Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Mississippi for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Mississippi only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Mississippi (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Matthew Brennan (NPI 1174799688)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Matthew Brennan
Address	624 Highway 90
City	Bay St Louis
State	MS
ZIP	39520
Taxonomy	General Practice Physician
NPI Enumerated	May 5, 2008

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$1.4M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

MATTHEW BRENNAN is effectively a single-payer Medicare billing practice with Total Medicare revenue of $1.4M and no Medicaid billing on file; the absence of any Medicaid activity indicates payer mix is overwhelmingly Medicare-driven and Medicaid is not a meaningful revenue source.

Revenue concentration is high: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes account for 61.3% of this provider's total Medicare revenue, indicating most revenue is coming from a very narrow set of services rather than a broad portfolio.

The top revenue-driving codes (99310, 11043, 11044) point to a mixed clinical model combining high-volume nursing facility E/M care and extensive surgical debridement procedures; 99310 (subsequent nursing facility visit) contributes $332.1K (24.3% of Medicare revenue) while 11043 and 11044 together contribute $320.4K and $185.1K respectively, reflecting both time-intensive E/M work and substantial wound/tissue debridement surgical activity.

Competitive standing for several codes is extraordinarily high: the provider ranks in the 99th–100th percentile and is labeled an "extreme outlier" for 99310 (100th percentile, rank #17), 11043 (99th percentile, rank #13), 11044 (99th percentile, rank #8), and multiple additional debridement codes, signaling national-level volume dominance in these specific procedures well above typical peers.

Operational implications: the combination of frequent nursing facility E/M codes (99310, 99309, 99306, etc.) with a cluster of debridement codes (11042–11047) suggests the practice likely focuses on wound care and long-term care facility visits, pairing bedside E/M management with on-site or procedure-based wound debridement services.

Tenure: NPI enumerated ~2008-05-05 (about 18 years ago), indicating an established billing history and sustained presence in Medicare over nearly two decades, which supports the interpretation that current high volumes are not a short-term anomaly.

Several debridement codes (11047 rank #6, 11046 rank #10, 11042 rank #158) are flagged as extreme outliers or far above typical national volume, reinforcing that the provider's procedural volume for tissue/bone debridement is unusually concentrated relative to national peers and is a distinctive competitive characteristic.

While some nursing facility E/M codes show typical national volumes (99306 at the 83rd percentile; 99309 at the 96th percentile), the mix of both very high-volume and more typical-volume E/M codes suggests the provider sees a broad spectrum of acuity in facility-based visits, from low-to-high complexity, supporting a role as a major regional nursing-facility clinician for Medicare beneficiaries.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

13 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
99310	The provider sees a patient for a subsequent nursing facility care visit involving evaluation and management (E/M). The visit involves a high level of medical decision making or the provider spends…	2,890	$120	$332.1K
11043	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove the dead tissue in muscle and/or fascia, including any debridement of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue, for the first or only 20 cm2 or…	2,070	$160	$320.4K
11044	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove the dead, infected tissue in bone, also including the epidermis, dermis, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and/or fascia as needed. This code covers the…	810	$230	$185.1K
99309	The provider sees a patient for a subsequent nursing facility care visit involving evaluation and management (E/M). The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making or the provider…	1,860	$80	$149K
11047	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove dead, infected tissue from bone as well as the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and/or fascia if needed. She performs this service…	1,650	$90	$146.8K
11046	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove the dead tissue from the muscle and/or fascia, as well as the subcutaneous tissue layer, epidermis, and dermis if needed. She performs this service at…	1,950	$50	$105K
11042	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove the dead tissue in skin down to the subcutaneous layer and including the epidermis and dermis, up to the first 20 cm2.	1,020	$60	$63.2K
99306	The provider sees a patient for an initial nursing facility care visit involving evaluation and management (E/M). The visit involves high medical decision making, and/or the provider spends at least…	160	$140	$21.5K
11045	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove dead tissue from the subcutaneous layer, as well as the epidermis and dermis if needed. She performs this service at the same session as a separately…	660	$30	$19.1K
99305	The provider sees a patient for an initial nursing facility care visit involving evaluation and management (E/M). The visit involves moderate medical decision making or the provider spends at least…	180	$100	$18.3K

Showing 1–10 of 13

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 13 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Mississippi Distribution

Matthew Brennan — 6 of 13 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Mississippi

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

13 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
11047	2	10	240	$90	$67.6K
11044	2	20	30	$220	$40.3K
99309	3	210	100	$70	$20.9K
11043	1	50	70	$140	$19.3K
99310	1	70	80	$100	$19.1K
11046	1	20	160	$50	$13.8K
11042	4	140	120	$60	$13.5K
99308	208	260	110	$50	$13K
99306	6	70	30	$120	$6.9K
11045	4	50	140	$20	$4.6K

Showing 1–10 of 13

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Matthew Brennan, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Timothy Onyiuke	MD	General Practice Physician	$2.1M	$0
Freemu Varghese	TX	Nephrology Physician	$2M	$0
Albert Young	CA	General Practice Physician	$1.2M	$0
Emmanuel Kuyinu	TX	General Practice Physician	$1.2M	$0
Adrian Harewood	PA	General Practice Physician	$967.8K	$3.3K
Son Huynh	CA	Surgical Physician Assistant	$970.3K	$0
Lolita Palmer	CA	Surgery Physician	$892.2K	$0
Jason Aguirre	CA	General Practice Physician	$874K	$0
Gerald Searle	CA	General Practice Physician	$717.2K	$5.5K
Bekele Haimanot	CA	Medical Physician Assistant	$695.2K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Matthew Brennan, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Ochsner Medical Center - Hancock LLC	MS	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$16.8M
James Rahaim	MS	Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Dentistry	$0	$4.2M
Covenant Laboratories	MS	Clinical Medical Laboratory	$3.6M	$350.8K
Ochsner Mississippi, LLC	MS	Internal Medicine Physician	$0	$3.2M
J Austin Rahaim, Dmd, Ms, PA	MS	Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Dentistry	$0	$2.6M
Hancock Emergency Group LLC	MS	Emergency Medicine Physician	$0	$2M
Coastal Family Health Center, Inc	MS	Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC)	$0	$1.5M
Children's International, LLC	MS	Primary Care Clinic/Center	$0	$1.4M
Hancock Womens Center PA	MS	Gynecology Physician	$0	$1.2M
Matthew Capo	MS	Physical Therapist	$193.1K	$0

Matthew Brennan — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Matthew Brennan — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Matthew Brennan — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Matthew Brennan — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References