Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Tennessee for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Tennessee only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Tennessee (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Bioventus LLC (NPI 1861761785)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Organization
Organization	Bioventus LLC
Address	7101 Goodlett Farms Pkwy
City	Cordova
State	TN
ZIP	38016
Taxonomy	Durable Medical Equipment & Medical Supplies
NPI Enumerated	December 21, 2011

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicaid	$34.5M
Medicare	$0

Key Findings

This provider is effectively single-payer in the federal programs dataset: there is no Medicare billing on file and the provider reports $34.5M in Medicaid revenue, indicating its measurable public-payer activity is concentrated in Medicaid rather than Medicare. The absence of Medicare claims prevents cross-payer comparisons and suggests the entity either does not bill Medicare or has not recorded Medicare activity in the data provided.

Medicaid revenue is extremely concentrated: the precomputed top 3 Medicaid codes account for 100.0% of this provider's total Medicaid revenue, and a single code—E0760—alone represents 99.4% of Medicaid revenue ($34.3M). This concentration indicates the organization’s Medicaid business is dominated by one product line rather than a diversified DME mix.

The code mix and the provider taxonomy (Durable Medical Equipment & Medical Supplies) show a clear operational focus on bone-growth and stimulation devices: E0760 is an osteogenesis stimulator (low intensity ultrasound, non-invasive) and E0770 is a functional electrical stimulator. The prevalence of E0760 (32.9K claims at $1043 avg paid/claim generating $34.3M) implies this supplier operates at high volume in the osteogenesis-stimulation market segment, with a much smaller presence in transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation (140 claims, $1559 avg paid/claim, $218.3K).

There is a marked disparity between volume and unit payment across the two reported Medicaid codes: E0760 shows very large volume (32.9K claims) at $1043 avg paid/claim producing $34.3M in revenue, while E0770 has far lower volume (140 claims) but a higher avg paid/claim ($1559) yielding $218.3K. This combination indicates the provider’s revenue depends on high-volume, lower-unit-dollar deliveries for E0760, with E0770 representing a small, higher-unit-dollar niche.

In-state competitive standing is unique: both listed Medicaid codes rank #1 of 1 providers in-state (0th percentile; no state peer volume comparison available), meaning this entity is the sole in-state reporter for these codes in the dataset. Because there are no in-state peers reported, the provider functions as the de facto in-state supplier for these specific DME codes, though the percentile and rank reflect the lack of peer data rather than a measured dominance against multiple competitors.

The provider has an established enrollment history: the NPI was enumerated on 2011-12-21 (~15 years ago), which indicates a long-standing presence in the market. That tenure is consistent with the scale of reported Medicaid activity and suggests an established supply chain or contracting footprint for the reported products.

From a business-risk and strategic perspective, the extremely high reliance on a single code (E0760 at 99.4% of Medicaid revenue) creates operational vulnerability: changes in reimbursement policy, code edits, or clinical guidelines affecting osteogenesis stimulators could materially impact total Medicaid revenue. Analysts should treat the provider as highly concentrated in a single DME product line and consider scenario analyses for reimbursement or demand shifts.

Data limitations are material for interpretation: the dataset shows no Medicare billing and no state peer volume comparisons for the listed codes, so assessments of national competitiveness or cross-payer positioning are not possible from these records alone. Any conclusions about market share or competitive strength outside the reported state should therefore be labeled tentative unless supplemented with additional claims or supplier data.

Medicaid: Complete Services Breakdown

Every CPT/HCPCS code this provider has billed to Medicaid, with claims volume, average payment, and total revenue.

2 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
E0760	Osteogenesis stimulator, low intensity ultrasound, non-invasive	32,880	$1,040	$34.3M
E0770	Functional electrical stimulator, transcutaneous stimulation of nerve and/or muscle groups, any type, complete system, not otherwise specified	140	$1,560	$218.3K

Medicaid: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicaid billing volume and revenue compare to other Tennessee providers billing the same CPT/HCPCS codes.

Claims Volume vs. Tennessee Distribution

Bioventus LLC — 0 of 2 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Tennessee

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. Tennessee median

2 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
E0760	Osteogenesis stimulator, low intensity ultrasound, non-invasive	1	10	32,880	$1,040	$34.3M
E0770	Functional electrical stimulator, transcutaneous stimulation of nerve and/or muscle groups, any type, complete system, not otherwise specified	1	10	140	$1,560	$218.3K

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Bioventus LLC, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Resource One Medical Staffing	TN	Nursing Care Agency	$0	$13.4M
Healthquest PC	TN	Psychiatry Physician	$0	$3.2M
Vinall & Smith Pediatric Dentistry	TN	Pediatric Dentistry	$0	$3M
Cordova Pediatrics PLLC	TN	Pediatrics Physician	$0	$2.9M
Tejinder Saini	TN	Psychiatry Physician	$402K	$65.7K
Michael Smith	TN	Physical Therapist	$413.3K	$0
Jeffrey Hall	TN	Pain Medicine (Anesthesiology) Physician	$216.5K	$0
Chad Webster	TN	Foot & Ankle Surgery Podiatrist	$188.3K	$9K
Ted Butterfield	TN	Foot & Ankle Surgery Podiatrist	$135.6K	$0
Rebecca Jones	TN	Family Nurse Practitioner	$117.1K	$0

Bioventus LLC — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Bioventus LLC — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Bioventus LLC — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Bioventus LLC — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicaid: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicaid: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicaid: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References