may be considered case‑by‑case with required documentation of prior conservative care and alignment with FDA indication.
Injectable biologics and autologous blood
Injectable biologics and autologous blood products:
Documentation should include preparation method and objective outcome measures when requesting coverage.
Policy concludes there is insufficient evidence to support autologous whole blood injections for plantar fasciitis.
Unproven/Insufficient modalities
Other procedural, ablative, and biologic interventions considered unproven or insufficiently supported:
Although some coblation devices have 510(k) clearance for soft‑tissue debridement, effectiveness for plantar fasciitis is not established.
Limited study number and small sample sizes prevent definitive conclusions.
Tenex system has 510(k) clearance for soft tissue removal, but clinical evidence specific to plantar fasciitis is limited.
Use of radiotherapy for plantar fasciitis is not routinely supported by the policy.
FDA has not approved engineered or expanded allogeneic MSC products for orthopedic applications; safety risks have been noted.
Available reports lack control groups and randomization; further rigorous trials required.
Revised policy statements (5/15/2026)
Policy summary items from the revision notes
See the main policy for the updated list of interventions retained or removed from the NMN classification.
Specific items classified as experimental/investigational are detailed elsewhere in the policy document.
The following interventions are designated Not Medically Necessary for the treatment of plantar fasciitis: radiotherapy, stem cell therapy, and stereotactic radiofrequency thermal lesioning. These treatments are excluded from coverage under this policy when billed for plantar fasciitis management.
Use of biologic injections (including autologous platelet-derived products and amniotic-derived preparations) for plantar fasciitis requires documentation of prior conservative therapy failure — typically at least 3 months — consistent with inclusion criteria used in clinical trials and summarized in the evidence reviews. Prior authorization should confirm conservative management attempts and duration before coverage is considered.
Systematic review evidence does not support the use of autologous whole blood injections for chronic tendinopathy, including plantar fasciitis; the literature review concluded that autologous whole blood injections should not be recommended for this indication due to insufficient or negative evidence.
A focused review removed several prior policy statements from this coverage document. Specifically, policy statements for laser therapy (low-level laser therapy/LLLT) and coblation (e.g., Topaz™) were removed during the focused review as noted in the revision history.
Examples of procedure and supply codes referenced in the policy as excluded or considered experimental/unproven when used for plantar fasciitis include: CPT 28899 (unlisted foot procedure) and the bone marrow harvesting series 38230, 38232, 38240, 38241 (listed as Not Medically Necessary), as well as codes listed as experimental/unproven for this indication such as CPT 28890, 0232T, and HCPCS codes for amniotic/skin substitute products (e.g., Q4139, Q4155, Q4174, Q4192, Q4215).
The policy concludes that injectable amniotic-derived allografts are not supported by sufficient peer-reviewed evidence for plantar fasciitis and therefore are considered not supported for coverage. For platelet-rich plasma (PRP), systematic reviews and meta-analyses report mixed results with some medium-term benefit (3–6 months) versus corticosteroids but high heterogeneity and inconsistent long-term findings, leaving PRP's overall benefit uncertain.
The following modalities are considered unproven or insufficiently supported for the treatment of plantar fasciitis: coblation (plasma radiofrequency techniques), intracorporeal pneumatic shock therapy (IPST), percutaneous ultrasonic ablation (e.g., Tenex), and stem cell therapy. The literature notes limited or no supportive randomized data and therefore these procedures are not established as effective for this indication.
Policy statements classifying treatments as Not Medically Necessary were revised during the Annual Review dated 5/15/2026; the revision updated the not medically necessary language and the specific therapies included in that category in the main policy text.
Coding and Regulatory Information
| 28899 | Unlisted procedure, foot or toes. |
| 38230 | Bone marrow harvesting for transplantation; allogeneic. |
| 38232 | Bone marrow harvesting for transplantation; autologous. |
| 38240 | Hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC); allogeneic transplantation per donor. |
| 38241 | Hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC); autologous transplantation |
| 77401 | Radiation treatment delivery, superficial and/or ortho voltage, per day (Code deleted 12/31/2025). |
| 28890 | Extracorporeal shock wave, high energy, performed by a physician or other qualified health care professional, requiring anesthesia other than local, including ultrasound guidance, involving the plantar fascia. |
| 28899 | Unlisted procedure, foot or toes. |
| 0232T | Injection(s), platelet rich plasma, any site, including image guidance, harvesting and preparation when performed. |
| Q4100 | Skin substitute, not otherwise specified. |
| Q4139 | AmnioMatrix or BioDMatrix, injectable, 1 cc. |
| Q4155 | Neox Flo or Clarix Flo 1 mg. |
| Q4174 | PalinGen or ProMatrX, 0.36 mg per 0.25 cc. |
| Q4192 | Restorigin, 1 cc. |
| Q4215 | Axolotl ambient or axolotl cryo, 0.1 mg. |
| FDA 510(k) | Regulatory pathway for PRP preparation systems (CBER/FDA reference) |
| NBN | FDA product code for ESWT devices (example) |
Provider Requirements, Prior Authorization, and Documentation
Verify benefit plan, laws/regulations, and collateral materials
Coverage determinations require review of the member's applicable benefit plan document, relevant laws/regulations, collateral materials (including Cigna Coverage Policies and delegated vendor guidelines where applicable), and the specific facts of the case before a coverage decision is made.
Prior authorization must document failed conservative therapy (typically ≥3 months)
Obtain prior authorization when required and include documentation confirming failure of conservative therapy—studies and policy references generally require at least 3 months of conservative care prior to advanced biologic or procedural treatments.
- Submit clinical documentation showing prior conservative therapy attempts and durations (typically ≥3 months as required in PRP trials).
- Include trial or outcomes data when available to support medical necessity determinations.
Prior-authorize ESWT per FDA PMA indication and document symptom duration
For requests for ESWT, prior authorization should confirm the device is being used consistent with FDA PMA indications: chronic proximal plantar fasciitis in adults with symptoms ≥6 months that have failed conservative therapy.
- Document symptom duration (≥6 months) and prior conservative therapy attempts and objective outcome measures referenced in trials (e.g., VAS, AOFAS).
- Note device regulatory status (ESWT devices = FDA Class III, PMA).
Prior authorization required for experimental/unproven procedures with supporting evidence
Treatments described in the policy as experimental, investigational, or unproven (for example, coblation, IPST, percutaneous ultrasonic ablation, stereotactic radiofrequency thermal lesioning, and stem cell therapies) generally require prior authorization and submission of supporting evidence; absence of high-quality supportive evidence may result in denial.
- Provide randomized trial data or technology-assessment evidence when available; if not provided, requests may be denied as unproven.
- Policy revisions on 5/15/2026 affirm prior authorization and evidence requirements for these modalities.
Require documented progression through first‑ and second‑line conservative care
Follow stepwise conservative therapy: initial first‑line care (stretching, ice, activity modification, weight management, appropriate footwear, arch taping, NSAIDs, shock‑absorbing inserts/orthoses) and progress to second‑line measures (night splints, steroid injections, short‑leg walking cast) before considering advanced interventions.
- Surgery considered only after 6–12 months of proper conservative treatment.
- Document each conservative modality tried and duration as part of the authorization request.
Document prior conservative therapy before biologic or procedural treatments
Document stepwise management with recorded conservative measures (e.g., RICE, stretching, NSAIDs, orthotics) prior to biologic injections or procedural therapies; many studies and trial inclusion criteria required prior conservative treatment.
- Include dates, modalities, and patient response for each conservative intervention.
- Note exclusions: prior surgery, trauma, or other confounding conditions may affect eligibility per trial criteria.
Conservative-care failure is a prerequisite in many trials—document before advanced therapy
Recognize that many clinical studies require failure of conservative care (stretching, NSAIDs, heel pads, orthotics, exercise) prior to enrollment; consider this conservative therapy prerequisite when evaluating coverage and prior authorization requests.
- Ensure prior conservative therapy duration and content match study or device indication requirements when used to support coverage.
Document prior conservative therapies (stretching, orthoses, night splints, injections)
When requesting coverage, include explicit documentation of prior conservative therapies such as stretching programs, use of orthoses or night splints, and any prior injections (steroid or other), with dates and clinical response.
- List each conservative measure tried, the start and end dates, patient adherence, and objective or subjective response.
- Attach relevant clinical notes, imaging, and trial outcome measures when available.
Use correct, policy‑effective procedure codes or risk denial
Use the most appropriate CPT/HCPCS codes effective on the date of service; claims for services lacking covered codes under this policy will be denied as not covered.
- Avoid billing codes explicitly listed as Not Medically Necessary (e.g., 28899) for plantar fasciitis treatments.
- Confirm applicable code groups in the policy Coding section before claim submission.
Provide required clinical documentation: prior conservative failure and objective outcome measures
Include clinical documentation showing duration of failed conservative therapy (studies generally required ≥3 months), and objective pain/function measures (e.g., VAS, AOFAS, FFI) when requesting coverage for biologics or procedures.
- For PRP and other biologics, include details of biologic preparation/administration given variability in methods.
- Attach outcome measures reported in trials to support medical necessity.
ESWT-specific documentation: prior therapy duration (≥6 months) and objective outcomes
For ESWT requests, document prior conservative therapy attempts and duration consistent with the FDA indication (e.g., symptoms ≥6 months) and include objective outcome measures and trial data when available.
- Include VAS, AOFAS, FADI, or plantar fascia thickness measurements used in supporting trials.
- Attach relevant randomized trial or technology-assessment evidence if requesting coverage despite mixed evidence.
Attach clinical notes, imaging, and trial evidence for minimally invasive procedures or ESWT
Include supporting clinical documentation—clinical notes, imaging, and trial data—when requesting coverage for minimally invasive procedures or ESWT because the literature notes limited study quality and the need for rigorous supporting evidence.
- Provide randomized controlled trial data or technology assessment citations when available to substantiate medical necessity.
- Attach imaging (e.g., ultrasound of plantar fascia) and pre/post outcome measures.
Claims lacking covered codes will be denied
Claims submitted without a covered code under this policy will be denied as not covered; verify coding aligns with the policy Coding Information prior to submission.
- Denials may result if the service is billed with codes that are not listed as covered for the procedure.
Use of Not Medically Necessary codes (e.g., 28899) may trigger denial
Avoid billing codes listed as Not Medically Necessary for plantar fasciitis (for example, unlisted foot procedure 28899 and listed bone marrow/hematopoietic progenitor cell harvesting codes), as their use may trigger claim denial.
- Confirm whether a code appears in the policy's Not Medically Necessary code list before billing.
Insufficient/highly heterogeneous evidence for biologics may lead to denial
Be aware that interventions with insufficient high‑quality evidence—such as amniotic‑derived allografts and PRP when unsupported by trial criteria—may be denied if submitted without meeting policy criteria or without high‑quality supportive evidence.
- For amniotic-derived allografts, the policy states there is insufficient evidence to support use for plantar fasciitis.
- For PRP, heterogeneity and mixed results mean coverage is limited unless trial-aligned documentation is provided.
Autologous whole blood injections lack evidence and may be denied
Autologous whole blood injections are not recommended based on review evidence; submission for coverage without supportive high-quality evidence may be denied as not medically necessary.
- The systematic review found strong evidence that autologous whole blood injections should not be recommended for chronic tendinopathy/plantar fasciitis.
Unproven procedures are likely to be denied without high‑quality evidence
Procedures classified as unproven in the policy (e.g., coblation, intracorporeal pneumatic shock therapy, percutaneous ultrasonic ablation, stem cell therapies, stereotactic radiofrequency lesioning) are likely to be denied unless high‑quality supportive evidence is submitted.
- Provide rigorous RCTs or technology-assessment findings to overcome unproven status; absent such evidence, expect denial.
ESWT may be denied without indication‑consistent documentation and supportive evidence
Recognize ESWT carries uncertainty in efficacy and cost‑effectiveness per technology assessments (e.g., WSHCA); requests for ESWT may be denied when supportive, high‑quality evidence or indication‑consistent documentation is lacking.
- When requesting ESWT coverage, include trial evidence and documentation that the indication and symptom duration (≥6 months) meet FDA-labeled criteria.
Background and Evidence Summary
Plantar fasciitis is an overuse injury characterized by inflammation and degeneration of the plantar fascia, typically presenting as heel pain that is worse with the first steps after rest and with focal tenderness over the medial calcaneal tubercle. Risk factors include obesity, older age, female sex, limited ankle dorsiflexion, and increased weight-bearing activity; early conservative treatment generally reduces symptom duration.
Definitions and Key Terms
Policy Revision History
Annual Review updated the policy statement for treatments considered Not Medically Necessary for plantar fasciitis (revised not medically necessary language).
Annual Review revised the policy statement classifying certain treatments as experimental, investigational, or unproven for plantar fasciitis.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.