Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Colorado for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Colorado only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Colorado (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Lizbet Rubio (NPI 1659963320)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Lizbet Rubio
Address	13741 E Rice Pl Ste 101
City	Aurora
State	CO
ZIP	80015
Taxonomy	Family Nurse Practitioner
NPI Enumerated	February 4, 2021

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$1.9M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider is effectively single-payer in the dataset: lifetime Medicare revenue is $1.9M while there is no Medicaid billing on file, indicating all documented public-payer activity is Medicare-focused and the practice likely relies on Medicare patients for its publicly reported volume. The absence of Medicaid billing suggests limited engagement with that program or that Medicaid activity is routed through another tax ID or subcontractor.

Revenue is highly concentrated in a very small set of procedure codes: the top 3 Medicare codes by revenue account for 96.6% of this provider's total Medicare revenue, signaling that a narrow suite of services drives nearly all reported Medicare income. This concentration raises business implications for revenue stability — changes in payment, utilization, or access for those specific services would disproportionately affect overall revenue.

Clinical/service-line profile is dominated by advanced wound and biologic membrane therapies: Q4262 (Dual layer impax membrane) and Q4253 (Zenith amniotic membrane) together represent the majority of billing ($1.2M and $549.8K respectively) and align with use of amniotic/placental membrane products, while 97610 (low-frequency ultrasound for wound healing) adds a wound-care modality. These codes indicate the provider operates primarily in specialized wound care or advanced biologic dressing application rather than general primary care.

Competitive standing on the primary revenue codes is modest rather than dominant: for Q4262 the provider ranks #80 of 141 nationally (44th percentile) and for Q4253 ranks #59 of 73 (19th percentile), both described as typical, unremarkable volumes. The rank/percentile profiles show the provider is an active participant in these niche services but not a national leader or high-volume outlier for either code.

For commonly billed office E/M codes the provider shows limited volume: 99214 accounts for $28.1K and 99213 for $1.9K of Medicare revenue, with national percentiles at the 81st and 23rd respectively, reflecting modest use of standard evaluation-and-management visits relative to peers and reinforcing that ambulatory E/M encounters are not the primary revenue driver. The presence of both new-patient (99204) and established-patient higher-level E/M codes indicates the provider does perform clinic visits, but these make up a small share of total Medicare revenue.

Tenure is short-to-moderate: the NPI was enumerated on 2021-02-04 (~5 years ago), so the provider’s Medicare billing history spans roughly a five-year period. That timeframe, combined with concentrated code usage, suggests a relatively recent focus or ramp-up in wound-care/biologic membrane services rather than a long-standing, broadly diversified Medicare practice.

Procedure mix includes multiple debridement and skin-substitute codes (11042, 11000, 15271) alongside advanced membrane products, pointing to a service model that pairs wound bed preparation with biologic coverings. These complementary code groups support a bundled wound-care delivery approach where the provider bills both mechanical/operative wound management and higher-value allograft/xenograft products.

Statistical descriptors attached to the codes support a characterization of typical utilization rather than outlier behavior: most top codes are labeled “typical, unremarkable volume” across national peers, and percentile ranks mostly fall in the middle ranges. This pattern indicates the provider’s activity is within normal peer variation for specialized wound-care procedures, rather than unusually high or low compared with national Medicare providers.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

10 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
Q4262	Dual layer impax membrane, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	1,210	$1,010	$1.2M
Q4253	Zenith amniotic membrane, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	740	$750	$549.8K
97610	The provider uses a low–frequency ultrasound device to try to improve wound healing.	200	$310	$62.5K
99214	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the…	330	$90	$28.1K
15271	The provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover wounds on the patient’s trunk, arms, and/or legs up to an area of 100 cm2. This code covers up to the first 25 cm2.	160	$100	$16.1K
99204	The provider sees a new patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the provider…	70	$110	$7.1K
99215	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a high level of medical decision making, and/or the…	40	$120	$5.1K
11042	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove the dead tissue in skin down to the subcutaneous layer and including the epidermis and dermis, up to the first 20 cm2.	50	$80	$3.5K
11000	The provider uses surgical instruments to debride the dead tissue in skin for up to 10 percent of the body surface.	120	$30	$3.1K
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	30	$60	$1.9K

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 10 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Colorado Distribution

Lizbet Rubio — 0 of 10 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Colorado

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

10 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
Q4262	6	10	1,500	$970	$4.8M
Q4253	8	10	3,440	$520	$3.5M
97610	2	10	170	$320	$47.9K
99214	895	8,160	80	$80	$11.3K
15271	3	20	70	$100	$8.9K
11042	88	130	80	$70	$8.3K
99215	1,546	3,230	40	$110	$8.1K
99213	5,246	7,200	70	$60	$6.6K
99204	609	3,670	30	$110	$4.7K
11000	3	10	90	$30	$3.5K

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Lizbet Rubio, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Ty Shettron	CO	Family Nurse Practitioner	$3M	$0
Crystal Birdsong	WA	Nurse Practitioner	$2M	$0
Sarah Jane Zanone	CO	Nurse Practitioner	$1.2M	$0
Marcel Marcos	CO	Family Nurse Practitioner	$1M	$0
Alexandra Letsinger	CO	Nurse Practitioner	$83.4K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Lizbet Rubio, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Deluxe Homehealth Care Agency LLC	CO	Home Health Agency	$0	$8M
New Day In Home Support & Respite Services, Inc.	CO	In Home Supportive Care Agency	$0	$7.9M
101 Home Care LLC	CO	Home Health Agency	$0	$4.7M
Kmb Endeavors, Inc	CO	Behavior Analyst	$0	$4.1M
Angel's Service LLC	CO	Developmentally Disabled Services Day Training Agency	$0	$3.8M
Heather Krohn	CO	Family Nurse Practitioner	$121.7K	$0
Amy Quinn	CO	Family Nurse Practitioner	$58.7K	$0
Phillip Smith	CO	Medical Physician Assistant	$22.1K	$0
Karalyn Pazdernik-harmon	CO	Physician Assistant	$11.7K	$0
Sofia Goli	CO	Acute Care Nurse Practitioner	$4.5K	$0

Lizbet Rubio — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Lizbet Rubio — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Lizbet Rubio — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Lizbet Rubio — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References