Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerNPI Medicare & MedicaidAlexandria Heart & Vascular Surgery Center
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    Alexandria Heart & Vascular Surgery Center — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

    NPI 1811378375 · XX · healthcare

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for Alexandria Heart & Vascular Surgery Center — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Alexandria Heart & Vascular Surgery Center is a healthcare provider located in Unspecified Location. This profile covers 8 Medicare and 0 Medicaid CPT/HCPCS procedure codes, with claims volume, average reimbursement, and total revenue by code, benchmarked against other providers billing the same services. Note: "XX" is a placeholder CMS uses when a provider's practice-location state wasn't reported — not a traditional US state; claims coded under it are grouped and benchmarked here the same way a traditional state would be.

    Provider details (source: NPPES NPI Registry)

    FieldValue
    Entity TypeIndividual
    OrganizationAlexandria Heart & Vascular Surgery Center
    Address
    City
    StateXX (Unspecified Location)
    ZIP
    TaxonomyN/A
    NPI Enumerated
    NPI DeactivatedMay 29, 2025

    Key Findings

    Procedure mix indicates an invasive cardiology and cardiac electrophysiology orientation: the top-billed services are coronary angiography and left heart catheterization (93458) and intracoronary stent placement (C9600), alongside multiple device-implant and device-replacement codes (33264, 33208, 33285, 33228). Code descriptions show the practice performs imaging supervision/interpretation for catheter-based coronary procedures as well as implantation and replacement of pacemakers and implantable defibrillators, consistent with a facility or specialist group focused on interventional cardiology and cardiac device management.

    Revenue concentration is high within a small set of procedure types: the precomputed top-3 Medicare codes account for 64.3% of the provider's total Medicare revenue. Those top three codes are ($319.1K, 30.6% of Medicare revenue), ($199.3K, 19.1%), and ($153.3K, 14.7%), indicating a heavy dependence on a narrow set of invasive imaging and device procedures for the bulk of revenue.

    Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

    Medicare revenue breakdown by CPT/HCPCS procedure code.

    View: Bar Chart1 / 2

    Medicare Revenue by CPT/HCPCS Code

    Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

    The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

    8 rows

    CPT/HCPCS CodeDescriptionClaimsAvg PaidRevenue
    33264The provider removes a previously placed implantable defibrillator pulse generator from the patient and replaces it with a new one. He performs this procedure for a patient with leads to at least…20$18,770$319.1K
    93458In this procedure, the provider performs imaging supervision and interpretation for a coronary angiography with left heart catheterization and intraprocedural injections for left ventriculography. He…200$1,020$199.3K
    C9600Percutaneous transcatheter placement of drug eluting intracoronary stent(s), with coronary angioplasty when performed; single major coronary artery or branch30$4,650$153.3K
    33208The provider inserts or replaces a permanent pacemaker and implants electrodes into the right atrium and right ventricle.20$5,670$136K
    33285The provider inserts a cardiac rhythm monitor with self–contained electrodes into a pocket in the tissues beneath the patient's skin and programs the device according to manufacturer’s directions.20$4,970$104.3K
    33228The provider removes a previously placed pacemaker pulse generator from the patient and replaces it with a new one. The provider performs this procedure primarily for artificial regulation of heart…20$5,530$94K
    93459In this procedure, the provider performs coronary angiography, an imaging study of the vessels in the heart. He inserts tubing into an artery, typically in the groin or arm, and threads it into the…20$1,040$21.9K
    93454In this procedure, the provider performs imaging supervision and interpretation for a coronary angiography in which injections are performed to assess any coronary artery disease or any stenosis…20$1,010$16.2K

    Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

    How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 8 CPT/HCPCS codes. Note: this provider's state, "XX," is a placeholder CMS uses when a provider's practice-location state wasn't reported — not a traditional US state; the State panel below benchmarks against other providers coded under the same designation.

    View: State1 / 2

    Claims Volume vs. Unspecified Location Distribution
    Alexandria Heart & Vascular Surgery Center — 0 of 0 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)
    p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier
    Rank Distribution — Unspecified Location

    Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

    8 rows

    CPT/HCPCS CodeRankProvider CountMedian ClaimsAvg PaidAverage Revenue
    33208130N/A$N/A$N/A
    3322850N/A$N/A$N/A
    3326420N/A$N/A$N/A
    3328550N/A$N/A$N/A
    93454300N/A$N/A$N/A
    9345830N/A$N/A$N/A
    93459150N/A$N/A$N/A
    C960040N/A$N/A$N/A

    Frequently Asked Questions

    References

    1. 1.Medicare Physician & Other Practitioner by Provider and Service. CMS.gov.Provider-level Medicare Part B utilization and payment data.
    2. 2.NPPES NPI Registry. CMS.gov.National Provider Identifier registry used for provider enumeration and taxonomy metadata.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 7

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools

    Lifetime revenue by payer source (source: CMS Medicare & Medicaid claims data)

    Payer SourceTotal Paid
    Medicare$1M
    Medicaid$0
    33264
    93458
    C9600

    Payer mix is effectively single-payer Medicare: lifetime Medicare revenue is $1M while there is no Medicaid billing on file. The absence of Medicaid activity means the provider’s reimbursement exposure and case mix analysis should be evaluated primarily through Medicare data and may not reflect participation in state Medicaid networks or pediatric/low-income service lines.

    Competitive standing is mixed across codes: 93458 is an extreme outlier nationally (rank #61 of 7990 providers; 99th percentile), signaling unusually high national-volume billing for imaging supervision and interpretation in coronary angiography. By contrast, device-related codes are not nationally dominant — 33264 ranks #32 of 154 providers (76th percentile; characterized as typical/unremarkable), and C9600 ranks #36 of 62 providers (39th percentile; typical/unremarkable) — together suggesting a nationally notable imaging volume but more modest standing for device procedures.

    Device-service footprint appears broad and revenue-significant: multiple device implantation and replacement codes contribute substantial Medicare dollars (33264 $319.1K, 33208 $136K, 33285 $104.3K, 33228 $94K). This pattern—high revenue from both generator replacement (33264) and new implantations (33208, 33285)—is consistent with a provider that maintains an active device clinic and performs both elective implants and generator exchanges.

    Payer and unit economics vary by service: the average paid per claim is high for device replacement (33264 avg paid/claim $18768) and moderate for coronary stent placement (C9600 avg paid/claim $4645), while imaging supervision for coronary procedures (93458) has a lower avg paid/claim ($1017) but generates large revenue through volume. This mix implies that a small number of high-dollar device encounters plus high-volume imaging supervision together drive overall Medicare revenue.

    Data gaps limit some competitive and tenure inferences: city, state, taxonomy, and NPI-enumeration details are listed as unknown, and there is no Medicaid billing on file. Those missing identifiers constrain local market comparisons, affiliation/ownership assessment, and calculation of tenure, so conclusions about regional market share or network relationships should be made cautiously and supplemented with external registry or enrollment data where available.