Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Ohio for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Ohio only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Ohio (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Faizuddin Khaja (NPI 1043409873)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Faizuddin Khaja
Address	2055 Reading Rd
City	Cincinnati
State	OH
ZIP	45202
Taxonomy	Ophthalmology Physician
NPI Enumerated	October 17, 2007

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$1.9M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

Medicare is the sole payer activity on file: total Medicare revenue is $1.9M and there is no Medicaid billing on file, so the provider functions effectively as a Medicare-focused practice rather than a dual‑payer operation. This single‑payer concentration means analyses of volume and revenue should be interpreted through a Medicare-only lens.

Revenue is highly concentrated in a small set of drug and injection codes: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes account for 84.5% of the provider’s Medicare revenue, with J0178 alone representing $1.2M (63.8% of Medicare revenue). This concentration indicates that biologic intravitreal therapy is the primary revenue driver for the practice.

The procedure mix indicates a retina-focused ophthalmology practice centered on intravitreal injections and retinal diagnostics: high-revenue drug codes J0178 and J2777 and the vitreous injection procedure 67028 are the top revenue contributors, and imaging code 92134 also appears in the top list. Together these codes (drug administration plus retinal imaging and injection procedures) are consistent with a clinic delivering anti‑VEGF/fundus care rather than a high-volume general cataract surgery practice.

Competitive standing is mixed across specific services: J0178 ranks #643 of 3204 providers nationally (80th percentile) and is labeled typical, unremarkable volume for that code, so the provider is above the median but not a dominant national leader for aflibercept injections. By contrast, retinal imaging 92134 ranks #955 of 26868 providers nationally (96th percentile) and is described as notably above typical national volume, indicating comparatively higher utilization of retinal diagnostic imaging versus peers.

The provider shows particularly high relative volume for some biologic classifications: J3590 (unclassified biologics) ranks #51 of 631 providers nationally (92th percentile) and is described as notably above typical national volume, suggesting outsized use of non‑specified biologic billing within a narrower peer group. This pattern may reflect frequent use of miscellaneous or evolving injectable therapies alongside the named agents.

Primary E/M activity is present but not dominant: established‑patient E/M code 99214 accounts for $51.4K (2.7% of Medicare revenue) and ranks #38910 of 479517 providers nationally (92th percentile) with a typical, unremarkable volume label, indicating the practice bills a routine level of office visits in addition to procedure‑centric revenue. New‑patient and high‑level E/M codes appear with low revenue shares, reinforcing the view that procedures and drug administration drive the business model.

Tenure and billing history support a long‑standing practice presence: the NPI was enumerated 2007-10-17 (~19 years ago), which aligns with sustained Medicare billing and an established pattern of drug and imaging utilization over time. Long tenure combined with concentrated injectable drug revenue suggests an established retina or medical ophthalmology focus rather than a recently pivoted service line.

Concentration around expensive injectable therapies creates operational sensitivity: with J0178, J2777, and 67028 making up 84.5% of Medicare revenue, the provider’s topline is closely tied to intravitreal drug use and reimbursement levels for those products. Any shifts in utilization patterns, drug pricing, or payer coverage for these specific agents would likely have a material impact on revenue given the narrow revenue base.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

23 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
J0178	Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg	1,780	$690	$1.2M
J2777	Injection, faricimab‑svoa, 0.1 mg	9,180	$30	$266.2K
67028	The provider injects a medication into the vitreous chamber of the eye as an isolated procedure or a separate procedure unrelated to any other procedure being performed on the eye.	1,460	$90	$130.1K
92134	The provider performs computerized diagnostic imaging of the retina in the posterior segment (back part) of the eye, interprets the data, and provides a report. The service may be on one or both eyes.	2,090	$30	$60.7K
99214	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the…	570	$90	$51.4K
J7312	Injection, dexamethasone, intravitreal implant, 0.1 mg	290	$160	$45.6K
66984	The provider inserts an artificial lens after removing an extracapsular cataract by aspiration or use of ultrasonic waves. This procedure is done without the use of an endoscopic laser probe to…	90	$410	$35.5K
J3590	Unclassified biologics	620	$50	$32K
92014	An ophthalmologist sees an established patient for a comprehensive level eye examination. Generally, a patient is considered to be "established" if the same physician, or any physician in the group…	270	$80	$21.4K
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	200	$60	$12.9K

Showing 1–10 of 23

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 23 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Ohio Distribution

Faizuddin Khaja — 2 of 23 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Ohio

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

23 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
J0178	24	100	840	$680	$729K
J2777	36	70	9,480	$30	$353.3K
66984	394	530	210	$110	$92.8K
67028	28	150	470	$90	$64K
J7312	9	20	240	$160	$41.7K
J3590	15	100	200	$100	$30K
66821	358	360	50	$180	$15.8K
92014	279	1,390	100	$70	$12.9K
99214	825	20,010	100	$70	$11.7K
99490	206	420	100	$40	$8.1K

Showing 1–10 of 23

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Faizuddin Khaja, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Tri-state Centers For Sight Inc	OH	Ophthalmologic Surgery Clinic/Center	$1.9M	$559.6K
Peter Blackburn	KY	Retina Specialist (Ophthalmology) Physician	$1M	$251.2K
Matthew Dykhuizen	KY	Ophthalmology Physician	$888.4K	$3.4K
Johannes Evans	KY	Ophthalmology Physician	$291.9K	$588.5K
Christopher Devine	OH	Ophthalmology Physician	$772.3K	$0
Michael Daun	OH	Ophthalmology Physician	$760.6K	$0
Midwest Eye Surgery Center	OH	Ophthalmologic Surgery Clinic/Center	$562.4K	$47.9K
Alexander Kuley	OH	Ophthalmology Physician	$381.1K	$0
David Blandford	KY	Ophthalmology Physician	$260.1K	$58.1K
William Curtis	KY	Ophthalmology Physician	$216.2K	$84.2K

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Faizuddin Khaja, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
City Of Cincinnati	OH	Ambulance	$1.4M	$15.8M
City Of Cincinnati	OH	Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC)	$0	$8.3M
Karla Walden	OH	Family Nurse Practitioner	$153.9K	$0
Lisa Wilson	OH	Family Nurse Practitioner	$78.7K	$0
Logan Siemer	OH	Physical Therapist	$78.1K	$0
Brian Kaminski	OH	Emergency Medicine Physician	$77.9K	$0
Georgia Bailey	OH	Family Nurse Practitioner	$12.3K	$0

Faizuddin Khaja — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Faizuddin Khaja — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Faizuddin Khaja — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Faizuddin Khaja — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References