Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or New Jersey for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to New Jersey only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. New Jersey (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Coyle Connolly (NPI 1386601433)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Coyle Connolly
Address	2106 New Rd Ste D4
City	Linwood
State	NJ
ZIP	08221
Taxonomy	Dermatology Physician
NPI Enumerated	May 1, 2006

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$3M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider appears to operate primarily as a radiation therapy-focused practice rather than a general dermatology clinic: the highest-revenue Medicare codes are procedure and therapy planning/verification codes (G6001, 77280, 77401, 77290, 77300) associated with radiation planning, imaging guidance, and dosimetry rather than routine dermatologic office visits. The mix of high-volume imaging/simulation and guidance codes indicates a workflow centered on planning and delivering external beam radiation therapy rather than primarily performing clinic-based dermatologic procedures.

Medicare revenue is concentrated heavily in a very small set of services: the precomputed top three Medicare codes account for 85.4% of this provider’s total Medicare revenue, and G6001 alone contributes $1.5M or 50.8% of Medicare receipts. This concentration indicates the practice derives the vast majority of Medicare income from a narrow set of radiation therapy-related services, making its financial profile highly dependent on those service lines.

This provider is effectively single-payer in the dataset provided: lifetime Medicare revenue is $3M while there is no Medicaid billing on file. Analysts should treat Medicaid exposure as nil for contract, utilization, or access analyses and focus competitive and payer-strategy work on Medicare fee-for-service dynamics.

On competitive standing and national volume, this provider is an outsized national player for multiple radiation therapy codes: G6001 ranks #1 of 280 providers (100th percentile) and is labeled an extreme outlier, 77280 ranks #14 of 3348 providers (100th percentile) as an extreme outlier, and 77401 ranks #1 of 426 providers (100th percentile) as an extreme outlier. Those ranks indicate the provider operates at volumes far above typical national peers for several specialized radiation therapy services.

Several additional radiation therapy planning codes also show unusually high volumes: 77290 ranks #2 of 3650 providers (100th percentile) with $307.6K revenue and is described as an extreme outlier, while 77300 ranks in the 98th percentile and 77427 and general evaluation codes like 99212 appear at much lower, more typical volumes. Together this suggests the organization’s dominance is concentrated in simulation, guidance, and treatment-planning services rather than routine evaluation-and-management visits.

The provider’s procedure mix shows limited office E/M activity relative to therapy planning: 99212 accounts for $56.7K (1.9% of Medicare revenue) at an extreme outlier national volume ranking, while 99213 is minimal ($1.5K). This pattern reinforces that most clinical activity billed to Medicare is technical/planning radiation work rather than standard outpatient dermatology E/M encounters.

Tenure data indicate the NPI was enumerated around 2006-05-01 (~20 years ago), suggesting the provider has long-standing Medicare enrollment. That longevity combined with exceptionally high national ranks for several specialized codes could reflect an established, high-volume radiation therapy operation over multiple years.

Because three codes produce 85.4% of revenue and individual codes like G6001 and 77401 are characterized as extreme outliers at the national level, the provider’s financial and operational risk is concentrated: any change in coverage, coding, or utilization for those specific radiation therapy services would likely materially affect overall revenue. Analysts should prioritize monitoring policy, reimbursement, and utilization trends for those dominant codes.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

8 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
G6001	Ultrasonic guidance for placement of radiation therapy fields	9,390	$160	$1.5M
77280	The provider uses a simulator or other imaging modality to determine the size and location of ports to be used for radiation therapy. This code describes a simple level service.	2,750	$240	$659.5K
77401	Deleted effective Jan. 1, 2026.	10,240	$40	$379K
77290	Before starting radiation therapy, a physician needs to know the location and size of the cancerous tumor, the radiation doses required to treat the tumor, and the positioning of the radiation beams…	770	$400	$307.6K
99212	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a straightforward level of medical decision making,…	1,160	$50	$56.7K
77300	Radiation therapy is one of the most effective treatment methods for cancerous tumors. Due to its negative side effects like damage to the healthy cells, radiation therapy involves thorough planning…	900	$60	$52.1K
77427	Radiation therapy utilizes ionizing radiation beams that are directed at cancerous cells in order to destroy them. The radiation, damages the DNA (the genetic material) in the cell, thus preventing…	110	$170	$18.3K
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	30	$60	$1.5K

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 8 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. New Jersey Distribution

Coyle Connolly — 6 of 8 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — New Jersey

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

8 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
G6001	1	10	1,210	$160	$606.3K
77401	1	10	1,150	$40	$148.7K
77427	82	110	210	$160	$41.3K
77280	1	70	50	$150	$18K
99213	11,925	14,090	100	$70	$13.1K
77300	5	100	210	$40	$11.5K
77290	1	80	50	$160	$10.3K
99212	7	3,450	40	$40	$3.6K

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Coyle Connolly, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Pradip Bhattacharjee	NJ	Dermatopathology (Pathology) Physician	$493.7K	$0
Priya Thakker	NJ	MOHS-Micrographic Surgery Physician	$313.7K	$0
Andriy Pavlenko	NJ	Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology Physician	$306.7K	$0
Sean Adair	NJ	Medical Physician Assistant	$253.7K	$0
Lauren Cincotta	NJ	Medical Physician Assistant	$230.7K	$0
Christopher Marsh	NJ	Physician Assistant	$189.8K	$0
Jennifer Sibiga	NJ	Nurse Practitioner	$158.8K	$0
Jody Maffei	NJ	Nurse Practitioner	$138.2K	$0
Eileen Aversa	NJ	Family Nurse Practitioner	$131.4K	$0
Jennifer Latteri	PA	Medical Physician Assistant	$93.3K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Coyle Connolly, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Jun Huang	NJ	Ophthalmology Physician	$1.3M	$0
Allen Silvey	NJ	Pulmonary Disease Physician	$1.2M	$4K
Athanasios Papastamelos	NJ	Infectious Disease Physician	$508.4K	$116.9K
Srisai Gowda	NJ	Psychiatry Physician	$612.5K	$0
Fabio Orozco	NJ	Orthopaedic Surgery Physician	$608.6K	$0
Thomas Mueller	NJ	Urology Physician	$527.2K	$0
David Sussman	NJ	Urology Physician	$516.2K	$0
Charles Murphy	NJ	Podiatrist	$448.4K	$0
Pujan Parikh	NJ	Internal Medicine Physician	$442K	$0
Kelley Tasca-fiorelli	NJ	Primary Care Nurse Practitioner	$389.7K	$0

Coyle Connolly — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Coyle Connolly — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Coyle Connolly — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Coyle Connolly — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References