Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Georgia for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Georgia only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Georgia (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Sri Krishna Mukkamala (NPI 1710184148)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Sri Krishna Mukkamala
Address	1200 Northside Forsyth Dr
City	Cumming
State	GA
ZIP	30041
Taxonomy	Hospitalist Physician
NPI Enumerated	June 29, 2007

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$3.4M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider’s commercial picture is effectively single‑payer at the public level: lifetime Medicare revenue is $3.4M while there is no Medicaid billing on file, meaning Medicaid does not appear in the payer mix and Medicare accounts for the entirety of recorded public‑payer revenue. Analysts should treat this profile as concentrated in Medicare when modeling payer exposure and access to publicly insured populations.

Revenue is heavily concentrated in a very small set of intravitreal drug codes: J2777 ($1.5M revenue, 42.9% of total Medicare revenue), J0178 ($1M, 30.5%), and J2778 ($357.8K, 10.5%) — the three together account for 83.8% of Medicare revenue. This concentration indicates that most of the provider’s Medicare dollars are derived from a few high‑value ophthalmic therapeutics rather than a broad mix of evaluation & management or surgical codes.

The CPT/HCPCS mix and code descriptions show an operational focus on retina care and intravitreal therapy: large volumes for J2777 (faricimab), J0178 (aflibercept), and J2778 (ranibizumab) paired with high counts of retinal imaging (92134) and intravitreal injection procedures (67028) are consistent with a retina‑oriented ophthalmic practice that delivers frequent drug injections and diagnostic imaging. These service types dominate the reimbursement profile rather than general medical inpatient or broad primary care services.

Competitive standing is strong for several ophthalmology items: J2777 ranks #103 of 2039 nationally (95th percentile) and 92134 ranks #748 of 26868 (97th percentile, described as an extreme outlier), indicating volumes far above typical national peers for key retina injections and imaging. Several other codes (92014 at the 96th percentile and 99204 at the 97th percentile) are also notably above typical national volume, which together suggest the provider is a prominent national participant for select ophthalmic procedures and drug administration.

Payment and utilization patterns diverge by code: J2777 shows very high claim count (50.6K claims) with a low average paid/claim ($29) yet produces $1.5M in revenue, while J0178 has far fewer claims (1.5K) but a much higher avg paid/claim ($683) generating $1M. This mix — high‑volume, low‑unit payments alongside lower‑volume, high‑unit payments — implies operational processes optimized for frequent in‑office injections as well as periodic administration of higher‑priced agents.

Operational throughput is substantial for certain procedures: examples include 50.6K claims for J2777, 2.4K claims for 92134, and 1.7K claims for 67028, showing consistent procedural activity around intravitreal injections and posterior‑segment imaging. Those volumes suggest a steady, high‑frequency outpatient procedural workflow rather than episodic or largely inpatient care.

There is a notable taxonomy/data mismatch to flag: the listed taxonomy is Hospitalist Physician but the billing composition is dominated by ophthalmology/retina therapeutic and diagnostic codes. This divergence is a concrete data point analysts should investigate further when reconciling credentialing, group affiliation, or specialty reporting.

The provider’s NPI has long tenure on file (enumerated 2007-06-29, ~19 years ago), which supports interpretation that the observed high volumes and concentrated service mix reflect an established practice pattern rather than a short‑term or transient billing change. Given the heavy dependence on a small set of high‑revenue ophthalmic drugs (top 3 = 83.8%), changes in formulary coverage, reimbursement, or supply could materially affect the provider’s Medicare revenue profile.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

19 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
J2777	Injection, faricimab‑svoa, 0.1 mg	50,580	$30	$1.5M
J0178	Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg	1,530	$680	$1M
J2778	Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg	2,000	$180	$357.8K
67028	The provider injects a medication into the vitreous chamber of the eye as an isolated procedure or a separate procedure unrelated to any other procedure being performed on the eye.	1,750	$100	$173K
92014	An ophthalmologist sees an established patient for a comprehensive level eye examination. Generally, a patient is considered to be "established" if the same physician, or any physician in the group…	1,030	$90	$92K
92134	The provider performs computerized diagnostic imaging of the retina in the posterior segment (back part) of the eye, interprets the data, and provides a report. The service may be on one or both eyes.	2,350	$30	$72.9K
J3490	Unclassified drugs	30	$1,760	$58.1K
J2781	Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg	470	$120	$55.9K
92012	For this CPT code, an Ophthalmologist sees an established patient for an intermediate level eye examination. Generally, a patient is considered to be "established" if the same physician, or any…	360	$70	$23.1K
99204	The provider sees a new patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the provider…	180	$130	$22.8K

Showing 1–10 of 19

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 19 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Georgia Distribution

Sri Krishna Mukkamala — 4 of 19 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Georgia

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

19 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
J0178	15	70	970	$680	$700.6K
J2777	2	40	14,100	$30	$524.3K
J2778	10	30	1,170	$180	$286.2K
67028	8	80	720	$90	$71.9K
J2781	2	10	320	$120	$43.6K
67042	19	20	20	$1,200	$31.1K
67108	3	10	10	$1,260	$25.2K
67036	4	10	20	$1,120	$23.6K
J3490	39	50	50	$320	$19.8K
92014	30	850	130	$80	$19.7K

Showing 1–10 of 19

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Sri Krishna Mukkamala, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Stephanie Vanderveldt	GA	Ophthalmology Physician	$4.1M	$0
Alexander Bottini	GA	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$3M	$0
David Chin Yee	GA	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$2.9M	$0
Gregory Lee	GA	Ophthalmology Physician	$2.9M	$6.3K
Robert Stoltz	GA	Specialist	$2.6M	$0
Hyung Cho	GA	Ophthalmology Physician	$2.5M	$0
Sean Koh	GA	Ophthalmology Physician	$2.5M	$0
Atul Sharma	GA	Ophthalmology Physician	$2.2M	$0
Mark Rivellese	GA	Ophthalmology Physician	$2.1M	$0
Rahul Komati	IL	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$1.9M	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Sri Krishna Mukkamala, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Advanced Center For Joint Surgery, LLC	GA	Ambulatory Surgical Clinic/Center	$8.4M	$0
Gregg Soifer	GA	Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Physician	$814.4K	$0
Charles Decook	GA	Orthopaedic Surgery Physician	$759.9K	$0
Forsyth Eye Surgery Center, LLC	GA	Ambulatory Surgical Clinic/Center	$689K	$0
Georgia Interventional Pain - C, LLC	GA	Ambulatory Surgical Clinic/Center	$659.4K	$0
Angie Rink	GA	Professional Counselor	$0	$541.3K
Bhaskar Reddy	GA	Cardiovascular Disease Physician	$521.6K	$0
Julia Branch	GA	Family Nurse Practitioner	$488.4K	$0
American Health Imaging Of Georgia, LLC	GA	Radiology Clinic/Center	$416.8K	$0
Charles Nunez	GA	Optometrist	$310.8K	$105.3K

Sri Krishna Mukkamala — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Sri Krishna Mukkamala — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Sri Krishna Mukkamala — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Sri Krishna Mukkamala — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References