Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Minnesota for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Minnesota only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Minnesota (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Sundeep Dev (NPI 1497744924)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Sundeep Dev
Address	3601 W 76th St Ste 325
City	Edina
State	MN
ZIP	55435
Taxonomy	Ophthalmology Physician
NPI Enumerated	October 18, 2005

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$4.5M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider’s billing is effectively single‑payer: total Medicare revenue is $4.5M and there is no Medicaid billing on file (none below). The absence of Medicaid activity indicates the practice’s payer mix is heavily concentrated on Medicare patients and Medicare reimbursement dynamics will dominate revenue performance and contracting leverage.

Revenue is extremely concentrated in a very small set of codes: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes by revenue account for 81.6% of this provider's total Medicare revenue. The single largest revenue driver is J0178 with $2.9M revenue (64.8% of total Medicare revenue), followed by Q5128 with $501.7K (11.2%) and 67028 with $244.4K (5.5%).

The code mix and volumes point to a procedure- and injection-focused ophthalmology practice, likely retina-oriented: J0178 (injection, aflibercept) is the dominant code with 4.2K claims and $692 avg paid/claim; Q5128 (ranibizumab biosimilar) has 2.3K claims; and 67028 (isolated intravitreal injection) has 2.5K claims. High counts for J0178 and 67028 alongside diagnostic imaging imply routine, repeated intravitreal therapy as the core service line rather than office evaluation visits.

Competitive standing on specific high-revenue services is strong at the national level. J0178 ranks #56 of 3204 providers nationally (98th percentile) and is described as notably above typical national volume; 67028 ranks #166 of 4255 (96th percentile) and is also notably above typical national volume; and 92134 (retinal imaging) registers as an extreme outlier at the 99th percentile with 3.2K claims and $96.5K revenue. These ranks indicate the provider is a major high-volume injector/imager among Medicare peers for those services.

The drug mix shows active use of both originator and biosimilar intravitreal agents: Q5128 (ranibizumab biosimilar) contributes $501.7K (11.2% of Medicare revenue) and Q5124 (another ranibizumab biosimilar) appears with $34.8K (0.8%), alongside J2778 (ranibizumab) at $217.1K (4.9%) and J2777 (faricimab) at $153.1K (3.4%). This pattern signals adoption of multiple anti‑VEGF agents and biosimilars in the therapeutic mix rather than reliance on a single branded product beyond the dominant aflibercept presence.

Office evaluation and management codes represent a small share of revenue relative to injections and imaging: 92014 yields $85.9K (1.9% of Medicare revenue) over 934 claims, and 99214 and 99204 together contribute only modestly to overall revenue. The provider’s economics therefore appear driven more by procedural and drug-reimbursement lines than by routine E/M visits.

The concentration in a few high‑value codes creates business sensitivity: J0178 alone accounts for $2.9M and 64.8% of Medicare revenue, and the top 3 codes together account for 81.6% of Medicare revenue, so changes in coverage, reimbursement, or drug utilization for these injections would materially affect practice revenue. These are concrete operational and contracting levers payers and analysts should monitor.

The provider has long-tenure in the Medicare program, with NPI enumeration dated 2005-10-18 (~21 years ago), indicating an established practice presence; combined with the national high-volume rankings on injection and imaging codes, this suggests sustained specialization and scale in intravitreal and retinal services over many years.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

23 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
J0178	Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg	4,180	$690	$2.9M
Q5128	Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg	2,310	$220	$501.7K
67028	The provider injects a medication into the vitreous chamber of the eye as an isolated procedure or a separate procedure unrelated to any other procedure being performed on the eye.	2,550	$100	$244.4K
J2778	Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg	1,160	$190	$217.1K
J2777	Injection, faricimab‑svoa, 0.1 mg	5,280	$30	$153.1K
92134	The provider performs computerized diagnostic imaging of the retina in the posterior segment (back part) of the eye, interprets the data, and provides a report. The service may be on one or both eyes.	3,220	$30	$96.5K
92014	An ophthalmologist sees an established patient for a comprehensive level eye examination. Generally, a patient is considered to be "established" if the same physician, or any physician in the group…	930	$90	$85.9K
J3590	Unclassified biologics	190	$340	$66.5K
J3490	Unclassified drugs	30	$1,770	$60.1K
J2781	Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg	330	$120	$39.6K

Showing 1–10 of 23

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 23 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Minnesota Distribution

Sundeep Dev — 5 of 23 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Minnesota

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

23 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
J0178	2	40	580	$690	$743.4K
J2777	17	20	6,120	$30	$411.1K
Q5128	5	20	1,410	$220	$393.8K
J2778	5	20	500	$180	$121K
J3590	5	10	220	$230	$73.7K
67028	4	80	420	$90	$64.8K
J2781	5	10	360	$120	$62.5K
Q5124	3	10	200	$170	$49.2K
67041	11	10	20	$1,090	$25.1K
J9035	21	40	220	$50	$16.9K

Showing 1–10 of 23

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Sundeep Dev, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Vitreoretinal Surgery PLLC	MN	Ophthalmology Physician	$0	$27.8M
David Williams	MN	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$5.5M	$0
David Parke	MN	Ophthalmology Physician	$4.8M	$0
John Davies	MN	Ophthalmology Physician	$3.9M	$0
Polly Quiram	MN	Ophthalmology Physician	$3.7M	$0
Geoffrey Emerson	MN	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$3.3M	$0
Robert Mittra	MN	Ophthalmology Physician	$3.1M	$0
Abdhish Bhavsar	MN	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$2.3M	$0
Jacob Jones	MN	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$2.3M	$0
Yevgeniy Sychev	MN	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$1.9M	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Sundeep Dev, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Emergency Physicians Professional Association	MN	Emergency Medicine Physician	$0	$72.7M
Fairview Health Services	MN	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$17.2M
Professional Resource Network - Prn - Corporation	MN	Home Health Agency	$0	$12.4M
Virtual Radiologic Professionals, LLC	MN	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$0	$11.3M
Mental Health Systems PC	MN	Psychologist	$0	$11M
Premier Obgyn Of Minnesota PLLC	MN	Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician	$0	$7M
Noran Neurological Clinic P.A.	MN	Specialist	$0	$6M
Nura Surgical Center LLC	MN	Ambulatory Surgical Clinic/Center	$5.3M	$581.7K
Southdale Pediatric Associates, Ltd	MN	Multi-Specialty Clinic/Center	$0	$5.3M
Peter Belin	MN	Ophthalmology Physician	$1.9M	$0

Sundeep Dev — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Sundeep Dev — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Sundeep Dev — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Sundeep Dev — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References