Lyme Disease Testing
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for blue cross blue shield - louisiana Policy AHS - G2143 - Lyme Disease Testing alerts
Get alerted when Policy AHS - G2143 - Lyme Disease Testing changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines coverage criteria for laboratory testing to diagnose Lyme disease, specifying when serologic, molecular, and other tests meet or do not meet coverage for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana members.
Combined the contents of CC1 (symptomatic for Lyme disease) into CC2 (extreme conditions potentially caused by undiagnosed Lyme), resulting in new subcriteria and reorganization of coverage criteria.
New CC2: When symptoms persist for individuals who tested negative by serologic testing, repeat serologic testing (no sooner than four weeks after previous test) MEETS COVERAGE CRITERIA.
Removed reference to endemic regions in CC3.a and removed screening of asymptomatic individuals living in endemic areas.
Removed former subcriteria 3.c (testing for nonspecific symptoms); nonspecific symptom guidance is now defined in CC1 and Note 1.
Off-cycle coding modifications added CPT codes 0580U, 0615U and initially added 0316U previously.
Coverage Criteria for Lyme Disease Testing
inv-01: Serologic testing - Covered indications
Covered when ANY of the following are met using a two-tier testing strategy (sensitive EIA/IFA followed by western immunoblot or an FDA‑cleared second EIA):
Two-tier serologic testing (first-tier EIA/IFA with reflex to immunoblot or FDA-cleared second-tier EIA) is required as the diagnostic strategy.
inv-02: Repeat serologic testing
Covered when the following condition is met:
Document persistent symptoms and timing of prior test; follow NICE guidance for repeat testing 4–6 weeks after initial negative when clinical suspicion remains.
inv-03: Coverage criteria and appropriate use
Testing is appropriate when clinical presentation and epidemiologic exposure support suspected Lyme disease; follow guideline-recommended sequencing and specimen timing.
If first-tier is negative, no further testing of that specimen is recommended unless clinical course warrants repeat testing per interval guidance.
Guidelines recommend serum antibody testing over PCR for most presentations; PCR of synovial fluid may be informative for Lyme arthritis.
CDC/IDSA/AAP/NICE guidance advise against testing in these scenarios to avoid false positives and unnecessary treatment.
inv-04: Reorganized coverage criteria (summary)
Coverage criteria were reorganized; highlights from the revision history relevant to coverage:
Note 1 defines early and late signs/symptoms and clarifies EM management.
This is a new, material change clarifying timing and coverage stance for repeat testing.
Asymptomatic screening is not supported and former subcriteria for nonspecific symptom testing were removed and reallocated into reorganized criteria.
Serologic testing DOES NOT MEET COVERAGE CRITERIA in specified situations. Examples include testing when an individual has an erythema migrans (EM) rash (clinical diagnosis should be made and treated without laboratory testing), screening of asymptomatic individuals, and testing performed solely for certain neurologic or psychiatric diagnoses without other supporting signs or symptoms of Lyme disease. These exclusions are explicit in the policy and reflect the updated coverage organization.
Other scenarios explicitly listed as not meeting coverage criteria include repeat serologic testing in individuals who have previously tested positive, testing of an individual tick, and all other Borrelia testing not described in the policy's covered indications.
The policy identifies several commercially available tests as invalid or not appropriate for diagnosis of Lyme disease, citing insufficient validation or excessive nonspecificity. Examples called out include urine antigen tests for Borrelia burgdorferi, the CD57 assay, novel culture techniques, and antibody panels that differ from standardized two‑tier testing.
The document notes these tests are not FDA cleared, have produced false-positive or nonspecific results in independent evaluations, and therefore do not meet coverage criteria as appropriate diagnostic tests.
The revision history clarifies that asymptomatic screening is not supported and explicitly removed prior language allowing screening of asymptomatic individuals in endemic areas. In the reorganized criteria, language was standardized by replacing the term 'patients' with 'individuals' for consistency across coverage statements.
Note 1 was added and referenced to define signs and symptoms of early and late untreated Lyme disease; the policy reiterates that individuals presenting with EM should be clinically diagnosed and treated without laboratory testing.
The policy states that detection of Borrelia burgdorferi by nucleic acid identification techniques (direct probe or amplified probe, e.g., PCR) DOES NOT MEET COVERAGE CRITERIA for routine diagnostic use in the contexts described.
Guidance referenced in the policy (for example, AAP/CDC statements) further emphasize that molecular testing has limited, specific applications (such as synovial fluid PCR for Lyme arthritis) and is not a broadly supported replacement for guideline-recommended two‑tier serology.
Serologic testing of asymptomatic individuals following a tick bite and routine testing for Lyme disease in the absence of supportive clinical or epidemiologic evidence is not recommended and does not meet coverage criteria. The CDC and other guidelines recommend against testing asymptomatic patients after an Ixodes tick bite.
The policy requires clinical and epidemiologic indications (signs/symptoms per Note 1 and relevant exposure) to support serologic testing; routine or reflex serologic screening without such support risks denial.
Testing for nonspecific symptoms was removed from the coverage criteria during the recent reorganization. The policy specifically eliminated the former subcriteria that allowed testing for nonspecific neurologic, psychiatric, or chronic conditions without other supporting evidence.
As a result, serologic testing for nonspecific complaints alone is not supported unless the presentation meets the newly defined symptomatic criteria in CC1 and Note 1.
Applicable Procedure and Proprietary Codes
| 86617 | Antibody; Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease) confirmatory test (eg, Western Blot or immunoblot). |
| 86618 | Antibody; Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease) Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Borrelia burgdorferi, direct. |
| 87475 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Borrelia burgdorferi, direct probe technique. |
| 87476 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Borrelia burgdorferi, amplified probe technique. |
| 0041U | Proprietary test: Lyme ImmunoBlot IgM; Lab/Manufacturer: IGeneX Inc. |
| 0042U | Proprietary test: Lyme ImmunoBlot IgG; Lab/Manufacturer: IGeneX Inc. |
| 0316U | Proprietary test: Lyme Borrelia Nanotrap® Urine Antigen Test; Lab/Manufacturer: Galaxy Diagnostics Inc. |
| 86617 | Antibody; Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease) confirmatory test (eg, Western Blot or immunoblot). |
| 86618 | Antibody; Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease) Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Borrelia burgdorferi, direct. |
| 87475 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Borrelia burgdorferi, direct probe technique. |
| 87476 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Borrelia burgdorferi, amplified probe technique. |
| 0041U | Proprietary test: Lyme ImmunoBlot IgM Lab/Manufacturer: IGeneX Inc. |
| 0042U | Proprietary test: Lyme ImmunoBlots IgG Lab/Manufacturer: IGeneX Inc. |
| 0316U | Proprietary test: Lyme Borrelia Nanotrap® Urine Antigen Test. Lab/Manufacturer: Galaxy Diagnostics Inc. |
| 0580U | CPT Proprietary code added off-cycle (documented in revision history). |
| 0615U | CPT Proprietary code added off-cycle (documented in revision history). |
Provider Requirements, Documentation, and Denial Risks
Prior authorization: document endemic travel and covered clinical indication
Coverage requires documentation that testing is being ordered for an individual with history of travel to a region endemic for Lyme and for a specific clinical indication consistent with the policy's covered presentations (e.g., early or later signs/symptoms, acute myocarditis/pericarditis, meningitis/encephalitis/myelitis, radiculoneuritis, mononeuropathy multiplex, acute cranial neuropathy).
- Documentation must show travel to a Lyme-endemic region when applicable.
- Record the specific clinical indication from the policy's covered list.
Prior authorization for listed procedure codes: no explicit PA stated
The policy does not state explicit prior authorization requirements for the listed CPT/HCPCS and proprietary codes; providers should follow standard payer submission rules and include the clinical documentation that supports medical necessity when submitting claims.
- No CPT-specific prior authorization statement appears in the policy excerpt.
- Attach clinical notes showing the covered indication when submitting testing codes.
Applicable procedure codes: list and operational guidance
The following CPT/HCPCS and proprietary codes are listed as applicable procedure codes for Lyme disease testing; ensure coding on claims matches documentation and any off-cycle additions noted in the revision history.
Preferred diagnostic algorithm: two-tier serologic testing
Use a two-tier serologic testing approach: perform a sensitive EIA or IFA as the first step, and if positive or equivocal, proceed to a confirmatory western immunoblot or an FDA-cleared second EIA (modified two-tier testing).
- If first-step EIA/IFA is negative, no further testing of that specimen is recommended.
- When FDA-cleared second-tier EIA is used, it replaces the western immunoblot as the confirmatory test per CDC guidance.
Recommended testing sequence: EIA/IFA then reflex confirmatory testing
Follow a two-step testing sequence: first-tier EIA or IFA; if the result is positive or equivocal, reflex to an immunoblot (western blot) or an FDA-cleared second EIA per CDC/AAP/NICE recommendations.
- If the first-tier EIA/IFA is negative, no further testing of the specimen is indicated.
- Perform second-tier testing only when first-tier is positive or equivocal.
Required clinical documentation: travel/exposure and signs/symptoms
Document the individual's history of travel to a Lyme-endemic region when applicable, and record signs and symptoms consistent with early or later Lyme disease as defined in Note 1.
- Include travel/exposure history (e.g., outdoor activities, contact with wildlife) when relevant.
- Reference Note 1 for the list of early and later signs/symptoms to justify testing.
Required clinical documentation: signs/symptoms, exposure, and timing
Document specific clinical signs or syndromes (e.g., erythema migrans when applicable, neurologic syndromes, arthritis, myocarditis) and epidemiologic exposure, and record timing of specimen collection (acute vs convalescent) relative to symptom onset.
- Specify the clinical presentation from the policy's covered list (e.g., meningitis, radiculoneuritis, Lyme arthritis).
- Note timing of symptoms and specimen collection to support serologic interpretation.
Repeat serologic testing documentation: persistent symptoms and interval
When repeating serologic testing after a prior negative result, document persistent symptoms and ensure the repeat test is performed no sooner than four weeks after the previous serologic test.
- Record clinical persistence of symptoms as the reason for repeat testing.
- Verify that at least four weeks have passed since the prior serologic test before repeating.
Triggers for denial: asymptomatic screening, EM, or lack of clinical support
Claims for serologic testing may be denied when testing is ordered for asymptomatic individuals, for persons with erythema migrans (EM) where laboratory testing is not indicated, or when testing is performed without clinical or epidemiologic support as defined in the policy.
- Testing asymptomatic individuals or routine screening is not covered.
- EM lesions should be clinically diagnosed and treated without laboratory testing.
Improper testing scenarios that risk denial
Testing scenarios that risk denial include serologic testing of asymptomatic patients after a tick bite, ordering tests without clinical or epidemiologic support, and performing a western immunoblot without a prior EIA/IFA.
- Do not order serology for asymptomatic individuals following a tick bite.
- Avoid ordering western immunoblot as the initial test if no prior EIA/IFA was performed or if first-tier is negative.
Asymptomatic screening and nonspecific symptoms: not supported
Do not screen asymptomatic individuals (including those in endemic areas); testing for nonspecific or vague symptoms without meeting the policy's defined symptomatic criteria is not supported and may be denied.
- Removed allowance for testing asymptomatic individuals living in endemic areas—screening is not supported.
- Testing for nonspecific symptoms was removed and is not covered unless the presentation meets defined criteria.
Background and Evidence Summary
Lyme disease is a tick‑borne multisystem infection in North America most commonly caused by Borrelia burgdorferi. Early clinical presentation (approximately three to thirty days after tick bite) may include fever, chills, headache, fatigue, myalgias/arthralgias, swollen lymph nodes, and erythema migrans (EM) skin lesions.
If untreated, later manifestations (days to months after bite) can affect multiple organ systems and include additional EM lesions, facial palsy, Lyme arthritis with severe joint pain and swelling (often the knee), neurologic involvement (e.g., meningitis, radiculoneuritis, nerve pain), cardiac manifestations (palpitations, conduction abnormalities), and symptoms of central nervous system inflammation. The policy notes that when EM is present, clinical diagnosis and treatment should proceed without laboratory testing.
Definitions and Notes
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.