Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Oklahoma for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Oklahoma only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Oklahoma (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Brent Byers (NPI 1659869881)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Brent Byers
Address	3040 Nw 179th Ct
City	Edmond
State	OK
ZIP	73012
Taxonomy	Nurse Practitioner
NPI Enumerated	April 24, 2018

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$9.8M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider’s billings are effectively single‑payer: total Medicare revenue is $9.8M and there is no Medicaid billing on file. The absence of any Medicaid claims suggests the practice’s revenue mix and contracting exposure are concentrated in Medicare rather than a dual Medicare/Medicaid model.

Revenue is extremely concentrated in a tiny number of line items: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes by revenue account for 99.1% of this provider's total Medicare revenue. Specifically, Q4217 generates $6.9M (70.1% of total), Q4277 generates $2.8M (28.4% of total), and 97610 generates $55.2K (0.6% of total), indicating dependence on a very small set of high‑value codes.

The CPT/HCPCS mix shows a focused wound‑care and skin‑substitute practice profile: the two largest codes, Q4217 and Q4277, are per‑square‑centimeter wound graft/membrane products and together drive nearly all Medicare revenue. Smaller but supportive line items (15271, 15275, 15272) and debridement/ultrasound codes (97610, 97597) reinforce that revenue is driven by advanced wound products and procedural wound management rather than high volumes of standard E/M visits.

Competitive standing is uneven across codes: for Q4217 the provider ranks #3 of 65 providers nationally (97th percentile; notably above typical national volume for this code), signaling a dominant national presence for that specific product. By contrast Q4277 ranks #2 of 3 providers nationally (50th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code) and 97610 ranks #130 of 320 providers (59th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume), so leadership is concentrated on a single code rather than broad superiority across wound modalities.

The practice bills across multiple care settings, but these visits represent small shares of revenue: nursing‑facility and home‑visit E/M codes (99304–99309, 99344, 99347, 99348) and low‑level office codes such as 99211 appear in the dataset but contribute only modest dollar amounts relative to the skin‑substitute codes. This pattern suggests on‑site procedural work (product/graft application billed per cm2) is the economic driver while E/M services are ancillary.

Tenure information shows the NPI was enumerated on 2018-04-24 (~8 years ago), indicating the provider has an established billing history over multiple years. Given the concentrated high dollar volumes on wound products, that tenure supports the interpretation of a stable, product‑centric wound care operation rather than a transient billing pattern.

From a contracting and utilization management perspective, the provider’s reliance on per‑square‑centimeter wound substitute codes (Q4217, Q4277) means reimbursement negotiations and coverage policy for skin substitutes will disproportionately affect its revenue. The complete lack of Medicaid billing on file also means payers and network managers should treat this entity as primarily Medicare‑dependent when modeling financial impact.

Statistical outlier signals are mixed: Q4217 is explicitly flagged as notably above typical national volume, which warrants further benchmarking against peers and local referral patterns; other frequently billed items such as Q4277 and 97610 are described as typical or unremarkable in national comparisons. These contrasts—one very strong outlier code plus several typical codes—suggest the provider’s profile is driven by a specific high‑volume product usage rather than uniformly high utilization across wound care services.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

20 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
Q4217	Woundfix, biowound, woundfix plus, biowound plus, woundfix xplus or biowound xplus, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	6,150	$1,120	$6.9M
Q4277	Woundplus membrane or e-graft, per square centimeter	2,020	$1,390	$2.8M
97610	The provider uses a low–frequency ultrasound device to try to improve wound healing.	210	$270	$55.2K
15271	The provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover wounds on the patient’s trunk, arms, and/or legs up to an area of 100 cm2. This code covers up to the first 25 cm2.	240	$90	$22.9K
99308	The provider sees a patient for a subsequent nursing facility care visit involving evaluation and management (E/M). The visit involves a low level of medical decision making and/or the provider…	230	$50	$10.6K
99309	The provider sees a patient for a subsequent nursing facility care visit involving evaluation and management (E/M). The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making or the provider…	140	$70	$9.4K
15275	The provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover wounds on the face, scalp, eyelids, mouth, neck, ears, orbits, genitalia, hands, feet, and/or multiple digits, up to…	80	$100	$7.6K
99348	The provider sees an established patient for a home or residence visit involving evaluation and management (E/M). The visit involves low medical decision making or the provider spends at least 30…	130	$50	$6.1K
0598T	The provider uses real–time fluorescence imaging in a darkened clinical setting to examine a wound. The provider uses this imaging to identify and locate bacterial infection in the wound and to…	50	$90	$4.7K
97597	The provider excises devitalized (dead) tissue from an open wound, choosing from a variety of techniques; treatment may include topical application of medicine or materials, wound assessment,…	80	$60	$4.6K

Showing 1–10 of 20

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 20 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Oklahoma Distribution

Brent Byers — 1 of 20 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Oklahoma

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

20 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
Q4217	1	10	2,800	$1,120	$3.5M
Q4277	1	10	2,020	$1,380	$2.8M
97610	2	10	210	$310	$137.9K
99309	146	270	170	$70	$42.7K
99308	121	270	180	$50	$26.5K
11043	32	40	90	$140	$21.7K
0598T	2	10	180	$90	$16.1K
99306	94	130	60	$130	$12.3K
15271	3	30	100	$90	$10.9K
99305	67	120	50	$90	$8.4K

Showing 1–10 of 20

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Brent Byers, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Carnegie Tri-county Municipal Hospital Management, Inc	OK	General Practice Physician	$0	$1.9M
Cordell Memorial Hospital 0189	OK	Rural Health Clinic/Center	$0	$1.7M
Michael Robinson	OK	Family Medicine Physician	$328.1K	$0
Daniel Tucker	AR	Family Medicine Physician	$276.2K	$0
Usman Bhutta	OK	Nephrology Physician	$206.5K	$0
Jeanie Loper	OK	Family Medicine Physician	$194.7K	$0
Jay Belt	OK	Family Medicine Physician	$178.2K	$0
Leonard Bowen	OK	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$176.6K	$0
Krysten Mescan	OK	Family Nurse Practitioner	$151.3K	$0
Joshua Smith	OK	Family Medicine Physician	$136K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Brent Byers, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Alphacare PLLC	OK	Physical Therapist	$0	$6.7M
Roberts Group Counseling	OK	Mental Health Counselor	$0	$2M
Andrew Stone	OK	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$130.5K	$0
Jeffrey Shelton	OK	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$88K	$0
Mark Stout	OK	Physician Assistant	$83.5K	$0
Eric Campbell	OK	Physician Assistant	$75.9K	$0
Peak Laboratories, LLC	OK	Clinical Medical Laboratory	$54K	$120
Kent Smalley	OK	Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine & OMM Physician	$31.9K	$0
Cristina Solis	OK	Family Medicine Physician	$22.4K	$0

Brent Byers — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Brent Byers — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Brent Byers — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Brent Byers — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References