Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Texas for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Texas only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Texas (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Brent Eaton (NPI 1699894378)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Brent Eaton
Address	4627 Sunset Circle
City	Sugar Land
State	TX
ZIP	77479
Taxonomy	Acute Care Nurse Practitioner
NPI Enumerated	March 27, 2007

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$5.9M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

BRENT EATON is effectively a single-payer Medicare biller: total Medicare revenue is $5.9M and there is no Medicaid billing on file. The absence of any Medicaid revenue indicates the provider’s Medicare activity represents the entirety of recorded public-payer claims and should be treated as the primary lens for clinical and business analysis.

Revenue is highly concentrated in two HCPCS add-on skin product codes: Q4262 accounts for $4.7M (80.3% of total Medicare revenue) and Q4276 accounts for $1.1M (19.4% of total Medicare revenue), together accounting for the precomputed top-3 concentration of 100.0% of this provider’s Medicare revenue. This suggests the practice’s Medicare business is almost exclusively driven by providing and billing for these specific skin substitute products.

The code mix (Q4262 and Q4276) points to a specialized service line focused on application of advanced skin substitute materials (dual layer impax membrane and Orion products) as add-on supplies per square centimeter. Combined with the smaller use of 15271, the profile indicates procedures involving skin substitute coverage for wounds on trunk/limbs rather than a broad procedural scope, implying a narrow operational focus on wound care and tissue-replacement products.

Competitive standing is modest for Q4262 and Q4276 at the national level: Q4262 ranks #28 of 141 providers (81th percentile) which the dataset labels as typical, unremarkable volume; Q4276 ranks #8 of 10 providers (22th percentile) also described as typical, unremarkable volume. These ranks indicate the provider is not a national outlier or dominant player for these product codes despite high internal revenue concentration.

The smaller clinical procedure code 15271 appears only as a marginal revenue contributor ($22.6K, 0.4% of total Medicare revenue) but shows relatively high national standing: it ranks #85 of 1157 providers (93th percentile) and is characterized as typical, unremarkable volume. This suggests the provider bills the skin-substitute application code consistently enough to compare favorably to many peers, but it does not materially drive revenue.

Tenure data show the provider’s NPI was enumerated on 2007-03-27 (~19 years ago), indicating a long-established billing presence. That duration supports the interpretation that the concentrated billing pattern for skin substitute products reflects a sustained, specialized operational practice rather than a short-term anomaly.

Given the 100.0% concentration of Medicare revenue in the top-3 codes, payer-mix risk is material: any changes in reimbursement policy or utilization for these specific HCPCS add-on products could disproportionately affect the provider’s revenue. Analysts should treat this profile as single-service-line sensitive and prioritize monitoring coding-specific reimbursement updates and utilization controls for Q4262 and Q4276.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

3 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
Q4262	Dual layer impax membrane, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	4,590	$1,030	$4.7M
Q4276	Orion, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	1,000	$1,140	$1.1M
15271	The provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover wounds on the patient’s trunk, arms, and/or legs up to an area of 100 cm2. This code covers up to the first 25 cm2.	230	$100	$22.6K

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 3 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Texas Distribution

Brent Eaton — 0 of 3 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Texas

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

3 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
Q4262	5	30	1,580	$1,010	$2.5M
Q4276	1	10	1,000	$1,140	$1.1M
15271	8	120	70	$100	$9.9K

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Brent Eaton, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Lenny Jue	TX	Anesthesiology Physician	$91.5K	$0
Jesus Flores	WA	Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist	$31.8K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Brent Eaton, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Consolidated Home Health Holdings, LLC	TX	Home Health Agency	$0	$23.3M
Fort Bend Isd	TX	Local Education Agency (LEA)	$0	$19.3M
David Amran	TX	Allergy & Immunology Physician	$2.8M	$0
Tieu Vy Nguyen	TX	Ophthalmology Physician	$2.8M	$0
Memorial Hermann Surgery Center Sugar Land LLP	TX	Ambulatory Surgical Clinic/Center	$1.8M	$0
Ryan Valicek	TX	Rheumatology Physician	$964.7K	$0
Salman Aly	TX	Internal Medicine Physician	$923.9K	$0
Swati Joglekar	TX	Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician	$910.9K	$0
Matthew Mcmenemy	TX	Ophthalmology Physician	$826.9K	$0
Tarek Fakhouri	TX	Dermatology Physician	$806.6K	$0

Brent Eaton — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Brent Eaton — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Brent Eaton — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Brent Eaton — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References