Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Nevada for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Nevada only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Nevada (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Myles Angelo Ferrer (NPI 1760089544)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Myles Angelo Ferrer
Address	2440 W Horizon Ridge Pkwy Ste 130
City	Henderson
State	NV
ZIP	89052
Taxonomy	Family Nurse Practitioner
NPI Enumerated	October 5, 2020

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$1.6M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider has reported $1.6M in lifetime Medicare revenue and no Medicaid billing on file, making their billings effectively single‑payer (Medicare) in the available record. That concentration implies any payer contracting or utilization review assessment should focus primarily on Medicare activity rather than Medicaid mix.

Revenue is extremely concentrated in a small set of procedure codes: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes account for 93.1% of this provider’s total Medicare revenue, with Q4262 (66.5% of Medicare revenue) and Q4173 (25.0% of Medicare revenue) alone representing the vast majority of receipts. This level of concentration suggests the practice’s economics are heavily dependent on a narrow set of wound/skin substitute add‑on procedures.

The top two revenue codes are procedure add‑ons tied to skin substitutes: Q4262 (Dual layer impax membrane, 1.2K claims, $838 avg paid/claim) and Q4173 (Palingen or palingen xplus, 546 claims, $716 avg paid/claim). Paired with frequent procedural codes for graft preparation and debridement (15002, 15271, 97610, 11000), the overall code mix is consistent with an outpatient wound care or skin‑substitute service line rather than routine primary care.

Competitive standing on the highest‑revenue codes is mixed: Q4262 ranks #78 of 141 nationally (45th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code) and Q4173 ranks #15 of 19 nationally (22th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code), indicating the provider is not a dominant national player for those add‑on skin substitute codes. However, several related procedural codes show higher relative activity — for example, 15002 ranks #24 of 283 (91th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code) and 11000 ranks #45 of 430 (90th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code) — pointing to pockets of above‑median national activity in debridement and graft preparation.

Evaluation and management activity is present but small relative to procedure revenue: 99214 generated $24.9K (304 claims, $82 avg paid/claim) and 99215 generated $18.6K (156 claims, $119 avg paid/claim), together representing a minor share of the Medicare revenue profile. These E/M volumes (99214 rank #98884 of 479517, 79th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code) imply that patient visits occur but are primarily in support of procedural/wound care services rather than being the primary revenue driver.

Tenure on file shows the provider’s NPI was enumerated on 2020-10-05 (~6 years ago), indicating roughly six years of billing history under this identifier. That relatively recent enumeration combined with concentrated procedural volume suggests a focused practice build‑out in wound/skin substitute services since enrollment.

The absence of any Medicaid claims on file (none below) means there is no in‑state Medicaid footprint to evaluate; this limits competitive analysis to Medicare where the provider’s business appears specialized and reliant on skin substitute/add‑on procedures. For payer strategy and network planning, the provider should be treated as a Medicare‑centered, procedure‑heavy outpatient wound care resource rather than a mixed‑payer primary care provider.

Several lower‑revenue procedural codes show elevated national percentiles that reinforce a procedural specialty profile: 15271 ranks #137 of 1157 (88th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code), 99215 ranks #16951 of 145531 (88th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code), and 11042 ranks #4873 of 10712 (54th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code). These placements indicate consistent, above‑median activity for wound coverage and higher‑complexity E/M visits even though overall Medicare revenue remains concentrated in the top add‑on skin substitute codes.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

12 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
Q4262	Dual layer impax membrane, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	1,240	$840	$1M
Q4173	Palingen or palingen xplus, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	550	$720	$390.9K
99214	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the…	300	$80	$24.9K
15002	The provider incises the skin of a body part with an open wound, burn eschar, or scar contracture to prepare the site to receive a skin graft. This procedure helps in repairing an area of the trunk,…	100	$240	$23.5K
97610	The provider uses a low–frequency ultrasound device to try to improve wound healing.	70	$300	$20.6K
99215	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a high level of medical decision making, and/or the…	160	$120	$18.6K
15271	The provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover wounds on the patient’s trunk, arms, and/or legs up to an area of 100 cm2. This code covers up to the first 25 cm2.	180	$100	$17.9K
11000	The provider uses surgical instruments to debride the dead tissue in skin for up to 10 percent of the body surface.	240	$30	$7.3K
11042	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove the dead tissue in skin down to the subcutaneous layer and including the epidermis and dermis, up to the first 20 cm2.	100	$80	$7.2K
11043	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove the dead tissue in muscle and/or fascia, including any debridement of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue, for the first or only 20 cm2 or…	40	$160	$6.8K

Showing 1–10 of 12

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 12 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Nevada Distribution

Myles Angelo Ferrer — 0 of 12 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Nevada

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

12 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
Q4262	7	10	1,300	$980	$3.6M
Q4173	5	10	720	$740	$732.5K
97610	10	10	180	$310	$98.4K
99214	835	3,610	110	$80	$19K
15271	7	40	80	$110	$17.8K
11043	16	30	60	$140	$13.2K
99215	139	790	40	$120	$12.2K
11042	66	120	120	$70	$11.6K
15002	3	10	50	$140	$8.8K
99204	552	2,010	30	$110	$5.8K

Showing 1–10 of 12

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Myles Angelo Ferrer, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Platinum Hospitalists LLP	NV	Hospitalist Physician	$0	$38.8M
Urgent Care Nevada, LLC	NV	Urgent Care Clinic/Center	$0	$34.9M
Dignity Health	NV	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$18.7M
Behavioral Health Solutions LLC	NV	Community/Behavioral Health Agency	$0	$11.4M
Lamotte Pediatrics, LLP	NV	Pediatrics Physician	$0	$9.4M
Minghsun Liu Md PC	NV	Infectious Disease Physician	$0	$5.1M
Optimized Management LLC	NV	Clinical Social Worker	$0	$5M
Misch/hyun/hodapp Healthcare, LLP	NV	Pediatrics Physician	$0	$4.5M
Ellsworth Cox Pediatric Dentistry LLC	NV	Pediatric Dentistry	$0	$3.7M
Total Infusion Care LLC	NV	Home Infusion Therapy Pharmacy	$0	$3.1M

Myles Angelo Ferrer — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Myles Angelo Ferrer — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Myles Angelo Ferrer — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Myles Angelo Ferrer — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References