OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.

Currentblue cross blue shield - south dakotaPolicy N/A

Anesthesia Services for Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures

Customize your policy alerts

Sign up for all blue cross blue shield - south dakota policy alerts

Know when blue cross blue shield - south dakota releases new policies or updates existing guidance.

Monitor payer policy activity

Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

Defines medical necessity criteria for monitored anesthesia care (MAC) or general anesthesia during outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, lists not medically necessary scenarios, provides policy guidelines, clinical background, evidence summary, and related definitions. Addresses anesthesia personnel, sedation depth, and risk factors but does not include the codes table in this part.

Policy Summary

Payerblue cross blue shield - south dakota

PolicyAnesthesia Services for Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures

Policy CodePolicy N/A

Change TypeClarified / Revised (literature update through Jan 2026)

Effective Date

Last ReviewJan 1, 2026

Next Review Date

Key ActionProviders must document in the medical record the specific risk factor or significant medical condition that meets the policy's 'Medically Necessary' criteria (e.g., ASA class, BMI, airway anatomy, pregnancy, age, history of intolerance to sedatives, prior anesthesia complications).

SourceLink

POLICY UPDATE CHANGES

Policy updated to reflect evidence review through January 2026 and to reference ASA definitions updated in 2024.

Policy renewed during annual reviews in Jan 2024, 2025, and 2026 with multiple prior annual reviews and revisions dating back to 2011-2024.

1Policy addresses MAC vs standard sedation for GI endoscopy

MultipleEvidence sources (RCTs, systematic reviews, observational studies)

ASA III-IV-VHigh-risk ASA classes noted as indication

5CPT codes listed

MultipleGuideline sources cited

Coverage Summary

Scope: This policy defines medical necessity criteria for Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) or general anesthesia during outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, and lists scenarios considered not medically necessary when the MAC/GA criteria are not met. Coverage stance: mixed (evidence includes RCTs, systematic reviews, and observational studies with heterogeneous/mixed findings). Status: CURRENT. Subject: anesthesia services (MAC/general anesthesia) for gastrointestinal endoscopic outpatient procedures. Effective/Last review dates: review updated through literature search to January 2026; last review documented as 2026-01. Evidence mix: includes randomized controlled trials, comparative systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and observational cohort studies; RCTs in ERCP reported higher sedation-related adverse events with propofol-based MAC vs GA, while systematic reviews/meta-analyses and observational data provide heterogeneous findings and guideline-based recommendations regarding when anesthesia assistance is appropriate.

ref":"b0_0"

Quick thresholds and facts

Body Mass Index (BMI)> 40 kg/m2

Age (upper)> 70 years old

Age (lower)< 17 years old

Decreased hyomental distance< 3 cm

Mallampati scoreClass greater than II (III or IV)

ASA physical statusASA class III, IV, or V

CPT codes listed (count)5 (00731, 00732, 00811, 00812, 00813)

Medical-Necessity Criteria

Medically Necessary

MAC or general anesthesia may be considered medically necessary during GI endoscopic procedures when at least one of the following specific risk factors or significant medical conditions is present:

ANY of the following

Demographic and behavioral risk factors
- > 70 years old
- < 17 years old
- Acutely agitated or uncooperative individuals (e.g., delirium)
- Organic brain disease

Clinical Evidence and Guideline Considerations

Summary statements and factors associated with sedation-related complications

Evidence and guideline-derived risk factors associated with sedation-related complications and recommendations for when anesthesia provider involvement should be considered:

ALL of the following

Risk factors associated with sedation-related complications: Sedation-related complications are associated with patient and procedure variables including increased age (per year OR 1.02), higher BMI (per point OR 1.03), higher ASA class (ASA III-IV vs I-II OR 1.69), Mallampati score, emergency procedures (OR 1.48), and longer procedure duration (OR 2.00).
Agostoni et al (2011) multivariate model
ERCP BMI association: In ERCP patients receiving MAC, higher BMI strongly associated with adverse respiratory events (OR 1.08; p<.001); obesity patients experienced respiratory events ~2x more often.
Berzin et al (2011) prospective cohort

Provider Actions and Billing Impact

Documentation Required

Document presence of qualifying risk factor

Providers must document in the medical record the specific risk factor or significant medical condition that meets the policy's 'Medically Necessary' criteria.

ASA class (III, IV, or V)
Body mass index (BMI > 40 kg/m2)
Airway anatomy / predictors of difficult airway (e.g., Mallampati > II, decreased hyomental distance < 3 cm, micrognathia, retrognathia, trismus, short neck, neck mass, limited neck extension, edentulous, macroglossia, tonsillar hypertrophy)
Pregnancy
Age (> 70 years or < 17 years)
History of intolerance to standard sedatives (e.g., chronic narcotic or benzodiazepine therapy)
History of previous problems with anesthesia or sedation

Documentation Required

Document monitoring and clinical assessments

Coding

Anesthesia CPT codes for GI endoscopic proceduresCPT

00731	Anesthesia for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, endoscope introduced proximal to duodenum; not otherwise specified
00732	Anesthesia for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, endoscope introduced proximal to duodenum; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
00811	Anesthesia for lower intestinal endoscopic procedures, endoscope introduced distal to duodenum; not otherwise specified
00812	Anesthesia for lower intestinal endoscopic procedures, endoscope introduced distal to duodenum; screening colonoscopy
00813	Anesthesia for combined upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, endoscope introduced both proximal to and distal to the duodenum

Place of servicemixed

Outpatient

Place of Service indicated as Outpatient

HCPCS / Revenue / ICD-10mixed

No code(s)

HCPCS entries listed as 'No code(s)' or not specified in this part

Definitions

- Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC): a set of anesthesia services defined by the type of anesthesia personnel present during a procedure; includes preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural anesthesia management, the ability to convert to general anesthesia, and the capacity to intervene if the airway is compromised.

- ASA Physical Status: American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I–VI describing preoperative health; ASA III–V are identified as increased risk in this policy.

- Sedation levels (ASA 2024): four levels — minimal, moderate, deep sedation, and general anesthesia — defined by responsiveness, airway intervention needs, ventilation adequacy, and cardiovascular function; note that sedation is a continuum and providers must be able to rescue patients who become deeper than intended.

- Rescue: correcting adverse physiologic consequences of deeper-than-intended sedation (e.g., hypoventilation, hypoxia, hypotension) and returning the patient to the intended level of sedation.

- Clarification: MAC is an anesthesia service performed by qualified anesthesia providers, not a label for a specific depth of sedation; personnel providing MAC must be prepared and qualified to diagnose and treat physiologic deviations and to convert to general anesthesia when necessary.

Revision History

2026-01literature_updateLatest

Policy updated to reflect literature review performed through January 2026; rationale section states most recent literature update was through January 2026 and the evidence synthesis was based on that search.

2024reference_update

Policy text updated to reference American Society of Anesthesiologists definitions of sedation levels amended/updated in 2024; ASA continuum/levels table adapted from ASA (2024) is included.

2026-01

Policy Summary

Payerblue cross blue shield - south dakota

PolicyAnesthesia Services for Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures

Policy CodePolicy N/A

Change TypeClarified / Revised (literature update through Jan 2026)

Effective Date

Last ReviewJan 1, 2026

Next Review Date

SourceLink

On This Page

Active medical complications related to alcohol or drug abuse including intoxication

Physiologic and prior history

Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2> 40 kg/m2
History of or anticipated intolerance to standard sedatives (e.g., chronic narcotic use, chronic benzodiazepine therapy)
History of previous problems with anesthesia or sedation
Inability to follow simple commands (e.g., cognitive dysfunction, developmental disorder, psychological, or neuropsychiatric diagnosis)

Increased risk for airway obstruction in one of the following anatomic variants

Dysmorphic facial features (e.g., Pierre-Robin syndrome, Trisomy-21)
Jaw abnormalities (e.g., Micrognathia, prior orthognathic surgery limiting mouth opening, Retrognathia, Significant malocclusion, Trismus)
Neck abnormalities (e.g., Advanced rheumatoid arthritis, Cervical spine disease/trauma/fusion, Decreased hyomental distance (< 3 cm), Limited neck extension, Neck mass, Obesity involving neck/facial structures, Short neck, Tracheal deviation)Decreased hyomental distance < 3 cm
Oral abnormalities (e.g., Edentulous individuals, High arched palate, Macroglossia, Non-visible uvula (Mallampati > II), Small oral opening (< 3 cm), Tonsillar hypertrophy)Mallampati > II; small oral opening < 3 cm
Sleep apnea
History of Stridor

Comorbidity and pregnancy

Increased risk of complications due to a severe comorbidity (ASA class III, IV, or V)ASA III-IV-V
See Policy Guidelines/ASA physical status
Pregnancy

Procedure complexity

Prolonged or therapeutic endoscopic procedure requiring deep sedation (examples)
Examples listed in children
Spasticity or movement disorder complicating the procedure

Not Medically Necessary

MAC or general anesthesia are considered not medically necessary during GI endoscopic procedures when:

ANY of the following

Routine assistance not indicated: Routine assistance of an anesthesiologist or CRNA for average-risk adult individuals undergoing standard upper and/or lower gastrointestinal endoscopic proceduresaverage-risk adult
Moderate sedation is reimbursed as part of the procedure for average-risk adults
When the medically necessary criteria above have not been met

Advanced endoscopic procedures airway modification factors: In advanced endoscopic procedures, factors associated with need for airway modification include higher BMI, male sex, and ASA class III or above; no patients required endotracheal intubation in Cote et al (2010) cohort.

Cote et al (2010) prospective study

RCT findings: Randomized trials comparing propofol-based MAC to general anesthesia for ERCP reported higher rates of sedation-related adverse events with MAC in three RCTs (sample sizes 200-360).

Smith et al (2019), Alzanbagi et al (2022), Wu et al (2023)

Guideline-derived considerations for anesthesia provider involvement and monitoring

Guideline excerpts indicating when anesthesia assistance, monitoring, and personnel/rescue capability are recommended:

ANY of the following

ASGE recommendations: ASGE (2018): Consider anesthesia provider assistance for prolonged/therapeutic procedures requiring deep sedation, anticipated intolerance to standard sedatives, severe comorbidity (ASA IV or V), or increased risk for airway obstruction because of anatomic variant. Also recommends trained personnel, continuous physiologic monitoring, and capability to rescue patients who become unresponsive.
ASGE 2018 guidance on monitoring and staffing
ASA practice guidance: ASA (2014, 2018): Non-anesthesia personnel administering propofol must be qualified to rescue patients who become deeper than intended; defines 'rescue' as correcting adverse physiologic consequences and returning patient to intended level.
ASA statements on rescue and airway risk factors
ASGE staffing and monitoring by sedation level: ASGE staff recommendations by level of sedation: minimal/no sedation needs one assistant; moderate sedation directed by credentialed physician and monitored by RN (may perform brief interruptible tasks); deep sedation generally administered by anesthesia professional with dedicated monitor and second staff person for procedure assistance.
ASGE recommendations for staff roles and monitoring
Documentation requirement: Documentation of assessments and monitoring data during sedation and recovery is required.
ASGE documentation guidance
NAAP guidance: 2009 joint position statement (ASGE and others): Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) can be as safe and effective as anesthesiologist-administered propofol with proper training and patient selection.
Joint societies NAAP statement

Purpose: to identify when MAC or general anesthesia is appropriate for planned outpatient GI endoscopic procedures in individuals with specified risk factors or significant medical conditions. Definition/clarification: MAC is a set of anesthesia services performed by qualified anesthesia providers and is not a specific depth of sedation; it includes preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural anesthesia management and the ability to convert to general anesthesia if needed. High-level evidence characterization: the evidence base comprises randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and observational studies; overall the RCTs (primarily in ERCP) appear to evaluate level of sedation (often propofol-based) rather than the anesthesia service itself and reported higher rates of sedation-related adverse events with MAC in several trials; systematic reviews and observational studies report mixed findings and identify patient and procedure risk factors associated with increased sedation-related complications.

- Smith et al (2019) RCT: high-risk ERCP patients — composite sedation-related adverse events higher with MAC vs general endotracheal anesthesia (52% vs 10%).

- McCarty et al (2021) meta-analysis: in ERCP, overall anesthesia-associated events similar but increased hypoxemia with MAC (OR 5.61) and fewer hypotension episodes with MAC (OR 0.32).

- Alzanbagi et al (2022) RCT: average-risk ERCP patients — higher sedation-related adverse events with MAC vs GA (35% vs 9%).

- Wu et al (2023) RCT: MAC had higher intraprocedural cardiopulmonary adverse events (38%) versus GA groups (18–19%).

Key numeric associations from observational studies/meta-analysis: increasing age (per-year OR 1.02), higher BMI (per-point OR 1.03; Berzin ERCP cohort OR 1.08), higher ASA class (ASA III-IV vs I-II OR 1.69), and longer procedure duration (OR 2.00) are associated with increased sedation-related complications.

Documentation of clinical assessments and monitoring data during sedation and recovery is required per ASGE guidance; monitoring should include appropriate physiologic measures during the procedure and post-procedure recovery.

Monitor before the procedure, after sedative administration, at regular intervals intraprocedurally, during initial recovery, and before discharge
Minimum monitoring for moderate sedation: blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, and pulse oximetry combined with visual assessment of consciousness and comfort
Capnography may be considered for deep sedation and advanced procedures (EUS, ERCP) but is not routinely required for moderate sedation
Units should have procedures and personnel to rescue patients who are sedated deeper than intended

Documentation Required

Patient selection and training for NAAP

Ensure proper training and appropriate patient selection for non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) as required by joint society guidance; NAAP can be safe and effective only with proper training and patient selection.

NAAP should follow joint society recommendations regarding training and patient selection
Personnel administering propofol must be qualified and trained to monitor and respond to deeper-than-intended sedation

Denial Risk

Rescue capability requirement for propofol administrators

Providers administering propofol must be qualified to rescue patients who enter deeper-than-intended sedation; absence of documented rescue capability for propofol administrators may expose the claim to coverage scrutiny or denial.

Rescue capability includes correcting hypoventilation, hypoxia, and hypotension and returning the patient to the intended sedation level
ASA notes non-anesthesia personnel administering propofol should be qualified to rescue patients who become deeper than intended

Billing Rule

Moderate sedation reimbursement

Moderate (conscious) sedation is reimbursed as an inherent part of the endoscopic procedure when administered to average-risk adult individuals undergoing general, diagnostic, uncomplicated, or therapeutic endoscopy and colonoscopy; separate anesthesia claims (MAC/GA) are not indicated for average-risk patients unless policy criteria are met.

Moderate sedation monitoring may be provided by an RN under direction of the credentialed physician
Deep sedation or MAC generally requires anesthesia professional involvement per guidelines

Denial Risk

Risk of denial if criteria not met

MAC or general anesthesia claims for GI endoscopy in average-risk adults without documented qualifying criteria may be considered not medically necessary and are subject to denial.

Routine anesthesiologist or CRNA assistance for average-risk adult individuals undergoing standard endoscopic procedures is considered not medically necessary when the policy's medical necessity criteria are not met
Documented presence of a listed qualifying risk factor or significant medical condition is required to support MAC/GA billing

Policy renewed during annual review (January 2026); policy history lists 'January 2026, Action = Policy Renewed.'

2025-01policy_renewal

Policy renewed during annual review (January 2025); policy history lists 'January 2025, Action = Policy Renewed.'

2024-01policy_renewal

Policy renewed during annual review (January 2024); policy history lists 'January 2024, Action = Policy Renewed.'

2023-03policy_revision

Policy revised in March 2023 during annual review (action = Policy Revised); policy history documents March 2023 revision.

2011-08prior_review

Multiple prior annual reviews and renewals dating back to 2011 are listed in policy history (earliest listed: August 2011, Action = Policy Renewed).