Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Urinary and Fecal Indications (for Louisiana Only)
Defines UnitedHealthcare Louisiana coverage, medical necessity, and coding for sacral nerve stimulation (SNS/SNM) for adults (≥18) with specific urinary and fecal disorders, and states treatments considered unproven. Applies only in Louisiana.
Added and clarified medical records documentation language specifying that documentation may be required to assess clinical criteria and must fully support medical necessity.
Removed notation that CPT codes 64585 and 64595 are not on the State of Louisiana Medicaid Fee Schedule.
References to 'Sacral Nerve Stimulation' were replaced with 'Sacral Nerve Stimulation (neurostimulation)'.
Added definition of 'Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS) [Also Known as Sacral Neuromodulation (SNM) or Urologic Nerve Stimulation]'.
Updated supporting information sections (Clinical Evidence, FDA, References) to reflect current information and archived previous version CS358LA.D.
Coverage Criteria for Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS/SNM)
SNS screening trial for urinary voiding dysfunction
Screening trial is proven and medically necessary when ALL of the following are met
Applies to individuals >= 18 years
SNS permanent implantation for urinary voiding dysfunction
Permanent implantation is proven and medically necessary when ALL of the following are met
Continuation from successful screening trial
SNS screening trial and permanent implantation for fecal incontinence
Screening trial and permanent implantation are proven and medically necessary when ALL of the following are met
Permanent implantation additionally requires >=50% improvement in screening trial
Replacement or revision
Replacement or revision of sacral nerve stimulator is considered medically necessary when ALL of the following are met
Considered medically necessary
Unproven / Not Medically Necessary
Considered unproven and not medically necessary due to insufficient evidence
Coverage criteria for SNS (evidence-based selection and test-phase requirement)
Coverage supported when evidence demonstrates benefit and appropriate patient selection; typical criteria derived from literature include:
Supported by multiple systematic reviews and comparative trials
Used in randomized and observational studies (eg, Marinello 2024; Elterman 2021)
Effectiveness and durability vary by indication and study
Revision and explant rates reported in long-term FI literature: revision 35.2%, explant 19.7%
Covered indications and prerequisites
Covered when ALL of the following guideline-supported conditions are met
Synthesis from ICS, EAU, AUA/SUFU, AGA/ACG guidance
Insufficient evidence / not recommended indications
Not covered / insufficient evidence when ANY of the following apply
Multiple RCTs and systematic reviews have not demonstrated consistent benefit for constipation
Covered indications with trial success requirement
Covered when clinical criteria in referenced guidelines are met:
References include EAU, ICS, NICE guidance
References include ICS, ASCRS guidance
NICE: female OAB management
Additional NICE-specific considerations for women:
NICE recommendations (per 2019/2020 NICE guidance)
Conditions explicitly excluded from eligibility for sacral nerve stimulation include urinary or fecal dysfunction that is secondary to neurologic disease (for example, Parkinson disease, stroke, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis). Exclusions also include urinary dysfunction due to a bladder outlet or mechanical obstruction (eg, BPH, tumor/radiation-related obstruction, urethral stricture), fecal incontinence that is secondary to constipation, and distorted anorectal anatomy (eg, anorectal malformation, abscess/fistula, prior rectal surgery).
There is insufficient evidence to support sacral nerve stimulation as a standard indication for chronic pelvic pain. The policy cites systematic reviews and limited randomized trials and concludes that additional high-quality, homogeneous studies are required before routine coverage can be recommended.
Use of sacral nerve stimulation for functional constipation or chronic functional constipation is not supported by the current body of evidence and is considered insufficient/inconclusive. Multiple systematic reviews and randomized trials have produced conflicting or negative results, and guideline panels note lack of consistent benefit and concerns about long-term complications.
Absolute contraindications include insufficient clinical response to a therapeutic trial, and inability of the individual to operate the device without supportive caregivers. Pregnancy is also listed as an absolute contraindication. Relative contraindications include severe or rapidly progressive neurologic disease, established complete spinal cord injury, anticipated need for MRI of body parts below the head, and abnormal sacral anatomy.
A prior-policy note indicating that CPT codes 64585 and 64595 were not on the Louisiana Medicaid Fee Schedule has been removed in this version of the policy.
Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of Constipation and Chronic Pelvic Pain is considered unproven and not medically necessary due to insufficient evidence of safety and/or efficacy; routine permanent implantation for these indications is not supported by randomized controlled trial evidence.
Routine use of sacral nerve stimulation for chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is unsupported by sufficient evidence and is therefore considered investigational or not established pending higher-quality clinical trials.
Permanent implantation following an initial positive temporary stimulation response for refractory constipation is not supported by randomized controlled trial evidence; available crossover and longer-term studies do not consistently show benefit, and guidelines caution against routine progression to permanent implant for constipation.
Information about FDA approvals is provided for context only and is informational. Device labeling (for example, InterStim, Neuspera) indicates use in individuals who have failed or could not tolerate more conservative treatments, but FDA clearance or PMA alone does not establish coverage without documented failure of conservative therapy and a successful screening trial per the policy criteria.
Procedure, Supply, and Diagnosis Codes
| 0784T | Insertion or replacement of percutaneous electrode array, spinal, with integrated neurostimulator, including imaging guidance, when performed. |
| 0785T | Revision or removal of neurostimulator electrode array, spinal, with integrated neurostimulator. |
| 0786T | Insertion or replacement of percutaneous electrode array, sacral, with integrated neurostimulator, including imaging guidance, when performed. |
| 0787T | Revision or removal of neurostimulator electrode array, sacral, with integrated neurostimulator. |
| 64561 | Percutaneous implantation of neurostimulator electrode array; sacral nerve (transforaminal placement) including image guidance, if performed. |
| 64581 | Open implantation of neurostimulator electrode array; sacral nerve (transforaminal placement). |
| 64585 | Revision or removal of peripheral neurostimulator electrode array. |
| 64590 | Insertion or replacement of peripheral, sacral, or gastric neurostimulator pulse generator or receiver, requiring pocket creation and connection between electrode array and pulse generator or receiver. |
| 64595 | Revision or removal of peripheral, sacral, or gastric neurostimulator pulse generator or receiver, with detachable connection to electrode array. |
| L8679 | Implantable neurostimulator, pulse generator, any type. |
| L8680 | Implantable neurostimulator electrode, each. |
| L8682 | Implantable neurostimulator radiofrequency receiver. |
| L8685 | Implantable neurostimulator pulse generator, single array, rechargeable, includes extension. |
| L8686 | Implantable neurostimulator pulse generator, single array, nonrechargeable, includes extension. |
| L8687 | Implantable neurostimulator pulse generator, dual array, rechargeable, includes extension. |
| L8688 | Implantable neurostimulator pulse generator, dual array, nonrechargeable, includes extension. |
| N32.81 | Overactive bladder. |
| N32.9 | Bladder disorder, unspecified. |
| N39.3 | Stress incontinence (female) (male). |
| N39.41 | Urge incontinence. |
| N39.42 | Incontinence without sensory awareness. |
| N39.46 | Mixed incontinence. |
| N39.490 | Overflow incontinence. |
| N39.498 | Other specified urinary incontinence. |
| R33.9 | Retention of urine, unspecified. |
| R15.9 | Full incontinence of feces. |
| No codes listed |
Provider Responsibilities, Prior Authorization, and Documentation
Prior Authorization / Code Listing
Prior authorization and coding: Certain procedure and supply codes related to sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) are listed in the policy for reference; inclusion of a code does not guarantee coverage. Prior authorization may be required by the member's federal, state, or contractual benefit and UnitedHealthcare may require medical policy review and supporting documentation before authorization or payment.
Prior Authorization: Document Indication, Prior Therapies, and Test-Phase Response
Authorization requests should document the clinical indication, prior conservative and medical therapies tried and failed, and objective results from the SNS test phase (screening trial).
- Document indication (e.g., OAB, urge incontinence, nonobstructive urinary retention, fecal incontinence) and confirm age ≥18 when applicable.
- Document prior conservative therapies: behavioral interventions, bladder/bowel training, pelvic floor rehabilitation, medications (anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists), and, when applicable, botulinum toxin A trials and reasons for discontinuation or failure.
- Include test-phase details: type of test (PNE or Stage 1), start/end dates, duration (PNE ~7 days bladder, 10–21 days bowel; Stage 1 typically 2–3 weeks), and both sensory and motor responses.
Prior Authorization Requires Documented Successful Trial
Authorization for permanent SNS implantation requires documented proof of a successful screening trial. A successful trial is generally defined as ≥50% improvement in one or more targeted urinary or bowel symptoms during the percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE) or Stage 1 test period.
- For urinary indications: ≥50% reduction in urinary frequency, urgency, or incontinence episodes, or return to normal voiding (e.g., <8 voids/day) as appropriate.
- For bowel indications: ≥50% reduction in validated symptom scores (e.g., LARS score) or bowel diary measures.
- If trial response is <50% or clinical response is insufficient, permanent implantation is not supported and may be denied.
Trial Success and Counseling Documentation Required for Authorization
Document trial success and preoperative counseling: records must show the degree of symptomatic improvement during the test phase and that the patient received counseling about risks, long-term expectations, and need for ongoing follow-up.
- Record objective outcome measures used to assess trial success (voiding/ bowel diaries, symptom scores, St. Mark's, Cleveland Clinic, PGI-I, etc.) and numeric percent improvement.
- Document counseling topics: device risks (implant-site pain, infection, lead migration, need for revisions, battery replacement), probability of test success, long-term commitment, and alternatives (e.g., BTX, PTNS).
- Ensure the patient is capable of operating the device or has adequate caregiving support; inability to operate the device is a contraindication.
Check Federal/State/Contractual Requirements
Check applicable federal, state, and contractual benefit requirements before relying on this policy. Those requirements govern coverage in the event of conflict and may impose additional prior authorization or documentation rules.
- Benefit coverage is determined by federal, state, or contractual requirements and applicable laws; these may differ from the standard policy.
- In the event of conflict, the federal/state/contractual requirements govern coverage decisions.
Test-Phase Response Affects Coverage
Test-phase response affects coverage decisions: success rates vary by indication and neurologic status; a low or absent test response (especially in some neurogenic conditions) may preclude implantation.
- Pooled test success rates vary (overall pooled ~66%; subgroups differ by neurogenic condition).
- Some neurogenic conditions (e.g., neurogenic urinary retention) have lower trial success rates and may result in higher denial risk for permanent implantation.
- Consider this evidence when documenting expected benefit and counseling the patient.
Documentation-Related Denial Risk
Documentation-related denial risk: lack of complete medical record documentation that supports medical necessity, missing trial results, or absence of prior conservative therapy records may lead to denial or non-coverage.
- Medical records must fully support medical necessity — incomplete, illegible, or absent documentation may result in denial.
- Requests for permanent implantation may be denied if screening trial improvement is <50% or if required screening/trial documentation is incomplete.
Medical Records Required
Medical records required for review: submit full supporting documentation including relevant history, physical examination findings, diagnostic test results, trial stimulation data, and follow-up outcome measures.
- Include medical history, focused physical exam, pertinent diagnostic testing (urodynamics where obtained), and rationale for SNS.
- Provide detailed trial stimulation documentation: dates, device/lead used, test duration, percent symptom change, diaries/scores, and post-trial follow-up notes.
- Make records legible, retained in the medical record, and available upon request.
Test-Phase and Outcome Documentation
Test-phase and outcome documentation to include objective measures and follow-up: use voiding/bowel diaries, validated symptom scores, and follow-up visits to demonstrate durability of response prior to approval for permanent implantation.
- Submit baseline and test-phase voiding or bowel diaries and validated scores (e.g., St. Mark's, LARS, ICIQ-OABqol).
- Provide follow-up outcome measures at appropriate intervals (e.g., 6–12 weeks and longer-term where available) to support ongoing benefit.
- Document any adverse events during trial and subsequent management.
Document Trial-Phase Results and Follow-Up
Document trial-phase results and follow-up: explicitly record percent improvement (threshold ≥50%) in one or more targeted parameters during PNE or Stage 1 and document subsequent decision-making and plans for implantation and lifelong follow-up.
- Record the specific parameter(s) that improved (frequency, urgency, incontinence episodes, LARS score, PVR, etc.) and the calculated percent improvement.
- Document the clinician's interpretation, informed consent, and plan for completion of the full system implant if criteria met.
- Include plan for life‑long surveillance and battery management as part of counseling documentation.
Step Therapy Expectations
Step therapy and treatment pathway expectations: SNS is generally considered a third-line therapy after failure of conservative (behavioral) and pharmacologic treatments; document prior stepwise care.
- Confirm prior conservative treatment and pharmacologic therapy trials (duration, agents, responses) and provide rationale for proceeding to SNS.
- Where applicable, document trials of alternative third-line options (e.g., PTNS, botulinum toxin) and reasons for selection of SNS.
- Align documentation with guideline recommendations that SNS is offered to patients refractory to conservative and medical therapies.
SNS Recommended After Failure of Conservative and Medical Therapies
SNS should be considered only after failure of appropriate conservative and medical therapies. Providers must ensure records show prior behavioral treatments, pelvic rehabilitation, and medication trials before the SNS test phase is pursued.
- Verify and document prior conservative care such as bladder/bowel training, pelvic floor therapy, and medication trials (antimuscarinics, beta-3 agonists).
- If botulinum toxin A was used, document timing, response, and reasons for discontinuation when relevant.
- Confirm the patient is competent to operate the device or has caregiver support prior to testing and implantation.
Background and Scope
Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS or SNM) involves placement of an electrode near a sacral nerve (commonly S3) to modulate afferent signaling and alter bladder, bowel, and pelvic floor function. The therapy is used after a temporary test-phase (percutaneous nerve evaluation or staged test) to predict response; a documented trial showing ≥50% improvement in target urinary or bowel symptoms is normally required before proceeding to permanent implantation. SNS is applied for refractory overactive bladder, urge incontinence, select nonobstructive urinary retention cases, and selected fecal incontinence patients when coverage criteria are met.
Definitions and Thresholds
Policy Revision History
Replaced references to 'Sacral Nerve Stimulation' with 'Sacral Nerve Stimulation (neurostimulation)' and added/updated definitions including SNS and urge incontinence; expanded medical records documentation language clarifying documentation requirements for medical necessity.
Added and clarified medical records documentation language specifying that documentation may be required to assess clinical criteria and must fully support medical necessity (including examples and requirement to be legible and available upon request).
Removed prior notation that CPT codes 64585 and 64595 were not on the State of Louisiana Medicaid Fee Schedule.
Updated Supporting Information sections (Clinical Evidence, FDA, References) and archived previous policy version CS358LA.D.
Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.