The Commissioner has determined that the following questions are legitimate disputes for which an insurer or other claim-paying entity may delay payment for a reasonable period while resolving the dispute. Investigations must remain limited to the conditions and purposes described below, and all reviews and investigations should be concluded promptly.
Whether the claim or condition that is the subject of a new claim is preexisting.
Any investigation must be consistent with Connecticut Insurance Department Bulletin HC-66 (September 24, 2007), limited to issues directly related to the alleged preexisting claim or condition, and may otherwise be deemed post-claim underwriting.
Whether the services rendered are medically necessary.
The investigation must apply the definition of medically necessary established by Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 38a-482a and 38a-513c.
Whether the services are consistent with emergency medical treatment.
An emergency medical condition is one in which a prudent layperson, acting reasonably, would have believed that emergency medical treatment was needed. The provider must code the presenting symptoms of each emergency claim, and the hospital must record the code in locator 76 of the UB92 form or its successor. The presenting symptoms recorded on the form, or the final diagnosis, whichever reasonably indicates an emergency medical condition, must be the basis for reimbursement or coverage. Investigation is permitted only when the UB92 claim form is not completed as required; when the required information is present, the claim is complete and must be processed without further investigation.
Whether there is potential for dual coverage and, if so, the applicable coordination of benefits (COB).
COB information should be investigated when the initial claim indicates dual coverage. Subsequent claims may not be investigated more frequently than once yearly unless changed circumstances are indicated. Investigation is permitted to determine payment priority; when another insurer is determined to be primary, the secondary carrier may withhold payment until receiving notice of the primary payment needed to determine secondary liability, but must notify the claimant that payment is being withheld pending proof of the primary payer's determination. Group-contract COB determinations must comply with Conn. Agencies Regs. §§ 38a-480-1 through 38a-480-7. Investigation may also verify whether a child or stepchild continues to qualify for coverage under Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 38a-497 and 38a-512b, or verify marital status when information varies from the records on file.
Whether a dependent remains eligible for coverage when the issue involves verification of dependent status beyond routine enrollment information.
For mentally or physically handicapped dependents, under Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 38a-489 and 38a-515, proof of incapacity and dependency must be furnished within 31 days after the child reaches the limiting age. The insurer or health care center may require proof of continuing incapacity and dependency at any time; after two years following attainment of the limiting age, periodic proof may be required no more frequently than once annually.
Whether a claim submitted by a foreign provider requires additional processing because bills are in a foreign language or payment is requested in a foreign currency.
A claim may be reasonably delayed in extraordinary circumstances to obtain date-of-service currency conversion rates or translate bills into English. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the claim must be processed within the timeframes established by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-816(15)(B)(i) and (ii).
Whether information concerning an accident is sufficient to evaluate a claim for health care services rendered in response to an accidental injury.
Investigation is permitted when information about the nature of the accident and how the injuries were sustained is missing or incomplete, and must be limited to issues directly related to the accident.
Whether there is a reasonable basis to suspect that a claim is fraudulent.
A carrier may investigate when the claim submission provides a reasonable basis to suspect fraudulent activity by the enrollee, member, subscriber, or provider. The carrier should be prepared to provide the Commissioner with evidence supporting the basis for the suspected fraud.