Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerNPI Medicare & MedicaidNPI 1598738262
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    NPI 1598738262 — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

    NPI 1598738262 · XX · healthcare

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for NPI 1598738262 — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    NPI 1598738262 is a healthcare provider located in Unspecified Location. This profile covers 22 Medicare and 0 Medicaid CPT/HCPCS procedure codes, with claims volume, average reimbursement, and total revenue by code, benchmarked against other providers billing the same services. Note: "XX" is a placeholder CMS uses when a provider's practice-location state wasn't reported — not a traditional US state; claims coded under it are grouped and benchmarked here the same way a traditional state would be.

    Provider details (source: NPPES NPI Registry)

    FieldValue
    Entity TypeIndividual
    OrganizationNPI 1598738262
    Address
    City
    StateXX (Unspecified Location)
    ZIP
    TaxonomyN/A
    NPI Enumerated
    NPI DeactivatedOctober 16, 2024

    (source: CMS Medicare & Medicaid claims data)

    Key Findings

    This provider’s Medicare revenue is $3.2M while there is no Medicaid billing on file, making their Medicaid footprint effectively nil and their contractual exposure heavily concentrated with Medicare payers. The absence of any Medicaid claims suggests this is a near–single-payer (Medicare) billing profile rather than a balanced dual‑payer practice, which has direct implications for network contracting and risk exposure to Medicare policy changes.

    Revenue concentration is extreme: the precomputed top‑3 Medicare codes account for 78.4% of total Medicare revenue, driven primarily by J1602 ($1.6M, 47.3%), J0129 ($688.9K, 20.5%), and J0717 ($356.8K, 10.6%). Such concentration indicates the business is reliant on a very small set of high‑revenue drug administrations, making overall revenue sensitive to formulary, reimbursement, or utilization changes affecting these specific agents.

    The code mix (J1602, J0129, , , ) plus infusion/administration codes (, , ) points to an infusion‑focused practice model that primarily administers biologic and parenteral specialty drugs, consistent with services for autoimmune or inflammatory conditions and some chemotherapy/infusion activity. Additional procedure codes for joint injections () and intra‑articular hyaluronan () suggest the site also performs office‑based musculoskeletal injections and procedural care alongside biologic infusions.

    Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

    Medicare revenue breakdown by CPT/HCPCS procedure code.

    View: Bar Chart1 / 2

    Medicare Revenue by CPT/HCPCS Code

    Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

    The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

    22 rows

    CPT/HCPCS CodeDescriptionClaimsAvg PaidRevenue
    J1602Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use144,100$10$1.6M
    J0129Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered)20,880$30$688.9K
    J0717Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered)89,200$1$356.8K
    J3262Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg68,360$10$341.8K
    J1745Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg4,810$30$125.1K
    99214The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the…1,260$80$104.8K
    96365The provider administers the initial intravenous infusion of a medication or other substance for a period up to one hour to prevent, treat, or diagnose a condition or disease.940$50$42.3K
    96413Chemotherapy is a therapeutic procedure used for the treatment of cancer via the use of chemical agents. These chemical agents (drugs) work on the cancerous cells of the body to destroy them. These…330$90$29.8K
    20611In this procedure, the provider inserts a needle through the skin of a patient and into a major joint or bursa, typically the shoulder, hip, knee, or subacromial bursa, and then uses the syringe…300$80$24.7K
    J7323Hyaluronan or derivative, euflexxa, for intra-articular injection, per dose170$100$17.3K

    Showing 1–10 of 22

    Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

    How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 22 CPT/HCPCS codes. Note: this provider's state, "XX," is a placeholder CMS uses when a provider's practice-location state wasn't reported — not a traditional US state; the State panel below benchmarks against other providers coded under the same designation.

    View: State1 / 2

    Claims Volume vs. Unspecified Location Distribution
    NPI 1598738262 — 4 of 9 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)
    p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier
    Rank Distribution — Unspecified Location

    Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

    22 rows

    CPT/HCPCS CodeRankProvider CountMedian ClaimsAvg PaidAverage Revenue
    964133310350$100$34.2K
    99214591080$90$15.8K
    992156761060$110$13.3K
    9636521090$50$4.2K
    963723810400$10$4.1K
    964151410150$20$3.2K
    992047161020$120$2.8K
    963759310200$10$2.4K
    J12004810100$1$80
    20550730N/A$N/A$N/A

    Showing 1–10 of 22

    Frequently Asked Questions

    References

    1. 1.Medicare Physician & Other Practitioner by Provider and Service. CMS.gov.Provider-level Medicare Part B utilization and payment data.
    2. 2.NPPES NPI Registry. CMS.gov.National Provider Identifier registry used for provider enumeration and taxonomy metadata.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 7

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools
    Lifetime revenue by payer source
    Payer SourceTotal Paid
    Medicare$3.2M
    Medicaid$0
    J0717
    J3262
    J1745
    96365
    96413
    96415
    20611
    J7323

    Competitive standing is highly uneven across codes: the provider is a national extreme outlier on J1602 (ranks #4 of 1041; 100th percentile; extreme outlier), indicating exceptionally high golimumab infusion volume versus peers; by contrast, other top biologic codes such as J0129 and J0717 are described as typical/unremarkable in volume (J0129: #121 of 1221, 90th percentile; J0717: #180 of 848, 79th percentile). This pattern implies dominant market behavior for one specific agent while otherwise operating at or above typical peer levels for other biologics.

    Several non‑drug service lines also show outlier intensity: 99214 (office E/M for established patients) ranks at the 99th percentile and is labeled an extreme outlier, and 96365 (initial IV infusion up to one hour) is likewise a 99th percentile extreme outlier. High volumes in both an E/M code and an IV infusion administration code suggest an integrated workflow where patients are evaluated and then receive on‑site infusions, supporting a vertically integrated infusion clinic model.

    Smaller services and supply codes are present but relatively minor: chemotherapy administration codes (96413, 96415) and ultrasound‑guided procedures (76942, 76881) appear at modest revenue shares and typical national percentiles, indicating the provider offers adjunctive chemo/infusion and image‑guided procedures but these are not primary revenue drivers. Corticosteroid injections (J3301) and other minor injection codes are reported as notably above typical national volume for their categories, but they contribute only small absolute dollars relative to the top biologic drugs.

    From a payer‑strategy perspective, the concentration in expensive injectable biologics and the lack of Medicaid activity mean commercial and Medicare Part B negotiations (pricing, site‑of‑service edits, buy‑and‑bill arrangements) will be far more material than state Medicaid contract considerations. Analysts evaluating network value or reimbursement risk should prioritize the provider’s handling of golimumab (J1602) utilization management, buy‑and‑bill margins, and infusion administration reimbursements.

    Tenure and enrollment status are unknown (NPI enumerated: unknown), so it is not possible from these data to assess how long the provider has been active on Medicare or whether recent enrollment changes could explain concentration patterns; any longitudinal or credentialing review will need to confirm enumeration date and practice history before inferring trends over time.