Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPolicy UpdatesPharmacy & Specialty DrugsExecutive Office of Health and Human Services PDL …
    Ask Trek AI about this page
    CurrentExecutive Office of Health and Human ServicesPolicy N/A

    Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee — Formulary Recommendations / Coverage Criteria

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for all Executive Office of Health and Human Services policy alerts

    Know when Executive Office of Health and Human Services releases new policies or updates existing guidance.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Quarterly Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee meeting minutes documenting formulary reviews, product additions/removals, and recommendations affecting the preferred drug list (PDL) and prior authorization practices for the Executive Office of Health & Human Services; intended for prescribers, pharmacists, and internal payer staff.

    Policy Summary
    PayerExecutive Office of Health and Human Services
    PolicyPharmacy & Therapeutics Committee — Formulary Recommendations / Coverage Criteria
    Policy CodePolicy N/A
    Change TypeRoutine formulary recommendations and DUR referrals
    Effective DateN/A
    Next Review DateN/A
    Key ActionDUR to review prior authorization diagnosis requirements for androgenic agents and consider adding diagnosis-based PA criteria.
    SourceLink
    POLICY UPDATE CHANGES

    No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.

    ~14therapeutic categories reviewed
    commonunanimous recommendations
    2new specialty agents

    OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.

    2DUR action items

    Formulary and Coverage Recommendations

    Formulary Recommendations

    Committee recommendations on formulary/PDL status and actions

    Alzheimer's agents: Namenda oral solution discontinued; committee recommended no changes to the PDL.
    Analgesics, Narcotic Long Acting: Reviewed safety communications (codeine and tramadol in children), new products (Arymo ER), new generic for Butrans, and market withdrawal of Opana ER; committee recommended no changes to preferred products.
    Analgesics, Narcotic Short Acting: New product RoxyBand (oxycodone IR) reviewed; recommendations accepted.
    Androgenic Agents: Recommendation to discontinue Axiron and its generics; committee noted there is not currently a diagnosis requirement on the prior authorization and referred this for DUR review.
    Antiparkinson's Agents: New items Gocovri and Osmolex ER reviewed; committee accepted recommendations.
    Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Agents: No changes to the class; recommendations accepted.
    Bladder Relaxants: Updated indication for Myrbetriq and recommendation to remove Enablex from preferred list; recommendations accepted.
    Cytokine and Calmodulin (CaM) Antagonists / Biologics: Updated indications and new formulations reviewed (Stelara, Taltz, Xeljanz/XR, Cimzia; Cyltezo, Enbrel Mini, Kevzara); two new products Ilumya and Olumiant noted; committee stated biosimilars should be considered safe and effective with substitutions made by the prescriber; motion to add Cosentyx failed and original motion passed.
    Erythropoietins: New biosimilar Retacrit (for Epogen/Procrit) noted and Mircera approved for dialysis; recommendations approved with one abstention.
    Ophthalmic Agents: Multiple ophthalmic subcategories reviewed (allergic conjunctivitis, antibiotics, antibiotic-steroid combinations, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulators, glaucoma); new products Rhopressa and Vyzulta noted; recommendations accepted.
    Otic Agents: Antibiotics, anti-infectives/anesthetics, and anti-inflammatory otic agents reviewed; preferred products recommended (e.g., acetic acid, Dermotic) and approved.
    Phosphate Binders: New generic lanthanum carbonate chewable (for Fosrenol) and new drug Axorerol reviewed; recommendations approved.
    Stimulants & Related Agents: New formulations (Adzenys ER oral suspension) and product changes (addition of Vyvanse chewable tablets, discontinuation of dextroamphetamine ER capsules and Methlyn chewables) reviewed; committee requested potential PA modification to document prior duration of use and continuity of care.
    Antihypertensives, Sympatholytics: Reviewed and recommendations accepted.

    The committee minutes do not record broad class‑level exclusions but do document specific removals from preferred lists. For example, the committee recommended discontinuing Axiron and its generics from the androgenic agents category and recommended removal of Enablex from the bladder relaxants preferred list. These actions represent targeted formulary removals rather than a blanket class exclusion and were accepted by unanimous vote.

    The minutes do not include explicit not medically necessary (NMN) determinations for individual drugs. Decisions recorded are limited to formulary placement and PDL recommendations (additions, removals, or status changes) voted on by the committee rather than statements declaring products NMN.

    Prior Authorization, Documentation, and Provider-Facing Actions

    Prior Authorization

    Prior auth for androgenic agents lacks diagnosis requirement — referred to DUR

    Committee identified that the prior authorization for androgenic agents (e.g., Axiron) currently does not include a diagnosis requirement and referred the issue to the DUR committee for review. No immediate PA policy change was recorded in the minutes.

    Step Therapy

    No step therapy requirements specified

    The minutes document that no formal step therapy (step edits) were specified for the reviewed classes; committee discussion did not produce any step therapy requirements.

    • Committee requested potential PA modification for stimulants to capture prior duration of use, but this was not recorded as a step therapy edit.

    Step Therapy and Stimulant Prior Use Considerations

    IssueCommittee discussion / recommendationPlanned follow-up / action
    Prior authorization modification for stimulants
    Committee asked whether the prior authorization could be modified to document if the patient has been on the medication and the start date (duration of prior use) to support continuity of care
    Refer to DUR for potential PA wording change to capture prior duration of use and continuity-of-care information; no formal policy change recorded in minutes (motion to accept recommendations approved)

    Biosimilars and Related Notes

    Note

    Retacrit (biosimilar for Epogen/Procrit) noted and accepted

    Retacrit (biosimilar for Epogen/Procrit) was noted as a new biosimilar and the committee accepted the recommendations regarding erythropoietins.

    Policy Context and Committee Process

    These are the quarterly Pharmacy & Therapeutics committee minutes summarizing routine class reviews and PDL recommendations. The committee conducts periodic reviews of approximately ~14 therapeutic classes, considers new approvals and generics, FDA safety communications, biosimilars, and utilization trends, and records motions to accept recommendations (commonly approved unanimously). Where issues were identified—such as lack of a diagnosis requirement on androgenic agent prior authorizations or potential modifications to stimulant prior authorization to capture prior duration of use—these were referred to DUR for follow‑up rather than immediately implemented as policy changes.

    Key Definitions

    inv-09: Biosimilar — definition and committee stance on biosimilars
    DefinitionA biological product highly similar to an approved reference biologic; the minutes note biosimilars should be considered safe and effective with substitutions made by the prescriber.
    Committee stanceBiosimilars should be considered safe and effective; substitutions should be made by the prescriber.
    Example notedRetacrit identified as a biosimilar for Epogen and Procrit; committee accepted recommendations.
    Implementation noteCommittee accepted biosimilar recommendations during formulary review with motions to approve related class recommendations.
    Action for prescribersWhen substituting a biosimilar for a reference biologic, prescribers should document the substitution per usual prescribing practices.
    Policy Summary
    PayerExecutive Office of Health and Human Services
    PolicyPharmacy & Therapeutics Committee — Formulary Recommendations / Coverage Criteria
    Policy CodePolicy N/A
    Change TypeRoutine formulary recommendations and DUR referrals
    Effective DateN/A
    Next Review DateN/A
    Key ActionDUR to review prior authorization diagnosis requirements for androgenic agents and consider adding diagnosis-based PA criteria.
    SourceLink
    On This Page
    Formulary and Coverage RecommendationsPrior Authorization, Documentation, and Provider-Facing ActionsStep Therapy and Stimulant Prior Use ConsiderationsBiosimilars and Related NotesPolicy Context and Committee ProcessKey Definitions
    Documentation Required

    DUR follow-up: consider adding diagnosis requirement and review stimulant use

    The committee requested DUR follow-up to review androgenic agent PA criteria specifically to consider adding diagnosis-based documentation, and to review stimulant use in adults.

    • DUR to look at patients who need Androgel and consider diagnosis-based criteria.
    • DUR to review stimulant utilization in adults and potential documentation of prior duration of use.
    Denial Risk

    Potential future PA/denial changes for androgenic agents — DUR referral

    Minutes flag a possible forthcoming change to PA/denial criteria for androgenic agents because the PA currently lacks a diagnosis requirement; this was referred to DUR and could lead to future PA additions or denials if diagnosis criteria are implemented.

    • Providers should anticipate potential future PA requirements or denial risk if DUR adds a required diagnosis for androgenic agents (e.g., Androgel).