Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.31
    OpenPayerPolicy UpdatesDental/Oral & MaxillofacialDelta Dental OH Direct Restorations Coverage | Ope…
    Ask Trek AI about this page
    CurrentDelta Dental of OhioPolicy 282.25.v2

    Clinical Criteria for Direct Restorations

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for deltadentalofohio Policy 282.25.v2 alerts

    Get alerted when Policy 282.25.v2 changes without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Establishes clinical criteria, documentation requirements, coding guidance, and utilization management considerations for direct dental restorations, including amalgam and resin-based composite restorations.

    Policy Summary
    PayerDelta Dental of Ohio
    PolicyClinical Criteria for Direct Restorations
    Policy CodePolicy 282.25.v2
    Change TypeNo material change
    Effective DateJune 21, 2025
    Next Review DateNot specified
    Key ActionSubmit preoperative diagnostic-quality radiographs showing cavitated carious lesions or other conditions requiring restorative intervention.
    SourceLink
    POLICY UPDATE CHANGES

    No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.

    15Applicable direct-restoration procedure codes
    4Accepted clinical indications
    3Maximum restorations per tooth per date of service
    2Primary restoration material groups

    OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.

    0
    Prior authorization required
    2025-06-21Version effective date

    Clinical Coverage Criteria

    Generally Accepted Indications

    A direct restoration is generally considered medically necessary and clinically appropriate when the dental record documents an accepted indication and the restoration is expected to restore and maintain tooth form and function with a good long-term prognosis.

    ONE or more of the following generally accepted indications

    • An active cavitated carious lesion for which a nonrestorative intervention is unlikely to provide a good long-term prognosis for preserving tooth form and function.
    • Slight to moderate coronal structure loss caused by tooth fracture, a noncarious cervical lesion, attrition, abrasion, or erosion, with enough intact tooth structure remaining for a direct restoration to have a good long-term prognosis.
    • Slight to moderate coronal structure loss after successful endodontic therapy, with sufficient intact tooth structure remaining for a direct restoration to restore and maintain tooth form and function.
    • Failure of a direct or indirect restoration when repair with a direct restoration is expected to have a good long-term prognosis.

    Additional Clinical and Coding Criteria

    Depending on the patient's condition and circumstances, all of the following clinical, diagnostic, treatment, and reporting requirements may apply to coverage determinations.

    Applicable clinical and coding requirements

    • Complete and document a comprehensive evaluation of the teeth and surrounding tissues before planning and performing direct restoration treatment, including identification of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions.
    • Address untreated caries or fractures, failed restorations, periodontal disease, endodontic pathology, and structural weakness in the dentition as part of the overall treatment plan.
    • Perform direct restorations in accordance with applicable standards of dental practice for restorative material selection, preparation, marginal integrity, interproximal contacts, and occlusion.
    • Report a restoration limited to one tooth surface with the appropriate single-surface procedure code; report a restoration extending without interruption across two or more contiguous surfaces with the appropriate multiple-surface procedure code. Extension across the line angle generally constitutes involvement of a contiguous surface, subject to any program-specific multiple-surface criteria.

    Potentially Not Medically Necessary or Clinically Inappropriate

    Depending on the clinical circumstances, a direct restoration may be considered not medically necessary, inadvisable, or deficient in clinical quality and may result in disapproval of benefits.

    ONE or more of the following concerns may support noncoverage or disapproval

    • The record lacks pretreatment documentation of an active cavitated carious lesion, tooth fracture, restoration failure, or another accepted indication for placement of a direct restoration.
    • Appropriate removal of caries has not been performed.
    • Appropriate removal of an existing restoration has not been performed.
    • The tooth is affected by unresolved periapical pathology, failed endodontic treatment, an improperly aligned post, or failed root integrity caused by root fracture or a resorptive defect.
    • The tooth has insufficient alveolar bone support, advanced furcation involvement, or advanced mucogingival defects.

    Potentially Noncovered Purposes

    Direct restorations performed solely for the following purposes may not be covered. The member's plan documents in effect on the date of service control whether a service is a covered benefit.

    ONE or more potentially noncovered purposes

    • Tooth structure loss resulting from attrition, abrasion, abfraction, or erosion.
    • Periodontal splinting.
    • Diagnosis or treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
    • Correction of congenital or developmental malformations.
    • Vertical dimension adjustment.

    Resin-based composite restorations placed in noncarious pits and fissures contained within a tooth's enamel should be reported as a sealant. Active carious lesions in pits and fissures that do not extend into dentin should be reported with the D1352 preventive resin restoration procedure code. Composite restorations extending into dentin should be reported with the appropriate resin-based composite restoration procedure code.

    A direct restoration performed solely to address tooth structure loss from attrition, abrasion, abfraction, or erosion, or solely for periodontal splinting, diagnosis or treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction, vertical dimension adjustment, stabilization of occlusion, or a related purpose may not be covered. Coverage depends on the member's dental plan documents in effect on the date of service.

    A direct restoration placed solely to improve esthetic appearance may not be medically necessary or covered, including diastema closure, cosmetic restoration of a peg lateral tooth, or replacement of an intact and functional amalgam restoration with a resin-based composite material.

    A direct restoration may be clinically inappropriate when the tooth is broken down by dental caries, extensive restoration, and/or fracture and has insufficient sound tooth structure for successful restoration. Related concerns include unresolved endodontic or periapical disease, failed root integrity, inadequate periodontal support, or another condition that prevents a predictable long-term result.

    High caries risk and/or poor oral hygiene may present a relative contraindication to restorative treatment and may affect medical-necessity or clinical-appropriateness determinations. The clinician should consider whether disease control and an alternative treatment are more appropriate before placing a direct restoration.

    Coding and Reimbursement Guidelines

    Amalgam restorationsmixed
    D2140amalgam - one surface, primary or permanent
    D2150amalgam - two surfaces, primary or permanent
    D2160amalgam - three surfaces, primary or permanent
    D2161amalgam - four or more surfaces, primary or permanent
    Resin-based composite restorationsmixed
    D2330resin-based composite - one surface, anterior
    D2331resin-based composite - two surfaces, anterior
    D2332resin-based composite - three surfaces, anterior
    D2335resin-based composite - four or more surfaces (anterior)
    D2390resin-based composite crown, anterior
    D2391resin-based composite - one surface, posterior
    D2392resin-based composite - two surfaces, posterior
    D2393resin-based composite - three surfaces, posterior
    D2394resin-based composite - four or more surfaces, posterior
    Preventive resin restorationCDTNot Covered
    D1352preventive resin restoration procedure code
    Maximum restorations per tooth per date of service
    Reimbursement limitNo more than three restorations per tooth per date of service will be reimbursed.
    Surface-count basisThe limit applies regardless of the number of surfaces restored.
    Applicable restorationsThe limit applies to amalgam and resin-based composite restorations.
    Single-surface posterior resin-based composite
    Required decay involvementA single-surface resin-based composite restoration must involve repair of decay in the dentin.
    Tooth and surface reporting

    Documentation and Provider Requirements

    Documentation Required

    Preoperative Radiographs Required

    Submit preoperative, diagnostic-quality radiographs with the claim when benefit payment depends on medical necessity or clinical appropriateness. Images should demonstrate cavitated carious lesions or another condition requiring restorative intervention and permit evaluation of the involved teeth from crown to root tip.

    Documentation Required

    Supplemental Clinical Rationale

    When radiographs do not clearly establish that a direct restoration was medically necessary, submit supplemental documentation consistent with the patient record to explain the preoperative treatment rationale.

    • Include clinical photographs and a narrative explaining the indication and treatment-planning decision.
    Documentation Required

    Comprehensive Clinical Record

    Policy Background

    Direct restorations are single-appointment restorations placed directly into a prepared tooth to restore form and function when coronal damage is slight to moderate and does not require an indirectly fabricated full-coverage crown. They commonly address tooth-structure loss from caries, trauma, wear, or restoration failure.

    Key Definitions

    Noncavitated carious lesion
    Surface conditionThe carious lesion surface appears macroscopically intact.
    Clinical findingThere is no clinical evidence of cavitation or discontinuity.
    Usual assessmentAccessible surfaces are generally assessed through visual-tactile examination with an accepted caries classification system; inaccessible approximal surfaces may be evaluated by radiographic depth.
    Cavitated carious lesion
    Surface conditionThe carious lesion surface is not macroscopically intact.
    Defining findingThe lesion has a distinct discontinuity or break in surface integrity.
    Policy Summary
    PayerDelta Dental of Ohio
    PolicyClinical Criteria for Direct Restorations
    Policy CodePolicy 282.25.v2
    Change TypeNo material change
    Effective DateJune 21, 2025
    Next Review DateNot specified
    Key ActionSubmit preoperative diagnostic-quality radiographs showing cavitated carious lesions or other conditions requiring restorative intervention.
    SourceLink
    On This Page
    Clinical Coverage CriteriaCoding and Reimbursement GuidelinesDocumentation and Provider RequirementsPolicy BackgroundKey Definitions
  1. Use accepted clinical methods to distinguish carious lesions. Noncavitated lesions appear macroscopically intact without a distinct break in surface integrity; cavitated lesions have a discontinuity or break in surface integrity.
  2. For accessible surfaces, generally diagnose primary and secondary cavitated and noncavitated lesions through visual-tactile examination used with an accepted caries classification system, while considering surface texture and overlying biofilm.
  3. For inaccessible approximal surfaces, use radiographic depth when determining whether a lesion is cavitated or noncavitated. Lesions limited to enamel and the outer one-third of dentin on radiographs are most likely noncavitated, and nonrestorative interventions should generally be prioritized.
  4. Photography may be used as an adjunct to document caries progression over time, but supplementary nonradiological detection technologies must be applied cautiously because available evidence regarding clinical effectiveness and sensitivity is incomplete.
  5. For high-risk children with large or multisurface cavitated or noncavitated lesions on primary molars, particularly when treatment requires sedation or general anesthesia, consider whether a prefabricated crown is more appropriate than an amalgam or resin-based restoration under applicable pediatric restorative guidance.
  6. The restoration is placed in a primary tooth undergoing natural exfoliation.
  7. The direct restoration is inadequately prepared or adapted, including marginal defects or inadequate interproximal contacts, axial contours, or occlusion.
  8. The patient has an allergy to a restoration material, such as nickel.
  9. A compromised temporomandibular joint is likely to cause complications during or after restorative treatment.
  10. An alternative treatment is more appropriate under accepted standards of care, such as nonrestorative treatment for an incipient noncavitated lesion likely to respond favorably.
  11. Stabilization of occlusion.
  12. Improvement of appearance.
  13. Claims must indicate the tooth surface and tooth number treated.
    Preventive restoration distinctionPreventive resin-based restorations are not covered services.
    Multiple-surface reporting
    Multiple-surface thresholdA direct restoration placed without interruption on two or more contiguous tooth surfaces must be reported using the appropriate multiple-surface procedure code.
    Contiguity requirementThe restoration must extend across two or more contiguous tooth surfaces without interruption.
    Line-angle ruleA restoration is generally considered to extend onto a contiguous tooth surface when it extends across the line angle between two surfaces.

    Maintain and submit a comprehensive clinical record supporting the direct restoration. The record should establish an accepted indication, document the clinical and radiographic evaluation, and describe the condition of the tooth and surrounding tissues before treatment.

    • Document active cavitated caries, fracture, restoration failure, or another accepted indication when applicable.
    • Identify noncavitated and cavitated lesions and address untreated caries or fractures, failed restorations, periodontal disease, endodontic pathology, and structural weakness as part of the overall treatment plan.
    Documentation Required

    Restorative Quality Documentation

    Ensure the restoration is clinically appropriate and meets applicable standards of restorative practice. Documentation and treatment should support appropriate material selection, caries or restoration removal, tooth preparation, marginal integrity, interproximal contacts, axial contours, and occlusion.

    • Inadequately prepared or adapted restorations, marginal defects, inadequate contacts, defective contours, or inadequate occlusion may result in disapproval of benefits.
    • Remove caries and existing restorations appropriately before placing the direct restoration.
    Note

    Additional Information Requests

    Delta Dental of Ohio may request additional clinical information relevant to the patient's care when determining coverage based on medical necessity or clinical appropriateness. Failure to provide requested or applicable documentation may result in disapproval of benefit payment.

    • Retain supporting records that substantiate the treatment decision and submit them when requested.
    Billing Rule

    Tooth and Surface Reporting

    Report the treated tooth number and tooth surface on claims for amalgam and resin-based composite restorations. Use the procedure code that accurately reflects whether the restoration involves a single surface or multiple contiguous surfaces.

    • A surface may generally be named only once, subject to the stated exceptions for maxillary first and second molars and anterior teeth.
    • A restoration extending across the line angle onto a contiguous surface is generally reported as a multiple-surface restoration.

    Unsupported block type: denial_risk

    Unsupported block type: denial_risk

    Unsupported block type: billing_rule

    Unsupported block type: denial_risk

    Billing Rule

    Claim Reporting Limits

    Apply the claim reporting limits for the applicable restorative material and date of service. Report each restoration accurately by tooth and surface and do not exceed the plan's limits or permitted surface combinations.

    • No more than three restorations per tooth per date of service will be reimbursed, regardless of the number of surfaces restored.
    • A tooth surface can generally be named only once, whether alone or combined with restorations on other surfaces.
    • For maxillary first and second molars, the occlusal surface may be named twice; for anterior teeth, facial and lingual surfaces may be named twice.
    • If the incisal angle of an anterior tooth is involved, only one four-surface restoration may be claimed for that tooth, with no additional surfaces or restorations allowed.
    Usual assessment
    The condition is usually determined using visual or tactile examination.
    Direct restoration
    PlacementA direct restoration is placed directly into a prepared tooth.
    TimingIt is generally performed in a single appointment.
    Purpose and scopeIt restores tooth form and function when coronal damage is slight to moderate and does not require an indirectly fabricated crown.
    Contiguous tooth surface
    Contiguous surfaceA restoration extends onto a contiguous tooth surface when it extends across the line angle between two surfaces.
    Multiple-surface reportingRestorations placed without interruption on two or more contiguous tooth surfaces must be reported using the appropriate multiple-surface procedure code.
    Single-surface distinctionA restoration confined to a single tooth surface without extension onto another contiguous surface must be reported using the appropriate single-surface procedure code.