Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or New Mexico for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to New Mexico only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. New Mexico (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Natalie Mills (NPI 1568912327)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Natalie Mills
Address	5120 Masthead St Ne
City	Albuquerque
State	NM
ZIP	87109
Taxonomy	Physician Assistant
NPI Enumerated	October 5, 2016

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$134.2K
Medicaid	$0

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

14 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	830	$50	$38.2K
J7308	Aminolevulinic acid HCl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg)	70	$300	$20.1K
17000	The provider destroys a premalignant lesion using techniques such as chemosurgery, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, or others. This code reports the destruction of the first or only lesion.	560	$30	$16.8K
11102	The provider biopsies a single skin lesion using a tangential (side–ways) approach; he shaves off the lesion or scoops it out with a knife or curette.	210	$50	$11.2K
17110	The provider destroys benign lesions using techniques such as chemosurgery, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, or others. This code reports the destruction of one to 14 lesions other than skin tags or…	170	$60	$11K
17004	The provider destroys 15 or more premalignant lesions using techniques such as chemosurgery, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, or others.	120	$90	$10.9K
17003	In this add–on procedure, the provider destroys a premalignant lesion using techniques such as chemosurgery, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, or others. This code is appropriate for the second through…	2,310	$1	$9.3K
99203	The provider sees a new patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the provider…	100	$50	$4.9K
96567	The provider applies a photosensitizing drug to the lesion and exposes it to a specific wavelength of light, depending on how far into the body the light needs to penetrate. The procedure is…	60	$80	$4.6K
11103	The provider biopsies an additional skin lesion using a tangential (side–ways) approach; he shaves off the lesion or scoops it out with a knife or curette. Report +11103 for each separate lesion…	80	$30	$2.5K

Showing 1–10 of 14

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 14 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. New Mexico Distribution

Natalie Mills — 3 of 14 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — New Mexico

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

14 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
99214	2,204	2,700	90	$70	$12.9K
11102	29	70	140	$60	$11.6K
17110	35	100	80	$70	$10.5K
17000	21	110	220	$30	$10.4K
17004	10	60	50	$100	$9.3K
J7308	1	10	30	$300	$8.6K
99213	42	2,440	60	$50	$7.3K
17003	15	90	830	$1	$5.3K
99203	122	870	30	$60	$3.3K
11103	18	60	50	$30	$3.2K

Showing 1–10 of 14

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Natalie Mills, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
David Davis	NM	MOHS-Micrographic Surgery Physician	$679.8K	$0
Daniel Davis	NM	MOHS-Micrographic Surgery Physician	$506.2K	$0
Michael Chang	NM	Dermatology Physician	$465.4K	$0
Monica Maria Romero	NM	Dermatology Physician	$193.2K	$0
Emily Bryl	NM	Physician Assistant	$107.3K	$0
Margaret Pribyl	NM	Physician Assistant	$106.5K	$0

Natalie Mills — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Natalie Mills — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Natalie Mills — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Natalie Mills — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References