Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerNPI Medicare & MedicaidDouglas Debenham
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    Douglas Debenham — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

    NPI 1821056425 · Newburgh, IN · Radiation Oncology Physician

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for Douglas Debenham — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Douglas Debenham is a radiation oncology physician provider located in Newburgh, Indiana. This profile covers 11 Medicare and 0 Medicaid CPT/HCPCS procedure codes, with claims volume, average reimbursement, and total revenue by code, benchmarked against other providers billing the same services.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 9

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools

    Provider details (source: NPPES NPI Registry)

    FieldValue
    Entity TypeIndividual
    OrganizationDouglas Debenham
    Address3699 Epworth Rd
    CityNewburgh
    StateIN
    ZIP47630
    TaxonomyRadiation Oncology Physician
    NPI EnumeratedMay 3, 2006

    Lifetime revenue by payer source (source: CMS Medicare & Medicaid claims data)

    Payer SourceTotal Paid
    Medicare$1.8M
    Medicaid$0

    Key Findings

    This provider is a radiation oncology physician by taxonomy and has been NPI‑enumerated since 2006‑05‑03 (~20 years ago), indicating an established clinical presence. The Medicare billing mix is concentrated in radiation treatment delivery and planning services rather than broad primary care or procedural diversity, consistent with a specialty radiation practice model.

    Medicare is effectively the sole payer on file: total Medicare revenue is $1.8M and there is no Medicaid billing on file, so this provider operates as a single‑payer (Medicare) biller in the available data. Analysts should treat the practice as Medicare‑dependent for public payer revenue analyses.

    Revenue concentration is pronounced: the precomputed top‑3 Medicare codes account for 85.4% of total Medicare revenue. Those top three codes are G6015 ($1M, 58.4% of Medicare revenue), 77014 ($345.6K, 19.7%), and 77301 ($127.3K, 7.3%), showing most revenue is driven by a handful of treatment and planning codes.

    Operationally the code mix indicates a high-volume IMRT treatment delivery operation: G6015 appears as the dominant code with 3.6K claims and $285 avg paid/claim, consistent with routine per‑session intensity‑modulated treatment delivery. Complementary codes such as 77301 (89 claims, $1430 avg paid/claim) and 77338 (167 claims, $360 avg paid/claim) reflect planning and MLC design work necessary to support complex IMRT workflows, suggesting this provider’s services center on advanced radiotherapy courses rather than brief consults.

    Competitive standing for key treatment codes is unusually strong at the national level: G6015 ranks #28 of 1429 providers (98th percentile; extreme outlier) and 77014 ranks #32 of 4303 providers (99th percentile; extreme outlier), indicating far higher than typical national volume for those codes and positioning this provider as a major national outlier on treatment delivery volume. By contrast, 77301 ranks #309 of 3815 providers (92th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume), indicating planning activity is high relative to many peers but not as anomalous as the delivery codes.

    Several ancillary oncology support codes are also comparatively elevated: 77427 reported 728 claims with $150 avg paid/claim and $109.2K revenue (6.2% of Medicare revenue) and ranks #63 of 4720 providers (99th percentile; extreme outlier), while 77336 (730 claims, $68 avg paid/claim) ranks #50 of 1488 providers (97th percentile; notably above typical national volume). These volumes reinforce that treatment delivery plus ongoing physics/quality support are core revenue drivers for the practice.

    The absence of any Medicaid billing on file (none below) means there is no Medicaid intake to assess competitive standing or in‑state market share; state‑level payer dynamics cannot be evaluated from public claims here. For payers or analysts interested in commercial or Medicaid contracting, the data indicate negotiations would be with a Medicare‑focused radiation provider rather than a dual‑payer clinic.

    From a risk and capacity perspective, the high concentration in a few high‑volume codes (top 3 = 85.4% of Medicare revenue) implies that changes in reimbursement or utilization for those specific IMRT delivery codes would disproportionately affect the provider’s revenue stream. Given the provider’s long tenure (~20 years) and the operational footprint suggested by high session counts (e.g., 3.6K claims for both G6015 and 77014), this appears to be a mature radiation therapy operation with substantial throughput concentrated in advanced radiation delivery services.

    Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

    Medicare revenue breakdown by CPT/HCPCS procedure code.

    View: Bar Chart1 / 2

    Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

    The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

    11 rows

    CPT/HCPCS CodeDescriptionClaimsAvg PaidRevenue
    G6015Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session3,590$290$1M
    77014N/A3,640$100$345.6K
    77301Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) uses advanced computer technology to deliver very precise radiation beams that target and destroy the cancerous cells while avoiding the surrounding healthy…90$1,430$127.3K
    77427Radiation therapy utilizes ionizing radiation beams that are directed at cancerous cells in order to destroy them. The radiation, damages the DNA (the genetic material) in the cell, thus preventing…730$150$109.2K
    77338In this procedure, the provider participates in the design and construction of one or more multi–leaf collimator, MLC, devices for intensity modulated radiation therapy, IMRT. IMRT is a radiotherapy…170$360$60.1K
    77336This code is for reporting ongoing medical physics consultation. When a patient is undergoing radiation treatment for a particular span of time with a number of therapy sessions every week, the…730$70$49.6K
    77263The provider decides the location and the number of ports (the points for the radiation beams to enter the body), the design and location of the shielding blocks, and the modes of therapy (e.g., arc…90$130$11.5K
    77300Radiation therapy is one of the most effective treatment methods for cancerous tumors. Due to its negative side effects like damage to the healthy cells, radiation therapy involves thorough planning…180$50$8.9K
    99204The provider sees a new patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the provider…60$130$7.5K
    99205The provider sees a new patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a high level of medical decision making, and/or the provider…40$170$6.1K

    Showing 1–10 of 11

    Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

    How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 11 CPT/HCPCS codes.

    View: State1 / 2

    Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

    11 rows

    CPT/HCPCS CodeRankProvider CountMedian ClaimsAvg PaidAverage Revenue
    G6015120900$260$331.2K
    774271110180$140$28.9K
    7730188040$570$27.3K
    770141110500$50$27.1K
    77336130270$60$16.9K
    7733838040$220$11.6K
    77263279070$130$8.9K
    7730060110200$30$7.2K
    992053731,17030$140$5.1K
    992041,1934,69030$100$4.9K

    Showing 1–10 of 11

    Related Providers

    Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Douglas Debenham, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

    ProviderStateTaxonomyMedicare RevenueMedicaid Revenue
    St. Vincent Medical Group, Inc.INOrthopaedic Surgery Physician$0$70.4M
    Sjhmc Physician ServicesAZMulti-Specialty Clinic/Center$0$46.6M
    St. Mary's Health, Inc.INGeneral Acute Care Hospital$0$34.6M
    Scl Health Medical Group - Billings LLCMTClinic/Center$0$32.2M
    St Mary's Medical Group, LLCINFamily Medicine Physician$0$31.1M
    Riverside Radiology And Interventional Associates IncOHDiagnostic Radiology Physician$0$30.3M
    Scl Health MontanaMTGeneral Acute Care Hospital$0$13.5M
    St. Vincent Medical Group, Inc.INRural Health Clinic/Center$0$10.2M
    Scl Health Medical Group-butte LLCMTFamily Medicine Physician$0$9.9M
    St. Mary's Health, Inc.INAmbulance$792K$2.3M

    Nearby Providers

    Other providers in the same ZIP code as Douglas Debenham, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

    ProviderStateTaxonomyMedicare RevenueMedicaid Revenue
    Deaconess Women's Hospital Of Southern Indiana, LLCINGeneral Acute Care Hospital$0$6.9M
    Deaconess Clinic, IncINPediatrics Physician$0$6.6M
    Newburgh Urgent Care LLCINNurse Practitioner$0$6.2M
    Deaconess Hospital, IncINEmergency Medicine Physician$0$3.3M
    Brentwood Meadows, LLCINPsychiatric Hospital$0$3.3M
    Paul W Morrison, Md, LLCINObstetrics & Gynecology Physician$0$3.2M
    Charles LackeyINDiagnostic Radiology Physician$683.9K$0
    Mohammed AdeelINPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation Physician$298.2K$384.3K
    Anthony CzaplickiINOrthopaedic Surgery Physician$515.6K$0
    Evansville Endoscopy Surgery Center, LLCINAmbulatory Surgical Clinic/Center$489.5K$0

    Frequently Asked Questions

    References

    1. 1.Medicare Physician & Other Practitioner by Provider and Service. CMS.gov.Provider-level Medicare Part B utilization and payment data.
    2. 2.NPPES NPI Registry. CMS.gov.National Provider Identifier registry used for provider enumeration and taxonomy metadata.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Medicare Revenue by CPT/HCPCS Code
    Claims Volume vs. Indiana Distribution
    Douglas Debenham — 5 of 11 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)
    p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier
    Rank Distribution — Indiana