Irreversible Electroporation of Tumors Located in the Liver, Pancreas, Kidney or Lung
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for blue cross blue shield - south dakota Policy 07.01.103 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 07.01.103 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
This policy governs the coverage stance for use of irreversible electroporation (IRE) to treat primary or metastatic solid tumors of the liver, pancreas, kidney, or lung for Wellmark (Blue Cross Blue Shield - South Dakota) members.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage Determination and Evidence Summary
Investigational / Not covered with evidence-based criteria
Policy decision
Evidence across indications is insufficient to demonstrate an improvement in net health outcome; most studies are single-arm with limited comparative data.
Evidence-based coverage considerations
Evidence summary and coverage-relevant conclusions
Insufficient comparative data and lack of standardized treatment protocols limit conclusions about net health benefit.
Kidney Tumors
Evidence for IRE in kidney tumors is limited to small, single-arm studies; no comparative data exist.
Insufficient evidence to determine comparative effectiveness or long‑term outcomes.
Lung Tumors
Evidence for IRE in lung tumors consists of small single-arm prospective studies; one multicenter ALICE trial was stopped early for lack of efficacy.
High recurrence and complication rates raise concerns about efficacy and safety.
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is considered investigational for the treatment of primary or metastatic solid tumors of the liver, pancreas, kidney, or lung. The available evidence is insufficient to conclude that IRE improves the net health outcome for these indications.
No published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating benefit of IRE for these tumor sites were identified. Two randomized trials for pancreatic cancer are ongoing (DIRECT, LAP-PIE) but results are not yet published; until RCT data are available, pancreatic studies remain largely single-arm and inconclusive.
Across organ sites the literature consists predominantly of small, single-arm studies with few comparative data. Liver reports include mainly uncontrolled series and one small retrospective comparative study; kidney studies are almost exclusively single-arm with only one series >10 participants; lung evidence includes small prospective single-arm work and a multicenter study (ALICE) stopped early. These study limitations prevent reliable conclusions about comparative effectiveness or long-term outcomes.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Panel acknowledges that IRE has been used in locally advanced pancreatic cancer but states that, due to concerns about complications and required technical expertise, the Panel does not currently recommend IRE for treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
In summary, evidence is insufficient across the reviewed indications. Most studies are single-arm, sample sizes are small, standardized treatment protocols are lacking, and functional or quality-of-life outcomes are not reported. For lung tumors, the ALICE study's early termination for high recurrence further underscores the limited and concerning outcome data.
There are no consistent data showing that IRE improves overall survival, disease-specific survival, or patient-reported outcomes compared with standard locoregional therapies or systemic therapy alone. For pancreatic cancer, single-arm series report high complication rates and there is insufficient evidence that adding IRE to chemotherapy improves survival or quality of life.
The evidence base is characterized by an absence of randomized controlled trials and reliance on single-arm observational studies. This lack of comparative data means current studies cannot determine how IRE compares with established ablative techniques or other standard treatments with respect to survival, recurrence, or adverse events.
NCCN guidance does not reference IRE as a recommended therapy for kidney cancer or non–small cell lung cancer. For pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the NCCN Panel notes use in locally advanced disease but explicitly does not recommend IRE because of complication concerns and technical expertise requirements.
Because IRE is designated investigational for liver, pancreas, kidney, and lung tumors, coverage for such procedures may be denied. Insufficient comparative evidence, lack of standardized protocols, and concerning outcomes in some studies (for example, high recurrence in the ALICE lung study) are coverage-relevant considerations that increase the risk of denial absent enrollment in a clinical trial or other defined investigational program.
Procedure and Billing Codes
| No codes listed |
| No codes listed |
| 0600T | Ablation, irreversible electroporation; 1 or more tumors per organ, other than liver or prostate, including imaging guidance, percutaneous |
| 0601T | Ablation, irreversible electroporation; 1 or more tumors per organ, including fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance, open |
| 47384 | Ablation, irreversible electroporation; liver, 1 or more tumors, including imaging guidance, percutaneous |
Prior Authorization, Documentation, and Billing Guidance
Prior approval and benefit verification
Prior approval is listed as “Not applicable.” Verify member benefits and contract-specific exclusions or limitations at time of service to confirm coverage and any prior authorization requirements.
- Benefit determinations are based on the applicable contract language in effect at the time the services were rendered.
- Exclusions, limitations, or exceptions may apply; individual member benefits must be verified.
Prior authorization should document clinical justification
When requesting prior authorization, document clinical justification that addresses limited comparative evidence and any elevated complication signals (notably in pancreatic studies) and include tumor stage, prior systemic therapies, and why standard locoregional options are not appropriate.
- Studies for pancreatic, liver, kidney, and lung indications are primarily single-arm and lack comparative RCT evidence.
- Document prior systemic therapy, tumor stage, and rationale for using IRE instead of standard therapies.
Prior authorization for IRE procedures (device / procedural planning confirmation)
Prior authorization should confirm planned use of the NanoKnife IRE system and that procedural planning includes CT guidance, electrocardiography synchronization, general anesthesia, and electrode placement to bracket the targeted tissue.
- NanoKnife System described as the IRE device cleared for surgical ablation of soft tissue.
- Procedure is performed under CT guidance and ECG synchronization and under general anesthesia.
- Physician places 2–6 electrodes to bracket the targeted tissue.
Alternative locoregional therapy options
Consider established locoregional alternatives (e.g., radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, arterial embolization, and radiotherapy including SBRT) before IRE when clinically appropriate.
- NCCN lists microwave/RFA, surgical or percutaneous ethanol injection and arterial embolization and radiotherapy as locoregional options for hepatic tumors.
- Thermal ablation and other established ablative procedures are alternatives for small renal masses.
Systemic therapy precedes local ablation for pancreas (NCCN context)
For locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, document that appropriate systemic therapy (e.g., FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-based regimens) with or without radiation was given per NCCN recommendations prior to considering local ablation.
- NCCN recommended initial approach for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is systemic therapy, potentially with radiation, to attempt downstaging.
- There is insufficient data to determine whether chemotherapy followed by IRE improves survival compared with chemotherapy alone; RCTs are ongoing.
Consider standard ablative or surveillance options first
Document consideration of standard ablative approaches or active surveillance for small renal masses before IRE; NCCN guidance supports thermal ablation or surveillance for selected small renal tumors.
- NCCN states thermal ablation (cryo, RFA, microwave) and active surveillance are options for certain small renal masses (<3 cm, T1a).
- IRE evidence for kidney tumors is limited to small, single-arm studies with no comparative data.
Step therapy (informational)
No explicit step therapy mandate is specified in this policy; the guidance notes IRE is an emerging modality and not currently recommended by some guidelines for several indications.
- NCCN describes IRE as an emerging modality and the Panel does not currently recommend IRE for locally advanced pancreatic cancer due to concerns about complications and technical expertise.
- No formal step-wise requirement (e.g., mandatory prior-line therapies) is specified in this segment.
Documentation and benefit verification (refer to policy and codes table)
Refer to the policy text and the Codes table when preparing authorization requests and claims; verify member benefits and applicable contract language at the time of service.
- Policy states to use appropriate CPT/HCPCS and diagnosis codes per Codes table.
- Benefit determinations depend on the member’s contract and may vary.
Procedural documentation details
Include procedural details in the medical record and authorization request: device used (NanoKnife), number and placement of electrodes (2–6), imaging guidance (CT), ECG synchronization, anesthesia type, pulse settings, and perioperative monitoring for arrhythmia/muscle contractions.
- NanoKnife System details and that voltage is applied between probe pairs in pulses.
- Procedure performed under CT guidance and ECG synchronization; physician places 2–6 electrodes.
- Document pulse settings and perioperative monitoring due to risk of muscular spasms and arrhythmia.
Procedure documentation (NanoKnife specifics, electrode details, CT/ECG guidance)
For NanoKnife procedures, document the specific device (NanoKnife System), electrode count and configuration (typically 2–6 electrodes to bracket tissue), CT imaging guidance, and ECG synchronization used during energy delivery.
- NanoKnife System is a software-controlled direct-current generator with single electrode probes and optional spacer.
- Physician places 2–6 electrodes and applies a series of electrical pulses.
- Procedure performed under CT guidance and electrocardiography synchronization.
Investigational designation may trigger denial
Because IRE for liver, pancreas, kidney, or lung tumors is designated investigational by this policy, lack of coverage may result in claim denial unless the service is part of an approved clinical trial or meets any narrow, documented exception.
- Policy states IRE is considered investigational for treatment of primary or metastatic solid tumors including liver, pancreas, kidney, or lung.
- Investigational services may be denied.
Lung study outcomes may trigger denial (ALICE trial results)
Document and anticipate possible denial for lung IRE based on ALICE trial outcomes: the multicenter ALICE study was stopped early (n=23) for lack of efficacy with 61% progressive disease at ~1 year and high pneumothorax rates (48%).
- ALICE study stopped early (planned n=36, stopped at n=23) with 61% progressive disease at median 12 months.
- Pneumothorax occurred in 48% with chest tubes required in 8 participants.
Clinical Background and Definitions
Irreversible electroporation delivers high-frequency electrical pulses between electrodes to create an electric current that permanently disrupts cell membranes and induces nonthermal cell death. The technique may preserve adjacent structures such as vessels, ducts, and nerves relative to thermal ablation approaches and is performed percutaneously or via open approaches with CT guidance and ECG synchronization.
Policy Revision History
New policy created noting CPT codes for irreversible electroporation (0600T, 0601T, 47384) and establishing prior authorization and billing guidance.
New policy record added to history: policy created in January 2025.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.