Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Outpatient Setting
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for all blue cross blue shield - kansas policy alerts
Know when blue cross blue shield - kansas releases new policies or updates existing guidance.
Monitor payer policy activity
This policy governs coverage and medical necessity criteria for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas members, specifying eligible conditions, program requirements, and interventions considered experimental/investigational.
Section E: 'Virtual cardiac rehabilitation is considered experimental / investigational.'
Section F: 'Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation is considered experimental / investigational for all other indications (e.g., SARS-CoV-2).'
Duration of the Program: a cardiac rehabilitation exercise program is eligible for coverage for 3 sessions per week up to a 12-week period (36 sessions).
Policy added/updated multiple ICD-10 diagnosis codes and later removed ICD-10 codes (05-25-2023).
Coverage and Medical Necessity Criteria
Medically necessary indications
Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs are considered medically necessary when ANY of the following qualifying conditions or procedures are present:
From policy Section A; list items reflect covered indications.
Evidence summary
Summary of evidence-based findings relevant to coverage decisions:
Sources: Oldridge 2012; Anderson 2016; Long et al/HF-ACTION; Molloy 2023.
Sources: Nilsson et al 2018 and related cohort studies.
Sources: Sumner et al systematic review; RAMIT (West et al); study limitations described in systematic reviews.
Coverage considerations
Evidence-based coverage considerations drawn from the reviewed literature:
Supported by meta-analyses and systematic reviews.
Supported by Jafri et al, Wang et al, and systematic reviews of home-based programs.
No studies identified for repeat CR.
Sources: Ornish RCT and nonrandomized Pritikin studies; see trial summaries.
Evidence-based coverage considerations (intensive CR vs standard)
Coverage considerations when evaluating intensive cardiac rehabilitation programs compared with standard outpatient cardiac rehabilitation:
Ornish RCT summary and section conclusion.
Nonrandomized studies and long-term institutional cohort data described.
Consider standard CR as the comparator; limited RCT evidence supports investigational designation for intensive programs without additional program-specific data.
Therapy purposes
Purpose statements for covered therapies:
Clinical context and therapy purpose for outpatient CR.
Clinical context and therapy purpose for virtual/ home-based CR.
Evidence and guideline-informed coverage considerations
Evidence synthesis and guideline-informed coverage considerations:
Cochrane and other systematic reviews; Zhou et al; McDonagh et al.
Indraratna, Nkonde-Price, Wang and Shah observational findings summarized.
AHA/AACVPR/ACC consensus statements and core components guidance.
Coverage highlights
Policy highlights and coverage guidance drawn from the document:
Policy coding and program duration language; session limit specified in policy revisions.
Policy statements designating intensive programs investigational.
Investigational designation added in 05-25-2023 revision.
Added effective 05-23-2024 per policy revision.
The policy designates interventions that lack sufficient evidence or established clinical utility as experimental/investigational. Specifically, Section E notes that virtual cardiac rehabilitation is considered experimental/investigational, and Section F declares that outpatient cardiac rehabilitation for other indications (e.g., SARS‑CoV‑2) is also experimental/investigational. These determinations were added in recent policy revisions and should be applied when assessing coverage for modalities or indications outside the policy’s listed medically necessary conditions.
The literature cited in the policy highlights limitations in trial populations and study designs that affect generalizability. RAMIT and other trials had concerns about applicability (differences between research protocols and real‑world programs), limited diversity, incomplete reporting of key outcomes, and variable follow‑up durations. These study limitations support cautious interpretation of trial results when considering coverage for populations not well represented in the evidence base.
The policy states that no studies were identified evaluating repeat participation in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Consequently, repeat enrollment in a CR program without a new qualifying cardiac event is designated experimental/investigational and lacks direct evidence to support routine coverage.
Within the reviewed sections there are no explicit population exclusions listed. However, study relevance tables and program summaries note gaps in trial representativeness and reporting, which may restrict applicability to some patient groups despite the absence of formal exclusion statements.
For patients with post‑acute cardiac sequelae of SARS‑CoV‑2 infection, the policy identifies a lack of direct evidence. No trials specifically assessing CR efficacy for post‑acute COVID cardiac sequelae were found; controlled prospective studies in defined populations are needed before coverage can be supported for this indication.
The American Heart Association consensus cited in the policy specifies core components for cardiac rehabilitation (assessment, nutrition, BP/lipids/diabetes management, tobacco cessation, psychosocial care, aerobic and strength training, activity counseling, and program quality). Programs that only offer supervised exercise training were not considered full cardiac rehabilitation, so offerings limited to exercise-only supervision do not meet the AHA definition of a comprehensive CR program referenced in the policy.
The policy explicitly treats virtual (home‑based) cardiac rehabilitation as experimental/investigational in the policy text and revision history. Virtual delivery modalities (video, phone, apps, wearables) are identified as investigational for coverage purposes unless otherwise specified by the policy.
Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation delivered for indications other than the policy’s listed qualifying cardiac conditions (for example, for sequelae of SARS‑CoV‑2 infection) is designated experimental/investigational. The absence of direct prospective evidence for post‑COVID cardiac sequelae underlies this exclusion from routine coverage.
The policy considers repeat participation in outpatient CR without a subsequent qualifying cardiac event to be experimental/investigational. Because no studies were identified evaluating repeat CR, repeat enrollment in the absence of a new event is not supported by the evidence summarized in the policy.
Intensive cardiac rehabilitation programs (examples: Ornish, Pritikin, Benson‑Henry) are designated experimental/investigational in the policy. The Ornish program has one small RCT with limited generalizability and other intensive programs lack randomized trial evidence; therefore, intensive programs are not considered established for routine coverage without program‑specific supporting evidence.
The policy’s experimental/investigational designations for virtual cardiac rehabilitation mean that virtual CR is excluded from coverage under the policy as written. Claims for virtual CR may be denied unless future evidence or policy changes alter this stance.
There is no direct evidence
The policy notes the absence of trials evaluating repeat outpatient CR and flags this as a coverage risk for repeat‑CR requests lacking supporting evidence. In practice, repeat participation without a new qualifying event should be carefully documented and justified, as the evidence base does not support routine coverage.
Because many RCTs and observational studies cited in the policy have limitations (small sample sizes, short follow‑up, unclear bias risk, or lack of randomized data for some intensive programs), the insufficient evidence base may constrain coverage decisions. The policy reflects this by designating several program types and indications as experimental/investigational and by advising that program‑specific evidence may be required to support coverage.
The policy highlights a specific evidence gap for post‑acute COVID cardiac sequelae: reports to date are largely observational and do not clearly isolate cardiac rehabilitation components. The policy therefore recommends that controlled prospective studies in well‑defined patient populations are needed to determine benefit before CR can be routinely covered for post‑COVID cardiac conditions.
Designating virtual CR, intensive programs, and other‑indication CR as experimental/investigational has direct implications for coverage: these designations make such services ineligible for routine coverage under this policy and increase the likelihood of claim denials unless robust, program‑specific evidence is submitted or policy language changes.
Procedure and Diagnosis Codes
| 93797 | Physician services for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation; without continuous ECG monitoring (per session) |
| 93798 | Physician services for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation; with continuous ECG monitoring (per session) |
| G0422 | Intensive cardiac rehabilitation; with or without continuous ECG monitoring with exercise, per session |
| G0423 | Intensive cardiac rehabilitation; with or without continuous ECG monitoring; without exercise, per session |
| I21.A1 | ICD-10 code added in 2017 revision |
| I50.810 | ICD-10 code added in 2017 revision |
| I50.811 | ICD-10 code added in 2017 revision |
| I50.812 | ICD-10 code added in 2017 revision |
| I50.813 | ICD-10 code added in 2017 revision |
| I50.814 | ICD-10 code added in 2017 revision |
| I50.82 | ICD-10 code added in 2017 revision |
| I50.83 | ICD-10 code added in 2017 revision |
| I50.84 | ICD-10 code added in 2017 revision |
| Z94.1 | ICD-10 code added in 2017 revision |
| 99215 | Previously mentioned as possible single initial physician visit for referral (bullet removed in later revision) |
Provider Requirements, Documentation, and Prior Authorization
Verify benefit, site of service, and physician availability
Coverage is limited to programs furnished in a physician's office or hospital outpatient setting and all settings must have a physician immediately available; check the member's contract benefits to determine coverage applicability for the individual member.
- Programs must be furnished in a physician's office or hospital outpatient setting.
- A physician must be immediately available and accessible for consultations and emergencies whenever services are being furnished.
- Verify the member's contract benefits at time of service to confirm coverage.
Prior authorization not specified
No explicit prior authorization requirements are specified in the extracted sections of this policy.
- The document states that no prior authorization requirements are specified in the extracted sections.
Include supporting evidence for repeat or intensive CR requests
Requests for repeat cardiac rehabilitation or enrollment in intensive programs should include supporting evidence of benefit for the individual because trials are lacking for repeat CR and RCT evidence for some intensive programs is limited.
- No studies were identified that evaluated repeat participation in cardiac rehabilitation (no direct evidence for repeat CR).
- Ornish program evidence is limited to a small RCT; provide program-specific evidence when requesting intensive CR.
Prior authorization — consider limited evidence
Although the policy does not set explicit prior authorization rules, coverage decisions should take into account the limited evidence base—especially for intensive programs—when assessing requests.
- Insufficient or low-quality evidence for some intensive programs may affect coverage determinations.
- Consider the limited and program-specific nature of the evidence when reviewing requests.
Define virtual delivery method (HBCR) in requests
When submitting requests that involve home-based or virtual cardiac rehabilitation, describe the virtual delivery method (HBCR) used—e.g., video conferencing, phone, email, text, smartphone applications, or wearable devices—to distinguish it from standard outpatient CR.
- Define whether delivery is remote/virtual and list modalities used (video, phone, email, text, apps, wearables).
- Document program components and monitoring methods to clarify how HBCR meets or differs from standard CR.
Use listed procedure codes only when policy criteria are met
The policy lists CPT/HCPCS codes for outpatient and intensive cardiac rehabilitation; these codes are medically necessary only if the procedure is performed according to the Policy section.
No explicit prior authorization rules in these sections
No explicit prior authorization rules are stated in the cited chunks; policy updates emphasize coverage scope, program duration, and investigational designations rather than new authorization requirements.
- Recent revisions added investigational designations (virtual CR, other indications) and clarified session limits but did not specify prior authorization requirements in these excerpts.
Do not combine PT/OT with CR unless distinct and unrelated
Physical and/or occupational therapy are not considered medically necessary in conjunction with cardiac rehabilitation unless they are performed for an unrelated diagnosis; bill separately only when services are distinct.
- PT/OT should not be billed as part of CR unless performed for a separate, unrelated diagnosis.
- Document the unrelated diagnosis and distinct services if PT/OT are provided concurrently.
No step therapy specified
No step therapy requirements are described in the provided sections of this policy.
- The document explicitly notes no step therapy requirements in the extracted sections.
Document prior completion of standard outpatient CR
When requesting repeat or intensive CR, document completion of prior standard outpatient cardiac rehabilitation where relevant, as standard single-course CR is the comparator for assessing repeat or intensive programs.
- Provide records showing prior completion of a standard single-course outpatient CR program if applicable.
- Document how the proposed repeat or intensive program differs from or supplements prior standard CR.
Consider standard outpatient CR as first-line comparator
Consider standard outpatient cardiac rehabilitation as the first-line comparator when evidence for intensive programs is limited; document why intensive CR is being requested instead of standard CR.
- Explain why standard outpatient CR is not appropriate or sufficient for the patient.
- Provide program-specific evidence if requesting intensive CR in lieu of standard CR.
Document standard management comparator when relevant
When applicable, document prior trials of standard medical management (medications, surgery, devices) if claiming that CR is being used because standard management alone is insufficient.
- Include history of medical therapy, procedures, or device interventions attempted before CR, if relevant to the request.
- Clarify how CR is intended to complement or replace prior management strategies.
Document required program components and setting
Programs must include physician-prescribed exercise each day services are furnished, cardiac risk factor modification, psychosocial assessment, outcomes assessment, and an individualized treatment plan; ensure documentation reflects these components and that services are provided in the required settings with physician availability.
- Physician-prescribed exercise on each day services are furnished.
- Cardiac risk factor modification and psychosocial assessment included.
- An individualized treatment plan detailing how components are used.
- Services furnished in a physician's office or hospital outpatient setting with a physician immediately available.
Perform and document baseline and (if done) follow-up stress testing
A comprehensive evaluation including a medical examination and an electrocardiogram stress test may be performed before initiation of CR; an additional stress test may be performed at program completion—include these evaluations in the medical record when performed.
- Document baseline medical exam and any ECG stress test performed prior to starting CR.
- Record any follow-up stress testing performed at program completion.
Include baseline and follow-up objective outcome measures
Studies report outcome measures such as peak VO2, cardiopulmonary exercise test results, BMI, blood pressure, and quality-of-life questionnaires; include baseline and follow-up objective measures where available to support medical necessity.
- Include peak oxygen uptake (VO2) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing results when available.
- Document body mass index, blood pressure, and validated quality-of-life measures used by the program.
Document program type, duration, components, and diagnoses
Document program type (home-based vs facility-based), duration, components (exercise, education, behavior change, psychosocial support), and patient diagnosis to support requests and claims.
- Specify whether the program is HBCR, CBCR, or an intensive program and list all components delivered.
- Include the patient's cardiac diagnosis and how the program addresses it.
Provide detailed intervention and diagnosis documentation for program review
Provide details of the intervention (diet, exercise prescription, stress management, education) and the patient's heart disease diagnosis when submitting documentation for intensive or novel programs.
- For intensive programs, describe diet and stress-management components and frequency/duration of sessions.
- Attach trial or program-specific evidence if available to support clinical benefit claims.
Provide methodologically credible evidence (prefer RCTs) for novel program coverage
When evaluating novel program coverage requests, be prepared to supply information on study design and population (preference for RCTs; comparative observational studies acceptable if RCTs absent) to support effectiveness claims.
- Indicate whether supporting evidence comes from randomized controlled trials, comparative observational studies, or single-arm long-term outcome studies.
- Document study populations, follow-up duration, and whether populations overlap with other studies.
Assess and document patient status and planned interventions before program start
Perform and record a patient assessment before beginning the program and document interventions across core domains (nutrition, BP/lipids/diabetes, tobacco, psychosocial, exercise and strength training, activity counseling, and program quality).
- Document symptom-limited exercise testing where indicated per AHA guidance.
- Record planned interventions and expected outcomes across core components before starting CR.
Document session counts, individualized plan, and components (up to 36 sessions)
Document the number of sessions provided (coverage is eligible up to 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks, i.e., up to 36 sessions), an individualized treatment plan, and the components utilized per policy guidelines.
- Record session dates and count to show adherence to the 36-session coverage limit when applicable.
- Keep an individualized treatment plan in the patient record detailing exercise prescription and other components.
Repeat CR without new qualifying event may be denied
Repeat participation in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation without another qualifying cardiac event is considered experimental/investigational and may be denied; provide strong justification and supporting evidence if requesting repeat CR.
- Policy states repeat participation without another qualifying event is experimental/investigational.
- Requests lacking supporting evidence for repeat CR face potential denial.
Intensive CR programs may be denied (investigational)
Intensive cardiac rehabilitation programs (Ornish, Pritikin, Benson-Henry) are designated experimental/investigational and may be denied; supply program-specific evidence if requesting coverage.
- Policy lists Ornish, Pritikin, and Benson-Henry as experimental/investigational.
- Coverage decisions require program-specific supporting evidence due to limited high-quality trials.
Virtual CR is investigational — risk of claim denial
Virtual cardiac rehabilitation is considered experimental/investigational per policy and claims for virtual CR may be denied unless compelling evidence or exception is provided; clearly document modality and evidence when requesting coverage.
- Policy explicitly designates virtual CR (HBCR) as experimental/investigational.
- Claims for virtual CR should include detailed modality description and supporting evidence to avoid denial.
Evidence gap for repeat CR — denial risk without data
No studies were identified that evaluated repeat outpatient cardiac rehabilitation, creating an evidence gap that may lead to denial of repeat-CR requests lacking supporting data.
- The policy review found zero studies evaluating repeat participation in outpatient CR.
- Expect requests for repeat CR to require additional justification or evidence.
Limited evidence quality may affect coverage decisions
Insufficient or low-quality evidence (small RCTs, absence of RCTs for some intensive programs) may result in unfavorable coverage determinations for intensive or novel programs; include higher-quality supporting data when possible.
- Ornish RCTs were small with limited follow-up; Pritikin lacks RCTs.
- Provide robust comparative evidence to support claims for intensive programs.
No evidence for post-acute COVID cardiac sequelae — denial risk
There is no direct evidence supporting cardiac rehabilitation specifically for post-acute cardiac sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection; requests for CR for long COVID cardiac indications may be denied or require additional justification.
- The policy found no direct studies assessing CR efficacy for post-acute cardiac sequelae of SARS-CoV-2.
- Provide controlled prospective evidence or strong rationale when requesting CR for post-COVID cardiac conditions.
Code listing alone does not guarantee coverage
Listing of procedure or diagnosis codes in the policy does not by itself guarantee member coverage or provider reimbursement; codes are medically necessary only if used in accordance with the Policy section and the member's contract.
- Refer to the member's contract benefits to determine coverage or non-coverage.
- Use listed codes only when the service meets the policy's medical necessity criteria.
High denial risk for virtual CR (investigational)
Because virtual cardiac rehabilitation is designated investigational, claims for virtual CR are at risk of denial; include detailed description of the virtual modality and supporting evidence if coverage is requested.
- Policy revision explicitly added virtual CR as experimental/investigational.
- Describe HBCR modalities (video, phone, apps, wearables) and provide evidence to mitigate denial risk.
CR for other indications (e.g., SARS-CoV-2) may be denied
Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation for other indications (for example, SARS‑CoV‑2) is considered experimental/investigational per policy and claims for these indications may be denied; provide strong supporting evidence if requesting coverage.
- Policy added a designation that outpatient CR is investigational for other indications such as SARS-CoV-2.
- Requests for CR for nonlisted indications should include robust, condition-specific evidence.
Background and Context
Cardiac rehabilitation is a comprehensive, medically supervised outpatient program that includes medical evaluation, physician‑prescribed exercise, cardiac risk‑factor modification, education, and counseling. The AHA core components cited in the policy emphasize pre‑program assessment (including symptom‑limited exercise testing), nutrition and weight management, blood pressure, lipid and diabetes management, tobacco cessation, psychosocial support, aerobic and strength training, activity counseling, and program quality—components that distinguish full CR programs from supervised exercise alone.
Key Definitions and Abbreviations
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.