Bronchial Thermoplasty
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for Aetna Policy 0744 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 0744 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines Aetna's coverage stance for bronchial thermoplasty for asthma and other indications, describing that BT is considered experimental/investigational because effectiveness has not been established; applies to adult asthma care and related procedures.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage Criteria for Bronchial Thermoplasty
Experimental/Investigational (Not Covered)
Coverage = not covered for these indications per policy statement.
Initial therapy — Covered when ALL of the following are met
Covered when ALL of the following are met
Supported by FDA approval and trial populations
FDA indication and guideline context
Guidelines and expert reviews recommend specialist centers and experienced operators
Based on product labeling, trial exclusions and policy contraindications
Restricted/Experimental use — Use limited or considered experimental when ANY of the following are present
Use limited or considered experimental when ANY of the following are present
Many trials excluded patients with FEV1 <60% (guideline note) and evidence is limited in sicker populations
Cochrane, NICE and guideline groups advise data collection and cautious use
NICE and other expert panels recommend specialist-center performance and registry reporting
Conditional/Contextual Coverage Considerations
Context and conditional recommendations from major guidelines and trials
Strong/conditional recommendations based on low-quality evidence
AIR2 showed reductions in severe exacerbations and ED visits but other measures were inconsistent
Cochrane and RCT data document increased peri-procedural morbidity and limited long-term controlled data
Initial candidate selection — Consider BT when ALL of the following are met (per guidance and expert consensus)
Consider BT when ALL of the following are met (per guidance and expert consensus):
Expert consensus: may be considered for selected phenotypes (eg, non-TH2) after failure of triple therapy and before chronic oral corticosteroid dependence or as an alternative after inadequate response to biologics for some patients.
Registry protocols and expert panels recommend thorough documentation and phenotype assessment
Guidelines and NICE recommend registry-based use or research context
Effectiveness and safety profile — Clinical considerations and expected outcomes
Clinical considerations and expected outcomes:
Systematic reviews and RCTs report modest QOL gains and reductions in some healthcare utilizations but inconsistent physiologic effects
Cochrane and pooled RCT data document increased peri-procedural morbidity and rare serious AEs
Post-approval and registry studies report up to 5-year follow-up with sustained reductions in exacerbations in observational cohorts
When BT is considered — Indications and specialist-setting recommendations
BT is considered for adults with severe asthma not controlled with optimized therapy; multiple guidelines recommend use only in specialized contexts or registries.
International guidelines advise specialist referral and registry/clinical-study context
ERS/ATS and GINA recommendations emphasize registry or study-based use due to limited evidence
Bronchial thermoplasty is not intended for individuals with known sensitivities to atropine, benzodiazepines, or lidocaine, and is contraindicated for persons with implanted cardiac electronic devices such as a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator. These device- and medication-related cautions derive from device labeling and standard procedural precautions for the Alair system and should be assessed and documented before any proposed treatment.
Product labeling and procedural guidance specify that the Alair system is not for use in patients with pacemakers, internal defibrillators, or other implantable electronic devices. The labeling also lists patients with known sensitivities to lidocaine, atropine, or benzodiazepines as individuals who should not be treated with the device; these contraindications should be confirmed in the pre-procedure assessment.
Clinical trial protocols and guideline summaries frequently excluded patients with chronic sinus disease, frequent chest infections, or a baseline FEV1 less than 60% predicted. These trial exclusions have been cited by guideline panels as reasons to exercise caution or to consider such populations ineligible for routine treatment outside of research settings.
Guidance documents note that bronchial thermoplasty may be unsuitable for people with bronchiectasis and emphasize that the device is not licensed for patients younger than 18 years. Such considerations should be part of the specialist evaluation when assessing candidacy.
Important uncertainty remains regarding the long-term safety and applicability of bronchial thermoplasty across broader severe asthma populations. Reviews and expert summaries highlight unknowns about durability of benefit, long-term adverse effects, and which phenotypes benefit most — for example, applicability in patients with FEV1 above certain thresholds or those receiving systemic steroid therapy is not well established.
The excerpts provided from the Clinical Policy Bulletin do not list additional explicit administrative coverage exclusions beyond the clinical contraindications and trial-based exclusions noted elsewhere; the bulletin also includes administrative links and notices advising providers that the document is a partial summary of plan benefits.
Aetna considers bronchial thermoplasty to be experimental and investigational for the treatment of asthma and other indications because effectiveness has not been established; accordingly BT is not covered as medically necessary for these indications under this policy.
Systematic reviews, guideline assessments, and technology reviews characterize evidence for bronchial thermoplasty as showing modest benefits in some outcomes (for example, small improvements in quality of life and reductions in some exacerbation measures) but with important evidence gaps. Multiple reviews note limited trial numbers, small sample sizes, inconsistent outcome effects across studies, and concerns about long-term effectiveness and generalizability.
Major guideline reviews and technology assessments advise caution: given the limited quantity and generally low-to-moderate quality of evidence, adoption of bronchial thermoplasty outside controlled settings is discouraged. Several reviews and guideline statements recommend that further data — particularly long-term, sham-controlled outcomes and clearer phenotype identification — are needed before routine use is warranted.
Guidance emphasizes limits on where and by whom BT should be performed. Use of bronchial thermoplasty outside of specialist centers, without multidisciplinary specialist evaluation, or in patients who have not undergone documented optimization of medical management (including high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting beta-agonists and other appropriate add-ons) is discouraged.
International guideline panels recommend that when bronchial thermoplasty is used it should be performed only within an IRB-approved registry or clinical study or in the context of systematic data collection. This approach permits accumulation of longer-term safety and effectiveness data and supports careful patient selection and follow-up.
Within the provided document excerpts there are no additional explicit statements phrased as standalone 'not medically necessary' clauses beyond the policy's overarching designation of bronchial thermoplasty as experimental/investigational; administrative notes remind readers that the bulletin is a partial description of plan benefits.
Procedure and Diagnosis Codes
| J41.0-J47.9 | Chronic lower respiratory diseases (including asthma). |
| J67.0-J67.9 | Hypersensitivity pneumonitis due to organic dust. |
| N/A | No explicit CPT/HCPCS/ICD-10 codes were provided in this document segment; FDA approval and trial populations referenced (Alair system, adults ≥18 years). |
Provider Actions, Prior Authorization, and Documentation
Prior authorization / coverage stance
Aetna designates bronchial thermoplasty (BT) as experimental and investigational for the treatment of asthma and other indications because its effectiveness has not been established. As a result, coverage may be denied consistent with this policy designation.
- BT is considered experimental/investigational by Aetna for asthma and other indications.
- Designation may lead to claim denial or requirement for exception review.
Registry/Study participation or specialty‑center justification
Major international guidelines (ERS/ATS, GINA, and others) strongly recommend that BT be performed only in the context of an Institutional Review Board–approved independent registry or clinical study. Authorization decisions should recognize guideline guidance favoring registry/study participation.
- Guidelines recommend use only within IRB‑approved registries or clinical studies.
- Clinicians and centers should document enrollment or justify participation in a specialty-center study or registry.
Specialist center and patient‑selection documentation recommended
The procedure should be performed only in specialist centers by clinicians trained in BT and experienced in managing severe asthma, with multidisciplinary governance and on‑site access to intensive care. Documentation of patient selection and specialist evaluation is recommended for any authorization or utilization review.
- Multi‑disciplinary team in specialist center with on‑site intensive care required.
- Clinician must have training/experience in BT and severe asthma management.
- Document rationale for selecting the patient for BT, including specialist referral.
Prior authorization: specialist evaluation and evidence of maximal inhaled therapy
Prior to consideration of BT, patients should have specialist evaluation confirming severe persistent asthma that remains uncontrolled despite optimized medical therapy (for example, high‑dose inhaled corticosteroid plus long‑acting beta‑agonist and other appropriate controller therapy). For some phenotypes, BT is considered after failure of optimized pharmacologic therapy (including trials of biologics where indicated) and before initiation of maintenance oral corticosteroids in selected pathways.
- Confirm adult patient (≥18 years) with severe persistent asthma not controlled with optimized inhaled therapy.
- Document trials of high‑dose ICS + LABA (and other controllers/biologics when appropriate) and ongoing symptoms/exacerbations.
- State whether BT is being considered as alternative after biologic therapy failure for relevant phenotypes.
Experimental/Investigational denial risk
BT carries denial risk because Aetna classifies it as experimental/investigational. Even in cases where guideline contexts suggest limited use, authorization is not guaranteed.
- Aetna’s experimental/investigational designation is an explicit ground for non‑coverage.
- Guideline endorsement for registry‑based use does not override payer non‑coverage determinations.
Contraindications / Denial Triggers
Contraindications and common denial triggers that should be documented and assessed include active respiratory infection, asthma exacerbation at time of planned treatment, coagulopathy, recent changes to corticosteroid regimen (within 14 days), presence of pacemaker or implantable electronic device, known sensitivities to lidocaine, atropine, or benzodiazepines, and other exclusions used in clinical trials (e.g., frequent chest infections, bronchiectasis, low baseline FEV1 in some studies).
- Active respiratory infection or current asthma exacerbation — exclude.
- Coagulopathy or recent anticoagulation — exclude.
- Pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or other implantable electronic devices — contraindicated.
- Known sensitivities to lidocaine, atropine, or benzodiazepines — contraindicated.
- Recent corticosteroid regimen changes within 14 days prior to planned treatment — contraindicated.
Guidelines recommend BT only in the context of IRB‑approved registry/clinical study
Guidelines emphasize caution in patient selection and recommend BT only in adults and only within IRB‑approved registries or clinical studies to accumulate long‑term safety and effectiveness data. This guideline‑recommended context may influence authorization decisions and payers may require registry/study participation or strong specialty‑center justification.
- Recommendation: perform BT in adults only in context of IRB‑approved registry or clinical study.
- Caution recommended for patients with chronic sinus disease, frequent chest infections, or low FEV1 included in guideline exclusions.
- Authorization requests should address guideline recommendations and provide supporting documentation.
Procedure should only be done in specialist centers
Procedure should only be performed by trained clinicians in specialist centers with multidisciplinary oversight and on‑site intensive care access. Appropriate training and experience should be documented.
- Specialist center with multidisciplinary team and ICU access required.
- Document clinician training and experience with BT.
- Centers should have governance, consent, and audit processes in place.
Authorization and step‑therapy administrative notes
While guidelines and some registries support registry‑based use, there are no explicit Aetna prior authorization or step‑therapy requirements specified in this policy text. Providers should include complete documentation to facilitate authorization review.
- No explicit prior authorization criteria or step‑therapy sequence are specified in the policy text.
- No step‑therapy requirements are specified here; authorization decisions will be handled per payer process and experimental/investigational designation.
- Providers should supply full clinical documentation to support any authorization requests.
Procedure documentation & coding
Include detailed procedural and coding documentation with any claim or authorization request. Relevant CPT codes include 31660 (bronchoscopy with bronchial thermoplasty, 1 lobe) and 31661 (2 or more lobes). Provide bronchoscopy details, number of lobes treated, dates of each session, anesthesia/sedation, and any intra‑ or post‑procedural complications.
Suggested Clinical Documentation
Suggested clinical documentation to accompany requests or registry entry includes baseline spirometry (FEV1, FVC), bronchodilator responsiveness, AQLQ and ACT scores, medication history (including doses of ICS, LABA, OCS, biologics), history of exacerbations/hospitalizations/ED visits in prior 12 months, comorbidities, and rationale for BT selection.
- Baseline FEV1, FVC, and bronchodilator reversibility.
- AQLQ and ACT scores at baseline.
- Medication history and doses (high‑dose ICS, LABA, other controllers, biologics, maintenance OCS).
- History of severe exacerbations, ED visits, and hospitalizations in prior 12 months.
- Rationale for choosing BT (failed optimized therapy, phenotype considerations, specialist assessment).
Histologic and clinical follow‑up data collection
When available, histologic and immunohistochemical follow‑up data (airway smooth muscle mass, collagen deposition) and clinical outcomes should be collected and submitted to registries or included in follow‑up reports to support ongoing evaluation of BT safety and effectiveness.
- Collect histologic data where clinically obtained (airway biopsy results showing ASM changes) and summarize findings.
- Collect and report clinical follow‑up: exacerbation rates, hospitalizations, ED visits, spirometry, medication changes, AQLQ/ACT.
Clinicians should enter details of all patients into registries
Clinicians should enter details of all patients undergoing BT into established registries (for example, the UK Severe Asthma Registry or other IRB‑approved registries) when feasible, and document consent, patient selection criteria, and outcomes to support surveillance and future authorization considerations.
- Registry entry: baseline characteristics, consent, ACT/AQLQ, medications, FEV1/FVC, 12‑month baseline exacerbation/utilization data.
- Document long‑term outcomes and any adverse events in registry submissions.
Administrative notes and policy links
This portion of the policy includes administrative notes and links for review history, effective date, and additional information. Providers should consult the policy history and additional information sections for updates and payer‑specific administrative procedures.
- Effective date: 2008‑02‑08; Next review noted in policy header.
- Administrative links and clinical policy bulletin notes available for providers.
Background and Evidence Summary
Bronchial thermoplasty is an outpatient bronchoscopic procedure that delivers controlled radiofrequency thermal energy to the airway wall to reduce airway smooth muscle mass and thereby attempt to attenuate bronchoconstriction. The Alair system applies energy via a catheter introduced through a bronchoscope, typically in a series of three outpatient sessions spaced several weeks apart; each treatment session generally takes about one hour under conscious sedation.
Systematic reviews and major guideline assessments summarize the trial evidence as demonstrating some statistically significant but generally modest improvements in patient-reported quality of life and reductions in certain exacerbation measures; however, benefits were inconsistent across studies, did not consistently reach clinically important thresholds, and important evidence gaps remain (including small trial sizes, heterogeneous patient selection, and limited sham-controlled long-term data).
Given the limited quantity and quality of evidence, guideline groups and technology assessments advise that bronchial thermoplasty should not be widely adopted outside controlled settings. They recommend performance within clinical studies or registries, careful patient selection, and specialist-center delivery to mitigate risks and to collect long-term outcome data.
Definitions and Terms
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.