Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Indiana for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Indiana only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Indiana (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Travis Hubbuch (NPI 1508157280)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Travis Hubbuch
Address	645 W 5th St
City	Jasper
State	IN
ZIP	47546
Taxonomy	Foot & Ankle Surgery Podiatrist
NPI Enumerated	April 28, 2011

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$1.6M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider’s Medicare revenue is highly concentrated: total Medicare revenue is $1.6M and the precomputed top 3 codes account for 90.5% of that Medicare revenue. The single code A2001 alone accounts for $1.3M or 80.1% of the provider’s Medicare receipts, indicating heavy dependence on a very small set of billable services.

The CPT/HCPCS mix points to a procedural, wound-care–oriented podiatry practice that relies on skin substitute and wound management products and services. High-revenue add-on codes such as A2001 and Q4197 plus skin-substitute codes 15275 and 15271, and wound-imaging codes 0598T/0599T, suggest the clinic frequently delivers advanced wound therapies in addition to routine podiatric procedures.

Payer mix is effectively single-payer Medicare: Medicare revenue is $1.6M while Medicaid billing is recorded as none, so the practice has no Medicaid volume on file. This concentration exposes the provider to Medicare reimbursement policy and utilization trends without an in-state Medicaid revenue buffer.

Competitive standing is mixed across key codes: A2001 ranks #5 of 37 (89th percentile) but is described in the data as "typical, unremarkable volume for this code," implying a relatively high national rank within a small specialist cohort rather than true outlier status. By contrast, Q4197 ranks #60 of 82 (25th percentile) and 11721 ranks #967 of 12535 (92th percentile), both likewise labeled "typical, unremarkable volume for this code," indicating uneven but overall typical national participation across the high-revenue codes.

Clinical service balance tilts toward procedures over evaluation-and-management visits: 99213 generates $16.3K (1.0% of Medicare revenue) and 99214 $8.7K (0.5%), while procedural codes like 11721 (1.2K claims, $35.3K, 2.2%) and 11056 (493 claims, $26.6K, 1.7%) contribute materially to revenue. This pattern is consistent with a practice model that prioritizes procedural interventions and product-based therapies rather than high volumes of office-based E&M encounters.

The provider shows substantive use of wound-imaging and add-on services: 0598T appears 384 times for $18.8K (1.2% of Medicare revenue) and 0599T appears 43 times for $1.2K, supporting the interpretation that imaging and adjunctive technologies are integrated into care pathways. These codes, together with A2001 and Q4197, indicate reliance on reimbursable, device- or product-linked procedures rather than solely on surgeon-performed primary procedures.

Tenure and stability are notable: the NPI was enumerated on 2011-04-28 (~15 years ago), indicating a long-established presence in the market that likely underpins the accumulated Medicare volume and the specialized service mix observed. Long tenure combined with concentrated code use suggests an established clinical focus rather than a newly shifted service line.

The absence of any Medicaid billing on file ("none below") combined with high concentration in a few Medicare add-on/product codes suggests limited participation in the broader safety-net population and a revenue profile sensitive to changes in coverage or utilization of specific skin-substitute products. For payers and partners, this implies contracting or utilization-management strategies should focus on the dominant product and imaging codes to influence overall spend with this provider.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

19 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
A2001	Innovamatrix ac, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	1,580	$810	$1.3M
Q4197	Puraply xt, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	980	$130	$130.7K
11721	The provider surgically debrides (debulks or removes) 6 or more abnormal, diseased, or infected nails.	1,180	$30	$35.3K
11056	The provider removes 2 to 4 benign hyperkeratotic lesions by using surgical instruments like a scalpel or curette.	490	$50	$26.6K
15275	The provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover wounds on the face, scalp, eyelids, mouth, neck, ears, orbits, genitalia, hands, feet, and/or multiple digits, up to…	180	$120	$20.4K
0598T	The provider uses real–time fluorescence imaging in a darkened clinical setting to examine a wound. The provider uses this imaging to identify and locate bacterial infection in the wound and to…	380	$50	$18.8K
11042	The provider uses surgical instruments to remove the dead tissue in skin down to the subcutaneous layer and including the epidermis and dermis, up to the first 20 cm2.	250	$70	$17.2K
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	270	$60	$16.3K
11057	The provider removes more than 4 benign hyperkeratotic lesions by using surgical instruments like a scalpel or curette.	190	$60	$11.1K
11055	The provider removes a single benign hyperkeratotic lesion by using surgical instruments like a scalpel or curette.	190	$50	$9.3K

Showing 1–10 of 19

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 19 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Indiana Distribution

Travis Hubbuch — 4 of 19 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Indiana

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

19 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
A2001	1	10	990	$810	$853.2K
Q4197	1	10	980	$130	$131.1K
99214	5,580	10,540	110	$80	$15.5K
11721	12	240	270	$30	$11K
11042	62	290	100	$60	$9.4K
0598T	1	10	130	$50	$8.1K
11056	8	150	90	$50	$7.9K
99213	1,470	10,820	80	$50	$7.6K
15275	2	20	80	$80	$7.2K
11720	43	100	120	$20	$7.1K

Showing 1–10 of 19

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Travis Hubbuch, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Deaconess Memorial Medical Center, Inc.	IN	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$14.5M
Deaconess Clinic, Inc	IN	Pediatrics Physician	$0	$6.6M
Deaconess Memorial Medical Center Inc	IN	Hospitalist Physician	$0	$4.4M
Medical Foundation, Inc.	MS	Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician	$0	$1.8M
Darin Serletic	IN	Podiatrist	$895.5K	$0
Arvind Durvasan	AZ	Nephrology Physician	$639.3K	$8.9K
Neil Anand	MN	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$529.9K	$58.1K
Andrew Rader	IN	Podiatrist	$572.4K	$0
Joyce Williams	OH	Rheumatology Physician	$500.7K	$0
Robert Percell	NE	Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician	$431.8K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Travis Hubbuch, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Lifespring, Inc	IN	Community/Behavioral Health Agency	$0	$3.4M
Jesc LLC	IN	Ambulatory Surgical Clinic/Center	$455.1K	$132.5K
Scott Wilhelmus	IN	Dermatology Physician	$433.4K	$0
Judith Englert	IN	Ophthalmology Physician	$413.7K	$0
Richard Moss	IN	Plastic Surgery within the Head & Neck (Otolaryngology) Physician	$31.1K	$320.6K
Adam Dawkins	IN	Cardiovascular Disease Physician	$311.2K	$0
Joshua Leonard	IN	Interventional Cardiology Physician	$270.1K	$0
Geoffrey Day	IN	Interventional Cardiology Physician	$257K	$0
Daniel Eby	IN	Sports Medicine (Orthopaedic Surgery) Physician	$227.6K	$0
Amy Wigand	IN	Diagnostic Radiology Physician	$171.6K	$0

Travis Hubbuch — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Travis Hubbuch — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Travis Hubbuch — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Travis Hubbuch — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References