Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerNPI Medicare & MedicaidNPI 1396754727
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    NPI 1396754727 — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

    NPI 1396754727 · XX · healthcare

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for NPI 1396754727 — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    NPI 1396754727 is a healthcare provider located in Unspecified Location. This profile covers 88 Medicare and 0 Medicaid CPT/HCPCS procedure codes, with claims volume, average reimbursement, and total revenue by code, benchmarked against other providers billing the same services. Note: "XX" is a placeholder CMS uses when a provider's practice-location state wasn't reported — not a traditional US state; claims coded under it are grouped and benchmarked here the same way a traditional state would be.

    Provider details (source: NPPES NPI Registry)

    FieldValue
    Entity TypeIndividual
    OrganizationNPI 1396754727
    Address
    City
    StateXX (Unspecified Location)
    ZIP
    TaxonomyN/A
    NPI Enumerated
    NPI DeactivatedOctober 16, 2024

    (source: CMS Medicare & Medicaid claims data)

    Key Findings

    Revenue concentration is heavy: the provider reports $2.5M in total Medicare revenue and the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes (J9271, J9299, 78815) account for 64.3% of that Medicare revenue, indicating a business tightly focused on a small set of high-revenue services. Those three codes alone include J9271 ($645K, 26.5%) and J9299 ($604.8K, 24.8%), showing most income is driven by high-cost injectable oncology agents and associated imaging.

    Service-line profile points to oncology/infusion and advanced imaging services: high revenue from J9271 (pembrolizumab) and J9299 (nivolumab) combined with substantial billing for 78815 (PET/CT, $316K, 13.0%) and radiopharmaceuticals and suggests the provider operates as an infusion/imaging practice supporting cancer care. Additional chemotherapy administration codes (, , ) and infusion-related supplies (, ) reinforce an infusion‑center or oncology outpatient service-line.

    Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

    Medicare revenue breakdown by CPT/HCPCS procedure code.

    View: Bar Chart1 / 2

    Medicare Revenue by CPT/HCPCS Code

    Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

    The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

    88 rows

    CPT/HCPCS CodeDescriptionClaimsAvg PaidRevenue
    J9271Injection, pembrolizumab, 1 mg15,000$40$645K
    J9299Injection, nivolumab, 1 mg25,200$20$604.8K
    78815PET and CT scans are both standard imaging tools that allow doctors to evaluate the location and metabolic actions of tumors or cancer inside the body before beginning an active treatment regimen.…250$1,270$316K
    J1568Injection, immune globulin, (octagam), intravenous, non-lyophilized (e.g., liquid), 500 mg6,900$30$227.7K
    J0897Injection, denosumab, 1 mg6,960$20$125.3K
    J0881Injection, darbepoetin alfa, 1 microgram (non-esrd use)40,620$1$81.2K
    A9552Fluorodeoxyglucose f-18 fdg, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuries260$280$74.7K
    99213The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…990$60$59.5K
    A9595Piflufolastat f-18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie120$490$57.2K
    96413Chemotherapy is a therapeutic procedure used for the treatment of cancer via the use of chemical agents. These chemical agents (drugs) work on the cancerous cells of the body to destroy them. These…420$100$43.4K

    Showing 1–10 of 88

    • More pages

    Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

    How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 88 CPT/HCPCS codes. Note: this provider's state, "XX," is a placeholder CMS uses when a provider's practice-location state wasn't reported — not a traditional US state; the State panel below benchmarks against other providers coded under the same designation.

    View: State1 / 2

    Claims Volume vs. Unspecified Location Distribution
    NPI 1396754727 — 17 of 25 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)
    p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier
    Rank Distribution — Unspecified Location

    Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

    88 rows

    CPT/HCPCS CodeRankProvider CountMedian ClaimsAvg PaidAverage Revenue
    J9271131017,200$40$743.5K
    78815410200$1,090$220.7K
    A9552410220$400$87.4K
    96413910350$100$34.2K
    7881641030$1,090$29.4K
    J089714101,440$20$26.6K
    7417712210210$120$23.9K
    992136110140$60$18.8K
    992148411080$90$15.8K
    992153731060$110$13.3K

    Showing 1–10 of 88

    • More pages

    Frequently Asked Questions

    References

    1. 1.Medicare Physician & Other Practitioner by Provider and Service. CMS.gov.Provider-level Medicare Part B utilization and payment data.
    2. 2.NPPES NPI Registry. CMS.gov.National Provider Identifier registry used for provider enumeration and taxonomy metadata.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 7

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools
    Lifetime revenue by payer source
    Payer SourceTotal Paid
    Medicare$2.5M
    Medicaid$0
    A9552
    A9595
    96413
    96365
    96375
    J1568
    J0881

    Payer mix is effectively single-payer Medicare: there is no Medicaid billing on file, so the provider’s entire reported public-payer volume in this dataset is Medicare-only. This concentration means the practice’s reported public revenue streams and utilization patterns are driven solely by Medicare reimbursement dynamics rather than a balanced Medicaid/Medicare mix.

    Competitive standing across Medicare is mixed: for key immunotherapy agents the provider is a modest-to-strong participant rather than a market leader — J9299 ranks in the 80th percentile nationally (described in the file as "typical, unremarkable volume" for that code) while J9271 is at the 63th percentile (also characterized as "typical, unremarkable volume"). By contrast, imaging-related 78815 sits in the 88th percentile nationally (again labeled "typical, unremarkable volume"), indicating above-average PET/CT activity versus most providers.

    Specialty supply and infusion volumes are notable: J1568 (immune globulin) appears as a meaningful revenue contributor ($227.7K, 9.3%) and ranks in the 86th percentile ("typical, unremarkable volume"), consistent with a practice that bills for complex biologic infusions in addition to checkpoint inhibitors. Other therapy/support codes such as J0897 (denosumab) and J0881 (darbepoetin alfa) further indicate a mix of supportive and specialty infusions commonly offered in oncology-focused infusion settings.

    Operational throughput signals from evaluation-and-management and basic procedure codes show atypical patterns: 99213 is listed as an "extreme outlier, far above typical national volume for this code," implying unusually high numbers of low-complexity office visits relative to national peers and potentially reflecting significant return-visit management or infusion-related follow-ups. Likewise, 96372 is flagged as "notably above typical national volume for this code," consistent with frequent IM/SC injections or nurse-administered injections as part of routine treatment workflows.

    Risk and strategic implications: relying on a narrow set of high-cost oncology drugs and PET/CT imaging (64.3% concentration in top 3 codes) exposes the provider’s Medicare revenue to shifts in oncology utilization, reimbursement changes for immunotherapies, or imaging utilization policies. The absence of Medicaid billing removes diversification from the public-payer mix and could amplify sensitivity to Medicare policy changes affecting drugs or imaging.

    Data caveat on tenure and identity: NPI enumeration status is recorded as unknown in the file, so tenure and registration date cannot be assessed from the provided data; any analysis of historical growth or credentialing timelines should obtain a validated enumeration date before drawing conclusions about market entry or duration of activity.