Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Utah for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Utah only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Utah (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

David Savage (NPI 1891789491)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	David Savage
Address	1120 E 100 N #2
City	Payson
State	UT
ZIP	84651
Taxonomy	Foot & Ankle Surgery Podiatrist
NPI Enumerated	September 9, 2005

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$813.4K
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider is effectively single‑payer: total Medicare revenue is $813.4K and there is no Medicaid billing on file, so Medicare accounts for essentially all reported public-payer activity. Analysts should treat Medicaid influence as absent when modeling this practice's public-payer exposure.

Revenue is extremely concentrated in a single add‑on product code: Q4204 accounts for $746.2K (91.8% of the provider's Medicare revenue) and the precomputed top-3 codes collectively account for 95.1% of total Medicare revenue. That concentration implies most Medicare dollars are driven by a narrow set of interventions rather than a broad mix of evaluation & management or imaging services.

The procedure mix indicates a wound-care and procedural focus within podiatry: high use of Q4204 (Xwrap, per square centimeter) alongside 15275 (skin substitute up to 25 cm2) and debridement/ nail procedures such as 11721 suggests this practice emphasizes skin-substitute applications and operative wound management on the foot and digits rather than primarily office-based chronic disease management. This aligns with the provider taxonomy (Foot & Ankle Surgery Podiatrist) and the dominance of supply/add-on codes in revenue.

Although Q4204 produces the dominant share of revenue, the provider's national standing on that code is not extreme: Q4204 ranks #3 of 7 providers nationally (67th percentile) and is labeled as typical, unremarkable volume for this code. In other words, the provider's dollar exposure to Q4204 is large because of unit pricing and claim counts rather than unusually high relative usage versus peers.

Other top codes show mixed competitive positions: 15275 ranks #204 of 888 providers nationally (77th percentile), indicating above‑average use of that skin‑substitute procedure among peers, while 11721 ranks #3466 of 12535 providers nationally (72th percentile), which is a broadly typical participation level for nail debridement. These rankings suggest the practice is relatively stronger in skin-substitute wound work than in routine podiatric procedures by peer comparison.

Non-procedural E/M and imaging codes represent a tiny share of Medicare revenue: examples include 99213 at $4.3K (0.5% of Medicare revenue) and 73620 at $270 (0.0%), illustrating that office visits and diagnostic imaging are minor revenue streams compared with procedural and product-driven codes. This reinforces the interpretation of a procedure- and product-dominant business model.

The provider has long tenure in the Medicare program, with the NPI enumerated on 2005-09-09 (~21 years ago), indicating an established practice footprint which may help explain steady claim patterns even with concentrated revenue sources. Longevity combined with concentrated code dependence points to an experienced operator whose financials could be sensitive to reimbursement or supply changes affecting skin-substitute codes.

Because one add-on/product code (Q4204) and two other procedure codes make up 95.1% of Medicare revenue, the practice faces concentration risk: any changes in coverage, unit pricing, or coding policy for Q4204 or related skin‑substitute codes could materially impact overall revenue. Analysts should prioritize monitoring reimbursement, utilization trends, and peer-code policy developments for Q4204 and 15275 when assessing financial or operational vulnerability.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

15 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
Q4204	Xwrap, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	700	$1,060	$746.2K
11721	The provider surgically debrides (debulks or removes) 6 or more abnormal, diseased, or infected nails.	530	$30	$15.2K
15275	The provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover wounds on the face, scalp, eyelids, mouth, neck, ears, orbits, genitalia, hands, feet, and/or multiple digits, up to…	100	$120	$11.8K
11056	The provider removes 2 to 4 benign hyperkeratotic lesions by using surgical instruments like a scalpel or curette.	210	$50	$9.9K
11755	This procedural code is used when the physician biopsies the nail plate, bed, hyponychium, proximal nail folds, or lateral nail folds. Each one is a separate procedure.	80	$80	$6.6K
11042	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove the dead tissue in skin down to the subcutaneous layer and including the epidermis and dermis, up to the first 20 cm2.	90	$50	$4.9K
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	70	$60	$4.3K
99203	The provider sees a new patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the provider…	40	$70	$3K
93922	Noninvasive physiologic studies of upper or lower extremity arteries, single level, bilateral	40	$60	$2.4K
99212	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a straightforward level of medical decision making,…	60	$40	$2.2K

Showing 1–10 of 15

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 15 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Utah Distribution

David Savage — 1 of 15 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Utah

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

15 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
Q4204	1	10	540	$1,020	$551.7K
11721	24	120	210	$30	$10.2K
15275	6	10	100	$110	$9.8K
11042	57	120	90	$70	$9.1K
11056	24	100	80	$50	$8K
99213	1,760	3,680	60	$50	$6.4K
99304	13	30	30	$50	$4K
97597	42	50	40	$60	$4K
11055	53	90	50	$50	$3.7K
11755	3	20	30	$70	$3K

Showing 1–10 of 15

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as David Savage, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Mountain View Hospital, Inc.	UT	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$6.1M
Steps Recovery Centers	UT	Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facility	$0	$3.1M
Payson City Corporation	UT	Land Ambulance	$79.7K	$1.2M
Gary Behrmann	UT	Pediatric Adolescent Medicine Physician	$0	$1.1M
Elk Ridge Assisted Living	UT	Community Health Clinic/Center	$0	$1.1M
Robert Baird	UT	Dentist	$0	$707.4K
Cascade Family Dental	UT	General Practice Dentistry	$0	$655.3K
John Weber	UT	Dentist	$0	$361.7K
Chad Farley	UT	Neurological Surgery Physician	$302.8K	$0
Steven Hillam	UT	Ophthalmology Physician	$222.9K	$0

David Savage — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for David Savage — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

David Savage — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for David Savage — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References