Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPolicy UpdatesReimbursement/Payment PolicyEmblemHealth 5‑FU TDM Coverage Update | OpenPayer
    Ask Trek AI about this page
    CurrentEmblemHealthPolicy AHS-M2067

    Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for 5‑Fluorouracil - Lab Benefit Program (LBM)

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for EmblemHealth Policy AHS-M2067 alerts

    Get alerted when Policy AHS-M2067 changes without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    This reimbursement policy governs coverage and billing guidance for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of 5‑fluorouracil for individuals receiving 5‑FU chemotherapy under the Lab Benefit Program (LBM), including which tests meet or do not meet coverage criteria.

    Policy Summary
    PayerEmblemHealth
    PolicyTherapeutic Drug Monitoring for 5‑Fluorouracil - Lab Benefit Program (LBM)
    Policy CodePolicy AHS-M2067
    Change TypeAdministrative clarification / template update
    Effective DateJun 13, 2025
    Next Review Date
    Key ActionTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to aid in managing dose adjustment for individuals receiving 5‑fluorouracil chemotherapy meets coverage criteria; uracil breath tests and dihydrouracil/uracil ratio testing do not meet coverage.
    SourceLink

    OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.

    POLICY UPDATE CHANGES

    Updated for clarity; no changes to coding or coverage criteria.

    Reformatted and reorganized policy, transferred content to new template with new Reimbursement Policy Number.

    20–30recommended 5‑FU therapeutic AUC range cited
    654meta-analysis sample
    208Gamelin RCT sample
    58%proportion achieving target AUC after TDM
    S3722,80299,82542,83789referenced procedure codes
    nomaterial change status

    Coverage criteria for 5‑FU Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

    Coverage criteria and exclusions

    Covered when ALL of the following are met:

    For individuals who are undergoing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to aid in managing dose adjustment meets coverage criteria.

    Exclusions (these DO NOT meet coverage criteria)

    • Uracil breath tests.
    • Dihydrouracil/uracil ratio testing of plasma, serum, or urine samples.

    Coverage considerations and evidentiary nodes

    Guidance, recommendations, and evidentiary considerations relevant to clinical use of 5‑FU TDM and related DPD testing:

    Professional society guidance

    • IATDMCT: AUC is the accepted and clinically relevant metric for assessing systemic 5‑FU exposure; TDM reduces variability and toxicity and is strongly recommended for management of 5‑FU in colorectal and head‑and‑neck cancer.
    • CPIC: Pharmacokinetically‑guided dosing increases the proportion of patients with AUC in the therapeutic range and reduces adverse effects; follow‑up TDM is recommended after genotype‑guided dose reductions.
    • CPIC/LBM guidance: For DPYD poor metabolizers, avoid 5‑FU; if no alternatives, give a strongly reduced dose combined with early TDM.
    • RNPGx/GPCO and French groups: Recommend DPD testing before FP chemotherapy and recommend 5‑FU TDM in partial DPD‑deficient patients.
    • EMA (PRAC): Recommend DPD deficiency testing (genotyping or plasma uracil) before initiation; contraindicate 5‑FU in complete DPD deficiency and adjust dose in partial deficiency.

    Assay and coding considerations

    • Procedure codes referenced for AUC dose optimization and analytic methods include S3722, 80299, 82542, 83789 (informational for claim submission).
    • NICE: My5‑FU assay noted as having promise but recommended only for research purposes in their review (informing evidence context).

    Evidence and economic context

    • Clinical trials and systematic reviews (e.g., Deng et al., Gamelin/PREDICT studies) report that AUC‑based dosing can increase proportion of patients achieving therapeutic AUC and reduce certain toxicities (diarrhea, mucositis).
    • Economic evaluations (e.g., Vithanachchi et al.) commonly find TDM for 5‑FU to be cost‑effective or cost‑saving in included studies.
    • Comparative assay evaluations (e.g., My5‑FU immunoassay vs LC‑MS/MS) and breath test reviews highlight variable analytic approaches; the uracil breath test is not recommended by IATDMCT for clinical dosing decisions.

    Regulatory and implementation notes

    • Many 5‑FU assays are laboratory‑developed tests (LDTs) and are subject to CLIA; FDA prescribing information does not include AUC‑based dosing for fluorouracil.

    Coverage summary and evidence (administrative clarification)

    Administrative summary and evidence references:

    This policy was updated for clarity with no changes to coding or coverage criteria as noted in the revision history.
    References supporting the policy and evidence discussion are provided (selected examples include systematic reviews, guideline statements, clinical trials, assay evaluations, and economic evaluations).
    Procedure codes cited in the policy for informational use include S3722, 80299, 82542, and 83789. Coding and coverage remain unchanged in this revision.

    Procedure and billing codes

    Applicable CPT/HCPCS procedure codesmixed
    No codes listed
    Referenced procedure codesCPT | HCPCS | mixed
    S3722Dose optimization by area under the curve (AUC) analysis, for infusional 5‑fluorouracil.
    80299Quantitation of therapeutic drug, not elsewhere specified.
    82542Column chromatography, includes mass spectrometry, if performed (e.g., HPLC, LC, LC/MS, LC/MS‑MS, GC, GC/MS‑MS, GC/MS, HPLC/MS), non‑drug analyte(s) not elsewhere specified, qualitative or quantitative, each specimen.
    83789Mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry (e.g., MS, MS/MS, MALDI, MS‑TOF, QTOF), non‑drug analyte(s) not elsewhere specified, qualitative or quantitative, each specimen.
    Coding changesmixed
    No codes listed
    inv-07: Therapeutic AUC target
    Therapeutic AUC target20–30 mg×h/L
    Unitsmg×h/L (milligrams × hours per liter)
    Clinical contextTarget applies to intravenous continuous‑infusion 5‑fluorouracil dosing
    inv-08: AUC target relevance
    Primary relevanceAUC is the accepted and clinically relevant metric for systemic 5‑FU exposure and correlates with both clinical activity and toxicity
    Use in dosingPharmacokinetically‑guided (AUC‑based) dosing increases proportion of patients achieving target exposure and reduces adverse effects

    Provider guidance, billing impact, and reimbursement notes

    Prior Authorization

    Coverage decision summary / prior authorization implication

    Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for 5‑fluorouracil (5‑FU) is covered when used to guide dose adjustment for individuals receiving 5‑FU chemotherapy; prior authorization may be required per the member’s benefit plan. Uracil breath tests and dihydrouracil/uracil ratio testing of plasma, serum, or urine DO NOT meet coverage criteria and are not covered.

    • Covered for dose adjustment of infusional 5‑FU when clinically indicated — verify member benefits and obtain prior authorization if required.
    • Not covered: Uracil breath tests; dihydrouracil/uracil ratio testing of plasma, serum, or urine.
    Billing Rule

    Procedure codes for 5‑FU TDM (codes referenced for dose optimization and laboratory quantitation)

    Key terms and acronyms

    inv-12: Key acronyms and test terms (5-FU, AUC, BSA, DPD/DPYD, TDM)
    5‑FU5‑fluorouracil (antineoplastic agent)
    AUCArea‑under‑curve (plasma concentration vs time) — metric for systemic drug exposure
    BSABody surface area — common dosing method for 5‑FU
    DPD / DPYDDihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (enzyme) / DPYD (gene) — variants can cause decreased 5‑FU metabolism
    TDMTherapeutic drug monitoring — measuring drug concentrations to guide dosing
    inv-13: Area under the curve (AUC) — accepted metric for 5‑FU exposure
    Definition
    Policy Summary
    PayerEmblemHealth
    PolicyTherapeutic Drug Monitoring for 5‑Fluorouracil - Lab Benefit Program (LBM)
    Policy CodePolicy AHS-M2067
    Change TypeAdministrative clarification / template update
    Effective DateJun 13, 2025
    Next Review Date
    Key ActionTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to aid in managing dose adjustment for individuals receiving 5‑fluorouracil chemotherapy meets coverage criteria; uracil breath tests and dihydrouracil/uracil ratio testing do not meet coverage.
    SourceLink
    On This Page
    Coverage criteria for 5‑FU Therapeutic Drug MonitoringProcedure and billing codesProvider guidance, billing impact, and reimbursement notesKey terms and acronyms
    Guideline supportIATDMCT and CPIC endorse AUC measurement/TDM to guide dose adjustment and follow‑up monitoring after genotype‑based dose changes

    Codes referenced below may be used when billing for 5‑FU TDM and related laboratory quantitation; confirm code applicability with the payer and submit documentation supporting medical necessity.

    • S3722 — Dose optimization by AUC analysis for infusional 5‑fluorouracil.
    • 80299 — Quantitation of therapeutic drug, not elsewhere specified.
    • 82542 — Column chromatography, includes mass spectrometry (eg, HPLC, LC, LC/MS, LC/MS-MS, GC, GC/MS-MS, GC/MS, HPLC/MS).
    • 83789 — Mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry (eg, MS, MS/MS, MALDI, MS-TOF, QTOF).
    Note

    Reimbursement Policy - evidence references (context for reimbursement; no PA/step therapy specified)

    Evidence and guidance supporting the reimbursement position for 5‑FU TDM include peer‑reviewed studies, assay comparisons, and health-technology guidance. Reviewers should reference these publications when documenting medical necessity for testing under the Lab Benefit Program (LBM).

    • Hashimoto Y et al. Current Status of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of 5‑Fluorouracil Prodrugs. Anticancer Res. 2020;40(8):4655-4661.
    • MyCare. Clinical Studies and process information (My5‑FU assay). https://mycaretests.com/oncology/clinicians/#process
    • NICE. Fluorouracil chemotherapy: The My5‑FU assay for guiding dose adjustment. Updated Dec 10, 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg16
    • Cunha‑Junior GF et al. (13)C‑uracil breath test to predict 5‑FU toxicity. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;72(6):1273-1282.
    • Ezzeldin HH et al. (13)C‑5‑FU breath test review. J Breath Res. 2009;3(4):047002.
    • Buchel B et al. Comparative evaluation of the My5‑FU immunoassay and LC‑MS/MS. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(8):1681-1688.
    Area under the curve (AUC) — plasma concentration vs time metric accepted as clinically relevant for systemic 5‑FU exposure
    Relationship to outcomesObserved correlations between 5‑FU AUC and both clinical activity (response, survival) and toxicity across disease types and dosing regimens
    Role in TDMUsed to guide pharmacokinetically‑guided dosing adjustments to increase the proportion of patients within the therapeutic window
    inv-14: DPD deficiency — DPYD variants and uracil levels relevance
    DPD deficiency — relevanceDPD deficiency (due to DPYD variants or abnormal plasma uracil) increases risk of severe 5‑FU toxicity; testing is recommended prior to therapy
    Testing methodsGenotyping for DPYD variants and phenotyping by measurement of plasma uracil levels are cited as suitable approaches
    Regulatory guidanceEMA/PRAC recommends DPD deficiency testing before initiating fluoropyrimidine therapy and contraindicates use in complete DPD deficiency
    inv-15: Lab Benefit Program (LBM) — reimbursement pathway referenced
    Program referencedLab Benefit Program (LBM) — reimbursement pathway for laboratory‑based TDM services related to 5‑FU
    ContextPolicy frames coverage and billing guidance for 5‑FU TDM within the LBM
    Supporting citationsLBM policy references multiple clinical and guideline sources (e.g., IATDMCT, CPIC, NICE) in its evidence base
    inv-16: DPD screening / phenotyping (plasma uracil) referenced as related testing
    DPD screening/phenotyping referencedPlasma uracil measurement is cited as a phenotyping method for DPD deficiency relevant to 5‑FU toxicity mitigation
    Relation to coverageDPD screening (genotyping or plasma uracil) is recommended by EMA/PRAC and discussed as related testing in the policy
    Distinction from excluded testsThe policy specifies that uracil breath tests and dihydrouracil/uracil ratio testing do not meet coverage criteria, while plasma uracil phenotyping and DPYD genotyping are recognized methods