Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells for Cancer Management (Liquid Biopsy)
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for all blue cross blue shield - kansas policy alerts
Know when blue cross blue shield - kansas releases new policies or updates existing guidance.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines BCBSKS coverage stance for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cell (CTC) testing for cancer management, excluding indications addressed in separate policies; applies to BCBSKS members and providers determining medical necessity for these tests.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage Criteria — ctDNA and CTC (Liquid Biopsy)
Not covered except where other policies apply
Covered only as specified in related, separate policy guidelines; all other uses:
See separate policies for certain tumor-specific, companion diagnostic, and tumor-informed ctDNA uses.
Coverage logic for CTC/ctDNA uses
Policy conclusions and criteria logic summarized from this section of the evidence review:
Trials are ongoing; see supplemental materials referenced in the full review.
Best unit for quantifying ctDNA burden not established.
Further details in subsequent sections of the evidence review.
Coverage for post-curative surveillance using ctDNA/CTCs
Covered when ALL of the following are met
see source RCT populations
Liquid biopsy using ctDNA or CTCs
Sensitivity critical to ensure benefit of early treatment
Clinical benefit must be demonstrated versus standard surveillance
Contexts with randomized direct evidence
Evidence-based contexts where ctDNA testing demonstrated clinical outcomes or strong prognostic validity
Trial limitations include undefined concentration thresholds and other design limitations; see study limitations tables.
Real-world monitoring / prognostic use
Observational/real-world evidence supporting prognostic use in lung cancers
Study limitations include non-standardized timing (6-15 weeks) and variability in assays and specimen types.
Coverage conclusions and required evidentiary logic
Summary of coverage-relevant conclusions from evidence review
One RCT exists but limitations preclude conclusions (see chunk 76).
No trials demonstrating improved outcomes based on CTC-guided treatment (chunks 75, 76).
RCTs show correlation with worse outcomes but thresholds for individual prediction are not established (chunk 77).
Absent validated management pathways, no inference on clinical utility (chunk 74).
This policy does not address the use of blood-based testing (liquid biopsy) to select targeted treatment for certain tumor types, including breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma/glioma, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and prostate cancer. It also excludes use of liquid biopsy to select immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, tumor‑informed ctDNA testing for cancer management, comprehensive genomic profiling for selecting targeted cancer therapies, blood‑based testing for detection or risk assessment of prostate cancer, and AR‑V7 circulating tumor cell (CTC) testing for metastatic prostate cancer. Refer to the member's contract benefits at the time of service to determine coverage for these services.
Alternate listing: the policy specifically excludes liquid biopsy to select targeted therapies for breast, non‑small cell lung, melanoma/glioma, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers; selection of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy based on blood testing; tumor‑informed ctDNA testing for management; comprehensive genomic profiling via blood; blood‑based prostate cancer detection/risk assessment; and AR‑V7 CTC testing for metastatic prostate cancer. Coverage determinations depend on the member's contract benefits.
Use of ctDNA or CTC assays for purposes other than monitoring for residual tumor or molecular relapse (for example, unrelated population screening) is not described as an intended use in this policy. When tissue biopsy is feasible, tissue‑based molecular characterization remains the expected comparator and individuals with negative liquid biopsy results should be reflexed to tumor biopsy testing if able to undergo tissue sampling.
Because assays, timing, and definitions of molecular response vary substantially across studies, heterogeneity and lack of standardized definitions reduce the ability to generalize results and may confound clinical validity. Assay variability and inconsistent timepoints limit comparability across tests and studies and should be considered when interpreting results or requesting coverage.
ASCO guidance states that, in early‑stage breast cancer (node‑negative or node‑positive ER‑positive, HER2‑positive, or triple‑negative disease), clinicians should not use ctDNA or circulating tumor cells to guide decisions about adjuvant endocrine therapy or adjuvant chemotherapy (evidence‑based recommendation; strength: strong).
Administrative note: this policy does not address use of liquid biopsy to select targeted treatments for the tumor types listed above, nor does it address tumor‑informed ctDNA testing or AR‑V7 CTC testing for metastatic prostate cancer; such uses are outside the scope of this policy and require review under the applicable tumor‑specific policy or the member's contract.
Coverage stance: circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cell (CTC) testing for indications not otherwise addressed in this policy or in separate, tumor‑specific policies is considered experimental/investigational and not medically necessary.
Currently available commercially marketed CTC assays lack independently established clinical validity for the management decisions reviewed here; therefore, using CTC test results to select or guide treatment is not supported by sufficient evidence of clinical utility.
Assay sensitivity is critical for clinical utility in the MRD/molecular relapse setting. Tests that cannot detect ultra‑low ctDNA concentrations risk high false‑negative rates and would not meet the necessary clinical validity for MRD surveillance or for informing early intervention decisions.
Performance limitation: clinical sensitivity of ctDNA assays for postoperative MRD detection is often suboptimal, with sensitivity shortly after completion of therapy frequently reported at or below 50% (≤50%), while clinical specificity is generally high (often ≥90%). Variable performance across assays and timepoints limits reliability for routine MRD use.
ASCO recommendation: clinicians should not use ctDNA or CTC to guide adjuvant endocrine or chemotherapy decisions in node‑negative or node‑positive ER‑positive, HER2‑positive, or triple‑negative early‑stage breast cancer (strong, evidence‑based recommendation).
Covered Indications and Accepted Uses
FDA-cleared companion diagnostic liquid biopsy assays for specific tumor types are recognized and are addressed in their respective policy opinions.
These FDA-cleared or approved companion diagnostic liquid biopsy assays are recognized and handled in their tumor-specific policies; listed here for information:
Refer to the related somatic biomarker and tumor-specific policy opinions for coverage details.
Patient populations and intended use categories (selection, monitoring, surveillance)
Patient populations and intended-use categories include the following:
ASCO notes cfDNA may be used when tissue is unavailable.
Evidence for improved outcomes from monitoring is insufficient but kinetics can be prognostic.
Assay sensitivity and timing are critical for MRD use.
Guiding adjuvant chemotherapy in select stage II colon cancer patients (DYNAMIC trial evidence)
Guiding adjuvant chemotherapy in select stage II colon cancer patients — randomized trial evidence:
Ordering clinicians should document intended management action and assay used because results are assay- and protocol-specific.
On-treatment ctDNA monitoring in lung cancer (molecular response definitions and prognostic associations)
On-treatment ctDNA monitoring in lung cancer — molecular response definitions and prognostic associations:
Specimens were collected 6–15 weeks after therapy initiation; assay heterogeneity limits generalizability.
Use of cfDNA when tissue-based testing unavailable to identify actionable alterations for treatment selection (ASCO noted)
When tissue-based testing is unavailable and genomic testing is indicated:
Use should follow tumor-specific guidance and laboratory standards.
Not Covered / Experimental Uses
All ctDNA and/or CTC testing indications that are not specifically addressed in other policy guidelines are considered experimental/investigational and not medically necessary, and claims for such testing may be denied unless coverage is established under a separate tumor‑specific policy or member contract.
Specific tests and contexts not addressed by this policy include tumor‑informed ctDNA testing for cancer management and AR‑V7 circulating tumor cell assays for metastatic prostate cancer; these uses lack established policy coverage within this document.
Tests that are unable to reliably detect ultra‑low ctDNA concentrations, or tests not used in the context of MRD/molecular relapse monitoring, lack demonstrated clinical utility for the uses evaluated in this policy.
Circulating tumor cell assays that lack independent demonstration of clinical validity are not established as clinically useful for guiding management decisions and therefore are considered not proven for treatment selection or monitoring.
ctDNA or CTC testing to guide adjuvant therapy decisions in early‑stage breast cancer is not supported; ASCO explicitly recommends against using these assays to guide adjuvant endocrine or chemotherapy in node‑negative or node‑positive early breast cancer subtypes.
Use of liquid biopsy to select targeted therapies, to select immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, or tumor‑informed MRD approaches outside the specified indications are not covered under this policy and are treated as experimental/investigational.
Eligibility Requirements and Ordering Conditions
Eligibility excerpts: when a tissue biopsy is feasible, tissue‑based molecular characterization is the standard comparator; liquid biopsy is generally considered when tissue is unavailable or biopsy is not feasible. Individuals with negative liquid biopsy results who can undergo tissue biopsy should be reflexed to tissue testing.
Eligibility excerpts: prior authorization for MRD surveillance should confirm the individual has received curative‑intent therapy and that the intended use is monitoring for molecular/minimal residual disease or molecular relapse using an assay capable of detecting ultra‑low ctDNA concentrations; documentation should include the specific assay and intended management action.
Eligibility excerpt (ASCO‑related): ordering clinicians should document the intended management action (for example, a plan to omit or administer adjuvant chemotherapy based on ctDNA results) and specify the assay/version used because trial results and recommendations are assay‑ and protocol‑specific; ASCO also notes cfDNA testing is most helpful when tissue results are unavailable.
Provider Actions, Prior Authorization, and Documentation
Verify member benefits and contract language
Verify member benefits and contract language prior to ordering liquid biopsy. State and federal mandates and member contract provisions take precedence over this medical policy. Contact Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Customer Service to confirm benefits, prior authorization requirements, and any applicable exclusions.
- State/federal mandates and member contract language take precedence
- Contact BCBSKS Customer Service to verify benefits/prior authorization
Provide indication and assay information
Provide the clinical indication for testing and specific assay information when submitting requests or claims for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or circulating tumor cell (CTC) testing. Document the assay type (tumor‑informed vs tumor‑agnostic, PCR vs NGS), intended timing relative to curative-intent therapy, and the intended use (surveillance for MRD, guidance for adjuvant chemotherapy, or other management decisions).
- Document assay methodology (tumor‑informed vs tumor‑agnostic; PCR vs NGS)
- Specify timing (post-curative treatment surveillance timepoint)
- State intended management use (e.g., ctDNA-guided adjuvant chemotherapy)
Claims for ctDNA and/or CTC testing for unaddressed indications
Claims for ctDNA and/or CTC testing for indications not addressed in this policy are considered experimental/investigational and may be denied. Inclusion of codes in the coding section is informational and does not imply coverage — coverage depends on medical necessity and member contract.
- Tests/uses not addressed by policy are experimental/investigational
- Coverage contingent on member contract and medical necessity
Tests and uses explicitly not addressed by this policy
This policy does not address certain blood-based testing uses. Tests and uses explicitly not addressed include: selection of targeted therapy for breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma/glioma, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and prostate cancer; use of liquid biopsy to select immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy; tumor‑informed ctDNA testing for cancer management; comprehensive genomic profiling for therapy selection; blood-based detection or risk assessment of prostate cancer; and AR-V7 CTC testing for metastatic prostate cancer. Refer to the member's contract benefits for coverage decisions.
- Breast, NSCLC, melanoma/glioma, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate targeted therapy selection
- Liquid biopsy to select immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
- Tumor‑informed ctDNA testing for cancer management
- Comprehensive genomic profiling for selecting targeted therapies
- Blood-based testing for prostate cancer detection/risk assessment
- AR‑V7 CTC testing for metastatic prostate cancer
Analytic and clinical variability risks
Assays vary widely in analytic sensitivity; inability to detect ultra-low ctDNA concentrations increases the risk of false-negative results and loss of clinical utility. The heterogeneity of assays, differing timepoints, and variable definitions for ctDNA reduction or clearance confound interpretation and clinical validity. Providers should document assay performance characteristics when relying on results for management.
- Assays must detect ultra-low ctDNA concentrations to reduce false-negatives
- Heterogeneity of assays and timepoints limits ability to standardize ctDNA response definitions
- Clinical sensitivity for MRD detection shortly after therapy is often suboptimal (≤50%) despite high specificity (often ≥90%)
Reflex to tissue biopsy when liquid biopsy is negative
If a liquid biopsy (CTC or ctDNA) yields a negative result and the patient is able to undergo tissue biopsy, reflex testing of tumor tissue is expected. For patients who can undergo biopsy, tissue-based molecular testing is the comparator and generally expected to guide treatment decisions.
- Reflex to tumor tissue testing when liquid biopsy is negative and tissue is available
- Tissue-based molecular characterization is preferred for patients able to undergo biopsy
Documentation requirements — indication and intent
Documentation submitted for prior authorization or claims should include that testing is being performed in the setting of curative‑intent therapy and for surveillance (MRD) purposes when applicable. Include clinical history, dates of definitive therapy, indication for surveillance, and how results will influence management.
- State that testing is for surveillance after curative‑intent treatment when applicable
- Provide clinical history and dates of definitive therapy
- Explain how test results will change management
Trial documentation and limitations
Trials assessing ctDNA-guided management (for example, the DYNAMIC randomized trial in stage II colon cancer) provide direct evidence that ctDNA-guided adjuvant chemotherapy can reduce chemotherapy use without compromising short‑term recurrence-free survival; updated longer-term results have shown comparable 5-year RFS and OS in trial cohorts. Trial limitations (population diversity, undefined positivity thresholds, assay/version clarity, and test interpretation procedures) should be acknowledged in clinical decision-making and documentation.
- DYNAMIC trial: ctDNA-guided ACT reduced chemotherapy use and was noninferior for 2-year RFS; 5-year RFS/OS later reported as comparable
- Acknowledge trial limitations: population diversity, undefined ctDNA positivity thresholds, assay/version and test interpretation issues
Coding and medical necessity linkage
Codes listed in the coding section are informational. Medical necessity must be established and documented for coverage. Inclusion of a procedure or diagnosis code does not guarantee reimbursement. The codes are medically necessary only when the procedure is performed according to the Policy section.
- Coding lists are informational only — confirm medical necessity and member contract
- Procedure codes are considered medically necessary only if performed per Policy
Consider standard monitoring as comparator
Consider standard monitoring approaches (imaging and clinical examination) as the comparator or baseline surveillance strategy when evaluating the clinical utility of liquid biopsy. For patients unable to undergo tissue biopsy, standard therapy and standard monitoring are the typical management pathways.
- Standard monitoring = imaging methods and clinical exam
- Patients unable to undergo biopsy generally receive standard therapy
When tissue biopsy is available, prefer tissue-based testing
When patients are able to undergo tissue biopsy, tissue-based molecular testing is generally expected and is the standard comparator for molecular characterization; liquid biopsy should not replace tissue testing when tissue is available for evaluation.
- Tissue-based testing is preferred when biopsy is feasible
- Liquid biopsy is primarily an alternative when tissue cannot be obtained
ctDNA-guided adjuvant chemotherapy as a management step
ctDNA-guided adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) can be considered a step in management for select patients (e.g., stage II colon cancer) where trial evidence supports reducing ACT use without compromising recurrence outcomes. Prior authorization may be required and should confirm curative intent and how test results will be used to guide therapy.
- ctDNA-guided ACT supported by trial evidence for select stage II colon cancer patients
- Prior authorization should confirm curative intent and intended management use
Coding and Procedure Codes (Informational)
| No codes listed |
| See table | Certain liquid biopsy-based assays have been cleared or approved by the FDA as companion diagnostic tests; these are listed in the source document and addressed in tumor-specific policies (informational only). |
| 81400 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 1 (Eg, Identification Of Single Germline Variant [Eg, Snp] By Techniques Such As Restriction Enzyme Digestion Or Melt Curve Analysis) |
| 81401 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 2 (Eg, 2-10 Snps, 1 Methylated Variant, Or 1 Somatic Variant [Typically Using Nonsequencing Target Variant Analysis], Or Detection Of A Dynamic Mutation Disorder/Triplet Repeat) |
| 81402 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 3 (Eg, >10 Snps, 2-10 Methylated Variants, Or 2-10 Somatic Variants [Typically Using Non-Sequencing Target Variant Analysis], Immunoglobulin And T-Cell Receptor Gene Rearrangements, Duplication/Deletion Variants Of 1 Exon) |
| 81403 | Molecular pathology procedure, level 4 (e.g., analysis of single exon by DNA sequence analysis, analysis of >10 amplicons using multiplex pcr in 2 or more independent reactions, mutation scanning or duplication/deletion variants of 2-5 exons) |
| 81404 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 5 (Eg, Analysis Of 2-5 Exons By DNA Sequence Analysis, Mutation Scanning Or Duplication/Deletion Variants Of 6-10 Exons, Or Characterization Of A Dynamic Mutation Disorder/Triplet Repeat By Southern Blot Analysis) |
| 81405 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 6 (Eg, Analysis Of 6-10 Exons By DNA Sequence Analysis, Mutation Scanning Or Duplication/Deletion Variants Of 11-25 Exons, Regionally Targeted Cytogenomic Array Analysis) |
| 81406 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 7 (Eg, Analysis Of 11-25 Exons By DNA Sequence Analysis) |
| 81400 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 1 |
| 81401 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 2 |
| 81402 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 3 |
| 81403 | Molecular pathology procedure, level 4 |
| 81404 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 5 |
| 81405 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 6 |
| 81406 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 7 |
| 81407 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 8 |
| 81408 | Molecular Pathology Procedure, Level 9 |
| 81479 | Unlisted Molecular Pathology Procedure |
Definitions and Background
Background: Liquid biopsy refers to analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from peripheral blood. ctDNA are small fragments of tumor‑derived cell‑free DNA used to quantify tumor DNA burden and assess treatment dynamics; CTCs are intact tumor cells shed into the circulation and are primarily used for prognostic enumeration or characterization. Detection is technically challenging because tumor‑derived material can be present at very low concentrations and requires sensitive targeted or broad genomic methods.
Revision History and Document Dates
Rationale and references sections updated (document revision noted).
Current effective date of the policy set to October 2, 2023.
Original effective date recorded as February 27, 2021.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.