Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or District of Columbia for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to District of Columbia only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. District of Columbia (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Jeffrey Steinberg (NPI 1699769075)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Jeffrey Steinberg
Address	4910 Massachusetts Ave Nw
City	Washington
State	DC
ZIP	20016
Taxonomy	Foot & Ankle Surgery Podiatrist
NPI Enumerated	August 31, 2005

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$13.3M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider’s Medicare billing is highly concentrated: total Medicare revenue is $13.3M and the precomputed top 3 codes account for 98.5% of that Medicare revenue. That level of concentration indicates the practice’s financial performance is driven almost entirely by a very small set of product/procedure codes rather than a broad mix of services.

Clinical and business profile aligns with specialized wound/skin-substitute work in the foot and ankle space: the largest revenue drivers are add-on, per-square-centimeter skin substitute codes Q4262 (62.0% of Medicare revenue), Q4276 (31.6%), and Q4169 (4.9%). The prevalence of these per-unit skin substitute codes suggests the operation is oriented toward supplying and applying advanced graft/membrane products for wound coverage rather than generating revenue primarily from evaluation-and-management visits.

Top-code operational throughput is substantial and concentrated: Q4262 shows 7.7K claims and Q4276 shows 3.6K claims while Q4169 records 2K claims, matching their dominant revenue shares. These volumes imply sustained procedural activity focused on skin-substitute applications and support a repeat, product-driven care pathway for Medicare patients with foot and ankle wounds.

Competitive standing by national rank is mixed by code: Q4276 ranks #2 of 10 providers nationally (89th percentile), indicating a leading position among the small group of high-volume billers for that product; Q4262 ranks #17 of 141 (89th percentile), which is a solid but not singularly dominant ranking at scale; Q4169 ranks #3 of 10 (78th percentile), again showing relatively high placement within a limited cohort. Overall, the provider appears to be a major player for a narrow set of skin-substitute products rather than a broad-spectrum national marketplace leader.

There is an isolated statistical outlier for a graft-related procedure: 15275 is labeled an "extreme outlier, far above typical national volume for this code," and it ranks #12 of 888 providers nationally (99th percentile), despite representing only 0.5% of this provider's Medicare revenue. This suggests occasional high-intensity use of a specific skin-substitute/graft service that is unusually frequent relative to peers, which could be relevant for network contracting or supply negotiations.

The practice is effectively single-payer at the claim level: Medicare revenue is $13.3M while there is no Medicaid billing on file. That lack of Medicaid activity means the provider’s payer mix is concentrated on Medicare, creating exposure to Medicare policy and pricing changes and limiting leverage with state Medicaid networks.

Evaluation-and-management and routine procedural codes contribute minimally to revenue, reinforcing the product-centric profile: for example, 99213 appears 320 times for $25K (0.2% of Medicare revenue) and 99214 contributes $2.7K (0.0% of revenue). Common office-visit codes and routine nail or debridement CPTs are present but account for only small fractions of revenue, indicating the practice monetizes procedural/device codes far more than E/M throughput.

The provider has long tenure in the Medicare program, with an NPI enumerated on 2005-08-31 (~21 years ago), which supports a sustained presence in this specialty and a stable billing history centered on skin substitute and wound coverage services. Longevity combined with concentrated code usage suggests an established clinical focus rather than a new or transient billing pattern.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

17 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
Q4262	Dual layer impax membrane, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	7,680	$1,070	$8.2M
Q4276	Orion, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	3,580	$1,170	$4.2M
Q4169	Artacent wound, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	2,040	$320	$648.4K
15275	The provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover wounds on the face, scalp, eyelids, mouth, neck, ears, orbits, genitalia, hands, feet, and/or multiple digits, up to…	420	$150	$62.2K
11056	The provider removes 2 to 4 benign hyperkeratotic lesions by using surgical instruments like a scalpel or curette.	500	$80	$37.7K
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	320	$80	$25K
11720	The provider surgically debrides (debulks or removes) 1 to 5 abnormal, diseased, or infected nails.	700	$30	$20.2K
15004	The provider prepares the skin of a body part with an open wound, burn eschar, or scar contracture to receive a skin graft. This procedure helps in repairing areas of the face, scalp, eyelids, mouth,…	40	$370	$16.3K
99203	The provider sees a new patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the provider…	110	$90	$10.4K
G0127	Trimming of dystrophic nails, any number	690	$10	$9K

Showing 1–10 of 17

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 17 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. District of Columbia Distribution

Jeffrey Steinberg — 4 of 17 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — District of Columbia

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

17 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
Q4262	1	10	4,340	$1,070	$4.6M
Q4276	1	10	3,580	$1,170	$4.2M
Q4169	1	10	2,040	$320	$649K
15275	1	10	230	$140	$32.7K
99214	1,181	1,400	90	$100	$15.3K
11042	16	20	100	$70	$13K
15004	2	10	40	$300	$12.9K
11056	1	20	80	$70	$11K
11721	17	20	180	$40	$10.1K
99213	111	1,200	50	$70	$8.5K

Showing 1–10 of 17

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Jeffrey Steinberg, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Medical Faculty Associates, Inc	DC	Anesthesiology Physician	$0	$75.7M
Columbus Radiology Corp	OH	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$0	$49.9M
Eric Berkowitz	NY	Vascular & Interventional Radiology Physician	$2.6M	$1.2M
Faysal Haroun	DC	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$2.4M	$0
Sam Mansour	VA	Ophthalmology Physician	$1.5M	$0
Roberto Soto	MD	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$1.3M	$0
Lewis Glass	FL	Dermatopathology Physician	$1.2M	$0
Renu Berry	MD	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$769.3K	$0
Marena Patronas	VA	Ophthalmology Physician	$744.9K	$0
Rashad Majeed	MD	Vascular Surgery Physician	$699.1K	$17K

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Jeffrey Steinberg, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School For Deaconesses & Missionarie	DC	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$19.1M
Friendship Place	DC	Case Management Agency	$0	$5.6M
Wisconsin Ave Psychiatric Center Inc	DC	Psychiatric Hospital	$0	$3.1M
Iona Senior Services	DC	Adult Health Nurse Practitioner	$0	$1.1M
Mary Ella Carter	DC	Plastic Surgery Physician	$942.2K	$0
Jaydot LLC	DC	Case Management Agency	$0	$820.6K
Edward Tanner	DC	Gynecologic Oncology Physician	$786.3K	$2.1K
Brandi Page	DC	Radiation Oncology Physician	$761K	$0
Joshua Yamamoto	DC	Cardiovascular Disease Physician	$688.3K	$0
Wisconsin Avenue Psychiatric Center	DC	Psychiatry Physician	$0	$678K

Jeffrey Steinberg — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Jeffrey Steinberg — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Jeffrey Steinberg — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Jeffrey Steinberg — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References