Automated Insulin Delivery Systems
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for all blue cross blue shield - kansas policy alerts
Know when blue cross blue shield - kansas releases new policies or updates existing guidance.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines medical necessity, FDA-status considerations, and coverage criteria for automated insulin delivery (AID) systems for members of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, including indications for type 1 and type 2 diabetes and exclusions for non-FDA–cleared devices.
FDA approvals expanded to include Omnipod 5 (August 26, 2024) and t:slim X2 with Control‑IQ+ (February 24, 2025) for adults with type 2 diabetes.
Pivotal trial evidence for type 2 diabetes: SECURE‑T2D (Omnipod 5) and 2IQP (t:slim X2 Control‑IQ+).
Added coverage criteria for FDA-cleared or approved hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery systems for individuals with type 2 diabetes meeting specific criteria.
Policy language changed to include 'cleared or approved' wording and removed reference to 'low glucose suspend feature' phrasing in Section A.
Added device-specific approvals for Omnipod 5 and t:slim X2 Control-IQ+ for type 2 diabetes and summarized pivotal trial inclusion characteristics.
Coverage Criteria for Automated Insulin Delivery Systems
Initial therapy — Type 1 diabetes
Covered when ALL of the following are met
Applies to FDA cleared or approved automated insulin delivery systems only.
Initial therapy — Type 2 diabetes (hybrid closed-loop)
Covered when ALL of the following are met
See Policy Guidelines for trial analogues (SECURE-T2D, 2IQP) informing prior regimen stability and other eligibility specifics.
Low-Glucose Suspend — Coverage criteria
Covered when ALL of the following are met (evidence basis summarized):
Trial criteria are guidance; device labeling and clinical judgment apply
User action and adherence affect safety outcomes observed in trials
Hybrid Closed-Loop — Coverage criteria
Covered when ALL of the following are met (evidence and device approvals considered):
Omnipod 5 and t:slim X2 Control‑IQ+ have FDA approvals for type 2 diabetes as noted in Policy Guidelines
Reflects inclusion requirements from SECURE‑T2D and 2IQP trials
Consistent with general Policy Guidelines for device use
Clinical evidence-based coverage criteria
Covered when evidence demonstrates improved glycemic outcomes and acceptable safety in persons with type 1 diabetes as shown in clinical trials
Supported by device and population descriptions in RCTs and prospective studies
Specific trial outcomes cited as evidence of clinical benefit
Multiple studies reported no DKA or severe hypoglycemia in intervention arms or rare events in extensions
Study-based evidence for AID/HCL in pediatric T1D
Evidence summary—outcomes from prospective trials and large-scale real-world analyses
Supports safety and efficacy in very young children under study conditions.
Longer-term extension shows sustained benefits with rare serious events.
Large observational dataset supports generalizability across ages and prior therapies.
Collective trial-level evidence supports clinical benefit in pediatric populations.
Trial-derived Eligibility Features
Evidence-based effectiveness criteria observed in trials (may inform medical necessity): Covered when ALL of the following trial-based clinical features are present
Derived from iLet and other randomized trial inclusion criteria
FDA-cleared hybrid closed-loop systems for type 2 diabetes
Device-specific regulatory clearance context (may inform eligible populations)
Two hybrid closed-loop systems approved for type 2 diabetes per document
Coverage supported by FDA approval and trial evidence
Covered when supported by FDA approval and clinical evidence in adults with type 2 diabetes
Omnipod 5 and t:slim X2 Control‑IQ+ have expanded indications as described in Policy Guidelines.
Omnipod 5 pivotal single-arm and t:slim X2 pivotal RCT provide the primary evidence base.
Mealtime carbohydrate entry by the user is required for bolus dosing.
Type 2 Diabetes — Hybrid Closed-Loop Coverage
Covered when ALL of the following are met for individuals with type 2 diabetes:
Applies to FDA cleared or approved hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery systems (with low glucose suspend and suspend-before-low features).
Type 1 Diabetes — AID Coverage (referenced)
Covered when ALL of the following are met for individuals with type 1 diabetes (per prior policy language referenced):
Section A language was updated to 'cleared or approved' in the current policy.
Not medically necessary / Experimental
All other indications not meeting specified criteria are considered investigational and not covered.
All indications for automated insulin delivery (AID) systems that are not specifically listed as medically necessary in this policy are considered not medically necessary. This includes any use outside the device-specific, FDA-cleared or -approved indications and the clinical criteria enumerated in Sections A and B of the policy.
This medical policy does not address use of automated insulin delivery systems during pregnancy. Coverage for pregnant members should be determined according to the member's contract benefits and plan provisions rather than by this policy's clinical criteria.
Use of an automated insulin delivery system that is not cleared or approved by the FDA is considered experimental / investigational and is not covered.
Several pivotal and prospective studies excluded individuals who had recently experienced diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia. Because these high‑risk patients were underrepresented or excluded from trials, the trial results may have limited generalizability to patients with recent severe glycemic events.
Device-specific regulatory status matters: for example, only the insulin‑only configuration of the iLet Bionic Pancreas currently has FDA clearance; the bihormonal (insulin plus glucagon) version is not cleared. Verify the FDA‑cleared configuration and the device labeling (age and indication) before determining coverage.
Provider Actions, Prior Authorization, and Documentation
Prior Authorization Required
Prior Authorization Required: Prior authorization may be required for automated insulin delivery (AID) systems depending on plan rules. Providers should submit PA requests when the member’s benefits require it and include documentation that the device is FDA cleared/approved for the patient’s age and indication.
- Prior authorization inference: Clinical trial inclusion criteria (age, duration of diabetes, stable insulin regimen) are reflected in the policy and may be used by plans to define PA requirements for type 2 diabetes (e.g., age ≥18; diagnosed ≥12 months; on MDI or pump ≥3 months; HbA1c ≥7% or clinically significant hypoglycemia).
- No explicit PA triggers in excerpt: The provided policy text does not list specific PA forms, codes, or stepwise authorization triggers; it describes medical-necessity criteria and documentation expectations instead.
- Device scope: Policy differentiates FDA cleared/approved AID systems (may be medically necessary when criteria met) versus non–FDA-cleared devices (considered experimental/investigational and not covered).
- Population scope: Criteria specified separately for type 1 and type 2 diabetes (type 1: FDA age requirement and pump education; type 2: hybrid closed-loop systems with age and treatment-history criteria).
Required Documentation and Denial Risk
Documentation and clinical justification are expected with PA submissions. The policy specifies required clinical elements for establishing medical necessity and indicates situations that increase denial risk.
- Required documentation: device FDA clearance/approval and patient age consistent with the device labeling; diabetes type (type 1 vs type 2) and duration; prior insulin therapy history (multiple daily injections >3x/day or insulin pump use and stability ≥3 months for type 2 trial-based criteria); recent HbA1c or history of significant hypoglycemia for type 2 criteria; evidence of comprehensive pump education within past 12 months for first-time pump users.
- Trial-based eligibility inference: Several pivotal trials used enrollment criteria (age ranges, duration of diabetes, stable insulin regimens, exclusion of recent severe hypoglycemia/DKA) — plans may use these trial criteria as a practical template for PA documentation.
- Monitoring recommended in studies: CGM metrics and HbA1c schedules used in trials (e.g., HbA1c measured every ~3 months; CGM time-in-range and percent time <70 mg/dL metrics) are relevant for ongoing device monitoring and documentation.
- Denial risk: Use of non–FDA-cleared AID systems is explicitly classified as experimental/investigational; failure to meet type 2-specific criteria (age, duration, prior insulin regimen, HbA1c/hypoglycemia status) creates denial risk.
- No documentation requirements specified: The excerpt does not provide a PA form, exact coding requirements, or a prescriptive list of operative PA fields (e.g., no explicit codes or PA form fields are listed).
Comparators, Evidence Context, and Data Considerations
Comparative and evidence-context notes — useful to support coverage discussions but not a substitute for PA documentation.
- Comparators noted: Sensor-augmented pumps, open-loop CGM plus pump, multiple daily injections — policy frames AID systems as alternatives or improvements to these comparators.
- Comparative study context only: Randomized trials and prospective studies summarized in the policy (RCTs and real-world large-series analyses) provide efficacy and safety context that may support medical necessity but do not define PA rules.
- Evidence exclusions: Studies with duplicative or overlapping populations were excluded from the evidence synthesis — reviewers should note potential gaps when relying on published cohorts (e.g., Forlenza et al. real-world dataset had data sufficiency requirements).
- Data sufficiency for inclusion (Forlenza et al.): Forlenza et al. required ≥90 days with ≥75% of days having ≥220 CGM readings/day to be included; real-world analyses like this can inform outcomes but are subject to dataset completeness requirements.
Operational Notes and Scope
Operational and scope clarifications for providers submitting PA or explaining coverage to members.
- Use in pregnancy: The policy does not address AID use in pregnancy; coverage for pregnant members should be determined by individual member contract benefits in effect at time of service.
- No step therapy rules in excerpt: The policy does not impose or describe any explicit step-therapy requirements or mandated prior therapies before AID system coverage.
- Prior therapy history: For type 2 coverage criteria and trial enrollment, documentation that the member has been on multiple daily injections (>3x/day) or pump therapy for the requisite duration (≥3 months) is relevant.
- No explicit PA rules provided: While plan-level PA may apply, this excerpt contains medical-necessity criteria and guidance rather than an explicit PA workflow or authorization criteria list; contact the payer’s PA department for operational PA requirements.
Coding and Billing References
| A4226 | Supplies for maintenance of insulin infusion pump with dosage rate adjustment using therapeutic continuous glucose sensing, per week |
| A9274 | External ambulatory insulin delivery system, disposable, each, includes all supplies and accessories |
| E0784 | External ambulatory infusion pump, insulin |
| E0787 | External ambulatory infusion pump, insulin, dosage rate adjustment using therapeutic continuous glucose sensing |
| S1034 | Artificial pancreas device system (e.g., low glucose suspend [LGS] feature) including continuous glucose monitor, blood glucose device, insulin pump and computer algorithm that communicates with all of the devices |
| S1035 | Sensor; invasive (e.g., subcutaneous), disposable, for use with artificial pancreas device system |
| S1036 | Transmitter; external, for use with artificial pancreas device system |
| S1037 | Receiver (monitor); external, for use with artificial pancreas device system |
| No codes listed |
| No codes listed |
Definitions and Device Terminology
Background and Evidence Summary
Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems integrate a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) with an insulin infusion pump and an algorithm to automatically suspend, reduce, or increase insulin infusion based on sensor glucose values. These systems range from low‑glucose suspend features that pause insulin at low glucose thresholds to hybrid closed‑loop systems that continuously adjust basal insulin and require user input for meal boluses.
Clinical evidence-based coverage criteria (evidence summary for T1D)
Covered when evidence demonstrates improved glycemic outcomes and acceptable safety in persons with type 1 diabetes as shown in clinical trials
Key trials include Renard et al., Bergenstal et al., Garg et al., Brown et al., Sherr et al., and long-term extensions.
Study-based evidence for AID/HCL in pediatric T1D
Evidence summary—outcomes from prospective trials and large-scale real-world analyses
Outcomes include HbA1c −0.55%, TIR +10.9% in Sherr et al.; median 97.1% automated mode in extensions; large N in Forlenza et al. supports real-world effectiveness.
Clinical trial populations frequently excluded patients with recent diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia and were often demographically homogeneous; therefore, evidence from these trials may not fully reflect outcomes or risks in higher‑risk or more diverse patient groups.
Within the provided excerpt there are no explicit subgroup exclusions (beyond device labeling and trial eligibility) stated for coverage; coverage determinations should follow device FDA indications and the policy's stated clinical criteria.
The excerpt does not identify any additional specific uses as explicitly not medically necessary beyond the policy's statements that non‑FDA‑cleared devices and all indications not meeting the stated criteria are considered experimental/investigational or not medically necessary.
Policy Revision History
Policy updated to add explicit coverage criteria (Section B) permitting FDA‑cleared or approved hybrid closed‑loop (AID) systems for individuals with type 2 diabetes meeting age, disease duration, insulin regimen, and HbA1c/hypoglycemia requirements; wording changed in Section A to 'cleared or approved'.
t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control‑IQ+ received FDA approval/expanded indication for use in adults with type 2 diabetes and was added to the policy as an approved hybrid closed‑loop system supported by pivotal trial evidence.
Omnipod 5 received FDA approval/expanded indication for automated insulin dosing in adults with type 2 diabetes and was incorporated into policy coverage considerations with supporting pivotal study data.
Pivotal trial evidence for type 2 diabetes (SECURE‑T2D for Omnipod 5 and 2IQP for t:slim X2 Control‑IQ+) and summaries of trial enrollment/eligibility were added to support device‑specific coverage; dates reference 2024–2025 published trials and summaries in the document.
Material changes effective 2025-06-10 include expansion of policy language to address hybrid closed‑loop AID systems for type 2 diabetes and incorporation of recent FDA approvals. The policy now recognizes FDA approvals for the Omnipod 5 and the t:slim X2 with Control‑IQ+ for adults with type 2 diabetes and adds device‑ and trial‑aligned coverage criteria for that population.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.