Artificial Retina and Artificial Iris
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for Aetna Policy 0713 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 0713 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
This policy governs coverage of artificial retina (retinal prosthesis) and artificial iris devices for Aetna members, defining these interventions as experimental and investigational due to insufficient evidence of safety and effectiveness.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage Criteria
Experimental and Investigational
Aetna considers the following interventions experimental and investigational because effectiveness has not been established:
[[chunk 3]]
[[chunk 3]]
Clinical candidate and outcome summaries
Clinical findings and selection considerations reported
Based on multi‑center trial data and reviews (see chunks 22, 25).
Based on retrospective series and device reviews (see chunks 36, 37).
Coverage considerations and clinical criteria
Evidence‑based considerations and observed outcomes informing coverage decisions
Supported by retrospective series and device descriptions (chunks 36, 38).
See chunks 37, 48.
See chunks 36, 41, 45, 48.
Consistent with observed outcomes and device‑specific cautions (chunks 36, 37, 45, 48).
Use of the CPT and HCPCS codes listed in this policy for the indications addressed in this Clinical Policy Bulletin is not covered. The policy explicitly identifies specific procedure codes for retinal prosthesis placement and follow-up programming (e.g., 0100T, 0472T, 0473T) and codes for insertion of iris prostheses (e.g., 0616T, 0617T, 0618T) as well as HCPCS codes for artificial iris and retinal prosthesis components (e.g., C1839, C1841, C1842, L8608) as not covered for the indications in this CPB.
Reported case series associate implants that contain an embedded fiber mesh with higher rates of complications such as glaucoma, darkening of iris tissue, and need for additional anterior segment surgery. The policy notes that use of full iris prostheses without embedded fiber mesh, and in some cases slightly smaller-than-recommended implant sizing, may reduce these device-specific risks and therefore may be preferred when reconstructing the anterior segment.
Cosmetic iris implantation devices marketed for elective eye color change (examples include NewColorIris and BrightOcular) have been associated with serious, sight‑threatening complications in clinical reports. In a retrospective series of patients who presented after cosmetic implants, common findings included iris abnormalities, elevated intraocular pressure, corneal edema, intraocular inflammation and cataract; many eyes required surgical interventions including explantation, corneal transplantation and glaucoma surgery.
Aetna considers artificial retina devices (e.g., the Argus II) and artificial iris devices (e.g., the CustomFlex Artificial Iris) to be experimental and investigational for the clinical indications addressed in this CPB because the effectiveness and safety of these approaches have not been established in the peer‑reviewed evidence. Services for interventions classified as experimental and investigational may be denied as not medically necessary.
Clinical reports indicate that the Argus II prosthesis does not consistently provide sufficiently reliable visual information to improve performance on certain navigational precision tasks that rely on non‑visual senses. In a small study, implanted patients did not show the same improvements in path reproduction precision as controls and, for some tasks, showed limited benefit from the prosthesis compared with non‑visual navigation strategies.
Elective cosmetic iris implants placed solely for cosmetic eye‑color modification have high complication and explantation rates in reported series. In the cited retrospective review, a large proportion of implanted eyes subsequently underwent cosmetic iris removal (explantation) and many required additional surgical procedures (for example, corneal transplantation, cataract extraction and glaucoma surgery), supporting classification of these elective cosmetic implants as associated with substantial post‑operative morbidity.
Coding
| 0100T | Placement of a subconjunctival retinal prosthesis receiver and pulse generator, and implantation of intra-ocular retinal electrode array, with vitrectomy. |
| 0472T | Device evaluation, interrogation, and initial programming of intra-ocular retinal electrode array (eg, retinal prosthesis), in person, with iterative adjustment of the implantable device to test functionality, select optimal permanent programmed values with analysis, including visual training, with review and report by a qualified health care professional. |
| 0473T | Device evaluation and interrogation of intra-ocular retinal electrode array (eg, retinal prosthesis), in person, including reprogramming and visual training, when performed, with review and report by a qualified health care professional. |
| 0616T | Insertion of iris prosthesis, including suture fixation and repair or removal of iris, when performed; without removal of crystalline lens or intraocular lens, without insertion of intraocular lens. |
| 0617T | Insertion of iris prosthesis with removal of crystalline lens and insertion of intraocular lens. |
| 0618T | Insertion of iris prosthesis with secondary intraocular lens placement or intraocular lens exchange. |
| C1839 | Iris prosthesis [artificial iris devices]. |
| C1841 | Retinal prosthesis, includes all internal and external components. |
| C1842 | Retinal prosthesis, includes all internal and external components; add-on to C1841. |
| L8608 | Miscellaneous external component, supply or accessory for use with the argus ii retinal prosthesis system. |
| E08.311-E08.39 | Diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with ophthalmic complications [retinopathy]. |
| E09.311-E09.39 | Drug or chemical induced diabetes mellitus with ophthalmic complications [retinopathy]. |
| E10.311-E10.39 | Type 1 diabetes mellitus with ophthalmic complications [retinopathy]. |
| E11.311-E11.39 | Type 2 diabetes mellitus with ophthalmic complications [retinopathy]. |
| E13.311-E13.39 | Other specified diabetes mellitus with ophthalmic complications [retinopathy]. |
| H21.00-H21.9 | Other disorders of iris and ciliary body. |
| H27.00-H27.03 | Aphakia [Post-operative or traumatic aphakia]. |
| H31.101-H31.129 | Choroidal degeneration. |
| H33.001-H35.9 | Retinal detachments and breaks, retinal vascular occlusions and other retinal disorders. |
| Q13.0 | Coloboma of iris. |
Provider Actions and Requirements
Codes explicitly listed as not covered
Use the following CPT and HCPCS codes exactly as listed when submitting claims: 0100T, 0472T, 0473T, 0616T, 0617T, 0618T, C1839, C1841, C1842, L8608. These codes are identified in the policy as not covered for the indications in this Clinical Policy Bulletin and should not be billed for covered indications under this CPB.
Prior authorization: document candidacy, rehab, counseling, team assessment
Obtain pre-authorization when requesting coverage or exception review, and include documentation that the patient meets candidacy criteria, has completed or been assessed for prior rehabilitation, received expectations counseling, and underwent multidisciplinary evaluation. The policy recommends these elements to support any coverage exception requests for specialized device procedures.
- Document candidacy criteria and prior rehabilitation
- Include expectations counseling and multidisciplinary team assessment
Prior authorization: indicate FDA‑approved CustomFlex device
When seeking approval for an FDA‑approved CustomFlex Artificial Iris, note device regulatory status and supply documentation that the CustomFlex device is the implanted prosthesis versus non‑marketed or cosmetic implants. The policy distinguishes FDA‑approved CustomFlex from investigational devices and advises noting FDA-approved device use in authorization requests.
- Indicate that CustomFlex Artificial Iris (FDA‑approved) is used
- Differentiate FDA‑approved device from investigational or cosmetic implants
Prior authorization: no PA requirement specified in this extract
No specific routine prior authorization form or requirement is listed in this extract; providers should follow standard plan processes but recognize the policy does not specify an automatic PA pathway in these sections.
Selection: confirm indication and assess alternatives before implantation
Confirm that the patient has end‑stage outer retinal disease (e.g., retinitis pigmentosa) for retinal prosthesis candidates or a clinically significant iris defect (congenital, traumatic, iatrogenic) for artificial iris candidates, and assess alternative, less-invasive options prior to implant consideration.
- For Argus II candidates: confirm end‑stage outer retinal disease and profound vision loss
- For artificial iris candidates: document indication (congenital, traumatic, iatrogenic) and remnant iris status
Conservative alternatives: document failure/intolerance of non‑surgical options
Before implantation, document trial and failure or intolerance of conservative alternatives when appropriate — for example, colored contact lenses, corneal tattooing, or prosthetic contact options — and record why these measures are unsuitable or unsuccessful for the patient.
- Document use and failure/intolerance of colored contact lenses
- Document consideration and unsuitability of corneal tattooing or prosthetic contact options
Supporting documentation: supply clinical trial reports and outcome data
Provide supporting clinical trial reports and outcome data when requesting coverage exceptions; the policy background documents trial enrollment, visual function tests, and adverse events that support evaluation of medical necessity.
- Include relevant clinical trial reports and objective visual function test results (mobility, localization, grating VA, Goldmann field)
- Report trial enrollment and follow‑up duration as applicable
Required clinical documentation: device, laterality, complications, objective outcomes
Include detailed clinical documentation with any request: identify the device implanted, laterality, perioperative and long‑term complications, objective visual function test results (e.g., mobility, localization, grating visual acuity, Goldmann field), and follow‑up duration to support assessment of outcomes and necessity.
- Device model and laterality
- Perioperative and long‑term complications and interventions
- Objective visual function test results and follow‑up duration
Required clinical documentation: indications, ocular history, surgical technique, follow‑up
Document specific clinical indications and prior ocular history in the medical record, including congenital or traumatic aniridia, iris melanotic lesion excision, Urrets‑Zavalia syndrome, aphakia, and relevant comorbidities; also detail surgical technique (endocapsular, sulcus, scleral fixation) and follow‑up findings (BCVA, IOP, complications, patient satisfaction).
- Indication (congenital, traumatic, iatrogenic) and prior ocular comorbidities
- Surgical technique and post‑operative findings including BCVA and IOP
Policy history and notices: extract includes review history but not additional documentation lists
This policy extract includes policy history and boilerplate notices; it does not substitute for submitting required clinical documentation with any authorization or exception request — providers should still follow the documentation guidance in the policy when requesting coverage.
Denial risk: experimental and investigational interventions may be denied
Interventions classified as experimental and investigational (artificial retina devices such as Argus II and artificial iris devices such as CustomFlex for the listed indications) are not considered established; services for these interventions may be denied as not medically necessary.
Adverse event reporting: fully document serious device‑ or surgery‑related AEs
Report and document serious device‑ or surgery‑related adverse events thoroughly; the Argus II trial reported 11 subjects with 23 serious device‑ or surgery‑related adverse events, and inadequate AE reporting or lacking complication details could jeopardize claims or exception requests.
- Include full details of any serious adverse events and their management
- Attach treatment records showing resolution or ongoing care for AEs
Complication‑related utilization risk: prior cosmetic implant complications often require explantation and further surgery
Recognize heightened utilization and reoperation risk after complications from cosmetic artificial iris implants; the policy documents frequent serious complications (elevated IOP, corneal edema, inflammation) that often required explantation and additional surgeries and may trigger high‑level review for subsequent utilization.
- Document any prior cosmetic iris implantation and subsequent complications or explantation
- Expect potential denial or additional review for procedures related to prior device complications
Not applicable / cosmetic implants: elective cosmetic iris implants associated with high complication and explantation rates
Document that conservative, non‑marketed cosmetic iris implants are associated with high complication and explantation rates; the policy highlights that elective cosmetic iris implants lack supportive safety evidence and often required removal and further interventions.
Background
Retinal prostheses are implantable systems intended to restore some visual perception by electrically stimulating surviving retinal neurons in degenerative outer retinal diseases (for example, retinitis pigmentosa). Systems are typically epiretinal (positioned on the retinal surface and driven by an external camera) or subretinal (positioned behind the retina to convert light to electrical signals). The Argus II is an epiretinal system that uses a glasses‑mounted camera to deliver stimulation via a 60‑electrode array; clinical evidence consists primarily of small feasibility and single‑arm series with variable functional improvements and documented device‑ or surgery‑related adverse events.
Definitions
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.